I have the following pandas dataframe:
import pandas as pd
foo = pd.DataFrame({'id': [1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3], 'time': [2,3,5,1,3,4,1,2,6,7,8],
'val':['a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a','a']})
id time val
0 1 2 a
1 1 3 a
2 1 5 a
3 2 1 a
4 2 3 a
5 2 4 a
6 3 1 a
7 3 2 a
8 3 6 a
9 3 7 a
10 3 8 a
I would like for each id, to add a row, for each missing time, where the val would be 'b'. time would start from 1
The resulting dataframe would look like this
foo = pd.DataFrame({'id': [1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3], 'time': [1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8],
'val':['b','a','a','b','a','a','b','a','a','a','a','b','b','b','a','a','a']})
id time val
0 1 1 b
1 1 2 a
2 1 3 a
3 1 4 b
4 1 5 a
5 2 1 a
6 2 2 b
7 2 3 a
8 2 4 a
9 3 1 a
10 3 2 a
11 3 3 b
12 3 4 b
13 3 5 b
14 3 6 a
15 3 7 a
16 3 8 a
Any ideas how I could do that in python ?
This answer does not work, because it does not take into account the groupby id and also the fact that for id == 1, i am missing the time == 1
Set the index of dataframe to time then reindex the time column per id and fill the NaN values in val column with b
(
foo
.set_index('time').groupby('id')
.apply(lambda g: g.reindex(range(1, g.index.max() + 1)))
.drop('id', axis=1).fillna({'val': 'b'}).reset_index()
)
If you want to try something :fancy:, here is another solution:
(
foo.groupby('id')['time'].max()
.map(range).explode().add(1).reset_index(name='time')
.merge(foo, how='left').fillna({'val': 'b'})
)
id time val
0 1 1 b
1 1 2 a
2 1 3 a
3 1 4 b
4 1 5 a
5 2 1 a
6 2 2 b
7 2 3 a
8 2 4 a
9 3 1 a
10 3 2 a
11 3 3 b
12 3 4 b
13 3 5 b
14 3 6 a
15 3 7 a
16 3 8 a
One option is with complete from pyjanitor :
# pip install pyjanitor
import pandas as pd
import janitor
# build a range of numbers for each group, starting from 1
new_time = {'time': lambda df: range(1, df.max() + 1)}
foo.complete(new_time, by = 'id', fill_value = 'b')
id time val
0 1 1 b
1 1 2 a
2 1 3 a
3 1 4 b
4 1 5 a
5 2 1 a
6 2 2 b
7 2 3 a
8 2 4 a
9 3 1 a
10 3 2 a
11 3 3 b
12 3 4 b
13 3 5 b
14 3 6 a
15 3 7 a
16 3 8 a
I have a dataset where I want to add a suffix to column names based on their positions. For ex- 1st to 4th columns should be named 'abc_1', then 5th to 8th columns as 'abc_2' and so on.
I have tried using dataframe.rename
but it is a time consuming process. What would be the most efficient way to achieve this?
I think here is good choice create MultiIndex for avoid duplicated columns names - create first level by floor divide by 4 and add prefix by f-strings:
np.random.seed(123)
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(10, size=(5, 10)))
df.columns = [[f'abc_{i+1}' for i in df.columns // 4], df.columns]
print (df)
abc_1 abc_2 abc_3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 2 2 6 1 3 9 6 1 0 1
1 9 0 0 9 3 4 0 0 4 1
2 7 3 2 4 7 2 4 8 0 7
3 9 3 4 6 1 5 6 2 1 8
4 3 5 0 2 6 2 4 4 6 3
More general solution if no RangeIndex in column names:
cols = [f'abc_{i+1}' for i in np.arange(len(df.columns)) // 4]
df.columns = [cols, df.columns]
print (df)
abc_1 abc_2 abc_3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 2 2 6 1 3 9 6 1 0 1
1 9 0 0 9 3 4 0 0 4 1
2 7 3 2 4 7 2 4 8 0 7
3 9 3 4 6 1 5 6 2 1 8
4 3 5 0 2 6 2 4 4 6 3
Also is possible specify MultiIndex levels names by MultiIndex.from_arrays:
df.columns = pd.MultiIndex.from_arrays([cols, df.columns], names=('level0','level1'))
print (df)
level0 abc_1 abc_2 abc_3
level1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 2 2 6 1 3 9 6 1 0 1
1 9 0 0 9 3 4 0 0 4 1
2 7 3 2 4 7 2 4 8 0 7
3 9 3 4 6 1 5 6 2 1 8
4 3 5 0 2 6 2 4 4 6 3
Then is possible select each level by xs:
print (df.xs('abc_2', axis=1))
4 5 6 7
0 3 9 6 1
1 3 4 0 0
2 7 2 4 8
3 1 5 6 2
4 6 2 4 4
Actually I thougth this should be very easy. I have a pandas data frame with lets say 100 colums and I want a subset containing colums 0:30 and 77:99.
What I've done so far is:
df_1 = df.iloc[:,0:30]
df_2 = df.iloc[:,77:99]
df2 = pd.concat([df_1 , df_2], axis=1, join_axes=[df_1 .index])
Is there an easier way?
Use numpy.r_ for concanecate indices:
df2 = df.iloc[:, np.r_[0:30, 77:99]]
Sample:
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(10, size=(5,15)))
print (df)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0 6 2 9 5 4 6 9 9 7 9 6 6 1 0 6
1 5 6 7 0 7 8 7 9 4 8 1 2 0 8 5
2 5 6 1 6 7 6 1 5 5 4 6 3 2 3 0
3 4 3 1 3 3 8 3 6 7 1 8 6 2 1 8
4 3 8 2 3 7 3 6 4 4 6 2 6 9 4 9
df2 = df.iloc[:, np.r_[0:3, 7:9]]
print (df2)
0 1 2 7 8
0 6 2 9 9 7
1 5 6 7 9 4
2 5 6 1 5 5
3 4 3 1 6 7
4 3 8 2 4 4
df_1 = df.iloc[:,0:3]
df_2 = df.iloc[:,7:9]
df2 = pd.concat([df_1 , df_2], axis=1, join_axes=[df_1 .index])
print (df2)
0 1 2 7 8
0 6 2 9 9 7
1 5 6 7 9 4
2 5 6 1 5 5
3 4 3 1 6 7
4 3 8 2 4 4
I have two data frames in pandas from which i need to get the rows with all the corresponding column values in second which are not in first .
ex
df A
A B C D
6 4 1 6
7 6 6 3
1 6 2 9
8 0 4 9
1 0 2 3
8 4 7 5
4 7 1 1
3 7 3 4
5 2 8 8
3 2 8 8
5 2 8 8
df B
A B C D
1 0 2 3
8 4 7 5
4 7 1 1
1 0 2 3
8 4 7 5
4 7 1 1
3 7 3 4
5 2 8 8
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
req
A B C D
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
i tried using pd.merge and inner/left on all columns but it is taking a lot more computational time and resource if the rows and columns are more. is there any other way to work it around like iterating through each row of dfA with dfB on all columns and then pick the ones which are there only in dfB?
You can use merge with ind parameter.
df_b.merge(df_a, on=['A','B','C','D'],
how='left', indicator='ind')\
.query('ind == "left_only"')\
.drop('ind', axis=1)
Output:
A B C D
9 1 1 1 1
10 2 2 2 2
11 1 1 1 1
I have a dataframe, that I want to calculate statitics on (value_count, mode, mean, etc.) and then put the result in a new column. My current solution is O(n**2) or so, and I'm sure there is likely a faster, obvious method that I'm overlooking.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(10, size=(100, 10)),
columns = list('abcdefghij'))
df['result'] = 0
groups = df.groupby([df.i, df.j])
for g in groups:
icol_eq = df.i == g[0][0]
jcol_eq = df.j == g[0][1]
i_and_j = icol_eq & jcol_eq
df['result'][i_and_j] = len(g[1])
The above works, but is extremely slow for large dataframes.
I tried
df['result'] = df.groupby([df.i, df.j]).apply(len)
but it doesn't seem to work.
Nor does
def f(g):
g['result'] = len(g)
return g
df.groupby([df.i, df.j]).apply(f)
Nor can I merge the resulting series of a df.groupby.apply(lambda x: len(x))
You want to use transform:
In [98]:
df['result'] = df.groupby([df.i, df.j]).transform(len)
df
Out[98]:
a b c d e f g h i j result
0 6 1 3 0 1 1 4 2 8 6 6
1 1 3 9 7 5 5 3 5 4 4 1
2 1 5 0 1 8 1 4 7 3 9 1
3 6 8 6 4 6 0 8 0 6 5 6
4 7 9 7 2 8 9 9 6 0 6 7
5 3 5 5 7 2 7 7 3 2 8 3
6 5 0 4 7 5 7 5 7 9 1 5
7 3 2 5 4 3 6 8 4 2 0 3
8 2 3 0 4 8 5 7 9 7 2 2
9 1 1 3 2 3 5 6 6 5 6 1
10 3 0 2 7 1 8 1 3 5 4 3
....
transform returns a Series with an index aligned to your original df so you can then add it as a column