Regular expression to capture different lines - python

I'm trying to find a better way to capture variable values from a file that stores some information but facing the problem with line breaks and spaces. For example, a DataSetList variable is given that stores a value in two different ways:
Input
Templates = <
item
Name = 'fruits'
TemplateList = '7,12'
end>
Surveys = <
item
ID = 542
Name = 'apple'
end
item
ID = 872
Name = 'banana'
DataSetList = '873,887,971,1055'
PluginInfo = {something}
end
item
ID = 437
Name = 'cherry'
DataSetList =
'438,452,536,620,704,788,1143,1179,1563,1647,1731,1839,1875,1851,' +
'1863,2060,2359,2443,2469,2620'
PluginInfo = {something}
end>
The only way i've found to capture the values of the variables ID, Name, DataSetList variable values that are stored in 'item end' block is (My approach):
Expression
ID[\s\=]*(?P<UID>\d*)\s*Name[\s\=]*'(?P<Name>.*)'\s*DataSetList[\s\=]*(?P<DataSetList>(?:'[\d\,]*'[\s\+]*)*)
ID[\s\=]*(?P<UID>\d*) # capture ID
\s* # match spaces
Name[\s\=]*'(?P<Name>.*)' # capture Name
\s* # match spaces
DataSetList[\s\=]*(?P<DataSetList>(?:'[\d\,]*'[\s\+]*)*) # capture DataSetList
My approach output
{'UID': '872',
'Name': 'banana',
'DataSetList': "'873,887,971,1055'\n "}
{'UID': '437',
'Name': 'cherry',
'DataSetList': "'438,452,536,620,704,788,1143,1179,1563,1647,1731,1839,1875,1851,' +\n '1863,2060,2359,2443,2469,2620'\n "}
Problem
I don't think my approach is good because named capturing group DataSetList also captures spaces, line breaks, literal + and finally requires postprocessing of values.
Any approaches or ideas to improve my regular expression would be very helpful. Unfortunately my knowledge base of regex isn't as deep as i would like it to be. It's very interesting to see how it's done in other ways

You can improve the regex a bit.
ID[\s=]*(?P<UID>\d*)\s*Name[\s=]*'(?P<Name>.*)'\s*DataSetList[\s=]*(?P<DataSetList>'(?:[\d,]|'[\s+]*')*')
This gets rid of the unnecessary = and , escapes. The last part now won't match the whitespace after the final bit of the DataSetList.
I can't see a nice way to avoid having to post-process the DataSetList, if you stick to regular expressions.
If you need to do anything more complicated with this, I'd advise moving away from regexes. They are great for simple things, but it looks like in this case you'd be better off with a proper parser. If none already exists for the language you have here, you can use a parsing library such as Lark to create one without too much difficulty.

Related

Extract named group regex pattern from a compiled regex in Python

I have a regex in Python that contains several named groups. However, patterns that match one group can be missed if previous groups have matched because overlaps don't seem to be allowed. As an example:
import re
myText = 'sgasgAAAaoasgosaegnsBBBausgisego'
myRegex = re.compile('(?P<short>(?:AAA))|(?P<long>(?:AAA.*BBB))')
x = re.findall(myRegex,myText)
print(x)
Produces the output:
[('AAA', '')]
The 'long' group does not find a match because 'AAA' was used-up in finding a match for the preceding 'short' group.
I've tried to find a method to allow overlapping but failed. As an alternative, I've been looking for a way to run each named group separately. Something like the following:
for g in myRegex.groupindex.keys():
match = re.findall(***regex_for_named_group_g***,myText)
Is it possible to extract the regex for each named group?
Ultimately, I'd like to produce a dictionary output (or similar) like:
{'short':'AAA',
'long':'AAAaoasgosaegnsBBB'}
Any and all suggestions would be gratefully received.
There really doesn't appear to be a nicer way to do this, but here's a another approach, along the lines of this other answer but somewhat simpler. It will work provided that a) your patterns will always formed as a series of named groups separated by pipes, and b) the named group patterns never contain named groups themselves.
The following would be my approach if you're interested in all matches of each pattern. The argument to re.split looks for a literal pipe followed by the (?=<, the beginning of a named group. It compiles each subpattern and uses the groupindex attribute to extract the name.
def nameToMatches(pattern, string):
result = dict()
for subpattern in re.split('\|(?=\(\?P<)', pattern):
rx = re.compile(subpattern)
name = list(rx.groupindex)[0]
result[name] = rx.findall(string)
return result
With your given text and pattern, returns {'long': ['AAAaoasgosaegnsBBB'], 'short': ['AAA']}. Patterns that don't match at all will have an empty list for their value.
If you only want one match per pattern, you can make it a bit simpler still:
def nameToMatch(pattern, string):
result = dict()
for subpattern in re.split('\|(?=\(\?P<)', pattern):
match = re.search(subpattern, string)
if match:
result.update(match.groupdict())
return result
This gives {'long': 'AAAaoasgosaegnsBBB', 'short': 'AAA'} for your givens. If one of the named groups doesn't match at all, it will be absent from the dict.
There didn't seem to be an obvious answer, so here's a hack. It needs a bit of finessing but basically it splits the original regex into its component parts and runs each group regex separately on the original text.
import re
myTextStr = 'sgasgAAAaoasgosaegnsBBBausgisego'
myRegexStr = '(?P<short>(?:AAA))|(?P<long>(?:AAA.*BBB))'
myRegex = re.compile(myRegexStr) # This is actually no longer needed
print("Full regex with multiple groups")
print(myRegexStr)
# Use a regex to split the original regex into separate regexes
# based on group names
mySplitGroupsRegexStr = '\(\?P<(\w+)>(\([\w\W]+?\))\)(?:\||\Z)'
mySplitGroupsRegex = re.compile(mySplitGroupsRegexStr)
mySepRegexesList = re.findall(mySplitGroupsRegex,myRegexStr)
print("\nList of separate regexes")
print(mySepRegexesList)
# Convert separate regexes to a dict with group name as key
# and regex as value
mySepRegexDict = {reg[0]:reg[1] for reg in mySepRegexesList}
print("\nDictionary of separate regexes with group names as keys")
print(mySepRegexDict)
# Step through each key and run the group regex on the original text.
# Results are stored in a dictionary with group name as key and
# extracted text as value.
myGroupRegexOutput = {}
for g,r in mySepRegexDict.items():
m = re.findall(re.compile(r),myTextStr)
myGroupRegexOutput[g] = m[0]
print("\nOutput of overlapping named group regexes")
print(myGroupRegexOutput)
The resulting output is:
Full regex with multiple groups
(?P<short>(?:AAA))|(?P<long>(?:AAA.*BBB))
List of separate regexes
[('short', '(?:AAA)'), ('long', '(?:AAA.*BBB)')]
Dictionary of separate regexes with group names as keys
{'short': '(?:AAA)', 'long': '(?:AAA.*BBB)'}
Output of overlapping named group regexes
{'short': 'AAA', 'long': 'AAAaoasgosaegnsBBB'}
This might be useful to someone somewhere.

What's a better way to process inconsistently structured strings?

I have an output string like this:
read : io=131220KB, bw=14016KB/s, iops=3504, runt= 9362msec
And I want to just extract one of the numerical values for computation, say iops. I'm processing it like this:
if 'read ' in key:
my_read_iops = value.split(",")[2].split("=")[1]
result['test_details']['read'] = my_read_iops
But there are slight inconsistencies with some of the strings I'm reading in and my code is getting super complicated and verbose. So instead of manually counting the number of commas vs "=" chars, what's a better way to handle this?
You can use regular expression \s* to handle inconsistent spacing, it matches zero or more whitespaces:
import re
s = 'read : io=131220KB, bw=14016KB/s, iops=3504, runt= 9362msec'
for m in re.finditer(r'\s*(?P<name>\w*)\s*=\s*(?P<value>[\w/]*)\s*', s):
print(m.group('name'), m.group('value'))
# io 131220KB
# bw 14016KB/s
# iops 3504
# runt 9362msec
Using group name, you can construct pattern string from a list of column names and do it like:
names = ['io', 'bw', 'iops', 'runt']
name_val_pat = r'\s*{name}\s*=\s*(?P<{group_name}>[\w/]*)\s*'
pattern = ','.join([name_val_pat.format(name=name, group_name=name) for name in names])
# '\s*io\s*=\s*(?P<io>[\w/]*)\s*,\s*bw\s*=\s*(?P<bw>[\w/]*)\s*,\s*iops\s*=\s*(?P<iops>[\w/]*)\s*,\s*runt\s*=\s*(?P<runt>[\w/]*)\s*'
match = re.search(pattern, s)
data_dict = {name: match.group(name) for name in names}
print(data_dict)
# {'io': '131220KB', 'bw': '14016KB/s', 'runt': '9362msec', 'iops': '3504'}
In this way, you only need to change names and keep the order correct.
If I were you,I'd use regex(regular expression) as first choice.
import re
s= "read : io=131220KB, bw=14016KB/s, iops=3504, runt= 9362msec"
re.search(r"iops=(\d+)",s).group(1)
By this python code, I find the string pattern that starts 'iops=' and continues number expression at least 1 digit.I extract the target string(3504) by using round bracket.
you can find more information about regex from
https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/re.html#module-re
regex is powerful language for complex pattern matching with simple syntax.
from re import match
string = 'read : io=131220KB, bw=14016KB/s, iops=3504, runt= 9362msec'
iops = match(r'.+(iops=)([0-9]+)', string).group(2)
iops
'3504'

Parse a string using regex to obtain matches beginning with a certain word

I tried to search but the information that I am getting seems to be kinda overwhelming and far from what I need. I can't seem to get it to work.
The requirement is to get the function that starts with "meta" and its parentheses.
input:
one metaOmph(uno)
one metaAsdf(dos)
one metaPoil(tres)
output:
[ metaOmph , (uno) ]
[ metaAsdf, (dos) ]
[ metaPoil, (tres)]
The one that I currently have just gets the entire line if it starts with "meta". so I have the entire "one meta<>" if it's a match, would it be possible do what I'm aiming for?
Edit: It's one input/line at a time.
I'd love to post what I did earlier but I closed repl.it due to my frustration. I'll keep it in mind on my next post. (quite new here)
import re
s = """one metaOmph(uno)
one metaAsdf(dos)
one metaPoil(tres)"""
print(re.findall(".+(meta\w+)(\(\w+\))", s))
Outputs:
[('metaOmph', '(uno)'), ('metaAsdf', '(dos)'), ('metaPoil', '(tres)')]
re.findall() approach with valid regex pattern:
import re
s = '''
one metaOmph(uno)
one metaAsdf(dos)
one metaPoil(tres)
'''
result = re.findall(r'\b(meta\w+)(\([^()]+\))', s)
print(result)
The output:
[('metaOmph', '(uno)'), ('metaAsdf', '(dos)'), ('metaPoil', '(tres)')]
If you are going to pass a multiline string, it would seem simple to use the module level re.findall function.
text = '''one metaOmph(uno)
one metaAsdf(dos)
one metaPoil(tres)'''
r = re.findall(r'\b(meta.*?)(\(.*?\))', text, re.M)
print(r)
[('metaOmph', '(uno)'), ('metaAsdf', '(dos)'), ('metaPoil', '(tres)')]
If you are going to be passing 1-line strings as input to a loop, it might make more sense to compile the pattern beforehand, using re.compile and re.search inside a function:
pat = re.compile(r'\b(meta.*?)(\(.*?\))')
def find(text):
return pat.search(text)
for text in list_of_texts: # assuming you're passing in your strings from a list, or elsewhere
m = find(text)
if m:
print(list(m.groups()))
['metaOmph', '(uno)']
['metaAsdf', '(dos)']
['metaPoil', '(tres)']
Note that m might return a match object or None depending on whether a search was found. You'll want to query the return value, otherwise you'll receive an AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'groups', or something along those lines.
Alternatively, if you want to append the result to a list, you might instead use:
r_list = []
for text in list_of_texts:
m = find(text)
if m:
r_list.append(list(m.groups()))
print(r_list)
[['metaOmph', '(uno)'], ['metaAsdf', '(dos)'], ['metaPoil', '(tres)']]
Regex Details
\b # word boundary (thought to add this in thanks to Roman's answer)
(
meta # literal 'meta'
.*? # non-greedy matchall
)
(
\( # literal opening brace (escaped)
.*?
\) # literal closing brace (escaped)
)

How fill a regex string with parameters

I would like to fill regex variables with string.
import re
hReg = re.compile("/robert/(?P<action>([a-zA-Z0-9]*))/$")
hMatch = hReg.match("/robert/delete/")
args = hMatch.groupdict()
args variable is now a dict with {"action":"delete"}.
How i can reverse this process ? With args dict and regex pattern, how i can obtain the string "/robert/delete/" ?
it's possible to have a function just like this ?
def reverse(pattern, dictArgs):
Thank you
This function should do it
def reverse(regex, dict):
replacer_regex = re.compile('''
\(\?P\< # Match the opening
(.+?) # Match the group name into group 1
\>\(.*?\)\) # Match the rest
'''
, re.VERBOSE)
return replacer_regex.sub(lambda m : dict[m.group(1)], regex)
You basically match the (\?P...) block and replace it with a value from the dict.
EDIT: regex is the regex string in my exmple. You can get it from patter by
regex_compiled.pattern
EDIT2: verbose regex added
Actually, i thinks it's doable for some narrow cases, but pretty complex thing "in general case".
You'll need to write some sort of finite state machine, parsing your regex string, and splitting different parts, then take appropriate action for this parts.
For regular symbols — simply put symbols "as is" into results string.
For named groups — put values from dictArgs in place of them
For optional blocks — put some of it's values
And so on.
One requllar expression often can match big (or even infinite) set of strings, so this "reverse" function wouldn't be very useful.
Building upon #Dimitri's answer, more sanitisation is possible.
retype = type(re.compile('hello, world'))
def reverse(ptn, dict):
if isinstance(ptn, retype):
ptn = ptn.pattern
ptn = ptn.replace(r'\.','.')
replacer_regex = re.compile(r'''
\(\?P # Match the opening
\<(.+?)\>
(.*?)
\) # Match the rest
'''
, re.VERBOSE)
# return replacer_regex.findall(ptn)
res = replacer_regex.sub( lambda m : dict[m.group(1)], ptn)
return res

PyParsing lookaheads and greedy expressions

I'm writing a parser for a query language using PyParsing, and I've gotten stuck on (what I believe to be) an issue with lookaheads. One clause type in the query is intended to split strings into 3 parts (fieldname,operator, value) such that fieldname is one word, operator is one or more words, and value is a word, a quoted string, or a parenthesized list of these.
My data look like
author is william
author is 'william shakespeare'
author is not shakespeare
author is in (william,'the bard',shakespeare)
And my current parser for this clause is written as:
fieldname = Word(alphas)
operator = OneOrMore(Word(alphas))
single_value = Word(alphas) ^ QuotedString(quoteChar="'")
list_value = Literal("(") + Group(delimitedList(single_value)) + Literal(")")
value = single_value ^ list_value
clause = fieldname + originalTextFor(operator) + value
Obviously this fails due to the the fact that the operator element is greedy and will gobble up the value if it can. From reading other similar questions and the docs, I've gathered that I need to manage that lookahead with a NotAny or FollowedBy, but I haven't been able to figure out how to make that work.
This is a good place to Be The Parser. Or more accurately, Make The Parser Think Like You Do. Ask yourself, "In 'author is shakespeare', how do I know that 'shakespeare' is not part of the operator?" You know that 'shakespeare' is the value because it is at the end of the query, there is nothing more after it. So operator words aren't just words of alphas, they are words of alphas that are not followed by the end of the string. Now build that lookahead logic into your definition of operator:
operator = OneOrMore(Word(alphas) + ~FollowedBy(StringEnd()))
And I think this will start parsing better for you.
Some other tips:
I only use '^' operator if there will be some possible ambiguity, like if I was going to parse a string with numbers that could be integers or hex. If I used Word(nums) | Word(hexnums), then I might misprocess "123ABC" as just the leading "123". By changing '|' to '^', all of the alternatives will be tested, and the longest match chosen. In my example of parsing decimal or hex integers, I could have gotten the same result by reversing the alternatives, and test for Word(hexnums) first. In you query language, there is no way to confuse a quoted string with a non-quoted single word value (one leads with ' or ", the other doesn't), so there is no reason to use '^', '|' will suffice. Similar for value = singleValue ^ listValue.
Adding results names to the key components of your query string will make it easier to work with later:
clause = fieldname("fieldname") + originalTextFor(operator)("operator") + value("value")
Now you can access the parsed values by name instead of by parse position (which will get tricky and error-prone once you start getting more complicated with optional fields and such):
queryParts = clause.parseString('author is william')
print queryParts.fieldname
print queryParts.operator

Categories