try-except command does not catch exception with multiprocessing.Pool - python

I'm trying to catch the exceptions I raise in a function called callback.
Here's a simplification of the code.
try:
logger.info("This message gets logged!!!")
with Pool() as executor:
results = executor.map(callback, made_up_list)
except Exception as e:
pass
This doesn't seem to work, since any exception raised by callback shows on the terminal.
One interesting thing is if we use the debug mode in an IDE (my case vscode), and put a breakpoint on the except line, we never get there, since we remain stuck due to the raised exception. However, if I do CTRL+c, I stop the process, and then I pass to the except line.
It may be worth knowing the callback itself already uses multithreading when doing some computations which will result in raising an exception.
If I change the line order a bit, to:
with Pool() as executor::
logger.info("This message gets logged!!!")
try:
results = executor.map(callback, made_up_list)
except Exception as e:
pass
I get a similar undesired result of not catching the exception.

I would suggest you to wrap your callback inside decorator to catch exception and then pass your decorated function inside executor like this
import logging
from multiprocessing import Pool
from functools import update_wrapper
class my_decorator(object):
def __init__(self, target):
self.target = target
try:
update_wrapper(self, target)
except:
pass
def __call__(self, args):
self.target(args)
def func(a):
print(int(a))
callback = my_decorator(func)
if __name__ == "__main__":
with Pool(4) as executor:
logging.info("This message gets logged!!!")
results = executor.map(callback,[1,2,3, '4', 'a'])

I am not sure why you are not catching an exception (assuming one occurs in your worker function, callback. Perhaps this is due to some peculiarity of your IDE. The following code when run from a command line (not an IDE) works as expected:
def callback(x):
if x == 2:
raise ValueError(f'Invalid value {x}')
return x ** 2
if __name__ == '__main__':
from multiprocessing import Pool
made_up_list = [1, 2, 3]
with Pool() as executor:
try:
results = executor.map(callback, made_up_list)
print(results)
except Exception as e:
print('Got exception:', e)
Prints:
Got exception: Invalid value 2
You might see if the following works, which has the additional benefit of getting a results list for those tasks that have completed normally, i.e. if you want to catch individual exceptions as well as the results of successful completions that occur in your worker function callback in your main process, then you could use the Pool.imap method instead of Pool.map:
def callback(x):
if x == 2:
raise ValueError(f'Invalid value {x}')
return x ** 2
if __name__ == '__main__':
from multiprocessing import Pool
made_up_list = [1, 2, 3]
with Pool() as executor:
results = []
it = executor.imap(callback, made_up_list)
while True:
try:
result = next(it)
except StopIteration:
break
except Exception as e:
result = e
print('Got exception:', e)
results.append(result) # Include Exception instances
print(results)
Prints:
Got exception: Invalid value 2
[1, ValueError('Invalid value 2'), 9]
If this makes no difference, then you need to post a minimal, reproducible example.

Related

asyncio.wait_for with non-async function [duplicate]

I'm calling a function in Python which I know may stall and force me to restart the script.
How do I call the function or what do I wrap it in so that if it takes longer than 5 seconds the script cancels it and does something else?
You may use the signal package if you are running on UNIX:
In [1]: import signal
# Register an handler for the timeout
In [2]: def handler(signum, frame):
...: print("Forever is over!")
...: raise Exception("end of time")
...:
# This function *may* run for an indetermined time...
In [3]: def loop_forever():
...: import time
...: while 1:
...: print("sec")
...: time.sleep(1)
...:
...:
# Register the signal function handler
In [4]: signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, handler)
Out[4]: 0
# Define a timeout for your function
In [5]: signal.alarm(10)
Out[5]: 0
In [6]: try:
...: loop_forever()
...: except Exception, exc:
...: print(exc)
....:
sec
sec
sec
sec
sec
sec
sec
sec
Forever is over!
end of time
# Cancel the timer if the function returned before timeout
# (ok, mine won't but yours maybe will :)
In [7]: signal.alarm(0)
Out[7]: 0
10 seconds after the call signal.alarm(10), the handler is called. This raises an exception that you can intercept from the regular Python code.
This module doesn't play well with threads (but then, who does?)
Note that since we raise an exception when timeout happens, it may end up caught and ignored inside the function, for example of one such function:
def loop_forever():
while 1:
print('sec')
try:
time.sleep(10)
except:
continue
You can use multiprocessing.Process to do exactly that.
Code
import multiprocessing
import time
# bar
def bar():
for i in range(100):
print "Tick"
time.sleep(1)
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Start bar as a process
p = multiprocessing.Process(target=bar)
p.start()
# Wait for 10 seconds or until process finishes
p.join(10)
# If thread is still active
if p.is_alive():
print "running... let's kill it..."
# Terminate - may not work if process is stuck for good
p.terminate()
# OR Kill - will work for sure, no chance for process to finish nicely however
# p.kill()
p.join()
How do I call the function or what do I wrap it in so that if it takes longer than 5 seconds the script cancels it?
I posted a gist that solves this question/problem with a decorator and a threading.Timer. Here it is with a breakdown.
Imports and setups for compatibility
It was tested with Python 2 and 3. It should also work under Unix/Linux and Windows.
First the imports. These attempt to keep the code consistent regardless of the Python version:
from __future__ import print_function
import sys
import threading
from time import sleep
try:
import thread
except ImportError:
import _thread as thread
Use version independent code:
try:
range, _print = xrange, print
def print(*args, **kwargs):
flush = kwargs.pop('flush', False)
_print(*args, **kwargs)
if flush:
kwargs.get('file', sys.stdout).flush()
except NameError:
pass
Now we have imported our functionality from the standard library.
exit_after decorator
Next we need a function to terminate the main() from the child thread:
def quit_function(fn_name):
# print to stderr, unbuffered in Python 2.
print('{0} took too long'.format(fn_name), file=sys.stderr)
sys.stderr.flush() # Python 3 stderr is likely buffered.
thread.interrupt_main() # raises KeyboardInterrupt
And here is the decorator itself:
def exit_after(s):
'''
use as decorator to exit process if
function takes longer than s seconds
'''
def outer(fn):
def inner(*args, **kwargs):
timer = threading.Timer(s, quit_function, args=[fn.__name__])
timer.start()
try:
result = fn(*args, **kwargs)
finally:
timer.cancel()
return result
return inner
return outer
Usage
And here's the usage that directly answers your question about exiting after 5 seconds!:
#exit_after(5)
def countdown(n):
print('countdown started', flush=True)
for i in range(n, -1, -1):
print(i, end=', ', flush=True)
sleep(1)
print('countdown finished')
Demo:
>>> countdown(3)
countdown started
3, 2, 1, 0, countdown finished
>>> countdown(10)
countdown started
10, 9, 8, 7, 6, countdown took too long
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 11, in inner
File "<stdin>", line 6, in countdown
KeyboardInterrupt
The second function call will not finish, instead the process should exit with a traceback!
KeyboardInterrupt does not always stop a sleeping thread
Note that sleep will not always be interrupted by a keyboard interrupt, on Python 2 on Windows, e.g.:
#exit_after(1)
def sleep10():
sleep(10)
print('slept 10 seconds')
>>> sleep10()
sleep10 took too long # Note that it hangs here about 9 more seconds
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 11, in inner
File "<stdin>", line 3, in sleep10
KeyboardInterrupt
nor is it likely to interrupt code running in extensions unless it explicitly checks for PyErr_CheckSignals(), see Cython, Python and KeyboardInterrupt ignored
I would avoid sleeping a thread more than a second, in any case - that's an eon in processor time.
How do I call the function or what do I wrap it in so that if it takes longer than 5 seconds the script cancels it and does something else?
To catch it and do something else, you can catch the KeyboardInterrupt.
>>> try:
... countdown(10)
... except KeyboardInterrupt:
... print('do something else')
...
countdown started
10, 9, 8, 7, 6, countdown took too long
do something else
I have a different proposal which is a pure function (with the same API as the threading suggestion) and seems to work fine (based on suggestions on this thread)
def timeout(func, args=(), kwargs={}, timeout_duration=1, default=None):
import signal
class TimeoutError(Exception):
pass
def handler(signum, frame):
raise TimeoutError()
# set the timeout handler
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, handler)
signal.alarm(timeout_duration)
try:
result = func(*args, **kwargs)
except TimeoutError as exc:
result = default
finally:
signal.alarm(0)
return result
I ran across this thread when searching for a timeout call on unit tests. I didn't find anything simple in the answers or 3rd party packages so I wrote the decorator below you can drop right into code:
import multiprocessing.pool
import functools
def timeout(max_timeout):
"""Timeout decorator, parameter in seconds."""
def timeout_decorator(item):
"""Wrap the original function."""
#functools.wraps(item)
def func_wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
"""Closure for function."""
pool = multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool(processes=1)
async_result = pool.apply_async(item, args, kwargs)
# raises a TimeoutError if execution exceeds max_timeout
return async_result.get(max_timeout)
return func_wrapper
return timeout_decorator
Then it's as simple as this to timeout a test or any function you like:
#timeout(5.0) # if execution takes longer than 5 seconds, raise a TimeoutError
def test_base_regression(self):
...
The stopit package, found on pypi, seems to handle timeouts well.
I like the #stopit.threading_timeoutable decorator, which adds a timeout parameter to the decorated function, which does what you expect, it stops the function.
Check it out on pypi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/stopit
I am the author of wrapt_timeout_decorator.
Most of the solutions presented here work wunderfully under Linux on the first glance - because we have fork() and signals() - but on windows the things look a bit different.
And when it comes to subthreads on Linux, You cant use Signals anymore.
In order to spawn a process under Windows, it needs to be picklable - and many decorated functions or Class methods are not.
So you need to use a better pickler like dill and multiprocess (not pickle and multiprocessing) - thats why You cant use ProcessPoolExecutor (or only with limited functionality).
For the timeout itself - You need to define what timeout means - because on Windows it will take considerable (and not determinable) time to spawn the process. This can be tricky on short timeouts. Lets assume, spawning the process takes about 0.5 seconds (easily !!!). If You give a timeout of 0.2 seconds what should happen?
Should the function time out after 0.5 + 0.2 seconds (so let the method run for 0.2 seconds)?
Or should the called process time out after 0.2 seconds (in that case, the decorated function will ALWAYS timeout, because in that time it is not even spawned)?
Also nested decorators can be nasty and You cant use Signals in a subthread. If You want to create a truly universal, cross-platform decorator, all this needs to be taken into consideration (and tested).
Other issues are passing exceptions back to the caller, as well as logging issues (if used in the decorated function - logging to files in another process is NOT supported)
I tried to cover all edge cases, You might look into the package wrapt_timeout_decorator, or at least test Your own solutions inspired by the unittests used there.
#Alexis Eggermont - unfortunately I dont have enough points to comment - maybe someone else can notify You - I think I solved Your import issue.
There are a lot of suggestions, but none using concurrent.futures, which I think is the most legible way to handle this.
from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor
# Warning: this does not terminate function if timeout
def timeout_five(fnc, *args, **kwargs):
with ProcessPoolExecutor() as p:
f = p.submit(fnc, *args, **kwargs)
return f.result(timeout=5)
Super simple to read and maintain.
We make a pool, submit a single process and then wait up to 5 seconds before raising a TimeoutError that you could catch and handle however you needed.
Native to python 3.2+ and backported to 2.7 (pip install futures).
Switching between threads and processes is as simple as replacing ProcessPoolExecutor with ThreadPoolExecutor.
If you want to terminate the Process on timeout I would suggest looking into Pebble.
Building on and and enhancing the answer by #piro , you can build a contextmanager. This allows for very readable code which will disable the alaram signal after a successful run (sets signal.alarm(0))
from contextlib import contextmanager
import signal
import time
#contextmanager
def timeout(duration):
def timeout_handler(signum, frame):
raise TimeoutError(f'block timedout after {duration} seconds')
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, timeout_handler)
signal.alarm(duration)
try:
yield
finally:
signal.alarm(0)
def sleeper(duration):
time.sleep(duration)
print('finished')
Example usage:
In [19]: with timeout(2):
...: sleeper(1)
...:
finished
In [20]: with timeout(2):
...: sleeper(3)
...:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exception Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-20-66c78858116f> in <module>()
1 with timeout(2):
----> 2 sleeper(3)
3
<ipython-input-7-a75b966bf7ac> in sleeper(t)
1 def sleeper(t):
----> 2 time.sleep(t)
3 print('finished')
4
<ipython-input-18-533b9e684466> in timeout_handler(signum, frame)
2 def timeout(duration):
3 def timeout_handler(signum, frame):
----> 4 raise Exception(f'block timedout after {duration} seconds')
5 signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, timeout_handler)
6 signal.alarm(duration)
Exception: block timedout after 2 seconds
Great, easy to use and reliable PyPi project timeout-decorator (https://pypi.org/project/timeout-decorator/)
installation:
pip install timeout-decorator
Usage:
import time
import timeout_decorator
#timeout_decorator.timeout(5)
def mytest():
print "Start"
for i in range(1,10):
time.sleep(1)
print "%d seconds have passed" % i
if __name__ == '__main__':
mytest()
timeout-decorator don't work on windows system as , windows didn't support signal well.
If you use timeout-decorator in windows system you will get the following
AttributeError: module 'signal' has no attribute 'SIGALRM'
Some suggested to use use_signals=False but didn't worked for me.
Author #bitranox created the following package:
pip install https://github.com/bitranox/wrapt-timeout-decorator/archive/master.zip
Code Sample:
import time
from wrapt_timeout_decorator import *
#timeout(5)
def mytest(message):
print(message)
for i in range(1,10):
time.sleep(1)
print('{} seconds have passed'.format(i))
def main():
mytest('starting')
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Gives the following exception:
TimeoutError: Function mytest timed out after 5 seconds
Highlights
Raises TimeoutError uses exceptions to alert on timeout - can easily be modified
Cross Platform: Windows & Mac OS X
Compatibility: Python 3.6+ (I also tested on python 2.7 and it works with small syntax adjustments)
For full explanation and extension to parallel maps, see here https://flipdazed.github.io/blog/quant%20dev/parallel-functions-with-timeouts
Minimal Example
>>> #killer_call(timeout=4)
... def bar(x):
... import time
... time.sleep(x)
... return x
>>> bar(10)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
__main__.TimeoutError: function 'bar' timed out after 4s
and as expected
>>> bar(2)
2
Full code
import multiprocessing as mp
import multiprocessing.queues as mpq
import functools
import dill
from typing import Tuple, Callable, Dict, Optional, Iterable, List, Any
class TimeoutError(Exception):
def __init__(self, func: Callable, timeout: int):
self.t = timeout
self.fname = func.__name__
def __str__(self):
return f"function '{self.fname}' timed out after {self.t}s"
def _lemmiwinks(func: Callable, args: Tuple, kwargs: Dict[str, Any], q: mp.Queue):
"""lemmiwinks crawls into the unknown"""
q.put(dill.loads(func)(*args, **kwargs))
def killer_call(func: Callable = None, timeout: int = 10) -> Callable:
"""
Single function call with a timeout
Args:
func: the function
timeout: The timeout in seconds
"""
if not isinstance(timeout, int):
raise ValueError(f'timeout needs to be an int. Got: {timeout}')
if func is None:
return functools.partial(killer_call, timeout=timeout)
#functools.wraps(killer_call)
def _inners(*args, **kwargs) -> Any:
q_worker = mp.Queue()
proc = mp.Process(target=_lemmiwinks, args=(dill.dumps(func), args, kwargs, q_worker))
proc.start()
try:
return q_worker.get(timeout=timeout)
except mpq.Empty:
raise TimeoutError(func, timeout)
finally:
try:
proc.terminate()
except:
pass
return _inners
if __name__ == '__main__':
#killer_call(timeout=4)
def bar(x):
import time
time.sleep(x)
return x
print(bar(2))
bar(10)
Notes
You will need to import inside the function because of the way dill works.
This will also mean these functions may not be not compatible with doctest if there are imports inside your target functions. You will get an issue with __import__ not found.
Just in case it is helpful for anyone, building on the answer by #piro, I've made a function decorator:
import time
import signal
from functools import wraps
def timeout(timeout_secs: int):
def wrapper(func):
#wraps(func)
def time_limited(*args, **kwargs):
# Register an handler for the timeout
def handler(signum, frame):
raise Exception(f"Timeout for function '{func.__name__}'")
# Register the signal function handler
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, handler)
# Define a timeout for your function
signal.alarm(timeout_secs)
result = None
try:
result = func(*args, **kwargs)
except Exception as exc:
raise exc
finally:
# disable the signal alarm
signal.alarm(0)
return result
return time_limited
return wrapper
Using the wrapper on a function with a 20 seconds timeout would look something like:
#timeout(20)
def my_slow_or_never_ending_function(name):
while True:
time.sleep(1)
print(f"Yet another second passed {name}...")
try:
results = my_slow_or_never_ending_function("Yooo!")
except Exception as e:
print(f"ERROR: {e}")
We can use signals for the same. I think the below example will be useful for you. It is very simple compared to threads.
import signal
def timeout(signum, frame):
raise myException
#this is an infinite loop, never ending under normal circumstances
def main():
print 'Starting Main ',
while 1:
print 'in main ',
#SIGALRM is only usable on a unix platform
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, timeout)
#change 5 to however many seconds you need
signal.alarm(5)
try:
main()
except myException:
print "whoops"
Another solution with asyncio :
If you want to cancel the background task and not just timeout on the running main code, then you need an explicit communication from main thread to ask the code of the task to cancel , like a threading.Event()
import asyncio
import functools
import multiprocessing
from concurrent.futures.thread import ThreadPoolExecutor
class SingletonTimeOut:
pool = None
#classmethod
def run(cls, to_run: functools.partial, timeout: float):
pool = cls.get_pool()
loop = cls.get_loop()
try:
task = loop.run_in_executor(pool, to_run)
return loop.run_until_complete(asyncio.wait_for(task, timeout=timeout))
except asyncio.TimeoutError as e:
error_type = type(e).__name__ #TODO
raise e
#classmethod
def get_pool(cls):
if cls.pool is None:
cls.pool = ThreadPoolExecutor(multiprocessing.cpu_count())
return cls.pool
#classmethod
def get_loop(cls):
try:
return asyncio.get_event_loop()
except RuntimeError:
asyncio.set_event_loop(asyncio.new_event_loop())
# print("NEW LOOP" + str(threading.current_thread().ident))
return asyncio.get_event_loop()
# ---------------
TIME_OUT = float('0.2') # seconds
def toto(input_items,nb_predictions):
return 1
to_run = functools.partial(toto,
input_items=1,
nb_predictions="a")
results = SingletonTimeOut.run(to_run, TIME_OUT)
#!/usr/bin/python2
import sys, subprocess, threading
proc = subprocess.Popen(sys.argv[2:])
timer = threading.Timer(float(sys.argv[1]), proc.terminate)
timer.start()
proc.wait()
timer.cancel()
exit(proc.returncode)
The func_timeout package by Tim Savannah has worked well for me.
Installation:
pip install func_timeout
Usage:
import time
from func_timeout import func_timeout, FunctionTimedOut
def my_func(n):
time.sleep(n)
time_to_sleep = 10
# time out after 2 seconds using kwargs
func_timeout(2, my_func, kwargs={'n' : time_to_sleep})
# time out after 2 seconds using args
func_timeout(2, my_func, args=(time_to_sleep,))
I had a need for nestable timed interrupts (which SIGALARM can't do) that won't get blocked by time.sleep (which the thread-based approach can't do). I ended up copying and lightly modifying code from here: http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577600-queue-for-managing-multiple-sigalrm-alarms-concurr/
The code itself:
#!/usr/bin/python
# lightly modified version of http://code.activestate.com/recipes/577600-queue-for-managing-multiple-sigalrm-alarms-concurr/
"""alarm.py: Permits multiple SIGALRM events to be queued.
Uses a `heapq` to store the objects to be called when an alarm signal is
raised, so that the next alarm is always at the top of the heap.
"""
import heapq
import signal
from time import time
__version__ = '$Revision: 2539 $'.split()[1]
alarmlist = []
__new_alarm = lambda t, f, a, k: (t + time(), f, a, k)
__next_alarm = lambda: int(round(alarmlist[0][0] - time())) if alarmlist else None
__set_alarm = lambda: signal.alarm(max(__next_alarm(), 1))
class TimeoutError(Exception):
def __init__(self, message, id_=None):
self.message = message
self.id_ = id_
class Timeout:
''' id_ allows for nested timeouts. '''
def __init__(self, id_=None, seconds=1, error_message='Timeout'):
self.seconds = seconds
self.error_message = error_message
self.id_ = id_
def handle_timeout(self):
raise TimeoutError(self.error_message, self.id_)
def __enter__(self):
self.this_alarm = alarm(self.seconds, self.handle_timeout)
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
try:
cancel(self.this_alarm)
except ValueError:
pass
def __clear_alarm():
"""Clear an existing alarm.
If the alarm signal was set to a callable other than our own, queue the
previous alarm settings.
"""
oldsec = signal.alarm(0)
oldfunc = signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, __alarm_handler)
if oldsec > 0 and oldfunc != __alarm_handler:
heapq.heappush(alarmlist, (__new_alarm(oldsec, oldfunc, [], {})))
def __alarm_handler(*zargs):
"""Handle an alarm by calling any due heap entries and resetting the alarm.
Note that multiple heap entries might get called, especially if calling an
entry takes a lot of time.
"""
try:
nextt = __next_alarm()
while nextt is not None and nextt <= 0:
(tm, func, args, keys) = heapq.heappop(alarmlist)
func(*args, **keys)
nextt = __next_alarm()
finally:
if alarmlist: __set_alarm()
def alarm(sec, func, *args, **keys):
"""Set an alarm.
When the alarm is raised in `sec` seconds, the handler will call `func`,
passing `args` and `keys`. Return the heap entry (which is just a big
tuple), so that it can be cancelled by calling `cancel()`.
"""
__clear_alarm()
try:
newalarm = __new_alarm(sec, func, args, keys)
heapq.heappush(alarmlist, newalarm)
return newalarm
finally:
__set_alarm()
def cancel(alarm):
"""Cancel an alarm by passing the heap entry returned by `alarm()`.
It is an error to try to cancel an alarm which has already occurred.
"""
__clear_alarm()
try:
alarmlist.remove(alarm)
heapq.heapify(alarmlist)
finally:
if alarmlist: __set_alarm()
and a usage example:
import alarm
from time import sleep
try:
with alarm.Timeout(id_='a', seconds=5):
try:
with alarm.Timeout(id_='b', seconds=2):
sleep(3)
except alarm.TimeoutError as e:
print 'raised', e.id_
sleep(30)
except alarm.TimeoutError as e:
print 'raised', e.id_
else:
print 'nope.'
I have face the same problem but my situation is need work on sub thread, signal didn't work for me, so I wrote a python package: timeout-timer to solve this problem, support for use as context or decorator, use signal or sub thread module to trigger a timeout interrupt:
from timeout_timer import timeout, TimeoutInterrupt
class TimeoutInterruptNested(TimeoutInterrupt):
pass
def test_timeout_nested_loop_both_timeout(timer="thread"):
cnt = 0
try:
with timeout(5, timer=timer):
try:
with timeout(2, timer=timer, exception=TimeoutInterruptNested):
sleep(2)
except TimeoutInterruptNested:
cnt += 1
time.sleep(10)
except TimeoutInterrupt:
cnt += 1
assert cnt == 2
see more: https://github.com/dozysun/timeout-timer
Here is a simple example running one method with timeout and also retriev its value if successfull.
import multiprocessing
import time
ret = {"foo": False}
def worker(queue):
"""worker function"""
ret = queue.get()
time.sleep(1)
ret["foo"] = True
queue.put(ret)
if __name__ == "__main__":
queue = multiprocessing.Queue()
queue.put(ret)
p = multiprocessing.Process(target=worker, args=(queue,))
p.start()
p.join(timeout=10)
if p.exitcode is None:
print("The worker timed out.")
else:
print(f"The worker completed and returned: {queue.get()}")
Here is a slight improvement to the given thread-based solution.
The code below supports exceptions:
def runFunctionCatchExceptions(func, *args, **kwargs):
try:
result = func(*args, **kwargs)
except Exception, message:
return ["exception", message]
return ["RESULT", result]
def runFunctionWithTimeout(func, args=(), kwargs={}, timeout_duration=10, default=None):
import threading
class InterruptableThread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.result = default
def run(self):
self.result = runFunctionCatchExceptions(func, *args, **kwargs)
it = InterruptableThread()
it.start()
it.join(timeout_duration)
if it.isAlive():
return default
if it.result[0] == "exception":
raise it.result[1]
return it.result[1]
Invoking it with a 5 second timeout:
result = timeout(remote_calculate, (myarg,), timeout_duration=5)
Here is a POSIX version that combines many of the previous answers to deliver following features:
Subprocesses blocking the execution.
Usage of the timeout function on class member functions.
Strict requirement on time-to-terminate.
Here is the code and some test cases:
import threading
import signal
import os
import time
class TerminateExecution(Exception):
"""
Exception to indicate that execution has exceeded the preset running time.
"""
def quit_function(pid):
# Killing all subprocesses
os.setpgrp()
os.killpg(0, signal.SIGTERM)
# Killing the main thread
os.kill(pid, signal.SIGTERM)
def handle_term(signum, frame):
raise TerminateExecution()
def invoke_with_timeout(timeout, fn, *args, **kwargs):
# Setting a sigterm handler and initiating a timer
old_handler = signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, handle_term)
timer = threading.Timer(timeout, quit_function, args=[os.getpid()])
terminate = False
# Executing the function
timer.start()
try:
result = fn(*args, **kwargs)
except TerminateExecution:
terminate = True
finally:
# Restoring original handler and cancel timer
signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, old_handler)
timer.cancel()
if terminate:
raise BaseException("xxx")
return result
### Test cases
def countdown(n):
print('countdown started', flush=True)
for i in range(n, -1, -1):
print(i, end=', ', flush=True)
time.sleep(1)
print('countdown finished')
return 1337
def really_long_function():
time.sleep(10)
def really_long_function2():
os.system("sleep 787")
# Checking that we can run a function as expected.
assert invoke_with_timeout(3, countdown, 1) == 1337
# Testing various scenarios
t1 = time.time()
try:
print(invoke_with_timeout(1, countdown, 3))
assert(False)
except BaseException:
assert(time.time() - t1 < 1.1)
print("All good", time.time() - t1)
t1 = time.time()
try:
print(invoke_with_timeout(1, really_long_function2))
assert(False)
except BaseException:
assert(time.time() - t1 < 1.1)
print("All good", time.time() - t1)
t1 = time.time()
try:
print(invoke_with_timeout(1, really_long_function))
assert(False)
except BaseException:
assert(time.time() - t1 < 1.1)
print("All good", time.time() - t1)
# Checking that classes are referenced and not
# copied (as would be the case with multiprocessing)
class X:
def __init__(self):
self.value = 0
def set(self, v):
self.value = v
x = X()
invoke_with_timeout(2, x.set, 9)
assert x.value == 9
I intend to kill the process if job not done , using thread and process both to achieve this.
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
from time import sleep
import multiprocessing
# test case 1
def worker_1(a,b,c):
for _ in range(2):
print('very time consuming sleep')
sleep(1)
return a+b+c
# test case 2
def worker_2(in_name):
for _ in range(10):
print('very time consuming sleep')
sleep(1)
return 'hello '+in_name
Actual class as a contextmanager
class FuncTimer():
def __init__(self,fn,args,runtime):
self.fn = fn
self.args = args
self.queue = multiprocessing.Queue()
self.runtime = runtime
self.process = multiprocessing.Process(target=self.thread_caller)
def thread_caller(self):
with ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
future = executor.submit(self.fn, *self.args)
self.queue.put(future.result())
def __enter__(self):
return self
def start_run(self):
self.process.start()
self.process.join(timeout=self.runtime)
if self.process.exitcode is None:
self.process.kill()
if self.process.exitcode is None:
out_res = None
print('killed premature')
else:
out_res = self.queue.get()
return out_res
def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_value, exc_traceback):
self.process.kill()
How to use it
print('testing case 1')
with FuncTimer(fn=worker_1,args=(1,2,3),runtime = 5) as fp:
res = fp.start_run()
print(res)
print('testing case 2')
with FuncTimer(fn=worker_2,args=('ram',),runtime = 5) as fp:
res = fp.start_run()
print(res)

How to stop execution of outer function from a inner function?

Here is what I want to do:
def bfunc():
try:
do_someting
except Exception as e:
return
def afunc():
bfunc()
xxx
def cfunc():
xxx
def main():
afunc()
cfunc()
in bfunc(),I catch the exception.Now in my main(), I want to stop the afunc() execution when an exception occurs but proceed to execute cfunc().
How can I do this or is there any other way to catch the exception without too many nested try statements?
Tx
Because bfunc() is a function, therefore, to stop the execution of bfunc you can simply use return to stop bfunc. This won't affect cfunc because return only affect bfunc.
def bfunc():
try:
# do_someting
except Exception as e:
return # Exit the bfunc() immediately
You can use below code to see whether print will work or not
def bfunc():
try:
raise IndexError
except Exception as e:
return
def main():
bfunc()
print("Hello world")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Just move the try exception block to afunc. It should give the effect you want.
def bfunc():
do_someting
def afunc():
try:
bfunc()
except Exception as e:
return
xxx #you can move it to try block in order to catch exceptions here too, but I don't know if it's what you like to do

Catch exception in Pool worker that is not started yet

I'm trying to catch exception in sub process. My code (see below) works fine if number of workers == number of tasks. But if workers more than tasks as in an example, 2 process that was not started yet will thow same exception but I can't catch it neither in MainProcess nor in sub processes.
from multiprocessing import Pool, current_process
import time
from exceptions import GracefulExit
import signal
def terminate_handler(signum, frame):
print(dir(frame))
if current_process().name == 'MainProcess':
# we will not raise error if process
# is main because we need to finish all the jobs
return
raise GracefulExit()
def test_func(val):
i = 0
try:
while True:
time.sleep(0.1)
i += 1
if i >= 10:
return i
except GracefulExit:
pass
return i
if __name__ == "__main__":
signal.signal(
signal.SIGINT, terminate_handler)
try:
with Pool(5) as p:
r = p.map(test_func, [1, 2, 3])
except GracefulExit:
pass
print(r)
What can I suggest, pick any variant:
make sure that number of tasks not less the number of workers, just add stubs (e.g. None) to ensure that all workers will start
override run method of Pool's Process:
class CustomProcess(Process):
def run(self):
try:
super().run()
except GracefulExit:
print('interrupted idle worker')
class CustomPool(multiprocessing.pool.Pool):
Process = CustomProcess
....
with CustomPool(5) as p:
r = p.map(test_func, [1, 2, 3])
write your own pool implementation

Threading with exception... Why it keeps ignoring the pass keyword?

I am stuck with a Python issue related to threading.
import threading
import time
import random
import sys
import echo
class presence(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, cb):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.callback = cb
def run(self):
minValue = 0
maxValue = 3
try:
while True:
time.sleep(1)
if random.randint(minValue, maxValue) == 1:
self.callback(1)
elif random.randint(minValue, maxValue) == 2:
raise Exception('An error')
else:
self.callback(0)
except:
print 'Exception caught!'
pass
def showAlert():
echo.echo('Someone is behind the door!')
def count(x):
if x == 1:
showAlert()
sys.stdout.flush()
That is how I call it:
t2 = presence.presence(presence.count)
t2.start()
I eventually get an "Exception caught!", but the thread stops not returning alerts anymore.
What did I do wrong here?
The try/except block should be inside the loop. For example:
while True:
...
elif random.randint(minValue, maxValue) == 2:
try:
raise Exception('An error')
except Exception:
print 'Exception caught!'
Otherwise, the loop will be exited when the exception is raised and Python jumps to the except: block in order to handle it.
You'll notice too that I selectively placed the try/except block in my example to only cover the code that might actually raise the exception. This is a best practice and I recommend it for your code. Having a try/except block enclose large portions of code decreases readability and also wastes space (lots of lines are unnecessarily indented).

Skipping execution of -with- block

I am defining a context manager class and I would like to be able to skip the block of code without raising an exception if certain conditions are met during instantiation. For example,
class My_Context(object):
def __init__(self,mode=0):
"""
if mode = 0, proceed as normal
if mode = 1, do not execute block
"""
self.mode=mode
def __enter__(self):
if self.mode==1:
print 'Exiting...'
CODE TO EXIT PREMATURELY
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
print 'Exiting...'
with My_Context(mode=1):
print 'Executing block of codes...'
According to PEP-343, a with statement translates from:
with EXPR as VAR:
BLOCK
to:
mgr = (EXPR)
exit = type(mgr).__exit__ # Not calling it yet
value = type(mgr).__enter__(mgr)
exc = True
try:
try:
VAR = value # Only if "as VAR" is present
BLOCK
except:
# The exceptional case is handled here
exc = False
if not exit(mgr, *sys.exc_info()):
raise
# The exception is swallowed if exit() returns true
finally:
# The normal and non-local-goto cases are handled here
if exc:
exit(mgr, None, None, None)
As you can see, there is nothing obvious you can do from the call to the __enter__() method of the context manager that can skip the body ("BLOCK") of the with statement.
People have done Python-implementation-specific things, such as manipulating the call stack inside of the __enter__(), in projects such as withhacks. I recall Alex Martelli posting a very interesting with-hack on stackoverflow a year or two back (don't recall enough of the post off-hand to search and find it).
But the simple answer to your question / problem is that you cannot do what you're asking, skipping the body of the with statement, without resorting to so-called "deep magic" (which is not necessarily portable between python implementations). With deep magic, you might be able to do it, but I recommend only doing such things as an exercise in seeing how it might be done, never in "production code".
If you want an ad-hoc solution that uses the ideas from withhacks (specifically from AnonymousBlocksInPython), this will work:
import sys
import inspect
class My_Context(object):
def __init__(self,mode=0):
"""
if mode = 0, proceed as normal
if mode = 1, do not execute block
"""
self.mode=mode
def __enter__(self):
if self.mode==1:
print 'Met block-skipping criterion ...'
# Do some magic
sys.settrace(lambda *args, **keys: None)
frame = inspect.currentframe(1)
frame.f_trace = self.trace
def trace(self, frame, event, arg):
raise
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
print 'Exiting context ...'
return True
Compare the following:
with My_Context(mode=1):
print 'Executing block of code ...'
with
with My_Context(mode=0):
print 'Executing block of code ... '
A python 3 update to the hack mentioned by other answers from
withhacks (specifically from AnonymousBlocksInPython):
class SkipWithBlock(Exception):
pass
class SkipContextManager:
def __init__(self, skip):
self.skip = skip
def __enter__(self):
if self.skip:
sys.settrace(lambda *args, **keys: None)
frame = sys._getframe(1)
frame.f_trace = self.trace
def trace(self, frame, event, arg):
raise SkipWithBlock()
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
if type is None:
return # No exception
if issubclass(type, SkipWithBlock):
return True # Suppress special SkipWithBlock exception
with SkipContextManager(skip=True):
print('In the with block') # Won't be called
print('Out of the with block')
As mentioned before by joe, this is a hack that should be avoided:
The method trace() is called when a new local scope is entered, i.e. right when the code in your with block begins. When an exception is raised here it gets caught by exit(). That's how this hack works. I should add that this is very much a hack and should not be relied upon. The magical sys.settrace() is not actually a part of the language definition, it just happens to be in CPython. Also, debuggers rely on sys.settrace() to do their job, so using it yourself interferes with that. There are many reasons why you shouldn't use this code. Just FYI.
Based on #Peter's answer, here's a version that uses no string manipulations but should work the same way otherwise:
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def skippable_context(skip):
skip_error = ValueError("Skipping Context Exception")
prev_entered = getattr(skippable_context, "entered", False)
skippable_context.entered = False
def command():
skippable_context.entered = True
if skip:
raise skip_error
try:
yield command
except ValueError as err:
if err != skip_error:
raise
finally:
assert skippable_context.entered, "Need to call returned command at least once."
skippable_context.entered = prev_entered
print("=== Running with skip disabled ===")
with skippable_context(skip=False) as command:
command()
print("Entering this block")
print("... Done")
print("=== Running with skip enabled ===")
with skippable_context(skip=True) as command:
command()
raise NotImplementedError("... But this will never be printed")
print("... Done")
What you're trying to do isn't possible, unfortunately. If __enter__ raises an exception, that exception is raised at the with statement (__exit__ isn't called). If it doesn't raise an exception, then the return value is fed to the block and the block executes.
Closest thing I could think of is a flag checked explicitly by the block:
class Break(Exception):
pass
class MyContext(object):
def __init__(self,mode=0):
"""
if mode = 0, proceed as normal
if mode = 1, do not execute block
"""
self.mode=mode
def __enter__(self):
if self.mode==1:
print 'Exiting...'
return self.mode
def __exit__(self, type, value, traceback):
if type is None:
print 'Normal exit...'
return # no exception
if issubclass(type, Break):
return True # suppress exception
print 'Exception exit...'
with MyContext(mode=1) as skip:
if skip: raise Break()
print 'Executing block of codes...'
This also lets you raise Break() in the middle of a with block to simulate a normal break statement.
Context managers are not the right construct for this. You're asking for the body to be executed n times, in this case zero or one. If you look at the general case, n where n >= 0, you end up with a for loop:
def do_squares(n):
for i in range(n):
yield i ** 2
for x in do_squares(3):
print('square: ', x)
for x in do_squares(0):
print('this does not print')
In your case, which is more special purpose, and doesn't require binding to the loop variable:
def should_execute(mode=0):
if mode == 0:
yield
for _ in should_execute(0):
print('this prints')
for _ in should_execute(1):
print('this does not')
Another slightly hacky option makes use of exec. This is handy because it can be modified to do arbitrary things (e.g. memoization of context-blocks):
from contextlib import contextmanager
#contextmanager
def skippable_context_exec(skip):
SKIP_STRING = 'Skipping Context Exception'
old_value = skippable_context_exec.is_execed if hasattr(skippable_context_exec, 'is_execed') else False
skippable_context_exec.is_execed=False
command = "skippable_context_exec.is_execed=True; "+("raise ValueError('{}')".format(SKIP_STRING) if skip else '')
try:
yield command
except ValueError as err:
if SKIP_STRING not in str(err):
raise
finally:
assert skippable_context_exec.is_execed, "You never called exec in your context block."
skippable_context_exec.is_execed = old_value
print('=== Running with skip disabled ===')
with skippable_context_exec(skip=False) as command:
exec(command)
print('Entering this block')
print('... Done')
print('=== Running with skip enabled ===')
with skippable_context_exec(skip=True) as command:
exec(command)
print('... But this will never be printed')
print('... Done')
Would be nice to have something that gets rid of the exec without weird side effects, so if you can think of a way I'm all ears. The current lead answer to this question appears to do that but has some issues.

Categories