We Keep Coding

How to i make "rows" consiting of pairs from a list of objects that is sorted based on their attributes

I have created a class with attributes and sorted them based on their level of x, from 1-6. I then want to sort the list into pairs, where the objects with the highest level of "x" and the object with the lowest level of "x" are paired together, and the second most and second less and so on. If it was my way it would look like this, even though objects are not itereable.
for objects in sortedlist:
i = 0
row(i) = [[sortedlist[i], list[-(i)-1]]
i += 1
if i => len(sortedlist)
break

Using zip
I think the code you want is:
rows = list(zip(sortedList, reversed(sortedList)))
However, note that this would "duplicate" the elements:
>>> sortedList = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>>> list(zip(sortedList, reversed(sortedList)))
[(1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3), (4, 2), (5, 1)]
If you know that the list has an even number of elements and want to avoid duplicates, you can instead write:
rows = list(zip(sortedList[:len(sortedList)//2], reversed(sortedList[len(sortedList)//2:])))
With the following result:
>>> sortedList = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
>>> list(zip(sortedList[:len(sortedList)//2], reversed(sortedList[len(sortedList)//2:])))
[(1, 6), (2, 5), (3, 4)]
Using loops
Although I recommend using zip rather than a for-loop, here is how to fix the loop you wrote:
rows = []
for i in range(len(sortedList)):
rows.append((sortedList[i], sortedList[-i-1]))
With result:
>>> sortedList=[1,2,3,4,5]
>>> rows = []
>>> for i in range(len(sortedList)):
... rows.append((sortedList[i], sortedList[-i-1]))
...
>>> rows
[(1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3), (4, 2), (5, 1)]

Problem in getting unique elements from list of tuples

I got sample input as a=[(1,2),(2,3),(1,1),(2,1)], and the expected ouput is a=[(1,2),(2,3),(1,1)].
Here, (2,1) is removed, since the same combinational pair (1,2) is already available. I tried below code to remove duplicate pairs
map(tuple, set(frozenset(x) for x in a))
However, the output is [(1, 2), (2, 3), (1,)]. How to get (1,1) pair as (1,1) instead of (1,).

You can use a dict instead of a set to map the frozensets to the original tuple values. Build the dict in reversed order of the list so that duplicating tuples closer to the front can take precedence:
{frozenset(x): x for x in reversed(a)}.values()
This returns:
[(1, 2), (2, 3), (1, 1)]

This is one approach using sorted
Ex:
a=[(1,2),(2,3),(1,1),(2,1)]
print set([tuple(sorted(i)) for i in a])
Output:
set([(1, 2), (2, 3), (1, 1)])

python 2.7 unique calculation issue

Using Python 2.7, I have a list, and each element in the list is a (sub-list) -- a list of tuples. I want to remove the duplicate sub-list, I post input and expected output. I tried to use set, but there is error said list is not hashable. Anyone have good elegant code solutions? Thanks.
a=[[(1,2),(1,3)],
[(1,3),(1,2)],
[(1,2),(1,3)]]
# expect output
'''
a=[[(1,2),(1,3)],
[(1,3),(1,2)]]
'''

Try this! This is the simplest method.
a = [[(1,2),(1,3)],
[(1,3),(1,2)],
[(1,2),(1,3)]]
print [list(i) for i in set(map(tuple, a))]
[[(1, 3), (1, 2)], [(1, 2), (1, 3)]] //output
The above one is without any library support and also the ordering of the original list can't be ensured.
If you want to preserve the order of the list, then go for collections library.
from collections import OrderedDict
a = [[(1,2),(1,3)],
[(1,3),(1,2)],
[(1,2),(1,3)]]
print map(list, OrderedDict.fromkeys(map(tuple, a)))
[[(1, 2), (1, 3)], [(1, 3), (1, 2)]] //output

I think you can use a set, something like below
a=[[(1,2),(1,3)],
[(1,3),(1,2)],
[(1,2),(1,3)]]
unique_list = [list(x) for x in set(tuple(x) for x in a)]
print unique_list
Output:
[[(1, 3), (1, 2)], [(1, 2), (1, 3)]]
See working repl here - https://repl.it/EinE/1

How does `key=function` in `sorted(tuple, key=function)` work?

Given a list of non-empty tuples, return a list sorted in increasing order by the last element in each tuple.
e.g. [(1, 7), (1, 3), (3, 4, 5), (2, 2)] yields [(2, 2), (1, 3), (3, 4, 5), (1, 7)]
Hint: use a custom key= function to extract the last element form each tuple.
The solution to the problem is:
def last(a):
return a[-1]
def sort_last(tuples):
return sorted(tuples, key=last)
Can anyone help me to understand what arguments are passed to the last function? Specifically, what does a contain?
We have not passed any values or arguments while calling the last function in the sorted method.

This is what is called a "lambda".
It's passing the current element of your list to the function "last" which will then get the last element of the tuple.
So the parameter "a" is the tuple being currently processed.

Iterating through a tuple via for loop - (Sorted initial list with 2nd element of the tuple.)
Nested for loops - comparing original tuple with the sorted 2nd element list.
tuple1 = [(2, 5), (1, 2), (4, 4), (2, 3), (2, 1)]
List2 =[]
List3 =[]
for t in tuple1:
List2.append(t[1],)
List2.sort()
print(List2)
for l in List2:
for q in tuple1:
if l == int(q[1],):
List3.append(q)
print(List3)

Simple List Error Python

In the following code, I created a list of lists, like an array. I began getting a "list assignment out of range" error. As a workaround for this error, I added 2 extra instances of diceSumTable, is you can see in the code. It will print now, but it is preceded by "2, 3". In my studying, I can't recall any reason why this would be happening if every instance of diceSumTable is already defined.
EDIT: Here was the original code, without applying the workaround.
def dice():
diceSumTable = [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]
diceSumTable[2] = [(1,1)]
diceSumTable[3] = [(1,2),(2,1)]
diceSumTable[4] = [(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)]
diceSumTable[5] = [(1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1)]
diceSumTable[6] = [(1,5),(2,4),(3,3),(4,2),(5,1)]
diceSumTable[7] = [(1,6),(2,5),(3,4),(4,3),(5,2),(6,1)]
diceSumTable[8] = [(2,6),(3,5),(4,4),(5,3),(6,2)]
diceSumTable[9] = [(3,6),(4,5),(5,4),(6,3)]
diceSumTable[10] = [(4,6),(5,5),(6,4)]
diceSumTable[11] = [(5,6),(6,5)]
diceSumTable[12] = [(6,6)]
#for illustrative purposes
for i in diceSumTable:
print i
dice()

As said, you start indexing the diceSumTable from index #2 onward, leaving entries 0 and 1 untouched. The error you got was because you were indexing past the end of the array.
For your problem a "dict" might be a better solution:
diceSumTable = {}
diceSumTable[ 2 ] = [(1,1)]
diceSumTable[ 3 ] = [(1,2), (2,1)]

Try this:
def dice():
diceSumTable = [] # define diceSumTable as a list
diceSumTable.append((1,1)) # append the tuple to diceSumTable
diceSumTable.append(((1,2),(2,1))) # append a tuple of tuples to diceSumTable
diceSumTable.append(((1,3),(2,2),(3,1)))
diceSumTable.append(((1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1)))
diceSumTable.append(((1,5),(2,4),(3,3),(4,2),(5,1)))
diceSumTable.append(((1,6),(2,5),(3,4),(4,3),(5,2),(6,1)))
diceSumTable.append(((2,6),(3,5),(4,4),(5,3),(6,2)))
diceSumTable.append(((3,6),(4,5),(5,4),(6,3)))
diceSumTable.append(((4,6),(5,5),(6,4)))
diceSumTable.append(((5,6),(6,5)))
diceSumTable.append(((6,6)))
#for illustrative purposes
for i in diceSumTable:
print i
dice()
You got 2, 3 because that's what you entered into the list in the first to places, the other numbers you put in got replaced with statements like diceSumTable[x] =.

You are entering data from 2 index (means third element in array).
diceSumTable = [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]
when you do
# Replacing third element
diceSumTable[2] = [(1,1)]
diceSumTable will be like
diceSumTable = [2,3,[(1,1)],5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]
Slly it will replace all values.

You are confusing the value of an entry in a list with the index of a list.
diceSumTable[3] corresponds to the fourth entry in diceSumTable (since they are numbered from 0).
Your first line creates a list diceSumTable with 13 entries, numbered 0...12.
Your next set of lines fills in the 3d through 13th entries (and throws away what was there before!).
To do what you want, you have a few choices.
1/ You can do what you're doing, but ignore the first two entries. This is not very pythonic...
2/ You can create a length 11 list, holding the actual entries. In this case, the most efficient way to do it is
diceSumTable = [] ### empty list
diceSumTable.append([(1,1)])
diceSumTable.append([(1,2),(2,1)])
#### etc.
3/ You can use a dict. This is probably closest to what you want, although it's slightly inefficient in space and time, since you just want consecutive integer keys (but premature optimisation is the root of all evil):
diceSumTable = {} ### empty dict
diceSumTable[2] = [(1,1)]
diceSumTable[3] = [(1,2),(2,1)]
#### etc.
(Markdown question: is there any way to intersperse code within a bulleted or enumerated list?)

When you set diceSumTable[2] you are replacing the third value in the list (lists are zero indexed - first value is name[0]) not the value that currently holds 2.
So after the first call you have diceSumTable equal to [2,3,[(1,1)],5,6,...].
I think what you could do is, as mentioned elsewhere, use diceSumTable = [] then diceSumTable.append((1,1)) for each dice combination.
You could also use a dictionary.
diceSumTable = {}
diceSumTable[2] = [(1,1)]
diceSumTable[3] = [(1,2),(2,1)]
#etc
You could then access by value rather than position.
>>>diceSumValue[3]
[(1,2),(2,1)]
>>>

You should index the list by it's indices, not the values:
In [123]: lst = [3, 4, 5]
In [124]: lst[0] == 3 #item "3" is at index 0
Out[124]: True
In [125]: lst[3] #out of range
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IndexError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-125-48d1ca706e8c> in <module>()
----> 1 lst[3] #out of range
IndexError: list index out of range
In [126]: lst[1] = 10 #if I want to change "4" in the list to "10"
In [127]: lst
Out[127]: [3, 10, 5]

I am not shure of what result do you except from this code, what i understood is that you want to code to print :
[(1, 1)]
[(1, 2), (2, 1)]
[(1, 3), (2, 2), (3, 1)]
[(1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 2), (4, 1)]
[(1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3), (4, 2), (5, 1)]
[(1, 6), (2, 5), (3, 4), (4, 3), (5, 2), (6, 1)]
[(2, 6), (3, 5), (4, 4), (5, 3), (6, 2)]
[(3, 6), (4, 5), (5, 4), (6, 3)]
[(4, 6), (5, 5), (6, 4)]
[(5, 6), (6, 5)]
[(6, 6)]
In this case, i think the error you are making is believing that the following line :
diceSumTable = [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]
Give you a list where index start from 2 and finish at 14, which is wrong because in Python every list index start at 0, and there is no way you can change that. The line you give me, actually create a list where the first index is 0 and the last index is 12 (size of the list - 1). And you list is such that diceSumTable[0] is 2 diceSumTable[1] is 3, etc.
This lead you to two options, either accept that list start at index 0, and if you want to keep using the mapping you want (i guess there is a reason for that, you surely want to associate 2 with (1,1), 3 with (1,2), (2,1)) just use diceSumTable[theNumberOfYourMapping -2]. Or as say haavee, you can use dict for that. But in this case, when you will iterate over your dict, you won't have you value is the write order. If there is no gap between you're wanted index i will go with the map.
I think it will be great if you could explain use a bit more what you want to do, why do you want 2 and not 0 to be associated to [(1,1)]. Do you want to do something else with this lis t than printing it. To sum up here is the code, i would have written, if i understood what you wanted to do :
def dice():
diceSumTable = [[(1,1)],
[(1,2),(2,1)],
[(1,3),(2,2),(3,1)],
[(1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1)],
[(1,5),(2,4),(3,3),(4,2),(5,1)],
[(1,6),(2,5),(3,4),(4,3),(5,2),(6,1)],
[(2,6),(3,5),(4,4),(5,3),(6,2)],
[(3,6),(4,5),(5,4),(6,3)],
[(4,6),(5,5),(6,4)],
[(5,6),(6,5)],
[(6,6)]]
#this is like for value in diceSumTable but i will iterate to 0,1..10 in more
for (i,value) in enumerate(diceSumTable):
print str(i+2) + " is associated to " + str(value)
dice()
Moreover if you want to know more about Python list, i could read :
http://effbot.org/zone/python-list.htm
And for Python dictionary :
http://www.pythonforbeginners.com/dictionary/dictionary-manipulation-in-pythonc