Sphinx: unable to import internal modules - python

My project (written in python 2.7) has a complex structure and most modules are interlinked. There is no direct entry or link to this project to execute. It works as toolbox for other project.
When I tried to use sphinx to create the documentation it is giving error related to "unable to import module.
sample structure:
<workspace>
└── toolbox (main folder)
├── __init__.py
│
├── sub
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── sub1.py
│ └── sub2.py
│
├── subpackageA
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── submoduleA1.py
│ └── submoduleA2.py
│
└── subpackageB
├── __init__.py
├── submoduleB1.py
└── submoduleB2.py code[from sub import sub1
from subpackageA import submoduleA2 and so on]
Is there a way to configure the index.rst or the config.rst to ignore the import module error and give a output document directory like below:
└── toolbox
│
├── sub
│ ├── index
│ ├── sub1.m
│ └── sub2.m
│
├── subpackageA
│ ├── index
│ ├── submoduleA1.m
│ └── submoduleA2.m
│
└── subpackageB
├── index
├── submoduleB1.m
└── submoduleB2.m
I tried adding system path in config.rst
import os
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.abspath('../'))
tried ('../..') or ('..')
even hardcoded the project path.
even tried to use the sphinx.ext.autodoc but getting the same import error.
commands used:
sphinx-apidoc -o doc project/toolbox
make html

Related

Problem importing nested package in Python

Based from a project with the following structure:
.
└── src/
├── main.py
├── PackageA/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── logic.py
│ ├── SubPackageA1/
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ └── util.py
│ └── SubPackageA2/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ └── otherUtil.py
└── PackageB/
├── __init__.py
└── helpers.py
Project structure
It would be possible to import in the file helpers.py the package otherutil.py?
All the combinations I tried until now fail.
If your program is executed from main.py the import in helpers.py should work like this:
from PackageA.SubPackageA2 import otherUtil
Yes, I checked it, main.py:
from PackageB import helpers
print(helpers.HELPERS_UTIL)
otherUtil.py:
OTHER_UTIL = 'test'
helpers.py
from PackageA.SubPackageA2 import otherUtil
HELPERS_UTIL = otherUtil.OTHER_UTIL

Python project structure many main.py endpoints

I currently have the following project structure in python:
| project
├── module_1
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── class_1.py
├── module_2
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── class_2.py
├── main_1.py
├── main_2.py
├── ..
├── main_n.py
├── set_up.py
Because of the vast amount of main files we use to run our scripts, I would like to organise these in different modules within the project (different module based on different usage of the endpoint). I have tried something like below:
| project
├── module_1
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── class_1.py
├── module_2
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── class_2.py
├── endpoints_1
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── main_1.py
│ ├── set_up.py
├── endpoints_2
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── main_2.py
│ ├── set_up.py
The problem that arises however is that I would have to make a different 'set_up.py' file for each of the endpoint modules. In this set_up file I would add the project path to the sys.paths so that all imports work as expected.
So to conclude I have the following two questions:
Is there any way I can have this project structure without having to mess to much with the sys paths and having a custom 'set_up.py' for each module which contains endpoints?
Should I, to begin with, even use this kind of project structure or should I just keep the original structure and not bundle the endpoints in a module ?

No moduled name... with pytest and pytest.ini

Hello I am trying to develop a few tests with python in order to do this I have the following folder structure:
.
├── Pipfile
├── Pipfile.lock
├── src
│ ├── adapters
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── orm.py
│ │ └── repository.py
│ ├── app.py
│ ├── bootstrap.py
│ ├── db.py
│ ├── domain
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ └── settings.py
└── test
├── conftest.py
├── __init__.py
├── integration
│ ├── test_orm.py
│ └── test_repository.py
├── pytest.ini
└── unit
├── test_account.py
├── test_client.py
├── test_commerce.py
└── test_move.py
The pytest.ini contains:
[pytest]
pythonpath = src
The tests are launched with the following command:
python -m pytest -s -v test/
The problem is about import, in the conftest.py I have the following code:
import pytest
from sqlalchemy.orm import clear_mappers
from adapters.orm import start_mappers
#pytest.fixture
def mappers():
start_mappers()
yield
clear_mappers()
The line from adapters.orm import start_mappers fails if I doesn't set src before like this from src.adapters.orm import start_mappers
but if do that, the file inside orm module fails, because it has the relative import:
from domain import Move, Account, Client, Commerce
instead of
from src.domain import Move, Account, Client, Commerce
but if I use this, of course, another thing fails, and the idea is not to use src. suffix in the src code.
So how can I solve this, in order to avoid installing src as a python package, or fill all folders with init.py or put src. in all places?
Thanks.

No Module named utils.utils , utils is not a package

I have a Project where there is a python(.py) file inside a Directory say A, under the folder A , I have a file having the code:
from utils.utils import csv_file_transform
where utils is a sibling directory to A
/A
file.py
/utils
__init__.py
utils.py
but, I am getting a error No Module named utils.utils, utils is not a package
I tried adding the path using sys, but its still giving the same error
import sys
sys.path.append('C:/Users/Sri/Documents/newmod/folder/utils')
The code is working fine in ubuntu but not in windows, I am using a windows system
as much as I don't support link only / reference only answers I reckon that your question is answered best by referencing the existing discussions and providing broader context on Python importing mechanism.
Your Requirements
Are you actually working on creating on Python module? If this is the case, it would be good if you could establish a rigorous structure for your module and follow those guidelines.
Consider the following article by Jason C. McDonald on strutting a hypothetical module omission in Python. Given the following structure:
omission-git
├── LICENSE.md
├── omission
│ ├── app.py
│ ├── common
│ │ ├── classproperty.py
│ │ ├── constants.py
│ │ ├── game_enums.py
│ │ └── __init__.py
│ ├── data
│ │ ├── data_loader.py
│ │ ├── game_round_settings.py
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── scoreboard.py
│ │ └── settings.py
│ ├── game
│ │ ├── content_loader.py
│ │ ├── game_item.py
│ │ ├── game_round.py
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ └── timer.py
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── __main__.py
│ ├── resources
│ └── tests
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── test_game_item.py
│ ├── test_game_round_settings.py
│ ├── test_scoreboard.py
│ ├── test_settings.py
│ ├── test_test.py
│ └── test_timer.py
├── pylintrc
├── README.md
└── .gitignore
Jason would import the modules in a following manner from omission.common.game_enums import GameMode.
Relative Imports
#am5 suggests adding
import os, sys; sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(__file__)))
to your __init__.py files. If you study the related discussion you will observer that views on modifying sys.path are diverse. Some may argue that failed imports and errors like:
ImportError: attempted relative import with no known parent package
are actually indication of code smell. As a solution, which I hope you won't find patronising, I would suggest that you solve your importing challenge by:
a) Deciding on your requirements on how "deep" you want to go into modular architecture.
b) Adopting a corresponding recommended architecture with rigorous approach to module structure
c) Refraining from hard-coding any path via sys.path. Appending relative paths, as outlined above, is not a flawless solution but has some merits and may be worth considering.
Other worthy discussions/artefacts
Best structure for the Python project
Sample project by PyPa (GitHub)
Importing files from different folders

Fix pylance import error by shifting working directory one level up to cover the imported code

I have this structure for my project:
├── Dockerfile
├── app
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── __pycache__
│ ├── config
│ ├── database
│ ├── logging.py
│ ├── main.py
│ ├── routers
│ ├── services
│ ├── static
│ ├── templates
│ ├── utils
│ └── worker
├── k6.js
├── poetry.lock
├── prestart.sh
├── pyproject.toml
├── pytest.ini
└── run.py
Inside app, I have this worker folder that I also open as a kind of separate project.
├── __init__.py
├── database
│ ├── __init__.py
│ └── conn.py
├── engine
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── core
│ ├── data
│ ├── main.py
│ └── utils
├── main.py
├── poetry.lock
├── pyproject.toml
└── run.sh
The issue that I have when I open worker project which uses code from upper directory, pylance gives me an error of an import that could not be resolved. However, this code runs fine and perfect.
I created .vscode/settings.json for the worker project and add these options:
"python.analysis.extraPaths": ["../../app"],
"python.autoComplete.extraPaths": ["../../app"]
But I am still getting these errors! How can I fix this?
These paths fixed my issue:
"python.analysis.extraPaths": ["${workspaceFolder}\\..\\.."],
"python.autoComplete.extraPaths": ["${workspaceFolder}\\..\\.."]

Categories