I am trying to fix how python plots my data.
Say:
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
matplotlib.pyplot.plot(x,y)
matplotlib.pyplot.show()
The x axis' ticks are plotted in intervals of 5. Is there a way to make it show intervals of 1?
You could explicitly set where you want to tick marks with plt.xticks:
plt.xticks(np.arange(min(x), max(x)+1, 1.0))
For example,
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(np.arange(min(x), max(x)+1, 1.0))
plt.show()
(np.arange was used rather than Python's range function just in case min(x) and max(x) are floats instead of ints.)
The plt.plot (or ax.plot) function will automatically set default x and y limits. If you wish to keep those limits, and just change the stepsize of the tick marks, then you could use ax.get_xlim() to discover what limits Matplotlib has already set.
start, end = ax.get_xlim()
ax.xaxis.set_ticks(np.arange(start, end, stepsize))
The default tick formatter should do a decent job rounding the tick values to a sensible number of significant digits. However, if you wish to have more control over the format, you can define your own formatter. For example,
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FormatStrFormatter('%0.1f'))
Here's a runnable example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x,y)
start, end = ax.get_xlim()
ax.xaxis.set_ticks(np.arange(start, end, 0.712123))
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FormatStrFormatter('%0.1f'))
plt.show()
Another approach is to set the axis locator:
import matplotlib.ticker as plticker
loc = plticker.MultipleLocator(base=1.0) # this locator puts ticks at regular intervals
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(loc)
There are several different types of locator depending upon your needs.
Here is a full example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as plticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x,y)
loc = plticker.MultipleLocator(base=1.0) # this locator puts ticks at regular intervals
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(loc)
plt.show()
I like this solution (from the Matplotlib Plotting Cookbook):
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
tick_spacing = 1
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1,1)
ax.plot(x,y)
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(ticker.MultipleLocator(tick_spacing))
plt.show()
This solution give you explicit control of the tick spacing via the number given to ticker.MultipleLocater(), allows automatic limit determination, and is easy to read later.
In case anyone is interested in a general one-liner, simply get the current ticks and use it to set the new ticks by sampling every other tick.
ax.set_xticks(ax.get_xticks()[::2])
if you just want to set the spacing a simple one liner with minimal boilerplate:
plt.gca().xaxis.set_major_locator(plt.MultipleLocator(1))
also works easily for minor ticks:
plt.gca().xaxis.set_minor_locator(plt.MultipleLocator(1))
a bit of a mouthfull, but pretty compact
This is a bit hacky, but by far the cleanest/easiest to understand example that I've found to do this. It's from an answer on SO here:
Cleanest way to hide every nth tick label in matplotlib colorbar?
for label in ax.get_xticklabels()[::2]:
label.set_visible(False)
Then you can loop over the labels setting them to visible or not depending on the density you want.
edit: note that sometimes matplotlib sets labels == '', so it might look like a label is not present, when in fact it is and just isn't displaying anything. To make sure you're looping through actual visible labels, you could try:
visible_labels = [lab for lab in ax.get_xticklabels() if lab.get_visible() is True and lab.get_text() != '']
plt.setp(visible_labels[::2], visible=False)
This is an old topic, but I stumble over this every now and then and made this function. It's very convenient:
import matplotlib.pyplot as pp
import numpy as np
def resadjust(ax, xres=None, yres=None):
"""
Send in an axis and I fix the resolution as desired.
"""
if xres:
start, stop = ax.get_xlim()
ticks = np.arange(start, stop + xres, xres)
ax.set_xticks(ticks)
if yres:
start, stop = ax.get_ylim()
ticks = np.arange(start, stop + yres, yres)
ax.set_yticks(ticks)
One caveat of controlling the ticks like this is that one does no longer enjoy the interactive automagic updating of max scale after an added line. Then do
gca().set_ylim(top=new_top) # for example
and run the resadjust function again.
I developed an inelegant solution. Consider that we have the X axis and also a list of labels for each point in X.
Example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,1,2,3,4,5]
y = [10,20,15,18,7,19]
xlabels = ['jan','feb','mar','apr','may','jun']
Let's say that I want to show ticks labels only for 'feb' and 'jun'
xlabelsnew = []
for i in xlabels:
if i not in ['feb','jun']:
i = ' '
xlabelsnew.append(i)
else:
xlabelsnew.append(i)
Good, now we have a fake list of labels. First, we plotted the original version.
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(range(0,len(x)),xlabels,rotation=45)
plt.show()
Now, the modified version.
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(range(0,len(x)),xlabelsnew,rotation=45)
plt.show()
Pure Python Implementation
Below's a pure python implementation of the desired functionality that handles any numeric series (int or float) with positive, negative, or mixed values and allows for the user to specify the desired step size:
import math
def computeTicks (x, step = 5):
"""
Computes domain with given step encompassing series x
# params
x - Required - A list-like object of integers or floats
step - Optional - Tick frequency
"""
xMax, xMin = math.ceil(max(x)), math.floor(min(x))
dMax, dMin = xMax + abs((xMax % step) - step) + (step if (xMax % step != 0) else 0), xMin - abs((xMin % step))
return range(dMin, dMax, step)
Sample Output
# Negative to Positive
series = [-2, 18, 24, 29, 43]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[-5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45]
# Negative to 0
series = [-30, -14, -10, -9, -3, 0]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[-30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0]
# 0 to Positive
series = [19, 23, 24, 27]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[15, 20, 25, 30]
# Floats
series = [1.8, 12.0, 21.2]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
# Step – 100
series = [118.3, 293.2, 768.1]
print(list(computeTicks(series, step = 100)))
[100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800]
Sample Usage
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(computeTicks(x))
plt.show()
Notice the x-axis has integer values all evenly spaced by 5, whereas the y-axis has a different interval (the matplotlib default behavior, because the ticks weren't specified).
Generalisable one liner, with only Numpy imported:
ax.set_xticks(np.arange(min(x),max(x),1))
Set in the context of the question:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
ax.plot(x,y)
ax.set_xticks(np.arange(min(x),max(x),1))
plt.show()
How it works:
fig, ax = plt.subplots() gives the ax object which contains the axes.
np.arange(min(x),max(x),1) gives an array of interval 1 from the min of x to the max of x. This is the new x ticks that we want.
ax.set_xticks() changes the ticks on the ax object.
xmarks=[i for i in range(1,length+1,1)]
plt.xticks(xmarks)
This worked for me
if you want ticks between [1,5] (1 and 5 inclusive) then replace
length = 5
Since None of the above solutions worked for my usecase, here I provide a solution using None (pun!) which can be adapted to a wide variety of scenarios.
Here is a sample piece of code that produces cluttered ticks on both X and Y axes.
# Note the super cluttered ticks on both X and Y axis.
# inputs
x = np.arange(1, 101)
y = x * np.log(x)
fig = plt.figure() # create figure
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y)
ax.set_xticks(x) # set xtick values
ax.set_yticks(y) # set ytick values
plt.show()
Now, we clean up the clutter with a new plot that shows only a sparse set of values on both x and y axes as ticks.
# inputs
x = np.arange(1, 101)
y = x * np.log(x)
fig = plt.figure() # create figure
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y)
ax.set_xticks(x)
ax.set_yticks(y)
# which values need to be shown?
# here, we show every third value from `x` and `y`
show_every = 3
sparse_xticks = [None] * x.shape[0]
sparse_xticks[::show_every] = x[::show_every]
sparse_yticks = [None] * y.shape[0]
sparse_yticks[::show_every] = y[::show_every]
ax.set_xticklabels(sparse_xticks, fontsize=6) # set sparse xtick values
ax.set_yticklabels(sparse_yticks, fontsize=6) # set sparse ytick values
plt.show()
Depending on the usecase, one can adapt the above code simply by changing show_every and using that for sampling tick values for X or Y or both the axes.
If this stepsize based solution doesn't fit, then one can also populate the values of sparse_xticks or sparse_yticks at irregular intervals, if that is what is desired.
You can loop through labels and show or hide those you want:
for i, label in enumerate(ax.get_xticklabels()):
if i % interval != 0:
label.set_visible(False)
Related
With matplotlib when a log scale is specified for an axis, the default method of labeling that axis is with numbers that are 10 to a power eg. 10^6. Is there an easy way to change all of these labels to be their full numerical representation? eg. 1, 10, 100, etc.
Note that I do not know what the range of powers will be and want to support an arbitrary range (negatives included).
Sure, just change the formatter.
For example, if we have this plot:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.axis([1, 10000, 1, 100000])
ax.loglog()
plt.show()
You could set the tick labels manually, but then the tick locations and labels would be fixed when you zoom/pan/etc. Therefore, it's best to change the formatter. By default, a logarithmic scale uses a LogFormatter, which will format the values in scientific notation. To change the formatter to the default for linear axes (ScalarFormatter) use e.g.
from matplotlib.ticker import ScalarFormatter
for axis in [ax.xaxis, ax.yaxis]:
axis.set_major_formatter(ScalarFormatter())
I've found that using ScalarFormatter is great if all your tick values are greater than or equal to 1. However, if you have a tick at a number <1, the ScalarFormatter prints the tick label as 0.
We can use a FuncFormatter from the matplotlib ticker module to fix this issue. The simplest way to do this is with a lambda function and the g format specifier (thanks to #lenz in comments).
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FuncFormatter(lambda y, _: '{:g}'.format(y)))
Note in my original answer I didn't use the g format, instead I came up with this lambda function with FuncFormatter to set numbers >= 1 to their integer value, and numbers <1 to their decimal value, with the minimum number of decimal places required (i.e. 0.1, 0.01, 0.001, etc). It assumes that you are only setting ticks on the base10 values.
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
import numpy as np
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FuncFormatter(lambda y,pos: ('{{:.{:1d}f}}'.format(int(np.maximum(-np.log10(y),0)))).format(y)))
For clarity, here's that lambda function written out in a more verbose, but also more understandable, way:
def myLogFormat(y,pos):
# Find the number of decimal places required
decimalplaces = int(np.maximum(-np.log10(y),0)) # =0 for numbers >=1
# Insert that number into a format string
formatstring = '{{:.{:1d}f}}'.format(decimalplaces)
# Return the formatted tick label
return formatstring.format(y)
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FuncFormatter(myLogFormat))
I found Joe's and Tom's answers very helpful, but there are a lot of useful details in the comments on those answers. Here's a summary of the two scenarios:
Ranges above 1
Here's the example code like Joe's, but with a higher range:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.axis([1, 10000, 1, 1000000])
ax.loglog()
plt.show()
That shows a plot like this, using scientific notation:
As in Joe's answer, I use a ScalarFormatter, but I also call set_scientific(False). That's necessary when the scale goes up to 1000000 or above.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.ticker import ScalarFormatter
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.axis([1, 10000, 1, 1000000])
ax.loglog()
for axis in [ax.xaxis, ax.yaxis]:
formatter = ScalarFormatter()
formatter.set_scientific(False)
axis.set_major_formatter(formatter)
plt.show()
Ranges below 1
As in Tom's answer, here's what happens when the range goes below 1:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.ticker import ScalarFormatter
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.axis([0.01, 10000, 1, 1000000])
ax.loglog()
for axis in [ax.xaxis, ax.yaxis]:
formatter = ScalarFormatter()
formatter.set_scientific(False)
axis.set_major_formatter(formatter)
plt.show()
That displays the first two ticks on the x axis as zeroes.
Switching to a FuncFormatter handles that. Again, I had problems with numbers 1000000 or higher, but adding a precision to the format string solved it.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.ticker import FuncFormatter
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.axis([0.01, 10000, 1, 1000000])
ax.loglog()
for axis in [ax.xaxis, ax.yaxis]:
formatter = FuncFormatter(lambda y, _: '{:.16g}'.format(y))
axis.set_major_formatter(formatter)
plt.show()
regarding these questions
What if I wanted to change the numbers to, 1, 5, 10, 20?
– aloha Jul 10 '15 at 13:26
I would like to add ticks in between, like 50,200, etc.., How can I do
that? I tried, set_xticks[50.0,200.0] but that doesn't seem to work!
– ThePredator Aug 3 '15 at 12:54
But with ax.axis([1, 100, 1, 100]), ScalarFormatter gives 1.0, 10.0, ... which is not what I desire. I want it to give integers...
– CPBL Dec 7 '15 at 20:22
you can solve those issue like this with MINOR formatter:
ax.yaxis.set_minor_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter())
ax.yaxis.set_minor_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.FormatStrFormatter("%.8f"))
ax.set_yticks([0.00000025, 0.00000015, 0.00000035])
in my application I'm using this format scheme, which I think solves most issues related to log scalar formatting; the same could be done for data > 1.0 or x axis formatting:
plt.ylabel('LOGARITHMIC PRICE SCALE')
plt.yscale('log')
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter())
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.FormatStrFormatter("%.8f"))
ax.yaxis.set_minor_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter())
ax.yaxis.set_minor_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.FormatStrFormatter("%.8f"))
#####################################################
#force 'autoscale'
#####################################################
yd = [] #matrix of y values from all lines on plot
for n in range(len(plt.gca().get_lines())):
line = plt.gca().get_lines()[n]
yd.append((line.get_ydata()).tolist())
yd = [item for sublist in yd for item in sublist]
ymin, ymax = np.min(yd), np.max(yd)
ax.set_ylim([0.9*ymin, 1.1*ymax])
#####################################################
z = []
for i in [0.0000001, 0.00000015, 0.00000025, 0.00000035,
0.000001, 0.0000015, 0.0000025, 0.0000035,
0.00001, 0.000015, 0.000025, 0.000035,
0.0001, 0.00015, 0.00025, 0.00035,
0.001, 0.0015, 0.0025, 0.0035,
0.01, 0.015, 0.025, 0.035,
0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.35]:
if ymin<i<ymax:
z.append(i)
ax.set_yticks(z)
for comments on "force autoscale" see: Python matplotlib logarithmic autoscale
which yields:
then to create a general use machine:
# user controls
#####################################################
sub_ticks = [10,11,12,14,16,18,22,25,35,45] # fill these midpoints
sub_range = [-8,8] # from 100000000 to 0.000000001
format = "%.8f" # standard float string formatting
# set scalar and string format floats
#####################################################
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter())
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.FormatStrFormatter(format))
ax.yaxis.set_minor_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter())
ax.yaxis.set_minor_formatter(matplotlib.ticker.FormatStrFormatter(format))
#force 'autoscale'
#####################################################
yd = [] #matrix of y values from all lines on plot
for n in range(len(plt.gca().get_lines())):
line = plt.gca().get_lines()[n]
yd.append((line.get_ydata()).tolist())
yd = [item for sublist in yd for item in sublist]
ymin, ymax = np.min(yd), np.max(yd)
ax.set_ylim([0.9*ymin, 1.1*ymax])
# add sub minor ticks
#####################################################
set_sub_formatter=[]
for i in sub_ticks:
for j in range(sub_range[0],sub_range[1]):
set_sub_formatter.append(i*10**j)
k = []
for l in set_sub_formatter:
if ymin<l<ymax:
k.append(l)
ax.set_yticks(k)
#####################################################
yields:
The machinery outlined in the accepted answer works great, but sometimes a simple manual override is easier. To get ticks at 1, 10, 100, 1000, for example, you could say:
ticks = 10**np.arange(4)
plt.xticks(ticks, ticks)
Note that it is critical to specify both the locations and the labels, otherwise matplotlib will ignore you.
This mechanism can be used to obtain arbitrary formatting. For instance:
plt.xticks(ticks, [ f"{x:.0f}" for x in ticks ])
or
plt.xticks(ticks, [ f"10^{int(np.log10(x))}" for x in ticks ])
or
plt.xticks(ticks, [ romannumerals(x) for x in ticks ])
(where romannumerals is an imagined function that converts its argument into Roman numerals).
As an aside, this technique also works if you want ticks at arbitrary intervals, e.g.,
ticks = [1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100]
etc.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.rcParams['axes.formatter.min_exponent'] = 2
plt.xlim(1e-5, 1e5)
plt.loglog()
plt.show()
This will become default for all plots in a session.
See also: LogFormatter tickmarks scientific format limits
I want to make some modifications to a few selected tick labels in a plot.
For example, if I do:
label = axes.yaxis.get_major_ticks()[2].label
label.set_fontsize(size)
label.set_rotation('vertical')
the font size and the orientation of the tick label is changed.
However, if try:
label.set_text('Foo')
the tick label is not modified. Also if I do:
print label.get_text()
nothing is printed.
Here's some more strangeness. When I tried this:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
axes = plt.figure().add_subplot(111)
t = np.arange(0.0, 2.0, 0.01)
s = np.sin(2*np.pi*t)
axes.plot(t, s)
for ticklabel in axes.get_xticklabels():
print(ticklabel.get_text())
Only empty strings are printed, but the plot contains ticks labeled as '0.0', '0.5', '1.0', '1.5', and '2.0'.
Caveat: Unless the ticklabels are already set to a string (as is usually the case in e.g. a boxplot), this will not work with any version of matplotlib newer than 1.1.0. If you're working from the current github master, this won't work. I'm not sure what the problem is yet... It may be an unintended change, or it may not be...
Normally, you'd do something along these lines:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
# We need to draw the canvas, otherwise the labels won't be positioned and
# won't have values yet.
fig.canvas.draw()
labels = [item.get_text() for item in ax.get_xticklabels()]
labels[1] = 'Testing'
ax.set_xticklabels(labels)
plt.show()
To understand the reason why you need to jump through so many hoops, you need to understand a bit more about how matplotlib is structured.
Matplotlib deliberately avoids doing "static" positioning of ticks, etc, unless it's explicitly told to. The assumption is that you'll want to interact with the plot, and so the bounds of the plot, ticks, ticklabels, etc will be dynamically changing.
Therefore, you can't just set the text of a given tick label. By default, it's re-set by the axis's Locator and Formatter every time the plot is drawn.
However, if the Locators and Formatters are set to be static (FixedLocator and FixedFormatter, respectively), then the tick labels stay the same.
This is what set_*ticklabels or ax.*axis.set_ticklabels does.
Hopefully that makes it slighly more clear as to why changing an individual tick label is a bit convoluted.
Often, what you actually want to do is just annotate a certain position. In that case, look into annotate, instead.
One can also do this with pylab and xticks
import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,1,2]
y = [90,40,65]
labels = ['high', 'low', 37337]
plt.plot(x,y, 'r')
plt.xticks(x, labels, rotation='vertical')
plt.show()
https://matplotlib.org/stable/gallery/ticks_and_spines/ticklabels_rotation.html
In newer versions of matplotlib, if you do not set the tick labels with a bunch of str values, they are '' by default (and when the plot is draw the labels are simply the ticks values). Knowing that, to get your desired output would require something like this:
>>> from pylab import *
>>> axes = figure().add_subplot(111)
>>> a=axes.get_xticks().tolist()
>>> a[1]='change'
>>> axes.set_xticklabels(a)
[<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x539aa50>, <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53a0c90>,
<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53a73d0>, <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53a7a50>,
<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53aa110>, <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53aa790>]
>>> plt.show()
and the result:
and now if you check the _xticklabels, they are no longer a bunch of ''.
>>> [item.get_text() for item in axes.get_xticklabels()]
['0.0', 'change', '1.0', '1.5', '2.0']
It works in the versions from 1.1.1rc1 to the current version 2.0.
It's been a while since this question was asked. As of today (matplotlib 2.2.2) and after some reading and trials, I think the best/proper way is the following:
Matplotlib has a module named ticker that "contains classes to support completely configurable tick locating and formatting". To modify a specific tick from the plot, the following works for me:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as mticker
import numpy as np
def update_ticks(x, pos):
if x == 0:
return 'Mean'
elif pos == 6:
return 'pos is 6'
else:
return x
data = np.random.normal(0, 1, 1000)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.hist(data, bins=25, edgecolor='black')
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(mticker.FuncFormatter(update_ticks))
plt.show()
Caveat! x is the value of the tick and pos is its relative position in order in the axis. Notice that pos takes values starting in 1, not in 0 as usual when indexing.
In my case, I was trying to format the y-axis of a histogram with percentage values. mticker has another class named PercentFormatter that can do this easily without the need to define a separate function as before:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as mticker
import numpy as np
data = np.random.normal(0, 1, 1000)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
weights = np.ones_like(data) / len(data)
ax.hist(data, bins=25, weights=weights, edgecolor='black')
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(mticker.PercentFormatter(xmax=1.0, decimals=1))
plt.show()
In this case xmax is the data value that corresponds to 100%. Percentages are computed as x / xmax * 100, that's why we fix xmax=1.0. Also, decimals is the number of decimal places to place after the point.
This works:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax1 = plt.subplots(1,1)
x1 = [0,1,2,3]
squad = ['Fultz','Embiid','Dario','Simmons']
ax1.set_xticks(x1)
ax1.set_xticklabels(squad, minor=False, rotation=45)
The axes class has a set_yticklabels function which allows you to set the tick labels, like so:
#ax is the axes instance
group_labels = ['control', 'cold treatment',
'hot treatment', 'another treatment',
'the last one']
ax.set_xticklabels(group_labels)
I'm still working on why your example above didn't work.
This also works in matplotlib 3:
x1 = [0,1,2,3]
squad = ['Fultz','Embiid','Dario','Simmons']
plt.xticks(x1, squad, rotation=45)
If you do not work with fig and ax and you want to modify all labels (e.g. for normalization) you can do this:
labels, locations = plt.yticks()
plt.yticks(labels, labels/max(labels))
Try this :
fig,axis = plt.subplots(nrows=1,ncols=1,figsize=(13,6),sharex=True)
axis.set_xticklabels(['0', 'testing', '10000', '20000', '30000'],fontsize=22)
I noticed that all the solutions posted here that use set_xticklabels() are not preserving the offset, which is a scaling factor applied to the ticks values to create better-looking tick labels. For instance, if the ticks are on the order of 0.00001 (1e-5), matplotlib will automatically add a scaling factor (or offset) of 1e-5, so the resultant tick labels may end up as 1 2 3 4, rather than 1e-5 2e-5 3e-5 4e-5.
Below gives an example:
The x array is np.array([1, 2, 3, 4])/1e6, and y is y=x**2. So both are very small values.
Left column: manually change the 1st and 3rd labels, as suggested by #Joe Kington. Note that the offset is lost.
Mid column: similar as #iipr suggested, using a FuncFormatter.
Right column: My suggested offset-preserving solution.
Figure here:
Complete code here:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# create some *small* data to plot
x = np.arange(5)/1e6
y = x**2
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(10,6))
#------------------The set_xticklabels() solution------------------
ax1 = axes[0]
ax1.plot(x, y)
fig.canvas.draw()
labels = [item.get_text() for item in ax1.get_xticklabels()]
# Modify specific labels
labels[1] = 'Testing'
labels[3] = 'Testing2'
ax1.set_xticklabels(labels)
ax1.set_title('set_xticklabels()')
#--------------FuncFormatter solution--------------
import matplotlib.ticker as mticker
def update_ticks(x, pos):
if pos==1:
return 'testing'
elif pos==3:
return 'testing2'
else:
return x
ax2=axes[1]
ax2.plot(x,y)
ax2.xaxis.set_major_formatter(mticker.FuncFormatter(update_ticks))
ax2.set_title('Func Formatter')
#-------------------My solution-------------------
def changeLabels(axis, pos, newlabels):
'''Change specific x/y tick labels
Args:
axis (Axis): .xaxis or .yaxis obj.
pos (list): indices for labels to change.
newlabels (list): new labels corresponding to indices in <pos>.
'''
if len(pos) != len(newlabels):
raise Exception("Length of <pos> doesn't equal that of <newlabels>.")
ticks = axis.get_majorticklocs()
# get the default tick formatter
formatter = axis.get_major_formatter()
# format the ticks into strings
labels = formatter.format_ticks(ticks)
# Modify specific labels
for pii, lii in zip(pos, newlabels):
labels[pii] = lii
# Update the ticks and ticklabels. Order is important here.
# Need to first get the offset (1e-6 in this case):
offset = formatter.get_offset()
# Then set the modified labels:
axis.set_ticklabels(labels)
# In doing so, matplotlib creates a new FixedFormatter and sets it to the xaxis
# and the new FixedFormatter has no offset. So we need to query the
# formatter again and re-assign the offset:
axis.get_major_formatter().set_offset_string(offset)
return
ax3 = axes[2]
ax3.plot(x, y)
changeLabels(ax3.xaxis, [1, 3], ['Testing', 'Testing2'])
ax3.set_title('With offset')
fig.show()
plt.savefig('tick_labels.png')
Caveat: it appears that solutions that use set_xticklabels(), including my own, relies on FixedFormatter, which is static and doesn't respond to figure resizing. To observe the effect, change the figure to a smaller size, e.g. fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(6,6)) and enlarge the figure window. You will notice that that only the mid column responds to resizing and adds more ticks as the figure gets larger. The left and right column will have empty tick labels (see figure below).
Caveat 2: I also noticed that if your tick values are floats, calling set_xticklabels(ticks) directly might give you ugly-looking strings, like 1.499999999998 instead of 1.5.
Here we are intending to modify some of the tick labels in Matplotlib but with no side effects, which works clean and which preserves offset scientific notations. None of the issues discussed in some of the other answers are faced in this solution.
import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from matplotlib import rcParams
rcParams['axes.formatter.use_mathtext'] = True
class CustomScalarFormatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter):
def __init__(self, useOffset=None, useMathText=None, useLocale=None, replace_values=([],[])):
super().__init__(useOffset=None, useMathText=None, useLocale=None)
self.replace_values = replace_values
def __call__(self, x, pos=None):
"""
Return the format for tick value *x* at position *pos*.
"""
if len(self.locs) == 0:
return ''
elif x in self.replace_values[0]:
idx = self.replace_values[0].index(x)
return str(self.replace_values[1][idx])
else:
xp = (x - self.offset) / (10. ** self.orderOfMagnitude)
if abs(xp) < 1e-8:
xp = 0
return self._format_maybe_minus_and_locale(self.format, xp)
z = np.linspace(0, 5000, 100)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
xmajorformatter = CustomScalarFormatter(replace_values=([2000,0],['$x_0$','']))
ymajorformatter = CustomScalarFormatter(replace_values=([1E7,0],['$y_0$','']))
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(xmajorformatter)
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(ymajorformatter)
ax.plot(z,z**2)
plt.show()
What we have done here is we created a derivative class of matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter class which matplotlib uses by default to format the labels. The code is copied from matplotlib source but only __call__ function is copied and modified in it. Following
elif x in self.replace_values[0]:
idx = self.replace_values[0].index(x)
return str(self.replace_values[1][idx])
are the new lines added to the __call__ function which do the replacement job. The advantage of a derived class is that it inherits all the features from the base class like offset notation, scientific notation labels if values are large. The result is:
matplotlib.axes.Axes.set_xticks, or matplotlib.axes.Axes.set_yticks for the y-axis, can be used to change the ticks and labels beginning with matplotlib 3.5.0. These are for the object oriented interface.
If using the pyplot state-based interface, use plt.xticks or plt.yticks, as shown in other answers.
In general terms, pass a list / array of numbers to the ticks parameter, and a list / array strings to the labels parameter.
In this case, the x-axis is comprised of continuous numeric values, so there are no set Text labels, as thoroughly explained in this answer. This is not the case when plots have discrete ticks (e.g. boxplot, barplot).
[Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, '')] is returned by ax.get_xticklabels()
[-0.25 0. 0.25 0.5 0.75 1. 1.25 1.5 1.75 2. 2.25] is returned by ax.get_xticks()
type(ax.get_xticks()) is <class 'numpy.ndarray'>
type(ax.get_xticks()[0]) is <class 'numpy.float64'>
Since the OP is trying to replace a numeric label with a str, all of the values in the ndarray must be converted to str type, and the value to be changed can be updated.
Tested in python 3.10 and matplotlib 3.5.2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# create figure and axes
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 6))
# plot data
t = np.arange(0.0, 2.0, 0.01)
s = np.sin(2*np.pi*t)
# plot
ax.plot(t, s)
# get the xticks, which are the numeric location of the ticks
xticks = ax.get_xticks()
# get the xticks and convert the values in the array to str type
xticklabels = list(map(str, ax.get_xticks()))
# update the string to be changed
xticklabels[1] = 'Test'
# set the xticks and the labels
_ = ax.set_xticks(xticks, xticklabels)
Note the x-axis offset is not preserved when changing the xticklabels. However, the correct value is shown without the offset.
# create figure and axes
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(8, 6), sharex=False)
# plot data
t = np.linspace(0, 1500000, 100)
s = t**2
# plot
ax1.plot(t, s)
ax2.plot(t, s)
# get the xticks, which are the numeric location of the ticks
xticks = ax2.get_xticks()
# get the xticks and convert the values in the array to str type
xticklabels = list(map(str, ax2.get_xticks()))
# update the string to be changed
xticklabels[1] = 'Test'
# set the xticks and the labels
_ = ax2.set_xticks(xticks, xticklabels, rotation=90)
you can do:
for k in ax.get_xmajorticklabels():
if some-condition:
k.set_color(any_colour_you_like)
draw()
I am preparing a graph of latency percentile results. This is my pd.DataFrame looks like:
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
%matplotlib inline
result = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(133000, size=(5,3)), columns=list('ABC'), index=[99.0, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999, 99.9999])
I am using this function (commented lines are different pyplot methods I have already tried to achieve my goal):
def plot_latency_time_bar(result):
ind = np.arange(4)
means = []
stds = []
for index, row in result.iterrows():
means.append(np.mean([row[0]//1000, row[1]//1000, row[2]//1000]))
stds.append(np .std([row[0]//1000, row[1]//1000, row[2]//1000]))
plt.bar(result.index.values, means, 0.2, yerr=stds, align='center')
plt.xlabel('Percentile')
plt.ylabel('Latency')
plt.xticks(result.index.values)
# plt.xticks(ind, ('99.0', '99.9', '99.99', '99.999', '99.99999'))
# plt.autoscale(enable=False, axis='x', tight=False)
# plt.axis('auto')
# plt.margins(0.8, 0)
# plt.semilogx(basex=5)
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1.05, 1), loc=2, borderaxespad=0.)
fig = plt.gcf()
fig.set_size_inches(15.5, 10.5)
And here is the figure:
As you can see bars for all percentiles above 99.0 overlaps and are completely unreadable. I would like to set some fixed space between ticks to have a same space between all of them.
Since you're using pandas, you can do all this from within that library:
means = df.mean(axis=1)/1000
stds = df.std(axis=1)/1000
means.plot.bar(yerr=stds, fc='b')
# Make some room for the x-axis tick labels
plt.subplots_adjust(bottom=0.2)
plt.show()
Not wishing to take anything away from xnx's answer (which is the most elegant way to do things given that you're working in pandas, and therefore likely the best answer for you) but the key insight you're missing is that, in matplotlib, the x positions of the data you're plotting and the x tick labels are independent things. If you say:
nominalX = np.arange( 1, 6 ) ** 2
y = np.arange( 1, 6 ) ** 4
positionalX = np.arange(len(y))
plt.bar( positionalX, y ) # graph y against the numbers 1..n
plt.gca().set(xticks=positionalX + 0.4, xticklabels=nominalX) # ...but superficially label the X values as something else
then that's different from tying positions to your nominal X values:
plt.bar( nominalX, y )
Note that I added 0.4 to the x position of the ticks, because that's half the default width of the bars bar( ..., width=0.8 )—so the ticks end up in the middle of the bar.
I want to make some modifications to a few selected tick labels in a plot.
For example, if I do:
label = axes.yaxis.get_major_ticks()[2].label
label.set_fontsize(size)
label.set_rotation('vertical')
the font size and the orientation of the tick label is changed.
However, if try:
label.set_text('Foo')
the tick label is not modified. Also if I do:
print label.get_text()
nothing is printed.
Here's some more strangeness. When I tried this:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
axes = plt.figure().add_subplot(111)
t = np.arange(0.0, 2.0, 0.01)
s = np.sin(2*np.pi*t)
axes.plot(t, s)
for ticklabel in axes.get_xticklabels():
print(ticklabel.get_text())
Only empty strings are printed, but the plot contains ticks labeled as '0.0', '0.5', '1.0', '1.5', and '2.0'.
Caveat: Unless the ticklabels are already set to a string (as is usually the case in e.g. a boxplot), this will not work with any version of matplotlib newer than 1.1.0. If you're working from the current github master, this won't work. I'm not sure what the problem is yet... It may be an unintended change, or it may not be...
Normally, you'd do something along these lines:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
# We need to draw the canvas, otherwise the labels won't be positioned and
# won't have values yet.
fig.canvas.draw()
labels = [item.get_text() for item in ax.get_xticklabels()]
labels[1] = 'Testing'
ax.set_xticklabels(labels)
plt.show()
To understand the reason why you need to jump through so many hoops, you need to understand a bit more about how matplotlib is structured.
Matplotlib deliberately avoids doing "static" positioning of ticks, etc, unless it's explicitly told to. The assumption is that you'll want to interact with the plot, and so the bounds of the plot, ticks, ticklabels, etc will be dynamically changing.
Therefore, you can't just set the text of a given tick label. By default, it's re-set by the axis's Locator and Formatter every time the plot is drawn.
However, if the Locators and Formatters are set to be static (FixedLocator and FixedFormatter, respectively), then the tick labels stay the same.
This is what set_*ticklabels or ax.*axis.set_ticklabels does.
Hopefully that makes it slighly more clear as to why changing an individual tick label is a bit convoluted.
Often, what you actually want to do is just annotate a certain position. In that case, look into annotate, instead.
One can also do this with pylab and xticks
import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,1,2]
y = [90,40,65]
labels = ['high', 'low', 37337]
plt.plot(x,y, 'r')
plt.xticks(x, labels, rotation='vertical')
plt.show()
https://matplotlib.org/stable/gallery/ticks_and_spines/ticklabels_rotation.html
In newer versions of matplotlib, if you do not set the tick labels with a bunch of str values, they are '' by default (and when the plot is draw the labels are simply the ticks values). Knowing that, to get your desired output would require something like this:
>>> from pylab import *
>>> axes = figure().add_subplot(111)
>>> a=axes.get_xticks().tolist()
>>> a[1]='change'
>>> axes.set_xticklabels(a)
[<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x539aa50>, <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53a0c90>,
<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53a73d0>, <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53a7a50>,
<matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53aa110>, <matplotlib.text.Text object at 0x53aa790>]
>>> plt.show()
and the result:
and now if you check the _xticklabels, they are no longer a bunch of ''.
>>> [item.get_text() for item in axes.get_xticklabels()]
['0.0', 'change', '1.0', '1.5', '2.0']
It works in the versions from 1.1.1rc1 to the current version 2.0.
It's been a while since this question was asked. As of today (matplotlib 2.2.2) and after some reading and trials, I think the best/proper way is the following:
Matplotlib has a module named ticker that "contains classes to support completely configurable tick locating and formatting". To modify a specific tick from the plot, the following works for me:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as mticker
import numpy as np
def update_ticks(x, pos):
if x == 0:
return 'Mean'
elif pos == 6:
return 'pos is 6'
else:
return x
data = np.random.normal(0, 1, 1000)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.hist(data, bins=25, edgecolor='black')
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(mticker.FuncFormatter(update_ticks))
plt.show()
Caveat! x is the value of the tick and pos is its relative position in order in the axis. Notice that pos takes values starting in 1, not in 0 as usual when indexing.
In my case, I was trying to format the y-axis of a histogram with percentage values. mticker has another class named PercentFormatter that can do this easily without the need to define a separate function as before:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as mticker
import numpy as np
data = np.random.normal(0, 1, 1000)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
weights = np.ones_like(data) / len(data)
ax.hist(data, bins=25, weights=weights, edgecolor='black')
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(mticker.PercentFormatter(xmax=1.0, decimals=1))
plt.show()
In this case xmax is the data value that corresponds to 100%. Percentages are computed as x / xmax * 100, that's why we fix xmax=1.0. Also, decimals is the number of decimal places to place after the point.
This works:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax1 = plt.subplots(1,1)
x1 = [0,1,2,3]
squad = ['Fultz','Embiid','Dario','Simmons']
ax1.set_xticks(x1)
ax1.set_xticklabels(squad, minor=False, rotation=45)
The axes class has a set_yticklabels function which allows you to set the tick labels, like so:
#ax is the axes instance
group_labels = ['control', 'cold treatment',
'hot treatment', 'another treatment',
'the last one']
ax.set_xticklabels(group_labels)
I'm still working on why your example above didn't work.
This also works in matplotlib 3:
x1 = [0,1,2,3]
squad = ['Fultz','Embiid','Dario','Simmons']
plt.xticks(x1, squad, rotation=45)
If you do not work with fig and ax and you want to modify all labels (e.g. for normalization) you can do this:
labels, locations = plt.yticks()
plt.yticks(labels, labels/max(labels))
Try this :
fig,axis = plt.subplots(nrows=1,ncols=1,figsize=(13,6),sharex=True)
axis.set_xticklabels(['0', 'testing', '10000', '20000', '30000'],fontsize=22)
I noticed that all the solutions posted here that use set_xticklabels() are not preserving the offset, which is a scaling factor applied to the ticks values to create better-looking tick labels. For instance, if the ticks are on the order of 0.00001 (1e-5), matplotlib will automatically add a scaling factor (or offset) of 1e-5, so the resultant tick labels may end up as 1 2 3 4, rather than 1e-5 2e-5 3e-5 4e-5.
Below gives an example:
The x array is np.array([1, 2, 3, 4])/1e6, and y is y=x**2. So both are very small values.
Left column: manually change the 1st and 3rd labels, as suggested by #Joe Kington. Note that the offset is lost.
Mid column: similar as #iipr suggested, using a FuncFormatter.
Right column: My suggested offset-preserving solution.
Figure here:
Complete code here:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# create some *small* data to plot
x = np.arange(5)/1e6
y = x**2
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(10,6))
#------------------The set_xticklabels() solution------------------
ax1 = axes[0]
ax1.plot(x, y)
fig.canvas.draw()
labels = [item.get_text() for item in ax1.get_xticklabels()]
# Modify specific labels
labels[1] = 'Testing'
labels[3] = 'Testing2'
ax1.set_xticklabels(labels)
ax1.set_title('set_xticklabels()')
#--------------FuncFormatter solution--------------
import matplotlib.ticker as mticker
def update_ticks(x, pos):
if pos==1:
return 'testing'
elif pos==3:
return 'testing2'
else:
return x
ax2=axes[1]
ax2.plot(x,y)
ax2.xaxis.set_major_formatter(mticker.FuncFormatter(update_ticks))
ax2.set_title('Func Formatter')
#-------------------My solution-------------------
def changeLabels(axis, pos, newlabels):
'''Change specific x/y tick labels
Args:
axis (Axis): .xaxis or .yaxis obj.
pos (list): indices for labels to change.
newlabels (list): new labels corresponding to indices in <pos>.
'''
if len(pos) != len(newlabels):
raise Exception("Length of <pos> doesn't equal that of <newlabels>.")
ticks = axis.get_majorticklocs()
# get the default tick formatter
formatter = axis.get_major_formatter()
# format the ticks into strings
labels = formatter.format_ticks(ticks)
# Modify specific labels
for pii, lii in zip(pos, newlabels):
labels[pii] = lii
# Update the ticks and ticklabels. Order is important here.
# Need to first get the offset (1e-6 in this case):
offset = formatter.get_offset()
# Then set the modified labels:
axis.set_ticklabels(labels)
# In doing so, matplotlib creates a new FixedFormatter and sets it to the xaxis
# and the new FixedFormatter has no offset. So we need to query the
# formatter again and re-assign the offset:
axis.get_major_formatter().set_offset_string(offset)
return
ax3 = axes[2]
ax3.plot(x, y)
changeLabels(ax3.xaxis, [1, 3], ['Testing', 'Testing2'])
ax3.set_title('With offset')
fig.show()
plt.savefig('tick_labels.png')
Caveat: it appears that solutions that use set_xticklabels(), including my own, relies on FixedFormatter, which is static and doesn't respond to figure resizing. To observe the effect, change the figure to a smaller size, e.g. fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(6,6)) and enlarge the figure window. You will notice that that only the mid column responds to resizing and adds more ticks as the figure gets larger. The left and right column will have empty tick labels (see figure below).
Caveat 2: I also noticed that if your tick values are floats, calling set_xticklabels(ticks) directly might give you ugly-looking strings, like 1.499999999998 instead of 1.5.
Here we are intending to modify some of the tick labels in Matplotlib but with no side effects, which works clean and which preserves offset scientific notations. None of the issues discussed in some of the other answers are faced in this solution.
import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from matplotlib import rcParams
rcParams['axes.formatter.use_mathtext'] = True
class CustomScalarFormatter(matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter):
def __init__(self, useOffset=None, useMathText=None, useLocale=None, replace_values=([],[])):
super().__init__(useOffset=None, useMathText=None, useLocale=None)
self.replace_values = replace_values
def __call__(self, x, pos=None):
"""
Return the format for tick value *x* at position *pos*.
"""
if len(self.locs) == 0:
return ''
elif x in self.replace_values[0]:
idx = self.replace_values[0].index(x)
return str(self.replace_values[1][idx])
else:
xp = (x - self.offset) / (10. ** self.orderOfMagnitude)
if abs(xp) < 1e-8:
xp = 0
return self._format_maybe_minus_and_locale(self.format, xp)
z = np.linspace(0, 5000, 100)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
xmajorformatter = CustomScalarFormatter(replace_values=([2000,0],['$x_0$','']))
ymajorformatter = CustomScalarFormatter(replace_values=([1E7,0],['$y_0$','']))
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(xmajorformatter)
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(ymajorformatter)
ax.plot(z,z**2)
plt.show()
What we have done here is we created a derivative class of matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter class which matplotlib uses by default to format the labels. The code is copied from matplotlib source but only __call__ function is copied and modified in it. Following
elif x in self.replace_values[0]:
idx = self.replace_values[0].index(x)
return str(self.replace_values[1][idx])
are the new lines added to the __call__ function which do the replacement job. The advantage of a derived class is that it inherits all the features from the base class like offset notation, scientific notation labels if values are large. The result is:
matplotlib.axes.Axes.set_xticks, or matplotlib.axes.Axes.set_yticks for the y-axis, can be used to change the ticks and labels beginning with matplotlib 3.5.0. These are for the object oriented interface.
If using the pyplot state-based interface, use plt.xticks or plt.yticks, as shown in other answers.
In general terms, pass a list / array of numbers to the ticks parameter, and a list / array strings to the labels parameter.
In this case, the x-axis is comprised of continuous numeric values, so there are no set Text labels, as thoroughly explained in this answer. This is not the case when plots have discrete ticks (e.g. boxplot, barplot).
[Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, ''), Text(0, 0, '')] is returned by ax.get_xticklabels()
[-0.25 0. 0.25 0.5 0.75 1. 1.25 1.5 1.75 2. 2.25] is returned by ax.get_xticks()
type(ax.get_xticks()) is <class 'numpy.ndarray'>
type(ax.get_xticks()[0]) is <class 'numpy.float64'>
Since the OP is trying to replace a numeric label with a str, all of the values in the ndarray must be converted to str type, and the value to be changed can be updated.
Tested in python 3.10 and matplotlib 3.5.2
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# create figure and axes
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 6))
# plot data
t = np.arange(0.0, 2.0, 0.01)
s = np.sin(2*np.pi*t)
# plot
ax.plot(t, s)
# get the xticks, which are the numeric location of the ticks
xticks = ax.get_xticks()
# get the xticks and convert the values in the array to str type
xticklabels = list(map(str, ax.get_xticks()))
# update the string to be changed
xticklabels[1] = 'Test'
# set the xticks and the labels
_ = ax.set_xticks(xticks, xticklabels)
Note the x-axis offset is not preserved when changing the xticklabels. However, the correct value is shown without the offset.
# create figure and axes
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(8, 6), sharex=False)
# plot data
t = np.linspace(0, 1500000, 100)
s = t**2
# plot
ax1.plot(t, s)
ax2.plot(t, s)
# get the xticks, which are the numeric location of the ticks
xticks = ax2.get_xticks()
# get the xticks and convert the values in the array to str type
xticklabels = list(map(str, ax2.get_xticks()))
# update the string to be changed
xticklabels[1] = 'Test'
# set the xticks and the labels
_ = ax2.set_xticks(xticks, xticklabels, rotation=90)
you can do:
for k in ax.get_xmajorticklabels():
if some-condition:
k.set_color(any_colour_you_like)
draw()
I have a matplotlib figure which I am plotting data that is always referred to as nanoseconds (1e-9). On the y-axis, if I have data that is tens of nanoseconds, ie. 44e-9, the value on the axis shows as 4.4 with a +1e-8 as an offset. Is there anyway to force the axis to show 44 with a +1e-9 offset?
The same goes for my x-axis where the axis is showing +5.54478e4, where I would rather it show an offset of +55447 (whole number, no decimal - the value here is in days).
I've tried a couple things like this:
p = axes.plot(x,y)
p.ticklabel_format(style='plain')
for the x-axis, but this doesn't work, though I'm probably using it incorrectly or misinterpreting something from the docs, can someone point me in the correct direction?
Thanks,
Jonathan
I tried doing something with formatters but haven't found any solution yet...:
myyfmt = ScalarFormatter(useOffset=True)
myyfmt._set_offset(1e9)
axes.get_yaxis().set_major_formatter(myyfmt)
and
myxfmt = ScalarFormatter(useOffset=True)
myxfmt.set_portlimits((-9,5))
axes.get_xaxis().set_major_formatter(myxfmt)
On a side note, I'm actually confused as to where the 'offset number' object actually resides...is it part of the major/minor ticks?
I had exactly the same problem, and these lines fixed the problem:
from matplotlib.ticker import ScalarFormatter
y_formatter = ScalarFormatter(useOffset=False)
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(y_formatter)
A much easier solution is to simply customize the tick labels. Take this example:
from pylab import *
# Generate some random data...
x = linspace(55478, 55486, 100)
y = random(100) - 0.5
y = cumsum(y)
y -= y.min()
y *= 1e-8
# plot
plot(x,y)
# xticks
locs,labels = xticks()
xticks(locs, map(lambda x: "%g" % x, locs))
# ytikcs
locs,labels = yticks()
yticks(locs, map(lambda x: "%.1f" % x, locs*1e9))
ylabel('microseconds (1E-9)')
show()
Notice how in the y-axis case, I multiplied the values by 1e9 then mentioned that constant in the y-label
EDIT
Another option is to fake the exponent multiplier by manually adding its text to the top of the plot:
locs,labels = yticks()
yticks(locs, map(lambda x: "%.1f" % x, locs*1e9))
text(0.0, 1.01, '1e-9', fontsize=10, transform = gca().transAxes)
EDIT2
Also you can format the x-axis offset value in the same manner:
locs,labels = xticks()
xticks(locs, map(lambda x: "%g" % x, locs-min(locs)))
text(0.92, -0.07, "+%g" % min(locs), fontsize=10, transform = gca().transAxes)
You have to subclass ScalarFormatter to do what you need... _set_offset just adds a constant, you want to set ScalarFormatter.orderOfMagnitude. Unfortunately, manually setting orderOfMagnitude won't do anything, as it's reset when the ScalarFormatter instance is called to format the axis tick labels. It shouldn't be this complicated, but I can't find an easier way to do exactly what you want... Here's an example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.ticker import ScalarFormatter, FormatStrFormatter
class FixedOrderFormatter(ScalarFormatter):
"""Formats axis ticks using scientific notation with a constant order of
magnitude"""
def __init__(self, order_of_mag=0, useOffset=True, useMathText=False):
self._order_of_mag = order_of_mag
ScalarFormatter.__init__(self, useOffset=useOffset,
useMathText=useMathText)
def _set_orderOfMagnitude(self, range):
"""Over-riding this to avoid having orderOfMagnitude reset elsewhere"""
self.orderOfMagnitude = self._order_of_mag
# Generate some random data...
x = np.linspace(55478, 55486, 100)
y = np.random.random(100) - 0.5
y = np.cumsum(y)
y -= y.min()
y *= 1e-8
# Plot the data...
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y, 'b-')
# Force the y-axis ticks to use 1e-9 as a base exponent
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(FixedOrderFormatter(-9))
# Make the x-axis ticks formatted to 0 decimal places
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(FormatStrFormatter('%0.0f'))
plt.show()
Which yields something like:
Whereas, the default formatting would look like:
Hope that helps a bit!
Edit: For what it's worth, I don't know where the offset label resides either... It would be slightly easier to just manually set it, but I couldn't figure out how to do so... I get the feeling that there has to be an easier way than all of this. It works, though!
Similar to Amro's answer, you can use FuncFormatter
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.ticker import FuncFormatter
# Generate some random data...
x = np.linspace(55478, 55486, 100)
y = np.random.random(100) - 0.5
y = np.cumsum(y)
y -= y.min()
y *= 1e-8
# Plot the data...
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y, 'b-')
# Force the y-axis ticks to use 1e-9 as a base exponent
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(FuncFormatter(lambda x, pos: ('%.1f')%(x*1e9)))
ax.set_ylabel('microseconds (1E-9)')
# Make the x-axis ticks formatted to 0 decimal places
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(FuncFormatter(lambda x, pos: '%.0f'%x))
plt.show()
As has been pointed out in the comments and in this answer, the offset may be switched off globally, by doing the following:
matplotlib.rcParams['axes.formatter.useoffset'] = False
Gonzalo's solution started working for me after having added set_scientific(False):
ax=gca()
fmt=matplotlib.ticker.ScalarFormatter(useOffset=False)
fmt.set_scientific(False)
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(fmt)
I think that a more elegant way is to use the ticker formatter. Here is an example for both xaxis and yaxis:
from pylab import *
from matplotlib.ticker import MultipleLocator, FormatStrFormatter
majorLocator = MultipleLocator(20)
xFormatter = FormatStrFormatter('%d')
yFormatter = FormatStrFormatter('%.2f')
minorLocator = MultipleLocator(5)
t = arange(0.0, 100.0, 0.1)
s = sin(0.1*pi*t)*exp(-t*0.01)
ax = subplot(111)
plot(t,s)
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(majorLocator)
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(xFormatter)
ax.yaxis.set_major_formatter(yFormatter)
#for the minor ticks, use no labels; default NullFormatter
ax.xaxis.set_minor_locator(minorLocator)
For the second part, without manually resetting all the ticks again, this was my solution:
class CustomScalarFormatter(ScalarFormatter):
def format_data(self, value):
if self._useLocale:
s = locale.format_string('%1.2g', (value,))
else:
s = '%1.2g' % value
s = self._formatSciNotation(s)
return self.fix_minus(s)
xmajorformatter = CustomScalarFormatter() # default useOffset=True
axes.get_xaxis().set_major_formatter(xmajorformatter)
obviously you can set the format string to whatever you want.