I have used 4 models to create my project, the multinomial naive Bayes classifier, logistic regression, linear SVC and random forest classifier. I want to show the classification report for all the above classifiers together to compare them in a single graph. They all are used for performing linear classification. My data set contains 5 columns: title, text, subject, date and class. The class can only be "FAKE" or "REAL".
from sklearn.model_selection import TimeSeriesSplit
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from yellowbrick.classifier import ClassificationReport
from yellowbrick.datasets import load_occupancy
X, y = load_occupancy()
classes = ["REAL", "Fake"]
tscv = TimeSeriesSplit()
for train_index, test_index in tscv.split(X):
X_train, X_test = X.iloc[train_index],
X.iloc[test_index]y_train, y_test = y.iloc[train_index], y.iloc[test_index]
model = LogisticRegression()visualizer = ClassificationReport(model, classes=classes, support=True)
visualizer.fit(X_train, y_train)
modelvisualizer.score(X_test, y_test)
datavisualizer.show()
I have used Logistic regression for making the report and plotting a heatmap of the same.
LINK OF IMAGE SCREENSHOT OF HEATMAP OF CLASSIFICATION REPORT USING LOGISTIC REGRESSION.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/yaFX9.png
I have been able to show the classification report using the logistic regression model. But I want to show and compare the classification reports of all the models that I have used together at the same time in the form of a graph.
Related
I am using smote to balanced the output (y) only for Model train but want to test the model with original data as it makes logic how we can test the model with smote created outputs. Please ask anything for clarification if I didn't explained it well. It's my starting on Stack overflow.
from imblearn.over_sampling import SMOTE
oversample = SMOTE()
X_sm, y_sm = oversample.fit_resample(X, y)
# Splitting Dataset into Train and Test (Smote)
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X_sm, y_sm,test_size=0.2,random_state=42)
Here i applied the Random Forest Classifier on my data
import math
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, confusion_matrix
import seaborn as sn
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn import metrics
# RF = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100)
# RF.fit(X_train, y_train.values.ravel())
# y_pred = RF.predict(X)
# print(metrics.classification_report(y,y_pred))
RF = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=10)
RF.fit(X_train, y_train.values.ravel())
If i applied this but X also contains the data which we used for train. how we can remove the data which we already used for training the data.
y_pred = RF.predict(X)
print(metrics.classification_report(y,y_pred))
I used SMOTE in the past, it is suboptimal. Lately, researchers have proven some flaws in the generated distribution of Synthetic Minority Oversample Technique (SMOTE). I know sometimes we don't have a choice regarding the unbalanced classes, but you can use sklearn.ensemble.RandomForestClassifier, where you can define a proper class_weight to handle the unbalanced class problem.
Check scikit-learn documentation:
Scikit-documentation
I agree with razimbres about using class_weight.
Another option for you would be to split the dataset into train and test first. Then, keep the test set aside. Use only the training set from here on:
X_sm, y_sm = oversample.fit_resample(X_train, y_train)
.
.
.
I searched in everywhere but couldn't find a way to do that. I used make_moons() data in my code and run a logistic regression model. After that i created ADABoost Classifier with 4 base classifiers and used logistic regression model for base estimator. My next task is to plot the decision boundary of each base classifiers The output should include 4 decision boundary. How can i plot the decision boundary of each base classifiers?
My code so far :
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.datasets import make_moons
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.ensemble import AdaBoostClassifier
X, y = make_moons(n_samples=100, noise=0.2)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.3, random_state=42)
logisticRegr = LogisticRegression()
logisticRegr.fit(X_train, y_train)
clf= AdaBoostClassifier(logisticRegr,n_estimators=4)
clf.fit(X, y)
The fitted AdaBoostClassifier (clf here) exposes its fitted base estimators in the attribute estimators_, and also defines itself as an iterable (source), so you can just loop over clf to get the base estimators. Then you can just use their decision methods to plot.
I happen to have previously make a notebook that did almost this for a CV.SE question; you can probably get a good start from that.
I'm trying out different classification models using a binary dependent variable (occupied/unoccupied). The models I am interested in are Logistic regression, Decision tree and Gaussian Naïve Bayes.
My input data is a csv-file with a datetime index (e.g. 2019-01-07 14:00), three variable columns ("R", "P", "C", containing numerical values), and the dependent variable column ("value", containing the binary values).
Training the model is not the problem, that all works fine. All the models give me their prediction in binary values (this of course should be the ultimate outcome), but I would also like to see the predicted probabilities which made them decide on either of the binary values. Is there any way to get also these values?
I have tried all of the classification visualizers that function with the yellowbrick package (ClassBalance, ROCAUC, ClassificationReport, ClassPredictionError). But all of these don't give me a graph that shows the calculated probabilities by the model for the data set.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
data = pd.read_csv('testrooms_data.csv', parse_dates=['timestamp'])
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, confusion_matrix, classification_report
##split dataset into test and trainig set
X = data.drop("value", axis=1) # X contains all the features
y = data["value"] # y contains only the label
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size = 0.5, random_state = 1)
###model training
###Logistic Regression###
clf_lr = LogisticRegression()
# fit the dataset into LogisticRegression Classifier
clf_lr.fit(X_train, y_train)
#predict on the unseen data
pred_lr = clf_lr.predict(X_test)
###Decision Tree###
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
clf_dt = DecisionTreeClassifier()
pred_dt = clf_dt.fit(X_train, y_train).predict(X_test)
###Bayes###
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB
bayes = GaussianNB()
pred_bayes = bayes.fit(X_train, y_train).predict(X_test)
###visualization for e.g. LogReg
from yellowbrick.classifier import ClassificationReport
from yellowbrick.classifier import ClassPredictionError
from yellowbrick.classifier import ROCAUC
#classificationreport
visualizer = ClassificationReport(clf_lr, support=True)
visualizer.fit(X_train, y_train) # Fit the visualizer and the model
visualizer.score(X_test, y_test) # Evaluate the model on the test data
g = visualizer.poof() # Draw/show/poof the data
#classprediction report
visualizer2 = ClassPredictionError(LogisticRegression())
visualizer2.fit(X_train, y_train) # Fit the training data to the visualizer
visualizer2.score(X_test, y_test) # Evaluate the model on the test data
g2 = visualizer2.poof() # Draw visualization
#(ROC)
visualizer3 = ROCAUC(LogisticRegression())
visualizer3.fit(X_train, y_train) # Fit the training data to the visualizer
visualizer3.score(X_test, y_test) # Evaluate the model on the test data
g3 = visualizer3.poof() # Draw/show/poof the data
it would be great to have e.g. an array similar to pred_lr that contains the probabilities calculated for each row of the csv file. Is that possible? If yes, how can I get it?
In most sklearn estimators (if not all) you have a method for obtaining the probability that precluded the classification, either in log probability or probability.
For example, if you have your Naive Bayes classifier and you want to obtain probabilities but not classification itself, you could do (I used same nomenclatures as in your code):
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB
bayes = GaussianNB()
pred_bayes = bayes.fit(X_train, y_train).predict(X_test)
#for probabilities
bayes.predict_proba(X_test)
bayes.predict_log_proba(X_test)
Hope this helps.
I'm new to machine learning and trying Sklearn for the first time. I have two dataframes, one with data to train a logistic regression model (with 10-fold cross-validation) and another one to predict classes ('0,1') using that model.
Here's my code so far using bits of tutorials I found on Sklearn docs and on the Web:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import sklearn
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
from sklearn.preprocessing import normalize
from sklearn.preprocessing import scale
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_predict
from sklearn import metrics
# Import dataframe with training data
df = pd.read_csv('summary_44.csv')
cols = df.columns.drop('num_class') # Data to use (num_class is the column with the classes)
# Import dataframe with data to predict
df_pred = pd.read_csv('new_predictions.csv')
# Scores
df_data = df.ix[:,:-1].values
# Target
df_target = df.ix[:,-1].values
# Values to predict
df_test = df_pred.ix[:,:-1].values
# Scores' names
df_data_names = cols.values
# Scaling
X, X_pred, y = scale(df_data), scale(df_test), df_target
# Define number of folds
kf = KFold(n_splits=10)
kf.get_n_splits(X) # returns the number of splitting iterations in the cross-validator
# Logistic regression normalizing variables
LogReg = LogisticRegression()
# 10-fold cross-validation
scores = [LogReg.fit(X[train], y[train]).score(X[test], y[test]) for train, test in kf.split(X)]
print scores
# Predict new
novel = LogReg.predict(X_pred)
Is this the correct way to implement a Logistic Regression?
I know that the fit() method should be used after cross-validation in order to train the model and use it for predictions. However, since I called fit() inside a list comprehension I really don't know if my model was "fitted" and can be used to make predictions.
I general things are okay, but there are some problems.
Scaling
X, X_pred, y = scale(df_data), scale(df_test), df_target
You scale training and test data independently, which isn't correct. Both datasets must be scaled with the same scaler. "Scale" is a simple function, but it is better to use something else, for example StandardScaler.
scaler = StandardScaler()
scaler.fit(df_data)
X = scaler.transform(df_data)
X_pred = scaler.transform(df_test)
Cross-validation and predicting.
How your code works? You split data 10 times into train and hold-out set; 10 times fit model on train set and calculate score on hold-out set. This way you get cross-validation scores, but the model is fitted only on a part of data. So it would be better to fit model on the whole dataset and then make a prediction:
LogReg.fit(X, y)
novel = LogReg.predict(X_pred)
I want to notice that there are advanced technics like stacking and boosting, but if you learn using sklearn, then it is better to stick to the basics.
I'm working on an example of applying Restricted Boltzmann Machine on Iris dataset. Essentially, I'm trying to make a comparison between RMB and LDA. LDA seems to produce a reasonable correct output result, but the RBM isn't. Following a suggestion, I binarized the feature inputs using skearn.preprocessing.Binarizer, and also tried different threshold parameter values. I tried several different ways to apply binarization, but none seemed to work for me.
Below is my modified version of the code based on this user's version User: covariance.
Any helpful comments are greatly appreciated.
from sklearn import linear_model, datasets, preprocessing
from sklearn.cross_validation import train_test_split
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.neural_network import BernoulliRBM
from sklearn.lda import LDA
# import some data to play with
iris = datasets.load_iris()
X = iris.data[:,:2] # we only take the first two features.
Y = iris.target
X_train, X_test, Y_train, Y_test = train_test_split(X, Y, test_size=0.2, random_state=10)
# Models we will use
rbm = BernoulliRBM(random_state=0, verbose=True)
binarizer = preprocessing.Binarizer(threshold=0.01,copy=True)
X_binarized = binarizer.fit_transform(X_train)
hidden_layer = rbm.fit_transform(X_binarized, Y_train)
logistic = linear_model.LogisticRegression()
logistic.coef_ = hidden_layer
classifier = Pipeline(steps=[('rbm', rbm), ('logistic', logistic)])
lda = LDA(n_components=3)
#########################################################################
# Training RBM-Logistic Pipeline
logistic.fit(X_train, Y_train)
classifier.fit(X_binarized, Y_train)
#########################################################################
# Get predictions
print "The RBM model:"
print "Predict: ", classifier.predict(X_test)
print "Real: ", Y_test
print
print "Linear Discriminant Analysis: "
lda.fit(X_train, Y_train)
print "Predict: ", lda.predict(X_test)
print "Real: ", Y_test
RBM and LDA are not directly comparable, as RBM doesn't perform classification on its own. Though you are using it as a feature engineering step with logistic regression at the end, LDA is itself a classifier - so the comparison isn't very meaningful.
The BernoulliRBM in scikit learn only handles binary inputs. The iris dataset has no sensible binarization, so you aren't going to get any meaningful outputs.