Set Pytest mock value to None - python

I have a main.py file which includes WindoMgr class, xvfb as a class attibute and two classmethods: _cleanup_lock_file and func_to_test. I only have problem with testing else block, which gets triggered when cls.xvfb is None. The else block returns default value of b which is 1.
#main.py
class WindowMgr:
xvfb = None
#classmethod
def _cleanup_lock_file(cls):
return True
#classmethod
def func_to_test(cls):
b = 1
if cls.xvfb is not None:
print(cls.xvfb) #<MagicMock name='xvfb' id='61908568'>
try:
cls.xvfb.terminate()
b = 2
except Exception:
b = 1 + 2
finally:
cls._cleanup_lock_file()
else:
return b
return b
Now, in the test_main.py file, I have patched the xvfb to mock cls.xvfb.terminate() in try block, but I want cls.xvfb to be None for the else block to be triggered. I have tried something like xvfb = None or xvfb.return_value = None. But the else block doesn't get triggered as printing cls.xvfb shows it as a MagickMock object as commented out in the code. The WindowMgr.func_to_test() return value is 2 and not 1. It should return default value of b as 1.
How do I set cls.xvfb mock object as None? Any help would be appreciated.
#test_main.py
from main import WindowMgr
def test_main_func(mocker):
xvfb = mocker.patch.object(WindowMgr, 'xvfb')
# To test the else block
# xvfb = None -----> doesn't work
# xvfb.return_value = None ----> doesn't work
assert WindowMgr.func_to_test() == 1 # AssertionError: assert 2 == 1

The problem is that setting xvbf does only reassign the local variable, not the mocked variable (this is just normal Python behavior). Setting the return_value does not work, because xvbf is not a callable. However, if you use a property mock instead of a regular mock, it will behave as if it were a callable, and the value can be set via return_value:
def test_main_func(mocker):
xvfb = mocker.patch.object(WindowMgr, "xvfb",
new_callable=mocker.PropertyMock)
xvfb.return_value = None
assert WindowMgr.func_to_test() == 1
(you can access PropertyMock directly from mocker as a convenience)
Even if xvbf is a class variable and not a property, it behaves like a property from the perspective of a mock and this will work.

Related

unittest - How to test internal parameter in a function?

I'm having some issue while creating unittest for internal parameter.
My structure is:
[1] my_animal.py contains Myclass and method: do_bite()
my_animal.py
class Myclass():
def do_bite(self):
return 1
[2] my_module.py contains jobMain("") which is using the method from my_animal.py
my_module.py
import sys
from someclass import Myclass
def jobMain(directoryPath):
flag = -1
result = Myclass()
if result.do_bite() is None:
flag = 0
if result.do_bite() is 1:
flag = 1
if result.do_bite() is 2:
flag = 2
[3] my_test.py contains the unittest to test jobMain in my_module.py
my_test.py
# Mock Myclass.dobite to None
#pytest.fixture
def mock_dobite0():
with mock.patch('my_module.Myclass') as mocked_animal:
mocked_animal.return_value.do_bite.return_value = None
yield
# Mock Myclass.dobite to 1
#pytest.fixture
def mock_dobite1():
with mock.patch('my_module.Myclass') as mocked_animal:
mocked_animal.return_value.do_bite.return_value = 1
yield
# Mock Myclass.dobite to 2
#pytest.fixture
def mock_dobite2():
with mock.patch('my_module.Myclass') as mocked_animal:
mocked_animal.return_value.do_bite.return_value = 2
yield
# My unittest to test dobite() method
def test_dobite0(mock_Myclass, mock_dobite0):
jobMain("")
def test_dobite1(mock_Myclass, mock_dobite1):
jobMain("")
def test_dobite2(mock_Myclass, mock_dobite2):
jobMain("")
My question is: How to test 'flag' parameter inside JobMain?
'flag' para must be assigned the correct value.( eg: dobite = 1 => flag = 1)
The variable para only exists in the scope of jobMain. If you want to use the variable outside jobMain the most common ways are
1) return the value
This is quite obvious. Since jobMain is a function, it returns a value. Without an explicit return statement you return None. You could just
def jobmain(pth):
# do stuff and assign flag
return flag
# and inside tests
assert jobmain("") == 1
2) Use a class instead
If you want the jobMain to remember some state, then it is common practice to use objects. Then flag would be attribute of the object and could be accessed from outside, after you call any method (function) of JobMain. For example
class JobMain:
def __init__(self):
self.flag = -1
def run(self, pth):
result = Myclass()
if result.do_bite() is None:
self.flag = 0
if result.do_bite() is 1:
self.flag = 1
if result.do_bite() is 2:
self.flag = 2
# and inside test
job = JobMain()
job.run()
assert job.flag == 1
Note
I just copy-pasted your code for setting the flag. Note that you call do_bite() many times, if the resulting value is None or 1. Also, when testing against a number, one should use == instead of is.
How to test 'flag' parameter inside JobMain?
You don't. It's an internal variable. Testing it would be glass-box testing; the test will break if the implementation changes.
Instead, test the effect of flag. This is black-box testing. Only the interface is tested. If the implementation changes the test still works allowing the code to be aggressively refactored.
Note: If you don't hard code result = Myclass() you don't need to mock. Pass it in as an argument with the default being Myclass().
def jobMain(directoryPath, result=Myclass()):
Then you don't need to patch Myclass(). Instead, pass in a mock object.
# I don't know unittest.mock very well, but something like this.
mock = Mock(Myclass)
mock.do_bite.return_value = 2
jobMain('', result=mock)
This also makes the code more flexible outside of testing.

How to assign a value to a property in django

i have a new property in my model however I'd like to assign a test value in it for my test script.
this is my code:
models.py
mycode = models.UUIDField(null=True)
#property
def haveCode(self):
if self.mycode == uuid.UUID('{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}'):
return False
else
return True
and this is the test script that i am working on. I wanted to have a test value for haveCode:
test = Test()
test.mycode = uuid.UUID('{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}')
test.save()
checkTest = Test()
#this is only to pass the test
#delete this when start coding
checkTest.haveCode = True
assertEqual(test.haveCode, True)
however I got an error in checkTest.haveCode = True since this is just a property and not an attribute.
how to assign True to it? I appreciate your help
You can 'mock' that property using the mock library
from mock import patch, PropertyMock
#patch.object(Test, 'haveCode', new_callable=PropertyMock)
def myTest(test_haveCode_mock):
test_haveCode_mock.return_value = True
checkTest = Test()
assertEqual(checkTest.haveCode, True)
patch.stopall() # when you want to release all mocks

set return_value of function

I have a class:
class AccountBusiness:
def save(self, account) -> Account:
if not account.account_number_is_valid():
return False
return True
and a test as:
#mock.patch.object(AccountBusiness, 'save')
def test_can_save_valid_account(self, mock_save):
mock_account = mock.create_autospec(Account)
mock_account.account_number_is_valid.return_value = False
account_business = AccountBusiness()
result = account_business.save(mock_account)
self.assertEqual(result.return_value, True)
but it shows an exception like:
AssertionError: <MagicMock name='save()()' id='48830448'> != True
I want to set the return value of account.account_number_is_valid() to False and run the test.
You are using a patch object on the instance method you are looking to test. However, you are looking to test the logic inside the save method. So mocking that out will not test any of the logic inside that method. So, the output you are actually getting here:
AssertionError: <MagicMock name='save()()' id='48830448'> != True
Should be the first hint that something is not right. Your save method is coming back as a MagicMock. You don't want this. What you actually want to do is only mock the Account class, and go accordingly from there. So, your patching here:
#mock.patch.object(AccountBusiness, 'save')
should actually only be:
#mock.patch('path.to.AccountBusiness.Account', return_value=Mock(), autospec=True)
The path.to.AccountBusiness.Account is the location of the Account class with respect to the AccountBusiness class.
So, with that patching, then the return_value of calling Account will now be your mock object that you can use for your account_number_is_valid. So, the code will actually look like this:
class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.account_business = AccountBusiness()
#mock.patch('path.to.AccountBusiness.Account', return_value=Mock(), autospec=True)
def test_can_save_valid_account(self, mock_account):
mock_account_obj = mock_account.return_value
mock_account_obj.account_number_is_valid.return_value = False
self.assertFalse(self.account_business.save(mock_account_obj))
Also, pay close attention to the assertion at the end. It was changed to make use of the available assertFalse. Also, look over your own logic, as returning False for account_number_is_valid will actually return False in your save method.

mock/patch os.path.exists with multiple return values

I'm trying to test a function that I made that iterates through a list, and calls os.path.exists for each item in the list. My test is passing the function a list of 2 objects. I need os.path.exists to return True for one of them and False for the other. I have tried this:
import mock
import os
import unittest
class TestClass(unittest.TestCase):
values = {1 : True, 2 : False}
def side_effect(arg):
return values[arg]
def testFunction(self):
with mock.patch('os.path.exists') as m:
m.return_value = side_effect # 1
m.side_effect = side_effect # 2
arglist = [1, 2]
ret = test(argList)
Using either but not both of line #1 and #2 give NameError: global name 'side_effect' is not defined
I found this question and modified my code like so:
import mock
import os
class TestClass(unittest.TestCase):
values = {1 : True, 2 : False}
def side_effect(arg):
return values[arg]
def testFunction(self):
mockobj = mock(spec=os.path.exists)
mockobj.side_effect = side_effect
arglist = [1, 2]
ret = test(argList)
And this produces TypeError: 'module' object is not callable.
I also tried switching these lines:
mockobj = mock(spec=os.path.exists)
mockobj.side_effect = side_effect
for this
mockobj = mock(spec=os.path)
mockobj.exists.side_effect = side_effect
and this
mockobj = mock(spec=os)
mockobj.path.exists.side_effect = side_effect
with the same error being produced. Can anyone point out what it is that I am doing wrong and what I can do to get this to work?
EDIT:
After posting my answer below I realised that my first bit of code actually works as well, I just needed m.side_effect = TestClass.side_effect instead of m.side_effect = side_effect.
So after a bit more research and trial and error, with most of the examples here: http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/patch.html, I solved my problem.
import mock
import os
def side_effect(arg):
if arg == 1:
return True
else:
return False
class TestClass(unittest.TestCase):
patcher = mock.patch('os.path.exists')
mock_thing = patcher.start()
mock_thing.side_effect = side_effect
arg_list = [1, 2]
ret = test(arg_list)
self.assertItemsEqual([1], ret)
test calls os.path.exist for each item in arg_list, and returns a list of all items that os.path.exist returned True for. This test now passes how I want it.
you could have done self.side_effect I believe. since the initial definition was not global, calling side_effect looks inside the global scope

Passing 'None' as function parameter (where parameter is a function)

I am writing a small app that has to perform some 'sanity checks' before entering execution. (eg. of a sanity check: test if a certain path is readable / writable / exists)
The code:
import logging
import os
import shutil
import sys
from paths import PATH
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)
log = logging.getLogger('sf.core.sanity')
def sanity_access(path, mode):
ret = os.access(path, mode)
logfunc = log.debug if ret else log.warning
loginfo = (os.access.__name__, path, mode, ret)
logfunc('%s(\'%s\', %s)==%s' % loginfo)
return ret
def sanity_check(bool_func, true_func, false_func):
ret = bool_func()
(logfunc, execfunc) = (log.debug, true_func) if ret else \
(log.warning, false_func)
logfunc('exec: %s', execfunc.__name__)
execfunc()
def sanity_checks():
sanity_check(lambda: sanity_access(PATH['userhome'], os.F_OK), \
lambda: None, sys.exit)
My question is related to the sanity_check function.
This function takes 3 parameters (bool_func, true_func, false_func). If the bool_func (which is the test function, returning a boolean value) fails, true_func gets executed, else the false_func gets executed.
1) lambda: None is a little lame , because for example if the sanity_access returns True, lambda: None gets executed, and the output printed will be:
DEBUG:sf.core.sanity:access('/home/nomemory', 0)==True
DEBUG:sf.core.sanity:exec: <lambda>
So it won't be very clear in the logs what function got executed. The log will only contain <lambda> . Is there a default function that does nothing and can be passed as a parameter ? Is it a way to return the name of the first function that is being executed inside a lambda ?
Or a way not to log that "exec" if 'nothing' is sent as a paramter ?
What's the none / do-nothing equivalent for functions ?
sanity_check(lambda: sanity_access(PATH['userhome'], os.F_OK), \
<do nothing, but show something more useful than <lambda>>, sys.exit)
Additional question, why is lambda: pass instead of lambda: None not working ?
What's with all the lambdas that serve no purpose? Well, maybe optional arguments will help you a bit:
def sanity_check( test, name='undefined', ontrue=None, onfalse=None ):
if test:
log.debug(name)
if ontrue is not None:
ontrue()
else:
log.warn( name )
if onfalse is not None:
onfalse()
def sanity_checks():
sanity_check(sanity_access(PATH['userhome'], os.F_OK), 'test home',
onfalse=sys.exit)
But you are really overcomplicating things.
update
I would normally delete this post because THC4k saw through all the complexity and rewrote your function correctly. However in a different context, the K combinator trick might come in handy, so I'll leave it up.
There is no builtin that does what you want AFIK. I believe that you want the K combinator (the link came up on another question) which can be encoded as
def K_combinator(x, name):
def f():
return x
f.__name__ = name
return f
none_function = K_combinator(None, 'none_function')
print none_function()
of course if this is just a one off then you could just do
def none_function():
return None
But then you don't get to say "K combinator". Another advantage of the 'K_combinator' approach is that you can pass it to functions, for example,
foo(call_back1, K_combinator(None, 'name_for_logging'))
as for your second statement, only expressions are allowed in lambda. pass is a statement. Hence, lambda: pass fails.
You can slightly simplify your call to sanity check by removing the lambda around the first argument.
def sanity_check(b, true_func, false_func):
if b:
logfunc = log.debug
execfunc = true_func
else:
logfunc = log.warning
execfunc = false_func
logfunc('exec: %s', execfunc.__name__)
execfunc()
def sanity_checks():
sanity_check(sanity_access(PATH['userhome'], os.F_OK),
K_combinator(None, 'none_func'), sys.exit)
This is more readable (largely from expanding the ternary operator into an if). the boolfunc wasn't doing anything because sanity_check wasn't adding any arguments to the call. Might as well just call instead of wrapping it in a lambda.
You might want to rethink this.
class SanityCheck( object ):
def __call__( self ):
if self.check():
logger.debug(...)
self.ok()
else:
logger.warning(...)
self.not_ok()
def check( self ):
return True
def ok( self ):
pass
def not_ok( self ):
sys.exit(1)
class PathSanityCheck(SanityCheck):
path = "/path/to/resource"
def check( self ):
return os.access( path, os.F_OK )
class AnotherPathSanityCheck(SanityCheck):
path = "/another/path"
def startup():
checks = ( PathSanityCheck(), AnotherPathSanityCheck() )
for c in checks:
c()
Callable objects can simplify your life.
>>> import dis
>>> f = lambda: None
>>> dis.dis(f)
1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
>>> g = lambda: Pass
>>>
>>>
>>> dis.dis(g)
1 0 LOAD_GLOBAL 0 (Pass)
3 RETURN_VALUE
>>> g = lambda: pass
File "<stdin>", line 1
g = lambda: pass
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Actually, what you want is a function which does nothing, but has a __name__ which is useful to the log. The lambda function is doing exactly what you want, but execfunc.__name__ is giving "<lambda>". Try one of these:
def nothing_func():
return
def ThisAppearsInTheLog():
return
You can also put your own attributes on functions:
def log_nothing():
return
log_nothing.log_info = "nothing interesting"
Then change execfunc.__name__ to getattr(execfunc,'log_info', '')

Categories