I don't really understand why this is happening. Maybe a fresh set of eyes could help.
in the table of an access database, say C:\dbase.mdb, I have a table called tProcedureGroups with two fields, ID and Description.
ID Description
1 DIAGNOSTIC
2 PREVENTATIVE
3 RESTORATIVE
So my recordset should be a lot more than an infinite... ID "\t" + Description + "\n"
Here's my code... this had to of happened to a few of you python gurus out there!
Thanks so much for your help, everyone on this site seems super helpful.
import win32com.client
def Procedures(listed):
DB = r"C:\dbase.mdb"
engine = win32com.client.Dispatch("DAO.DBEngine.36")
db = engine.OpenDatabase(DB)
sql = "select * from [tProcedureGroups]"
access = db.OpenRecordset(sql)
while not access.EOF:
for i in listed:
print i + '\t' + str(access.Fields(i).value) + '\n'
access.MoveNext
fields = ["ID", "Description"]
get_procs = Procedures(fields)
In Python you need to call methods explicitly with ().
So change:
access.MoveNext
to
access.MoveNext()
Related
I use flask, an api and SQLAlchemy with SQLite.
I begin in python and flask and i have problem with the list.
My application work, now i try a news functions.
I need to know if my json informations are in my db.
The function find_current_project_team() get information in the API.
def find_current_project_team():
headers = {"Authorization" : "bearer "+session['token_info']['access_token']}
user = requests.get("https://my.api.com/users/xxxx/", headers = headers)
user = user.json()
ids = [x['id'] for x in user]
return(ids)
I use ids = [x['id'] for x in user] (is the same that) :
ids = []
for x in user:
ids.append(x['id'])
To get ids information. Ids information are id in the api, and i need it.
I have this result :
[2766233, 2766237, 2766256]
I want to check the values ONE by One in my database.
If the values doesn't exist, i want to add it.
If one or all values exists, I want to check and return "impossible sorry, the ids already exists".
For that I write a new function:
def test():
test = find_current_project_team()
for find_team in test:
find_team_db = User.query.filter_by(
login=session['login'], project_session=test
).first()
I have absolutely no idea to how check values one by one.
If someone can help me, thanks you :)
Actually I have this error :
sqlalchemy.exc.InterfaceError: (InterfaceError) Error binding
parameter 1 - probably unsupported type. 'SELECT user.id AS user_id,
user.login AS user_login, user.project_session AS user_project_session
\nFROM user \nWHERE user.login = ? AND user.project_session = ?\n
LIMIT ? OFFSET ?' ('my_tab_login', [2766233, 2766237, 2766256], 1, 0)
It looks to me like you are passing the list directly into the database query:
def test():
test = find_current_project_team()
for find_team in test:
find_team_db = User.query.filter_by(login=session['login'], project_session=test).first()
Instead, you should pass in the ID only:
def test():
test = find_current_project_team()
for find_team in test:
find_team_db = User.query.filter_by(login=session['login'], project_session=find_team).first()
Asides that, I think you can do better with the naming conventions though:
def test():
project_teams = find_current_project_team()
for project_team in project_teams:
project_team_result = User.query.filter_by(login=session['login'], project_session=project_team).first()
All works thanks
My code :
project_teams = find_current_project_team()
for project_team in project_teams:
project_team_result = User.query.filter_by(project_session=project_team).first()
print(project_team_result)
if project_team_result is not None:
print("not none")
else:
project_team_result = User(login=session['login'], project_session=project_team)
db.session.add(project_team_result)
db.session.commit()
I have a very specific question. The line:
expform_ws.Range("Total").Offset(-1, 0).EntireRow.Insert
in the code below is not working:
# Write data in expenses form
expform_wb = xl.Workbooks.Open(expform_path, Editable=True)
expform_ws = expform_wb.Worksheets('Expense Form')
last_row_ef = expense_items + 15
expform_ws.Range("Total").Offset(-1, 0).EntireRow.Insert
expform_ws.Range('Casecode').Value = case_code
expform_ws.Range('D6').Value = name
expform_ws.Range('D7').Value = last_name
expform_ws.Range('D8').Value = datetime.date.today().strftime("%d/%m/%Y")
expform_ws.Range('B16:B' + str(last_row_ef)).Value = date
expform_ws.Range('D16:D' + str(last_row_ef)).Value = descr
In case this helps: the line gets highlighted in PyCharm as "Statement seems to have no effect".
Anyone can help to spot what I am doing wrong?
Thanks!
In this line
expform_ws.Range("Total").Offset(-1, 0).EntireRow.Insert
You aren't actually CALLING the function, you are just getting "reference" to it, add () to call it
expform_ws.Range("Total").Offset(-1, 0).EntireRow.Insert()
I am trying to create a custom primary_key within my helpdesk/models.py that I will use to track our help desk tickets. I am in the process of writing a small ticking system for our office.
Maybe there is a better way? Right now I have:
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
This increments in the datebase as; 1, 2, 3, 4....50...
I want to take this id assignment and then use it within a function to combine it with some additional information like the date, and the name, 'HELPDESK'.
The code I was using is as follows:
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
def build_id(self, id):
join_dates = str(datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d'))
return (('HELPDESK-' + join_dates) + '-' + str(id))
ticket_id = models.CharField(max_length=15, default=(build_id(None, id)))
The idea being is that the entries in the database would be:
HELPDESK-20170813-1
HELPDESK-20170813-2
HELPDESK-20170814-3
...
HELPDESK-20170901-4
...
HELPDESK-20180101-50
...
I want to then use this as the ForeignKey to link the help desk ticket to some other models in the database.
Right now what's coming back is:
HELPDESK-20170813-<django.db.models.fields.AutoField>
This post works - Custom Auto Increment Field Django Curious if there is a better way. If not, this will suffice.
This works for me. It's a slightly modified version from Custom Auto Increment Field Django from above.
models.py
def increment_helpdesk_number():
last_helpdesk = helpdesk.objects.all().order_by('id').last()
if not last_helpdesk:
return 'HEL-' + str(datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d-')) + '0000'
help_id = last_helpdesk.help_num
help_int = help_id[13:17]
new_help_int = int(help_int) + 1
new_help_id = 'HEL-' + str(datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d-')) + str(new_help_int).zfill(4)
return new_help_id
It's called like this:
help_num = models.CharField(max_length=17, unique=True, default=increment_helpdesk_number, editable=False)
If gives you the following:
HEL-20170815-0000
HEL-20170815-0001
HEL-20170815-0002
...
The numbering doesn't start over after each day, which is something I may look at doing. The more I think about it; however, I am not sure if I even need the date there as I have a creation date field in the model already. So I may just change it to:
HEL-000000000
HEL-000000001
HEL-000000002
...
It's quite simple to program just one product to get sold via my payment system (api.payson.se) but buying many products at the same time in various amounts posed trouble for me since it was not implemented and I didn't have a good idea how to do it. Now I have a solution that I just put together which works but the modelling and control flow is kind of very quick and dirty and I wonder whether this is even acceptable or should need a rewrite. The system now behaves so that I can enter the shop (step 1) and enter the amounts for the products I want to buy
Then if I press Buy ("Köp") my Python calculates the sum correctly and this works whatever combination of amounts and products I have saying which the total is and this page could also list the specification but that is not implemented yet:
The total sum is Swedish currency is correct and it has written an order to my datastore with status "unpaid" and containing which products are ordered and what amount for every product in the datastore:
The user can then either cancel the purchase or go on and actually pay through the payment system api.payson.se:
So all I need to do is listen to the response from Payson and update the status of the orders that get paid. But my solution does not look very clean and I wonder if I can go on with code like that, the data model is two stringlists, one with the amounts and one with which product (Item ID) since that was the easiest way I could solve it but it is then not directly accessible and only from the lists. Is there a better data model I can use?
The code that does the handling is slightly messy and could use a better data model and a better algorithm than just strings and lists:
class ShopHandler(NewBaseHandler):
#user_required
def get(self):
user = \
auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(self.auth.get_user_by_session()['user_id'
]))
self.render_jinja('shop.htm', items=Item.recent(), user=user)
return ''
#user_required
def post(self, command):
user = \
auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(self.auth.get_user_by_session()['user_id'
]))
logging.info('in shophandler http post item id'+self.request.get('item'))
items = [ self.request.get('items[1]'),self.request.get('items[2]'),self.request.get('items[3]'),self.request.get('items[4]'),self.request.get('items[5]'),self.request.get('items[6]'),self.request.get('items[7]'),self.request.get('items[8]') ]
amounts = [ self.request.get('amounts[1]'),self.request.get('amounts[2]'),self.request.get('amounts[3]'),self.request.get('amounts[4]'),self.request.get('amounts[5]'),self.request.get('amounts[6]'),self.request.get('amounts[7]'),self.request.get('amounts[8]') ]
total = 0
total = int(self.request.get('amounts[1]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[1]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[1]') else total
total = total + int(self.request.get('amounts[2]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[2]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[2]') else total
total = total + int(self.request.get('amounts[3]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[3]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[3]') else total
total = total + int(self.request.get('amounts[4]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[4]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[4]') else total
total = total + int(self.request.get('amounts[5]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[5]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[5]') else total
total = total + int(self.request.get('amounts[6]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[6]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[6]') else total
total = total + int(self.request.get('amounts[7]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[7]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[7]') else total
total = total + int(self.request.get('amounts[8]'))* long(Item.get_by_id(long(self.request.get('items[8]'))).price_fraction()) if self.request.get('amounts[8]') else total
logging.info('total:'+str(total))
trimmed = str(total)+',00'
order = model.Order(status='UNPAID')
order.items = items
order.amounts = amounts
order.put()
logging.info('order was written')
ExtraCost = 0
GuaranteeOffered = 2
OkUrl = 'http://' + self.request.host + r'/paysonreceive/'
Key = '3110fb33-6122-4032-b25a-329b430de6b6'
text = 'niklasro#gmail.com' + ':' + str(trimmed) + ':' + str(ExtraCost) \
+ ':' + OkUrl + ':' + str(GuaranteeOffered) + Key
m = hashlib.md5()
BuyerEmail = user.email
AgentID = 11366
self.render_jinja('order.htm', order=order, user=user, total=total, Generated_MD5_Hash_Value = hashlib.md5(text).hexdigest(), BuyerEmail=user.email, Description='Bnano Webshop', trimmed=trimmed, OkUrl=OkUrl, BuyerFirstName=user.firstname, BuyerLastName=user.lastname)
My model for the order, where not all fields are used, is
class Order(db.Model):
'''a transaction'''
item = db.ReferenceProperty(Item)
items = db.StringListProperty()
amounts = db.StringListProperty()
owner = db.UserProperty()
purchaser = db.UserProperty()
created = db.DateTimeProperty(auto_now_add=True)
status = db.StringProperty( choices=( 'NEW', 'CREATED', 'ERROR', 'CANCELLED', 'RETURNED', 'COMPLETED', 'UNPAID', 'PAID' ) )
status_detail = db.StringProperty()
reference = db.StringProperty()
secret = db.StringProperty() # to verify return_url
debug_request = db.TextProperty()
debug_response = db.TextProperty()
paykey = db.StringProperty()
shipping = db.TextProperty()
And the model for a product ie an item is
class Item(db.Model):
'''an item for sale'''
owner = db.UserProperty() #optional
created = db.DateTimeProperty(auto_now_add=True)
title = db.StringProperty(required=True)
price = db.IntegerProperty() # cents / fractions, use price_decimal to get price in dollar / wholes
image = db.BlobProperty()
enabled = db.BooleanProperty(default=True)
silver = db.IntegerProperty() #number of silver
def price_dollars( self ):
return self.price / 100.0
def price_fraction( self ):
return self.price / 100.0
def price_silver( self ): #number of silvers an item "is worth"
return self.silver / 1000.000
def price_decimal( self ):
return decimal.Decimal( str( self.price / 100.0 ) )
def price_display( self ):
return str(self.price_fraction()).replace('.',',')
#staticmethod
def recent():
return Item.all().filter( "enabled =", True ).order('-created').fetch(10)
I think you now have an idea what's going on and that this kind of works towards the user but the code is not looking good. Do you think I can leave the code like this and go on and keep this "solution" or must I do a rewrite to make it more proper? There are only 8 products in the store and with this solution it becomes difficult to add a new Item for sale since then I must reprogram the script which is not perfect.
Could you comment or answer, I'd be very glad to get some feedback about this quick and dirty solution to my use case.
Thank you
Update
I did a rewrite to allow for adding new products and the following seems better than the previous:
class ShopHandler(NewBaseHandler):
#user_required
def get(self):
user = \
auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(self.auth.get_user_by_session()['user_id'
]))
self.render_jinja('shop.htm', items=Item.recent(), user=user)
return ''
#user_required
def post(self, command):
user = \
auth_models.User.get_by_id(long(self.auth.get_user_by_session()['user_id'
]))
logging.info('in shophandler http post')
total = 0
order = model.Order(status='UNPAID')
for item in self.request.POST:
amount = self.request.POST[item]
logging.info('item:'+str(item))
purchase = Item.get_by_id(long(item))
order.items.append(purchase.key())
order.amounts.append(int(amount))
order.put()
price = purchase.price_fraction()
logging.info('amount:'+str(amount))
logging.info('product price:'+str(price))
total = total + price*int(amount)
logging.info('total:'+str(total))
order.total = str(total)
order.put()
trimmed = str(total).replace('.',',') + '0'
ExtraCost = 0
GuaranteeOffered = 2
OkUrl = 'http://' + self.request.host + r'/paysonreceive/'
Key = '6230fb54-7842-3456-b43a-349b340de3b8'
text = 'niklasro#gmail.com' + ':' + str(trimmed) + ':' \
+ str(ExtraCost) + ':' + OkUrl + ':' \
+ str(GuaranteeOffered) + Key
m = hashlib.md5()
BuyerEmail = user.email # if user.email else user.auth_id[0]
AgentID = 11366
self.render_jinja(
'order.htm',
order=order,
user=user,
total=total,
Generated_MD5_Hash_Value=hashlib.md5(text).hexdigest(),
BuyerEmail=user.email,
Description='Bnano Webshop',
trimmed=trimmed,
OkUrl=OkUrl,
BuyerFirstName=user.firstname,
BuyerLastName=user.lastname,
)
Man, this is a really strange code. If you will want to add new items in you shop you must rewrite you shop's script.
At the first unlink your items from interface, you must send POST request to controller with your items ids and quantity, i don know how work gae request object, but it must be like that:
from your order page make POST request with dict of items which really need {"item_id":"qnt"}.
When in the controller you can fetch all objects like:
for item, qnt in request.POST:
{do something with each item, for example where you can sum total}
and etc
Don't link controllers with your interfaces directly. You must write more abstraction code, if you want make really flexible app.
I'm going to try to focus on one very obvious problem with your code, but there are lots of problems with it that I'm not going to get into. My advice is to stop right now. You're implementing a web-based payment system. You really should leave that to people with more skills and experience. "Web-based" is a pretty difficult thing to get right whilst ensuring security, but an online payment system is the sort of thing that well-paid consultants with decades of experience are well-paid for, and they still manage to get it wrong pretty often. You're opening yourself up to a lot of legal liability.
If you're still dead set on it, please read The Python Tutorial cover to cover, possibly several times. Python is a very different language to whatever classical OOP language you're mentally cramming into it. After that, at least leaf through the other documentation. If you're having trouble with these, pick up an O'Reilly book on Python; approaching it from another angle should help. After you done all this (and maybe at the same time), write as much code as you can that is not going to get you sued into oblivion if you do it wrong. Then maybe you can write an order/payment system.
I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but the world doesn't need any more shoddy web stores; 1999 took care of that for us.
Anyway, on to your code :D When you write something repetitive and copy-pasted like this:
items = [ self.request.get('items[1]'),self.request.get('items[2]'),self.request.get('items[3]'),self.request.get('items[4]'),self.request.get('items[5]'),self.request.get('items[6]'),self.request.get('items[7]'),self.request.get('items[8]') ]
You should be thinking to yourself, "Wait a second! Repetitive task are exactly what computers are designed to do." You could get your text editor to do it (see Vim Macros), but concise (but not too concise ;) code is always better than long code, since you make it faster to maintain, less prone to programmer error, and easier to debug, not to mention the amount of time you save not copying and pasting, so let's improve the code.
Here's how I would revise this in Python (advanced programmers do this in their heads, or just skip to the end):
#1. with a for loop
MAX_ITEMS = 8
items = []
for i in range(MAX_ITEMS):
items.append(self.request.get('items[{}]'.format(i + 1))
#2. with a list comprehension
MAX_ITEMS = 8
items = [self.request.get('items[{}]'.format(i + 1)) for i in range(MAX_ITEMS)]
Actually, having a limit to the number of items is rather amateurish and will only frustrate your users. You can fix it like this:
items = []
i = 0
while True:
try:
items.append(self.request[i + 1]) #attempt to get the next item
except IndexError as exc: #but if it fails...
break #we must be at the last one
i += 1
I think this is the way you should leave it for now because it's clear but not repetitive. However, you could shorten it even further using functions from the itertools module.
A few quick tips:
Avoid string concatenation, especially where user-supplied strings and especially especially when user-supplied string from over the web are concerned. Use str.format and "%d" % (5,) modulus string formatting. BONUS: You don't have to convert everything to strings!
Get those constants (e.g., ExtraCost = 2) out of the middle and put them somewhere safe (at the top of the module, or in a special file in the package)
You trust the user way too much: At for item in self.request.POST:, you're assuming everything in the request is going to be an item, and you do zero validation.
Please, please, please. Never turn off autocomplete. I really don't know why that attribute exists, except to annoy.
I'm a newcomer to SQLAlchemy ORM and I'm struggling to accomplish complex-ish queries on multiple tables - queries which I find relatively straightforward to do in Doctrine DQL.
I have data objects of Cities, which belong to Countries. Some Cities also have a County ID set, but not all. As well as the necessary primary and foreign keys, each record also has a text_string_id, which links to a TextStrings table which stores the name of the City/County/Country in different languages. The TextStrings MySQL table looks like this:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `text_strings` (
`id` INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL,
`language` VARCHAR(2) NOT NULL,
`text_string` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`, `language`)
)
I want to construct a breadcrumb for each city, of the form:
country_en_name > city_en_name OR
country_en_name > county_en_name > city_en_name,
depending on whether or not a County attribute is set for this city. In Doctrine this would be relatively straightforward:
$query = Doctrine_Query::create()
->select('ci.id, CONCAT(cyts.text_string, \'> \', IF(cots.text_string is not null, CONCAT(cots.text_string, \'> \', \'\'), cits.text_string) as city_breadcrumb')
->from('City ci')
->leftJoin('ci.TextString cits')
->leftJoin('ci.Country cy')
->leftJoin('cy.TextString cyts')
->leftJoin('ci.County co')
->leftJoin('co.TextString cots')
->where('cits.language = ?', 'en')
->andWhere('cyts.language = ?', 'en')
->andWhere('(cots.language = ? OR cots.language is null)', 'en');
With SQLAlchemy ORM, I'm struggling to achieve the same thing. I believe I've setup the objects correctly - in the form eg:
class City(Base):
__tablename__ = "cities"
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
country_id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey('countries.id'))
text_string_id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey('text_strings.id'))
county_id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey('counties.id'))
text_strings = relation(TextString, backref=backref('cards', order_by=id))
country = relation(Country, backref=backref('countries', order_by=id))
county = relation(County, backref=backref('counties', order_by=id))
My problem is in the querying - I've tried various approaches to generating the breadcrumb but nothing seems to work. Some observations:
Perhaps using things like CONCAT and IF inline in the query is not very pythonic (is it even possible with the ORM?) - so I've tried performing these operations outside SQLAlchemy, in a Python loop of the records. However here I've struggled to access the individual fields - for example the model accessors don't seem to go n-levels deep, e.g. City.counties.text_strings.language doesn't exist.
I've also experimented with using tuples - the closest I've got to it working was by splitting it out into two queries:
# For cities without a county
for city, country in session.query(City, Country).\
filter(Country.id == City.country_id).\
filter(City.county_id == None).all():
if city.text_strings.language == 'en':
# etc
# For cities with a county
for city, county, country in session.query(City, County, Country).\
filter(and_(City.county_id == County.id, City.country_id == Country.id)).all():
if city.text_strings.language == 'en':
# etc
I split it out into two queries because I couldn't figure out how to make the Suit join optional in just the one query. But this approach is of course terrible and worse the second query didn't work 100% - it wasn't joining all of the different city.text_strings for subsequent filtering.
So I'm stumped! Any help you can give me setting me on the right path for performing these sorts of complex-ish queries in SQLAlchemy ORM would be much appreciated.
The mapping for Suit is not present but based on the propel query I would assume it has a text_strings attribute.
The relevant portion of SQLAlchemy documentation describing aliases with joins is at:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/orm/tutorial.html#using-aliases
generation of functions is at:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/core/tutorial.html#functions
cyts = aliased(TextString)
cits = aliased(TextString)
cots = aliased(TextString)
cy = aliased(Suit)
co = aliased(Suit)
session.query(
City.id,
(
cyts.text_string + \
'> ' + \
func.if_(cots.text_string!=None, cots.text_string + '> ', cits.text_string)
).label('city_breadcrumb')
).\
outerjoin((cits, City.text_strings)).\
outerjoin((cy, City.country)).\
outerjoin((cyts, cy.text_strings)).\
outerjoin((co, City.county))\
outerjoin((cots, co.text_string)).\
filter(cits.langauge=='en').\
filter(cyts.langauge=='en').\
filter(or_(cots.langauge=='en', cots.language==None))
though I would think its a heck of a lot simpler to just say:
city.text_strings.text_string + " > " + city.country.text_strings.text_string + " > " city.county.text_strings.text_string
If you put a descriptor on City, Suit:
class City(object):
# ...
#property
def text_string(self):
return self.text_strings.text_string
then you could say city.text_string.
Just for the record, here is the code I ended up using. Mike (zzzeek)'s answer stays as the correct and definitive answer because this is just an adaptation of his, which was the breakthrough for me.
cits = aliased(TextString)
cyts = aliased(TextString)
cots = aliased(TextString)
for (city_id, country_text, county_text, city_text) in \
session.query(City.id, cyts.text_string, cots.text_string, cits.text_string).\
outerjoin((cits, and_(cits.id==City.text_string_id, cits.language=='en'))).\
outerjoin((County, City.county)).\
outerjoin((cots, and_(cots.id==County.text_string_id, cots.language=='en'))).\
outerjoin((Country, City.country)).\
outerjoin((cyts, and_(cyts.id==Country.text_string_id, cyts.language=='en'))):
# Python to construct the breadcrumb, checking county_text for None-ness