I'm building a pyd file via pybind11. There's no python-only code in the project (not even in the final wheel). I'm packing this prebuilt pyd into a wheel package. It's all working well so far, but I've got one small issue. Every time I want to use the functions from the pyd file (which is actually the primary "source" of code) I have to type the following: from python_lib_name.pyd_name import pyd_exported_class example: from crusher.crusher import Shard. This looks pretty lame, is there any way to prevent this and let the developer simply use the from crusher import Shard syntax?
Also, I'm not sure what information to provide, obviously, I wouldn't like to throw the whole project at you unnecessarily. I'm glad to provide any details by editing.
how about this: put your pyd in a folder and include a __init__.py that import the stuff from the pyd
my_project
|---my_pyd_lib
| |---my_pyd_lib.pyd
| |---__init__.py
|---#the other stuff
and in that init just put
#__init__.py
from .my_pyd_lib import *
the dot in the import make it a relative import useful to make sure that import the thing in the same folder as that file, it also make sure you import your thing if it happens to share a name with some other package/module you happens to have installed
One way to make a pyd file simply importable is to use the Python interpreter's -m flag. For example, if your file is called foo.pyd and is located in the current directory, you can import it by running the following command:
python -m foo
This will cause the Python interpreter to load the module from foo.pyd and then execute its contents as if they were written in a normal .py file. You can also use this technique to import modules that are located in different directories; just specify the path to the module as an argument to -m.
Another way to make a pyd file simply importable is to convert it into a normal .py file.
Related
I know that python mechanism doesn't allow doing relative imports without a known parent package, but I want to know which the reason is.
If relative imports worked without known parent package it would make developers life much easier (I think, correct me if I am wrong)
Example:
From a python script a have to import a global definitions file. Right now I have to do it like this:
DEFS_PATH = '../../../'
sys.path.append(DEFS_PATH)
import DEFINITIONS as defs
If I could import this file just like this without having to specify the -m flag when executing the script or creating a __init__.py file that collects all packages. It would make everything much more easier.
from .... import DEFINITIONS as defs
Of course doing this raises the famous import error:
Obviously this is a toy example, but imagine having to repeat this in hundreds of python scripts...
Is there any workaround for importing relative packages without a known parent package that doesn't involve tha hacky ugly way (sys.path.append(...) or python -m myscript )?
I solved this problem but in a different way. I have a folder where I have lots of global functions that I used in different packages, I could create a Python Package of this folder, however I would have to rebuild it each time I changed something.
The solution that fitted me was to add user-packages.pth file in site-packages directory of my current environment, but it could also be added to global site-packages folder. Inside this user-packages.pth I added the absolute path to my directory where all the global utils are. And now I just have to do from any python script
from utils import data_processing as dp
from utils.database import database_connection as dc
Now I don't need to add in each file sys.path.append("path/to/myutils/")
Note:
The .pth file could have any file name (customName.pth) and paths inside the file should be separated by carriage return ("\n"). Also, paths should be absoulte.
For example:
C:\path\to\utils1
C:\path\to\other\utils2
First, I need to describe the environment I'm writing for. I'm writing Python code that will be loaded and executed by a Python runtime running within a CAD application. The CAD application uses Python as its scripting engine. As a result, I don't have access to the Python runtime and as a good citizen to all other scripts shouldn't modify any system settings. My script is just one of many that are loaded and running.
This all works fine except when I want to use non-standard libraries. In that case, I need to install a local copy of the library for my script to access. The problem I'm having is that most libraries expect to be installed and added to the sys path which is something I shouldn't do because it could create conflicts with what other scripts are doing. What I'm attempting to do instead is to set up a local copy of the library(s) and then edit their source so their imports are relative and they don't depend on the sys path. That way my program will have its own local copy of the libraries and not depend on anything else and won't disturb any other scripts.
I'm using the -t option of PIP to install Requests and PyOpenSSL into a "Packages" subfolder in my script folder. Here's an abbreviated list of what I have.
RequestsTest/
RequestsTest.py
Packages/
OpenSSL/
cryptography/
x509/
__init__.py
base.py
hazmat/
__init__.py
backends/
__init__.py
interfaces.py
openssl/
__init__.py
backend.py
x509.py
OpenSSL/
__init__.py
SSL.py
Requests/
chardet/
__init__.py
requests/
__init__.py
urllib3/
__init__.py
request.py
contrib/
__init__.py
pyopenssl.py
util/
__init__.py
request.py
ssl_.py
Although it's tedious to track down the various import statements and make then relative, it does seem to work. However, I'm having problems with one particular set of imports.
In Packages/Requests/urllib3/contrib/pyopenssl.py it contains the following imports, which I've modified:
from ....OpenSSL.OpenSSL import SSL
from ....OpenSSL.cryptography import x509
They were originally:
from OpenSSL import OpenSSL.SSL
from cryptography import x509
I get the error "ImportError: No module named 'OpenSSL'" for the first line and "ImportError: No module named 'cryptography'" for the second line. I'm fairly certain the path is correct because if I change the number of dots I get the no module named error but it lists the full path of the what it's trying to load and not just the name of the module.
I would appreciate some help with this specific issue but can also use some overall advice of how to set up and use private copies of libraries. Remember that my program is just one of many that the system is loading changing the system or setting up a virtual environment is not an option.
Check out the localimport module, which seems to be a solution for your particular use case. From the README:
Given your Python script, application or plugin comes with a directory that contains modules for import, you can use localimport to keep the global importer state clean.
app.py
res/modules/
some_package/
__init__.py
# app.py
with localimport('res/modules') as _importer:
import some_package
assert 'some_package' not in sys.modules
The tagline is "Isolated import of Python Modules for embedded applications." so it seems pretty relevant.
When using that module, the following may help keep things neat:
Put your actual script logic into its own file.
Have a wrapper script (which will be the one loaded by the CAD software) which does localimport as mentioned in the README then does a relative import of your module. If your module gets big enough maybe put it into its own package and consume it in the same way as everything else (just do from RequestsTest import * in the body of the with localimport(): ....
Try to have a clear boundary between the source code you write and the final organized set of files required to use that source code in the context of the CAD Python runtime. It is OK to have a build/packaging step that creates the localimport script, downloads the required packages, etc. It's better even because then it is automated and not something that was done manually that someone in the future may have to recreate.
I used below solution for importing dependencies.
I found this solution works if I run the code in Pycharm but not in Terminal.
The error message in Terminal is "cannot find graphics.primitive".
I'm using Mac and Python 3.5.
Why I see different behaviors from the Terminal and Pycharm?
How may I make the solution work for both?
http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000393/ch10.html#_solution_169
Making a Hierarchical Package of Modules
Problem
You want to organize your code into a package consisting of a hierarchical collection of modules.
Solution
Making a package structure is simple. Just organize your code as you wish on the file-system and make sure that every directory defines an init.py file. For example:
graphics/
__init__.py
primitive/
__init__.py
line.py
fill.py
text.py
formats/
__init__.py
png.py
jpg.py
Once you have done this, you should be able to perform various import statements, such as the following:
import graphics.primitive.line
from graphics.primitive import line
import graphics.formats.jpg as jpg
You need to make sure that the graphics package is in the Python search path. PyCharm does this by extending sys.path as follows:
import sys
sys.path.extend(['/Users/hackworth/Development/graphics_parent_dir', '/Applications/PyCharm.app/Contents/helpers/pycharm', '/Applications/PyCharm.app/Contents/helpers/pydev'])
You can do the same in your code replacing /Users/hackworth/graphics_parent_dir with the appropriate path, or you can include the full path to graphics_parent_dir in the PYTHONPATH environment variable. See the Python documentation for details.
Another option would be to place the graphics package into a location the is searched by default on your system.
I am experimenting with python, mostly troubleshooting other people's code. I am trying to get a program to run, "path\folderA\program.py".
I am running the program from path\folderA
I am getting an error:
ImportError: No module named fff.ggg.ppp
program.py contains an import:
from fff.ggg.ppp import mmm
In the folder "path\folderB" there are:
"path\folderB\fff\__init__.py"
"path\folderB\fff\ggg"
folder ggg also contains __init__.py, as well as program ppp.py
From reading other posts, like Python error "ImportError: No module named" I understand that having the __init__.py makes a folder a "package" which makes imports from it possible - but it doesn't work, since I am getting an error.
This has been working for other people that worked with these projects, so there is something wrong with my setup.
I read something about the directories having to be in the sys.path. Does that mean I have to add them to the environment variable path ? That would mean adding a lot of directories to the PATH though, so it can't be.
So I also found the following:
import sys
sys.path.append( <path to FolderB> )
But that means changing the code (which has not been necessary for other people) and hard-coding a path to what it is on my local machine - which I shouldn't have to, right ?
I can't visualize it - apparently I am not supposed to change the code and hard-code the physical path to the import module - so how can a program from folderA even know to look in folderB for an import ?
How does the magic of __init__.py work ?
I can't visualize it - apparently I am not supposed to change the code
and hard-code the physical path to the import module - so how can a
program from folderA even know to look in folderB for an import ?
You are correct. Somehow you have to tell python to look for imported modules in folderB. There is no __init__.py magic that lets you import from other folders on your hard drive.
Usually, if you've got various different python packages like that, they work by being installed into python's library. That way they can imported from anywhere. This is usually accomplished by a setup.py script. Check if folderB has one. Run it with python setup.py install.
If that doesn't work, we'll need more information about how this code is structured.
Folder B must be on the sys.path, so you would either need to move mmm to A, or modify sys.path from within A (not sure if that works). __init__.py tells python that the folder is a package, so you could have folders with __init__.py within folders with __init__.py and python treats the folders inside as parts of the parent folder. Check out sympy or almost any large python library and you will find such a structure. It can also contain code to be run on import, but can also be empty.
Let's say I have vtk module in my Python site packages, and from application with own Python distribution I want to access this module.
I tried couple of things like:
import sys
sys.path.append("C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages")
sys.path.append("C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages\vtk")
import vtk
lut = vtk.vtkLookupTable()
but it fails to load module properly:
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'vtkLookupTable'
If I do same from default Python interpreter all is fine.
Now I thought to make a wrapper of vtk in this application site packages, with simple __init__.py resolving paths, so that when I do import vtk it will hopefully load right thing, but I have no experience with Python packages to try to make this work
To put it simple, how can I wrap module from arbitrary folder, in Python site packages by making folder with same name as referenced package and simple __init__.py file?
Remove these lines:
sys.path.append("C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages")
sys.path.append("C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages\vtk")
The site-packages will already be on your python path. Adding a package/folder within that python path (especially at the first level), will just mess with your imports. How is this vtk package structured?
/path/to/site-packages/
vtk/
__init__.py
vtk.py
In this case, to access a function within vtk:
from vtk import vtk
lut = vtk.vtkLookupTable()
It all comes down to how the folder is arranged. You could also do this:
import vtk
lut = vtk.vtk.vtkLookupTable()
Do not try to hack python importing by creating proxy modules simply because you're not understanding how python importing is working. The error was quite clear. The attribute vtkLookupTable did not exist on whatever it was you imported. You imported the wrong thing. Fix it.
You should very very very very rarely have to manipulate the sys.path manually. When you do have to, you should know that it's the right reason - not to work around something you're not fully understanding.
I had trouble with python paths when I first started with python. It can be frustrating, but coming to understand how it works is necessary. What can help you is something like the following:
import vtk
print dir(vtk)
That will print the attributes of vtk, so you can explore exactly what is in the package or module in cases like this where you think you're importing the right thing.
After re-reading your question, it seems like this is a different python install you're talking about. The answer is to install this package into the other python install, or include this package as a top level import by copying the folder into the root level of your application.
"C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages" is already on your python path. So appending path is unnecessary. Remove:
import sys
sys.path.append("C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages")
sys.path.append("C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages\vtk")
Create a new folder called 'vtk\' in "C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages", then create a new python file named __init__.py in "C:\Python27\Lib\site-packages\vtk" and put your own module vtk.py in this directory.
Using:
import vtk
or
from vtk import vtk
to use your own module.