I'm using django 2.2 and in my view I have two functions that do the same thing but only one element changes. I would like to try to improve my code so that I don't repeat the same thing more times, basically do what the vm_schedule_power_on_vm function does and
vm_schedule_power_off_vm into one function. The only thing that will change is the call of vmware_poweron in the vm_schedule_power_on_vm function and vmware_poweroff in the vm_schedule_power_off_vm function.
path('vm/schedule/<int:pk>/powered_on/', vm.vm_schedule_power_on_vm,
name='vm_schedule_power_on_vm'),
path('vm/schedule/<int:pk>/powered_off/', vm.vm_schedule_power_off_vm,
name='vm_schedule_power_off_vm')
def vm_schedule_power_on_vm(request, pk):
sch = VmSchedule.objects.get(pk=pk)
mylistvm, mylist = list(), list()
mydate = time.strftime("%d/%m/%Y")
for i in sch.vms.all():
if i.lock:
return 'locked'
# here the order has importance because
# I try to have the start time and at the end the end time.
mylist.append(mydate)
mylist.append(time.strftime("%H:%M:%S"))
mylist.append(i.name)
mylist.append(i.vmware.hostname)
# only this line changes each time
mylist.append(vmware_poweron(i))
mylist.append(time.strftime("%H:%M:%S"))
mylist.append(sch.schedule)
mylistvm.append(mylist)
mylist = list()
vm_logs_export(mylistvm)
return HttpResponse(json.dumps(mylistvm))
def vm_schedule_power_off_vm(request, pk):
sch = VmSchedule.objects.get(pk=pk)
mylistvm, mylist = list(), list()
mydate = time.strftime("%d/%m/%Y")
for i in sch.vms.all():
if i.lock:
return 'locked'
mylist.append(mydate)
mylist.append(time.strftime("%H:%M:%S"))
mylist.append(i.name)
mylist.append(i.vmware.hostname)
# only this line changes each time
mylist.append(vmware_poweroff(i))
mylist.append(time.strftime("%H:%M:%S"))
mylist.append(sch.schedule)
mylistvm.append(mylist)
mylist = list()
vm_logs_export(mylistvm)
return HttpResponse(json.dumps(mylistvm))
# Example result of vm_schedule_power_on_vm or vm_schedule_power_off_vm
['09/12/2021', '13:54:33', 'API1VTEST11', 'ste1vvcsa', '13:54:33', 'testPowredOn02',
'09/12/2021', '13:54:33', 'API1VTEST12', 'ste1vvcsa', '13:54:33', 'testPowredOn02',
'09/12/2021', '13:54:33', 'API1VTEST2', 'ste1vvcsa', '13:54:33', 'testPowredOn02']
def vmware_poweron(vm):
#return list of something
def vmware_poweroff(vm):
#return list of something
# Example result of vmware_poweron or vmware_poweroff
[["09/12/2021", "13:54:33", "API1VTEST11", "ste1vvcsa", "13:54:33", "testPowredOn02",
"09/12/2021", "13:54:33", "API1VTEST12", "ste1vvcsa", "13:54:33", "testPowredOn02",
"09/12/2021", "13:54:33", "API1VTEST2", "ste1vvcsa", "13:54:33", "testPowredOn02"]
I thought of doing in one fonction like this past code here
The simplest thing to do is to extract the shared operations into a more generically named function, e.g. vm_schedule_power_operation. Give this a third parameter, operation, and pass either vmware_poweron or vmware_poweroff as that parameter.
When you reach the line that changes in the function, modify that line to call operation(i) instead of vmware_poweron or vmware_poweroff directly.
Then, your on/off functions can look like this:
def vm_schedule_power_on_vm(request, pk):
vm_schedule_power_operation(request, pk, vmware_poweron)
def vm_schedule_power_off_vm(request, pk):
vm_schedule_power_operation(request, pk, vmware_poweroff)
Related
I have two functions:
job_status is getting a response from boto3 api.
jobs_detailsis a list comprehension that performs job_status on each element of the input list.
I want to change jobs_details into a decorator of jobs_status but below solutions throws inner() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given error.
Appreciate any comment/alternative approach to my issue. Thanks!
import boto3
class GlueClient:
def __init__(self):
self.glue_client = boto3.client('glue')
#self.envs = envs
def jobs_list(self):
response = self.glue_client.list_jobs()
result = response["JobNames"]
while "NextToken" in response:
response = self.glue_client.list_jobs(NextToken=response["NextToken"])
result.extend(response["JobNames"])
return [e for e in result if "jobs_xyz" in e]
#WHAT IS CURRENTLY
def job_status(self, job_name):
paginator = self.glue_client.get_paginator('get_job_runs')
response = paginator.paginate(JobName=job_name)
return response
def jobs_details(self, jobs):
return [self.job_status(e) for e in jobs]
#WHAT IS EXPECTED
def pass_by_list_comprehension(func):
def inner(list_of_val):
return [func(value) for value in list_of_val ]
return inner
#pass_by_list_comprehension
def job_status(self, job_name):
paginator = self.glue_client.get_paginator('get_job_runs')
response = paginator.paginate(JobName=job_name)
return response
glue_client = GlueClient()
jobs = glue_client.jobs_list()
jobs_status = glue_client.job_status(jobs)
print(jobs)
You want something like:
import boto3
from typing import Callable
def handle_iterable_input(func):
def inner(self, list_of_val):
return [func(self, value) for value in list_of_val]
return inner
class GlueClient:
def __init__(self):
self.glue_client = boto3.client('glue')
#self.envs = envs
def jobs_list(self):
response = self.glue_client.list_jobs()
result = response["JobNames"]
while "NextToken" in response:
response = self.glue_client.list_jobs(NextToken=response["NextToken"])
result.extend(response["JobNames"])
return [e for e in result if "jobs_xyz" in e]
#handle_iterable_input
def job_status(self, job_name):
paginator = self.glue_client.get_paginator('get_job_runs')
response = paginator.paginate(JobName=job_name)
return response
glue_client = GlueClient()
jobs = glue_client.jobs_list()
jobs_status = glue_client.job_status(jobs)
print(jobs)
This is the most basic way to make your decorator handle methods properly, by explicitly handling the passing of self. Note, it assumes the function being decorated will only take a single argument.
If all you want to do is make job_status iterate through a list of job names instead of operating on just one, something like this should work:
def jobs_status(self, job_names):
paginator = self.glue_client.get_paginator('get_job_runs')
return [paginator.paginate(JobName=job_name) for job_name in job_names]
Using a decorator to change what parameters a method expects seems like a bad idea.
Also, naming your class GlueClient would imply that it is a glue client. The fact that it has an attribute named glue_client makes me suspect you could probably choose a clearer name for one or both of them. (However, I'm not familiar with the package you're using.)
I created an iterator to increment the figure number in various plotting function calls:
figndx=itertools.count()
I then proceed to call these throughout my code, passing next(figndx) as an argument to increment the value I use for the figure number: - for ex:
an.plotimg(ref_frame,next(figndx),'Ref Frame')
an.plotimg(new_frame,next(figndx),'New Frame')
etc...
After some particular function call, I want to read back the figndx value and store it in a variable for later use. However, when I look at figndx , it returns count(7), for example. How do I extract the '7' from this?
I've tried :
figndx
figndx.__iter__()
and I can't find anything else in the 'suggested' methods (when I type the dot (.)) that will get the actual iterator value. Can this be done?
`
Just wrap a count object
class MyCount:
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self._c = itertools.count(*args, **kwargs)
self._current = next(self._c)
def __next__(self):
current = self._current
self._current = next(self._c)
return current
def __iter__(self):
return self
def peek(self):
return self._current
You can create yourself a peeker, using itertools.tee, and encapsulate the peek:
from itertools import count, tee
def peek(iterator):
iterator, peeker = tee(iterator)
return iterator, next(peeker)
Then you can call it like
figndx = count(1)
next(figndx)
next(figndx)
figndx, next_value = peek(figndx)
next_value
# 3
I have a python module mymodule.py:
def auth():
'''Authorize and generate a JSON file'''
return j
j = auth()
def get_value(key):
'''Takes the key and return value from JSON'''
value = j[key]
return value
I have a program where I use this module myprogram.py:
import mymodule
keys = [1,2,3,4,5]
def simple_program(keys):
# mymodule.auth() should I place it here?
for key in keys:
value = mymodule.get_value(key)
return value
So the goal is to call mymodule.auth() once, every time I run simple_program to refresh the JSON file. I don't know how to achieve this. Because myprogram.py is also a module and I call simple_program() from another .py file. So where do I place mymodule.auth()? Is it ok to place mymodule.auth() inside simple_program?
The instant you import mymodule the code below runs
j = auth()
which is why when you call mymodule.get_value() it works. This causes J to be a singleton in the global space. Everytime you import this, auth() will run again. This could be bad.
What you could do is this:
def auth():
'''Authorize and generate a JSON file'''
return j
j = None
def get_value(key):
global j
'''Takes the key and return value from JSON'''
if not j:
j = auth()
value = j[key]
return value
Now you just need to run get_value() and everything should work fine. No need to execute auth() again.
Your exact use case is a little vague (e.g. simple_program is not the main program but smth like a subroutine? and it is called several times from another py file?), but it seems to me like you should get familiar with classes. I would suggest to implement auth() as a class, e.g. like this:
class MyJson(object):
def __init__(self):
self._json = ... # do authorization and generation here and save the result as member
def get_value(self, key):
value = self._json[key]
return value
Now import and create an object of that class wherever you need it for the first time
from mymodule import MyJson
# ...
my_json = MyJson()
If you only need it to be initialized once, do that in your main program and pass the my_json object as parameter to simple_program (which should possibly also be a class). And then use it like
value = my_json.get_value(key)
I am working on some project, and we have lots of some code usage like this;
# filtering fields are different from each other, please ignore the similarity below
def function1(self, param):
list_x = Model1.objects.filter(foo=bar, bla=bla).values_list('field', flat=True)
list_y = Model2.objects.filter(foo=bar, bla=bla).values_list('field', flat=True)
lists_to_delete = set(list_x) - set(list_y)
# here is the code line with set() that needed to be method
self._delete(lists_to_delete)
def function2(self, param):
list_z = Model3.objects.filter(foo=bar, bla=bla).values_list('field', flat=True)
list_q = Model4.objects.filter(foo=bar, bla=bla).values_list('field', flat=True).distinct()
list_w = Model5.objects.filter(foo=bar, bla=bla).values_list('field', flat=True)
lists_to_delete = set(list_x) - set(list_y) - set(list_w)
# here is the code line with set() that needed to be method
self._delete(lists_to_delete)
... # other functions continues like above
...
...
So, as you can see we have same usage with set() function. And I need to change this usage with custom method. I tried to write a method like this;
def _get_deleted_lists(self, *args):
value = set()
for arg in args:
value |= set(arg)
return value
and usage will be change like;
lists_to_delete = self._get_deleted_lists(list_x, list_y, ...)
instead of this;
lists_to_delete = set(list_x) - set(list_y)
But my custom method not return same value as before. How can I achieve this?
| operation on sets returns their union. What you want is the difference (-)
def _get_deleted_lists(*lists):
if not lists:
return set()
result = set(lists[0])
for l in lists[1:]:
result -= set(l)
return result
So I'm working on a chemistry project for fun, and I have a function that initializes a list from a text file. What I want to do s make it so the function replaces itself with a list. So here's my first attempt at it which randomly will or won't work and I don't know why:
def periodicTable():
global periodicTable
tableAtoms = open('/Users/username/Dropbox/Python/Chem Project/atoms.csv','r')
listAtoms = tableAtoms.readlines()
tableAtoms.close()
del listAtoms[0]
atoms = []
for atom in listAtoms:
atom = atom.split(',')
atoms.append(Atom(*atom))
periodicTable = atoms
It gets called in in this way:
def findAtomBySymbol(symbol):
try:
periodicTable()
except:
pass
for atom in periodicTable:
if atom.symbol == symbol:
return atom
return None
Is there a way to make this work?
Don't do that. The correct thing to do would be using a decorator that ensures the function is only executed once and caches the return value:
def cachedfunction(f):
cache = []
def deco(*args, **kwargs):
if cache:
return cache[0]
result = f(*args, **kwargs)
cache.append(result)
return result
return deco
#cachedfunction
def periodicTable():
#etc
That said, there's nothing stopping you from replacing the function itself after it has been called, so your approach should generally work. I think the reason it doesn't is because an exception is thrown before you assign the result to periodicTable and thus it never gets replaced. Try removing the try/except block or replacing the blanket except with except TypeError to see what exactly happens.
This is very bad practice.
What would be better is to have your function remember if it has already loaded the table:
def periodicTable(_table=[]):
if _table:
return _table
tableAtoms = open('/Users/username/Dropbox/Python/Chem Project/atoms.csv','r')
listAtoms = tableAtoms.readlines()
tableAtoms.close()
del listAtoms[0]
atoms = []
for atom in listAtoms:
atom = atom.split(',')
atoms.append(Atom(*atom))
_table[:] = atoms
The first two lines check to see if the table has already been loaded, and if it has it simply returns it.