I am currently working on a Python Project and I would like to create the UI with PyQt5 (preferably with the help of PyQt5 Designer).
I have recently finished a Youtube tutorial about the basics of PyQt5, but I am still at beginner level.
I am currently trying to create the Main Menu of the program.
I would like the Main Menu to look like this (the background image would decorate the background but it's not today's problem):
enter image description here
But if possible, I hope there is a way to achieve it, I would like the buttons to scale with window size.
So for example when the user resizes the window, I would like it to look somehow ike this (not exactly, but something similar):enter image description here
So as you can see I would like the button width and height getting changed, as the user resizes the window (and keeping their ratio within the window).
I hope there is a way to solve this problem.
Thank you for the help in advance.
I tried to right click on QWidget and then clicking on the last option (might be Alignment in English, I am not native) and then clicking on that option (Maybe align as Grid in English)
enter image description here
After doing this, the layout this expanded to the window size, the button got resized as well.
enter image description here
enter image description here
But the button width corresponds to the layout size (not just for example 1/3 of it as I would like) and the height does not change that greatly, just the width.
Premise: there are various questions on the matter here on StackOverflow; while they mostly point out to documentation or answer to specific issues, I've not found a comprehensive answer that could be considered as a "main reference" which can be used as duplicate pointer yet, especially when the developer wants to have big margins and leave some empty space within the UI. The following may be considered as a generic answer thanks to the simple nature of this question.
You are on the right track: layout managers are the solution, and while it's not forbidden to use explicit geometries, that practice its frowned upon[1].
Layout management basics
Know more about layout managers
Qt provides 2 basic layout types:
QBoxLayout, a "direction based" layout, that aligns widget along a specified direction: horizontally or vertically; Qt provides two convenience classes for those directions: respectively, QHBoxLayout and QVBoxLayout;
QGridLayout, a layout that aligns widget using a grid, similarly to a table or a spreadsheet;
There are also more complex layout managers:
form layout (QFormLayout), providing a simple "form style" layout, normally shown with a label on the left, and some widget on the right, with "items" shown from the top to the bottom;
stacked layout (QStackedLayout), which instead switches between visible widgets as they were "pages" (see below);
Additionally, there are complex widgets that implement custom layouts on their own:
QTabWidget is based on the convenience QStackedWidget class (using the above mentioned QStackedLayout) with the addition of a tab bar to allow the user to switch between them;
QSplitter, that can split the available space horizontally or vertically, with handles that allow resizing the contents within the available area;
QToolBox that behaves similarly to QTabWidget, with the difference that the "pages" are put in a column, similarly to a file cabinet;
Finally, in Qt, layout managers use layout items, which are abstract object that represent physical geometries that are being shown on the screen. Those items may be widgets, spacers or even nested layouts.
In this answer, I will only cover the basic (grid and boxed) layout managers.
Set a main layout
The first step is to ensure that the parent widget (the one that contains a group of child widgets) has a layout manager: in Designer (as the documentation explains), you have to open the context menu of the "container widget" by right clicking on an empty area inside it, and choose an appropriate item in the "Lay out" submenu.
Using code, that's normally done like this:
widget = QWidget()
layout = QVBoxLayout()
widget.setLayout(layout)
# alternatively, just use the target widget as argument in the constructor
# layout = QVBoxLayout(widget)
# the above line automatically calls setLayout(widget) internally
# ...
layout.addWidget(someWidget)
The issue of "responsiveness" and spacing
Modern UIs may often have lots of free space with relatively small controls. For instance, a login interface takes some amount of screen space, even if its input fields are quite small, allowing some space to show a fancy background or, even, just to better capture attention from the user.
With nowadays devices, we normally have a lot of available (and actually readable) screen size, but that wasn't the case until 10-20 years ago, when it was still normal to have "big" screens with a very small resolution (19" CRT screens only showing 1280x960 pixels if not less... heck, that's one of my screens!): you had about 90-100 pixels for inch, while High DPI screens or modern mobile devices can show about 10 times more in the same size. Less resolution means that it's more difficult to distinguish objects on the screen, especially when dealing with text; it's like having some light form of visual impairment: you may still be able to read text and set shapes apart, but it's difficult, you need to be more focused on what you're trying to see, and after some time that can be annoying and create fatigue.
The QtWidget module, similarly to other namespaces of other "old" common toolkits (eg. Gtk), was born on those concepts, meaning that "widgets" (UI elements that are used as human interface) have some requirements based on the available pixels, also considering the capabilities of the system to show text.
Long story short: widgets normally take as much space as it's possible in order to show their context, based on the principles above, but also considering previous, existing conventions.
Some widgets use space weirdly
Let's create two buttons and manually set their geometries:
And then set a vertical layout as explained above:
As you can see, they take all the available horizontal space, but do not extend vertically. The previous convention says that buttons do not expand vertically.
In the early days, UIs were simple: there were few buttons that were normally shown at the bottom of some dialog, and they used as much horizontal space as possible. Screen resolutions were actually small (640x480, or even less when using simple ASCII characters to display UI elements), there was no point in having "big" buttons, not to mention tall buttons.
Other widgets require different space usage
Let's add a QLineEdit to the top of the above layout: QLineEdit is a simple input field, it normally requires a simple string consisting of a single line; meaning that there is no point in requiring more vertical space, so the result is quite the same:
Now, we need a more complex text input, allowing text that may have multiple lines; let's add a QTextEdit widget:
Whoa, what's happened? Since QTextEdit is normally capable of showing multiple lines, it's important to take all the available space. Since the other widgets don't really need all that space, it will take advantage of it.
Size hints and policies
Layout managers have to decide how to set the geometry (position and size) of all the items they manage. In order to do that, they query all the items they manage (consider that layouts may be nested) and ask them about their size hints (the size that the item prefers), their constraints (minimum/maximum or fixed size) and their policy.
All Qt widgets provide a size policy, which tells the layout that manages them how they could be eventually resized and positioned. QPushButton has a fixed vertical policy (meaning that they usually have a predefined fixed height[2], as shown in the second image), while all scroll areas have an expanding vertical and horizontal policy, so they will try to take advantage of all the available space (and the layout will decide how much, based on all the other items).
Stretch factors
Basic layout managers support stretch factors, which can also be used as spacers: each layout item has a stretch factor that is considered as a ratio (computed with the total sum of all stretch factors of the layout).
Consider the following layout, using 2 QTextEdits:
Now, select the container widget in Designer, and scroll to the bottom of the Property Editor until we get the container layout properties; change the layoutStretch property to 1, 2, meaning that the available vertical space will be split in 3, with the first QTextEdit using the result of that value, and the second using twice (height / sum_of_stretches * stretch_of_item):
Margins and spaces
Considering the above, we still want to have a fancy UI that uses a lot of the huge available resolution and show very tiny widgets.
QBoxLayout classes provide the helper functions addStretch() and insertStretch(), that allow to create "empty" spaces (using QSpacerItem objects). This can also be done in Designer, by dragging and dropping the "Horizontal" or "Vertical" spacer item from the widget box; in the following image, I've added a vertical spacer to the top, and changed again the layoutStretch property to 1, 1, 2, meaning that there will be an empty space on top that is tall as much as the first QTextEdit, and both will be half of the second:
Complex layout management
As said above, QLayout subclasses manage their items, including nested layouts[3]. Let's restart from the basic two buttons and add spacers above and below:
That's still not fine. Let's set stretch factors properly; for instance, let the buttons take 1/5 of the available space each, with 2/5 of the space above and a remaining fifth below:
But that still doesn't work as expected. Remember about the size policy explained above. That property can be changed also in Designer (or by code by using setSizePolicy()); select those buttons and change their vertical policies to Preferred [4]:
That's better. But still not close enough: there's still a lot of unnecessarily used horizontal space.
We could change the maximumWidth properties of those buttons, but that would be fixed; we don't like that: the buttons will always have the same width, even if the window is very wide.
Enter QGridLayout
One of the benefits (and falls) of QGridLayout is that it always has a static amount of rows and columns [5], even if no layout item exists at that row/column cell position. This means that we can use its setRowStretch() and setColumnStretch() functions even when the layout has no widget for such row or column amount.
In Designer, we can change the layout type to a grid by right clicking on an empty area of the container, then it's just a matter of setting proper stretch factors, but if you already had a layout set it's better to select the Break Layout item and manually set an hypothetical layout by hand, then select Grid Layout from the submenu.
Let's restart again from scratch, as shown in the first image; break the layout and reposition/resize the buttons:
Then select a grid layout from the context menu (the following shows buttons for which a Preferred vertical size policy was already set):
Now add horizontal and vertical spacers:
Assuming that the vertical size policy of those buttons is set to Preferred as explained above, finally update the parent layout's layoutRowStretch and layoutColumnStretch factors to 2, 1, 1, 1 and 1, 1, 1 respectively; the vertical space will be split in 5, with an empty area occupying twice the resulting value, while the buttons and the bottom spacer occupying that fifth each; horizontally, left and right spacers will be as wide as the buttons:
If we resize the form or its preview, the button sizes are more responsive:
Note that in order to do that by code you must previously consider cell positions: the buttons will be added to rows 1 and 2, and column 1, then you have to properly call setRowStretch() and setColumnStretch() with appropriate indexes and factors.
This is one of the reasons for which QGridLayout may not always be the proper choice, especially for dynamic layouts for which the row/column cell count might not be known at first.
Layout management seems difficult, is it required?
The simple answer is "no", but reality is quite more complex.
As mentioned above, widgets must always ensure that they are always visible and usable. Modern systems use HighDPI screens, meaning that the physical pixels are never the same as logical pixels: a line that has a width of 1 "pixel" may actually be 10 pixels wide. Text may also depend on the font scaling.
Some visually impaired users (including people just having "simple" presbyopia) may set up their computers to have high font scale ratios (150, 200 or even more) in order to be able to read text more easily; some people may just use a peculiar default font that, at the default size, requires much more space to be shown, vertically and/or horizontally. Since Qt always tries to fully show a widget containing text considering the required space of its font, the result is that you may have overlapping widgets, because you didn't consider that another widget on its left or top may require more space than you thought.
The rule of thumb is: what you see on your device(s) is never what others will see.
Qt layout management (including QStyle functions, specifically those related to QSize such as QStyle.sizeFromContents()) always consider these factors, and, besides some unexpected behavior/bug, you can normally expect a resulting UI that is properly shown to the user.
99.9% of the times somebody wants to use fixed geometries, they are doing something wrong: they are probably trying to do something for the wrong reason (normally, lack of experience), and, in any case, they are not considering the above aspects.
As a reference, you've probably browsed some website on a mobile device that is simply "not responsive": you have to scroll a lot, and navigation is really annoying. That is because those website obviously didn't consider modern devices; and that's as annoying as a "not layout managed" UI might look. Luckily, even if the QtWidgets module is "old", it considers these modern aspects, and, even considering some glitches and inconsistencies, it normally allows proper geometry management as long as layout managers are properly used.
[1]: there is theoretically nothing wrong in explicitly setting geometries, as long as it's done with awareness; 99% of the times, it isn't: object require a certain size in order to be properly shown and used, which requires being aware of system settings: most importantly screen DPI and font scaling; Qt is quite careful about these aspects and tries to ensure that all widgets are properly displayed and usable; if you're getting issues with font or widget display, avoiding layout managers is not the solution;
[2]: Qt uses QStyle functions to decide how wide or tall a widget should or could be, based on the detected system configuration; you should normally trust it;
[3]: See the following posts: 1, 2 and 3;
[4]: It's possible to set properties to multiple widgets at once, as long as those properties are common; since the sizePolicy property is common to all widgets, we can select both buttons (using Ctrl) and the property change will be applied to both of them;
[5]: See this related post;
I have a PyQt5 project where I create complex geometrical objects in a QGraphicsScene, and them show them in a QGraphicsView - standard stuff.
When I run my code on a large (1920x1080) monitor, the scene is displayed nicely with no scrollbars. However when I run it on a 1366x768 device, the viewport is too small, and I only see a part of the object, with scrollbars.
(In both cases, the window starts maximised.)
To fix this, I added the following code when the window is initialised:
my_view.fitInView(my_scene.sceneRect(), Qt.KeepAspectRatio)
and this works perfectly on the small monitor. However, on the large monitor, the viewport is now made smaller, and the scene is smaller than before.
So I try to predict in advance whether the scene is going to fit in the view or not, and print out some sizes to try to work out how:
print("A", my_scene.sceneRect().size())
print("B", my_view.size())
print("C", my_view.viewport().size())
And I get this:
A PyQt5.QtCore.QSizeF(227.0, 702.0)
B PyQt5.QtCore.QSize(640, 480)
C PyQt5.QtCore.QSize(621, 478)
I get the same set of numbers before and after fitInView(), on both displays.
How can I predict whether or not the scene will fit in the view without scrollbars, so that I don't make the graphic smaller when it doesn't need to be, but still is rescaled when it is not going to fit?
I have a gtk.IconView with several icons in it. Sometimes I will resize the window to see more icons. When I do this, the extra space generated isn't distributed evenly between all the columns. Instead, it all gets put on the right until there's enough space for a new column.
I'm not seeing anything in the documentation that would let me do this automatically. Do I need to check for resize signals and then manually set the column and row spacings? If so, which resize signal do I use.
Here's a picture of what I mean. I've marked the extra space in red.
This is what I'd like to see (of course, with the gaps actually evenly spaced, unlike my poor MS Paint job).
We have encountered that problem in Ubuntu Accomplishments Viewer, and as we managed to solve it, I'll present our solution.
The trick is to place the GtkIconView in a GtkScrolledWindow, and set it's hscrollbar_policy to "always". Then, a check-resize signal has to be used, to react when the user resizes the window (note that it must be checked if the size has changed, for the signal is emitted also when e.g. the window is dragged around). When the size changes, the model used by GtkIconView has to be cleared and recreated, as this triggers GtkIconView properly reallocating the newly gained space (or shrinking). Also, as the result the horizontal scrollbar will never be seen, as the GtkIconView uses exactly that much space as the GtkScrolledWindow uses.
Yeap, it seems after a very fat look that you will need to do that on your own. And regardeing the signal, I'd check for GtkContainer::check-resize.
Use the event size_allocate.
I defined my class :
class toto(Gtk.IconView):
def __init__(self):
super(toto,self).__init__()
self.connect("size_allocate",self.resize)
self.set_columns(4)
Then I modify the number of working columns
def resize(self,_iv,_rect):
print("X",rect.x)
print("Y",rect.y)
print("W",rect.width)
print("H",rect.height)
# calculate number of columns, let's say 3
_cols=3
self.set_columns(_cols)
Seems working for me
I am working on an application with two children. One's a widget that functions as a toolbar, the second, below, functions as dashboard, on which information would appear. The latter can be shown/hidden with buttons on the former. Here's a screen-cast of the prototype.
Now I am looking at doing the same but with a motion animation whilst showing/hiding the lower widget.
In short: the effect should be giving the impression the entire application rises or falls progressively when toggling the dashboard.
In details: I would like the height of the lower widget to decrease until it is reduced to 0 and then hidden completely. Likewise it would increase slowly when showing the widget again. In the meanwhile the position of the application should change accordingly so it stays at the bottom of the screen.
How can I do that? I've never done animations on Qt before. If you don't have an answer, do you know of a quality tutorial that could lead me there.
NB: I am using PyQt.
I think you can get what you want by using a QPropertyAnimation that animates the geometry property of your widget.
But IMHO this is the window manager's role to do what you want. Maybe you will have some headaches bypassing it (but I'm maybe wrong).
After better reading of your question, it seems that you want to use your own components to trigger the hiding/showing so the WM shouldn't be a problem.
As a start here is some code that animate a minimizing of a widget (assuming tbw is an instance of the widget you want to animate):
formerGeometry = QtCore.QRect(tbw.geometry()) # storing previous geometry in order to be able to restore it later
hideAnimation = QtCore.QPropertyAnimation(tbw, "geometry")
hideAnimation.setDuration(2000) # chose the value that fits you
hideAnimation.setStartValue(formerGeometry)
#computing final geometry
endTopLeftCorner = QtCore.QPoint(tbw.pos() + QtCore.QPoint(0, tbw.height()))
finalGeometry = QtCore.QRect(endTopLeftCorner, QtCore.QSize(tbw.width(), 0))
hideAnimation.setEndValue(finalGeometry)
hideAnimation.start()
I'm having problems getting my wxPython window to refresh. It's currently plotting a graph using wxmpl which can be zoomed, panned, etc. On occasion the user may plot a large amount of data and zoom in on a small portion, which can cause it to 'freeze up'. By that I mean the plot itself is not updated, and the axis labels are drawn on top of each other. It is modifying the plot, just not displaying the updated info correctly. If you resize the window the plot is redrawn correctly.
I've spend an inordinate amount of time digging through source code and documentation for wx, wxmpl, and matplotlib... The best solution I've come up with is resizing the window to force a repaint (thus displaying the updated plot correctly).
# All of these fail - displays the same, incorrect plot
# (view is a wxmpl.PlotPanel object, which inherits from wx.Window among other things)
view.Refresh()
view.Update()
view.draw()
# This works, but is clearly less than ideal
view.SetSize((view.GetSize().width, view.GetSize().height+1))
view.SetSize((view.GetSize().width, view.GetSize().height-1))
There's got to be a better way - what I really want to know is what wx.Window.SetSize does to redraw the window, and just call that instead. Or, is there another method that I missed somewhere?
The panel.Layout() command is a great option because it is exactly the same method that is called when you resize your window. I also had trouble with the refresh and update methods. Layout seems to work when those two fail.
If you can't place it anywhere else, you could try
wx.Yield()
instead of Refresh or Update.
I would also try Show(False) and then Show(True) on the PlotPanel.
In a computational expensive application, where you are expecting something to be calculated for over 0.1 sec and probably have some user input it is not recommended usually to make those intense drawing in the GUI thread.
Not aware of your specific situation, but general approach if that you move all time consuming tasks (be it computation, image adjustment (e.g. scaling)) to the non GUI thread. Just a normal Python thread is fine, and once you have an long part complete, you refresh your GUI. During computation of course it would be a user friendly to display some sort of "waiting" sign. Also disable other controls, so bored user will not be able to change anything midway to your computation.
I was stuck with that issue since my early days with Java and later with Python, mostly in connection to network operations (which NEVER should be in GUI thread).
In case it is image adjusment (or graphics generation), which takes much time, background thread can prepare image in wxMemoryDC and then wxDC::Blit it to the window of your choice. I am not aware if this can be done with your component wxmpl.PlotPanel, so you will have to research this.