Im currently trying to test a function that will lock some string and will not allow to do anything under that locked string, using advisory_lock.
so here is my code:
import pytest
from django_pglocks import advisory_lock
from threading import Thread
from time import sleep
def function_that_should_lock():
with advisory_lock('secret_string', wait=True):
sleep(10)
#eager_db_test
def test_lock():
failed = False
function_that_should_lock_thread = Thread(
target=function_that_should_lock,
)
function_that_should_lock_thread.start()
with advisory_lock('secret_string', wait=False):
failed = True
assert not failed
For some reason function_that_should_lock actually doesn't lock the string, and failed will be set to True.
Please help me understand how it works =)
Related
I am writing a program that will test for an active network connection, then run our software downloader if there is. If there is an update ready to download in the downloader it will automatically download and install said update.
import urllib3
from subprocess import Popen
import subprocess
def run_downloader():
return subprocess.Popen(['C:\ProgramFiles\PrecisionOSTech\Education\POSTdownloader.exe'])
def internet_on():
if urllib3.urlopen('http://216.58.192.142', timeout=1):
return True
else:
urllib3.URLError
return False
if internet_on == True:
run_downloader()
The expectation is to have the program test for an active connection and return either true or false. If true, then it should run the downloader.
Currently, the program runs with no errors but does not run the downloader upon completion. I can only imagine that the internet_on(): method is not returning true as I am wanting. If I run the subprocess.Popen line outside of the method, the downloader will start as planned.
Any assistance is appreciated !
Thanks
It should be something like this:
import urllib.request
from subprocess import Popen
import subprocess
def run_downloader():
return subprocess.Popen(['C:\ProgramFiles\PrecisionOSTech\Education\POSTdownloader.exe'])
def ispageresponding():
response_status_code = urllib.request.urlopen("http://www.stackoverflow.com").getcode()
return response_status_code == 200:
if __name__ == '__main__':
if ispageresponding() == True:
run_downloader()
Note that internet connection function is called in the if statement and is not inside the same function. Also if you are using python3 you should use urllib.request lib.
Need help with how to modify/fix code to allow me to control what is occurring in a process. I have looked around and read I need to either make a global variable which the process can read or use an event function to trigger the process. Problem though is I don't know how to implement them in a class function. I thought that if I followed pyimagesearch code that it would work but it appears that it only works with the threading module and not the multiprocessing module.
import RPi.GPIO as GPIO
from RPI.GPIO import LOW,OUT,HIGH,BCM
import multiprocessing as mp
import time
class TestClass():
def __init__(self,PinOne=22,PinTwo=27):
self.PinOne = PinOne
self.PinTwo = PinTwo
self.RunningSys = True
GPIO.setmode(BCM)
GPIO.setup(PinOne,OUT)
GPIO.output(PinOne,LOW)
GPIO.setup(PinTwo,OUT)
GPIO.output(PinTwo,LOW)
def Testloop(self):
while self.RunningSys:
GPIO.output(PinOne,HIGH)
GPIO.output(PinTwo,HIGH)
time.sleep(1)
GPIO.output(PinOne,LOW)
GPIO.output(PinTwo,LOW)
GPIO.output(PinOne,LOW)
GPIO.output(PinTwo,LOW)
def StopPr(self):
self.RunningSys = False
def MProc(self):
MPGP = mp.process(target=TestClass().Testloop())
MPGP.start()
MPGP.join()
In a separate script
From testfile import TestClass
import time
TestClass().MProc()
time.sleep(4)
TestClass().StopPr()
I'm automating Minitab 17 using Python's win32com library, and while all of commands execute correctly, I can't seem to get the process started by the Minitab process to exit when my script ends. My structure looks like
from myapi import get_data
import pythoncom
from win32com.client import gencache
def process_data(data):
# In case of threading
pythoncom.CoInitialize()
app = gencache.EnsureDispatch('Mtb.Application')
try:
# do some processing
pass
finally:
# App-specific command that is supposed to close the software
app.Quit()
# Ensure the object is released
del mtb
# In case of threading
pythoncom.CoUninitialize()
def main():
data = get_data()
process_data(data)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
I don't get any exceptions raised or error messages printed, the Mtb.exe process is still listed in task manager. Even more frustrating is if I run the following in an IPython session:
>>> from win32com.client import gencache
>>> app = gencache.EnsureDispatch('Mtb.Application')
>>> ^D
The Minitab process is closed immediately. I observe the same behavior in a normal python interactive session. Why would the process get closed correctly when running in an interactive session but not in a standalone script? What is done differently there that isn't being performed in my script?
I've also tried running process_data in a threading.Thread and in a multiprocessing.Process with no luck.
EDIT:
If I have a script containing nothing but
from win32com.client import gencache
app = gencache.EnsureDispatch('Mtb.Application')
then when I run it I see the Mtb.exe process in task manager, but once the script exits the process is killed. So instead my question is why does it matter if this COM object is declared at top-level vs. inside a function?
I don't have minitab so I can't verify but try forcing a shutdown of COM server by setting app = None just after the call to app.Quit? Python uses ref counting to manage object life cycle, so assuming there are no other refs to app then setting it to none should cause it to be finalized immediately. I have seen that cause similar issues. You should not need weak reference, something else is going on. The following, based on your answer, should work:
def process_data(mtb, data):
try:
mtb.do_something(data)
finally:
mtb.Quit()
def main(mtb):
data = get_data()
process_data(mtb, data)
if __name__ == '__main__':
pythoncom.CoInitialize()
mtb = gencache.EnsureDispatch('Mtb.Application')
main(mtb)
mtb.Quit()
mtb = None
pythoncom.CoUninitialize()
The problem was that the the garbage collector could clean up the reference to the underlying IUnknown object (the base type for all COM objects), and without the gc doing it's job the process stayed alive. I solve the problem by using the weakref module to immediately wrap the COM object in a weakref so it could be more easily deferenced:
from myapi import get_data
import weakref
from win32com.client import gencache
import pythoncom
def process_data(mtb_ref, data):
try:
mtb_ref().do_something(data)
finally:
mtb_ref().Quit()
def main(mtb_ref):
data = get_data()
process_data(mtb_ref, data)
if __name__ == '__main__':
pythoncom.CoInitialize()
mtb_ref = weakref.ref(gencache.EnsureDispatch('Mtb.Application'))
main(mtb_ref)
pythoncom.CoUninitialize()
I'm not sure I understand fully why this makes a difference, but I believe it's because there's never a direct reference to the object, only a weak reference, so all the functions that use the COM object only do so indirectly, allowing the GC to know that the object can be collected sooner. For whatever reason it still needs to be created at the top level of the module, but this at least makes it possible for me to write more reusable code that cleanly exits.
after pythoncom.CoUninitialize() i still see process
for me it help (based):
from comtypes.automation import IDispatch
from ctypes import c_void_p, cast, POINTER, byref
def release_reference(self, obj):
logger.debug("release com object")
oleobj = obj._oleobj_
addr = int(repr(oleobj).split()[-1][2:-1], 16)
pointer = POINTER(IDispatch)()
cast(byref(pointer), POINTER(c_void_p))[0] = addr
pointer.Release()
I am using python daemon to check a particular table in mongodb if there is any value it should call another python script.
Below is the code what I am trying, but it doesn't call the script.
can somebody help me out:
import daemon
import time
import os
from pymongo import MongoClient
connection = MongoClient(IPADDRESS, PORT)
monitor_db = connection.testmongo.XYZ_monitoring
def interval_monitoring():
while True:
searchForm = monitor_db.find()
for user in searchForm:
user_id=user['user_id']
for ids in user_id:
path= "python XYZ.py "+ids
os.system(path)
time.sleep(60)
def run():
print daemon.__file__
with daemon.DaemonContext():
interval_monitoring()
if __name__ == "__main__":
run()
yes i got it. Am posting as it may be it helps someone
Instead of using
os.system(path)
Use:
subprocess.call(['python', '/Path_from_root_directory/XYZ.py', ids]) // ids is my argument to be passed
I have the following problem. Whenever a child thread wants to perform some IO operation (writing to file, downloading a file) the program hangs. In the following example the program hangs on opener.retrieve. If I execute python main.py the program is blocked on an retrieve function. If I execute python ./src/tmp.py everything is fine. I don't understand why. Can anybody explain me what is happening?
I am using python2.7 on Linux system (kernel 3.5.0-27).
File ordering:
main.py
./src
__init__.py
tmp.py
main.py
import src.tmp
tmp.py
import threading
import urllib
class DownloaderThread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, pool_sema, i):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.pool_sema = pool_sema
self.daemon = True
self.i = i
def run(self):
try:
opener = urllib.FancyURLopener({})
opener.retrieve("http://www.greenteapress.com/thinkpython/thinkCSpy.pdf", "/tmp/" + str(self.i) + ".pdf")
finally:
self.pool_sema.release()
class Downloader(object):
def __init__(self):
maxthreads = 1
self.pool_sema = threading.BoundedSemaphore(value=maxthreads)
def download_folder(self):
for i in xrange(20):
self.pool_sema.acquire()
print "Downloading", i
t = DownloaderThread(self.pool_sema,i)
t.start()
d = Downloader()
d.download_folder()
I managed to get it to work by hacking urllib.py - if you inspect it you will see many import statements dispersed within the code - i.e. it uses imports stuff 'on the fly' and not just when the module loads.
So, the real reason is still unknown - but not worth investigating - probably some deadlock in Python's import system. You just shouldn't run nontrivial code during an import - that's just asking for trouble.
If you insist, you can get it to work if you move all these weird import statements to the beginning of urllib.py.