We Keep Coding

Keeping alias types simple in Python documentation?

I'm trying to use the typing module to document my Python package, and I have a number of situations where several different types are allowable for a function parameter. For instance, you can either pass a number, an Envelope object (one of the classes in my package), or a list of numbers from which an Envelope is constructed, or a list of lists of numbers from which an envelope is constructed. So I make an alias type as follows:
NumberOrEnvelope = Union[Sequence[Real], Sequence[Sequence[Real]], Real, Envelope]
Then I write the function:
def example_function(parameter: NumberOrEnvelope):
...
And that looks great to me. However, when I create the documentation using Sphinx, I end up with this horrifically unreadable function signature:
example_function(parameter: Union[Sequence[numbers.Real], Sequence[Sequence[numbers.Real]], numbers.Real, expenvelope.envelope.Envelope])
Same thing also with the hints that pop up when I start to try to use the function in PyCharm.
Is there some way I can have it just leave it as "NumberOrEnvelope". Ideally that would also link in the documentation to a clarification of what "NumberOrEnvelope" is, though even if it didn't it would be way better than what's appearing now.

I had the same issue and used https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/autodoc.html#confval-autodoc_type_aliases, introduced in version 3.3.
In your sphinx conf.py, insert this section. It does not seem to make much sense at the first sight, but does the trick:
autodoc_type_aliases = dict(NumberOrEnvelope='NumberOrEnvelope')
Warning: It only works in modules that start with from __future__ import annotation
Note: If there is a target in the documentation, type references even have a hyperlink to the definition. I have classes, documented elsewhere with autoclass, which are used as types of function parameters, and the docs show the nice names of the types with links.

Support for this appears to be in the works.
See Issue #6518.
That issue can be closed by the recent updates to Pull Request #8007 (under review).
If you want the fix ASAP, you can perhaps try using that build.

EDIT: This doesn't quite work, sadly.
Turns out after a little more searching, I found what I was looking for. Instead of:
NumberOrEnvelope = Union[Sequence[Real], Sequence[Sequence[Real]], Real, Envelope]
I found that you can create your own compound type that does the same thing:
NumberOrEnvelope = TypeVar("NumberOrEnvelope", Sequence[Real], Sequence[Sequence[Real]], Real, Envelope)
This displays in documentation as "NumberOrEnvelope", just as I wanted.

Python __doc__ documentation on instances

I'd like to provide documentation (within my program) on certain dynamically created objects, but still fall back to using their class documentation. Setting __doc__ seems a suitable way to do so. However, I can't find many details in the Python help in this regard, are there any technical problems with providing documentation on an instance? For example:
class MyClass:
"""
A description of the class goes here.
"""
a = MyClass()
a.__doc__ = "A description of the object"
print( MyClass.__doc__ )
print( a.__doc__ )

__doc__ is documented as a writable attribute for functions, but not for instances of user defined classes. pydoc.help(a), for example, will only consider the __doc__ defined on the type in Python versions < 3.9.
Other protocols (including future use-cases) may reasonably bypass the special attributes defined in the instance dict, too. See Special method lookup section of the datamodel documentation, specifically:
For custom classes, implicit invocations of special methods are only guaranteed to work correctly if defined on an object’s type, not in the object’s instance dictionary.
So, depending on the consumer of the attribute, what you intend to do may not be reliable. Avoid.
A safe and simple alternative is just to use a different attribute name of your own choosing for your own use-case, preferably not using the __dunder__ syntax convention which usually indicates a special name reserved for some specific use by the implementation and/or the stdlib.

There are some pretty obvious technical problems; the question is whether or not they matter for your use case.
Here are some major uses for docstrings that your idiom will not help with:
help(a): Type help(a) in an interactive terminal, and you get the docstring for MyClass, not the docstring for a.
Auto-generated documentation: Unless you write your own documentation generator, it's not going to understand that you've done anything special with your a value. Many doc generators do have some way to specify help for module and class constants, but I'm not aware of any that will recognize your idiom.
IDE help: Many IDEs will not only auto-complete an expression, but show the relevant docstring in a tooltip. They all do this statically, and without some special-case code designed around your idiom (which they're unlikely to have, given that it's an unusual idiom), they're almost certain to fetch the docstring for the class, not the object.
Here are some where it might help:
Source readability: As a human reading your source, I can tell the intent from the a.__doc__ = … right near the construction of a. Then again, I could tell the same intent just as easily from a Sphinx comment on the constant.
Debugging: pdb doesn't really do much with docstrings, but some GUI debuggers wrapped around it do, and most of them are probably going to show a.__doc__.
Custom dynamic use of docstrings: Obviously any code that you write that does something with a.__doc__ is going to get the instance docstring if you want it to, and therefore can do whatever it wants with it. However, keep in mind that if you want to define your own "protocol", you should use your own name, not one reserved for the implementation.
Notice that most of the same is true for using a descriptor for the docstring:
>>> class C:
... #property
... def __doc__(self):
... return('C doc')
>>> c = C()
If you type c.__doc__, you'll get 'C doc', but help(c) will treat it as an object with no docstring.
It's worth noting that making help work is one of the reasons some dynamic proxy libraries generate new classes on the fly—that is, a proxy to underlying type Spam has some new type like _SpamProxy, instead of the same GenericProxy type used for proxies to Hams and Eggseses. The former allows help(myspam) to show dynamically-generated information about Spam. But I don't know how important a reason it is; often you already need dynamic classes to, e.g., make special method lookup work, at which point adding dynamic docstrings comes for free.

I think it's preferred to keep it under the class via your doc string as it will also aid any developer that works on the code. However if you are doing something dynamic that requires this setup then I don't see any reason why not. Just understand that it adds a level of indirection that makes things less clear to others.
Remember to K.I.S.S. where applicable :)

I just stumbled over this and noticed that at least with python 3.9.5 the behavior seems to have changed.
E.g. using the above example, when I call:
help(a)
I get:
Help on MyClass in module __main__:
<__main__.MyClass object>
A description of the object
Also for reference, have a look at the pydoc implementation which shows:
def _getowndoc(obj):
"""Get the documentation string for an object if it is not
inherited from its class."""
try:
doc = object.__getattribute__(obj, '__doc__')
if doc is None:
return None
if obj is not type:
typedoc = type(obj).__doc__
if isinstance(typedoc, str) and typedoc == doc:
return None
return doc
except AttributeError:
return None

Use isinstance with an undefined class

Assume that class MyClass is sometimes, but not always, defined. I have a function foo(a=None) in which argument a can be None, a string, or an object of MyClass.
My question is: If MyClass is not defined in my Python session, how can I check the type of argument a in a fashion similar to isinstance without getting a NameError?
Note on duck-typing: I am deliberately limiting the function.
I'm using Python 2.6.x and Updating is not an option. A forward-compatible solution (especially for 2.7.x) is highly appreciated.

I would suggest a different approach: polyfill the class so all code that wants to refer to it can simply do so:
try:
from foo import Bar # load the native class
except ImportError:
class Bar:
pass # implement necessary parts here
You can put this into your own module and then from mymodule import Bar everywhere it's needed. That allows all your code to use Bar regardless of whether it's defined natively or not.
Even if redefining the class isn't your preferred way to handle this, handling the ImportError is still the way to handle this situation, since you will have to import the class either way and that's where the error will occur. Instead of defining the class, you may instead want to set a class_exists = False flag or something.

If MyClass isn't defined then you have no way to reference its type.
Therefore you can have no way to verify that type(a) has the correct value.

I workarounded the problem by overriding a method in MyClass and doing nothing in it (pass). After that I no longer needed to check its type.
Different workarounds may exist for different cases. Catching the NameError could be another one.
t = 'asdfas'
print(isinstance(t, str))
try:
print(isinstance(t, MyClass))
except NameError:
print(False)
Seems to me, that such a construct may appear in future python. Like typed python, which is quite new. And in typed python we have a possibility to use future types, in apos.

Python dir command to determine the methods

I am using Python's dir() function to determine what attributes and methods a class has.
For example to determine the methods in wx.Frame, I use dir(wx.Frame)
Is there any command to determine the list of arguments for each method? For example, if I want to know what arguments belong to wx.Frame.CreateToolBar().

As mentioned in the comments, you can use help(fun) to enter the help editor with the function's signature and docstring. You can also simply use print fun.__doc__ and for most mature libraries you should get reasonable documentation about the parameters and the function signature.
If you're talking about interactive help, consider using IPython which has some useful extras. For instance you could type %psource fun to get a printout of the source code for the function fun, and with tab completion you could just type wx.Frame. and then hit TAB to see a list of all of the methods and attributes available within wx.Frame.

Even though GP89 seems to have already answered this question, I thought I'd jump in with a little more detail.
First, GP89's suggestion was the use Python's built-in help() method. This is a method you can use in the interactive console. For methods, it will print the method's declaration line along with the class' docstring, if it is defined. You can also access this with <object>.__doc__ For example:
>>> def testHelp(arg1, arg2=0):
... """This is the docstring that will print when you
... call help(testHelp). testHelp.__doc__ will also
... return this string. Here is where you should
... describe your method and all its arguments."""
...
>>> help(testHelp)
Help on function testHelp in module __main__:
testHelp(arg1, arg2=0)
This is the docstring that will print when you
call help(testHelp). testHelp.__doc__ will also
return this string. Here is where you should
describe your method and all its arguments.
>>>
However, another extremely important tool for understanding methods, classes and functions is the toolkit's API. For built-in Python functions, you should check the Python Doc Library. That's where I found the documentation for the help() function. You're using wxPython, whose API can be found here, so a quick search for "wx.Frame api" and you can find this page describing all of wx.Frame's methods and variables. Unfortunately, CreatteToolBar() isn't particularly well documented but you can still see it's arguments:
CreateToolBar(self, style, winid, name)
Happy coding!

Pylint best practices

Pylint looks like a good tool for running analysis of Python code.
However, our main objective is to catch any potential bugs and not coding conventions. Enabling all Pylint checks seems to generate a lot of noise. What is the set of Pylint features you use and is effective?

You can block any warnings/errors you don't like, via:
pylint --disable=error1,error2
I've blocked the following (description from http://www.logilab.org/card/pylintfeatures):
W0511: Used when a warning note as FIXME or XXX is detected
W0142: Used * or * magic*. Used when a function or method is called using *args or **kwargs to dispatch arguments. This doesn't improve readability and should be used with care.
W0141: Used builtin function %r. Used when a black listed builtin function is used (see the bad-function option). Usual black listed functions are the ones like map, or filter, where Python offers now some cleaner alternative like list comprehension.
R0912: Too many branches (%s/%s). Used when a function or method has too many branches, making it hard to follow.
R0913: Too many arguments (%s/%s). Used when a function or method takes too many arguments.
R0914: Too many local variables (%s/%s). Used when a function or method has too many local variables.
R0903: Too few public methods (%s/%s). Used when class has too few public methods, so be sure it's really worth it.
W0212: Access to a protected member %s of a client class. Used when a protected member (i.e. class member with a name beginning with an underscore) is access outside the class or a descendant of the class where it's defined.
W0312: Found indentation with %ss instead of %ss. Used when there are some mixed tabs and spaces in a module.
C0111: Missing docstring. Used when a module, function, class or method has no docstring. Some special methods like __init__ don't necessarily require a docstring.
C0103: Invalid name "%s" (should match %s). Used when the name doesn't match the regular expression associated to its type (constant, variable, class...).

To persistently disable warnings and conventions:
Create a ~/.pylintrc file by running pylint --generate-rcfile > ~/.pylintrc
Edit ~/.pylintrc
Uncomment disable= and change that line to disable=W,C

Pyflakes should serve your purpose well.

-E will only flag what Pylint thinks is an error (i.e., no warnings, no conventions, etc.)

Using grep like:
pylint my_file.py | grep -v "^C"
Edit :
As mentionned in the question, to remove the conventions advices from pylint output, you remove the lines that start with an uppercase C.
From the doc of pylint, the output consists in lines that fit the format
MESSAGE_TYPE: LINE_NUM:[OBJECT:] MESSAGE
and the message type can be:
[R]efactor for a “good practice” metric violation
[C]onvention for coding standard violation
[W]arning for stylistic problems, or minor programming issues
[E]rror for important programming issues (i.e. most probably bug)
[F]atal for errors which prevented further processing
Only the first letter is displayed, so you can play with grep to select/remove the level of message type you want.
I didn't use Pylint recently, but I would probably use a parameter inside Pylint to do so.