Looking for help got stuck at a point, I am new to python and django. There ARE two payments corresponding to one order, one COLLECTION and multiple TRANSFER and i need the payment corresponding to an order whose direction is COLLECTION only NOT transfered yet so that i can initiate TRANSFER against that order
models.py
class Orders(models.Model):
id= models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
payment_gateway_code = models.CharField(max_length=20,choices=[('PAYTM','PAYTM')])
is_active = models.BooleanField(default=True)
class Payments(models.Model):
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
orders = models.ForeignKey(Orders, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
direction = models.CharField(max_length=20,choices=[('COLLECTION','COLLECTION'),
('TRANSFER','TRANSFER')])
settlement_status = models.CharField(max_length=50,blank=True, null=True,choices=[('YES','YES'),
('NO','NO')])
is_active = models.BooleanField(default=True)
qualified_orders = Orders.objects.filter(payment_gateway_code='CASHFREE',
Exists(Payments.objects.filter(order=OuterRef('pk'), direction='COLLECTION',
settlement_status='YES')), ~Exists(Payments.objects.filter(order=OuterRef('pk'),
direction='TRANSFER')))
But above query is not working
What is OuterRef('pk')?
First, I'd suggest changing orders to order.
Then, the query you're trying to achieve will be something like this (Assuming order_id contains the ID of the order):
Paymen.objects.filter(order_id=order_id, direction="COLLECTION")
You can use views.py for that as follows
Models.py
class Orders(models.Model):
id= models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
payment_gateway_code = models.CharField(max_length=20,choices=[('PAYTM','PAYTM')])
is_active = models.BooleanField(default=True)
class Payments(models.Model):
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
orders = models.ForeignKey(Orders, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
direction = models.CharField(max_length=20,related_name="direction",choices=[('COLLECTION','COLLECTION'),
('TRANSFER','TRANSFER')])
settlement_status = models.CharField(max_length=50,blank=True, null=True,choices=[('YES','YES'),
('NO','NO')])
is_active = models.BooleanField(default=True)
views.py
from App.models import orders, payments
#in case if you need objects of order this is for that
def orderfunc():
order = Orders.objects.all()
def paymentfunc():
payment = Payment.objects.all()
# from here you can check for what record you want using conditional operator
#if direction == COLLECTION:
#then do what you need
Related
I am trying to display quiz only for users that are registered in a particular course, i.e if a user is registered in a Frontend Crash Course i want them to see only the quiz related to that course they are registered in, and not all the quiz from the db.
i have a model UserCourse where i am storing all the courses a user have enrolled in, when i try filtering by that models while user_course is get like this below
user_course = UserCourse.objects.get(user=request.user)
quizzes = Quiz.objects.filter(course__usercourse=user_course).annotate(questions_count=Count('questions'))
i get this error get() returned more than one UserCourse -- it returned 3! Now i have changed .get() to .filter() like this
user_course = UserCourse.objects.filter(user=request.user)
quizzes = Quiz.objects.filter(course__usercourse=user_course).annotate(questions_count=Count('questions'))
i then get this error The QuerySet value for an exact lookup must be limited to one result using slicing.
What is the right way to write this query.
models.py
class UserCourse(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User , null = False , on_delete=models.CASCADE)
course = models.ForeignKey(Course , null = False , on_delete=models.CASCADE, related_name="usercourse")
class Quiz(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE, related_name="quizzes")
title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
course = models.ForeignKey(Course, on_delete=models.SET_NULL, null=True, related_name="quizzes")
date = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
slug = models.SlugField(unique=True)
user_course = models.ForeignKey(UserCourse, on_delete=models.SET_NULL, null=True)
def __str__(self):
return self.title
The Problem in the Second Line
user_course = UserCourse.objects.filter(user=request.user)
quizzes=Quiz.objects.filter(course__usercourse=user_course).annotate(questions_count=Count('questions'))
remember that when You are using filter you get QuerySet not one object
if you want to return the quizes those related to user_course_queryset you can use __in filter
print(user_course) # print it to understand more
quizzes=Quiz.objects.filter(course__usercourse__in=user_course)
this will Return every Quiz Related to the QuerySet objects
I am writing a form to let a user enter a purchase from the template. A couple things need to happen:
the purchase goes to populate a row in the replenishment table
some fields of the replenishment table get updated based on what the user has input
here is what my model look like:
class replenishment(models.Model):
Id = models.CharField(max_length=100, primary_key=True, verbose_name= 'references')
Name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
Quantity = models.FloatField(default=0)
NetAmount = models.FloatField(default=0)
SupplierID = models.CharField(max_length=200)
Supplier = models.CharField(max_length=200)
SellPrice = models.FloatField(default=0)
StockOnOrder = models.FloatField(default=0)
StockOnHand = models.FloatField(default=0)
def __str__(self):
return self.reference
and the form:
class ProcurementOperationRecord(forms.Form)
Id = forms.CharField(required=True)
Quantity = forms.FloatField(required=True)
NetAmount = forms.FloatField(required=True)
Supplier = forms.CharField(required=True)
SellPrice = forms.FloatField(required=True)
I have no clue how to let the user input the values in form and automatically add Quantity to StockOnOrder as well as automatically recognize the SupplierID based on Supplier. At this point I don't know where to start really. At least, is it possible to achieve what I try to do?
First, I've changed some things around and added some comments to what and why I did them.
# models/classes in python are singular AND camel cased (99.9%)
class Supplier(models.Model):
...
# models/classes in python are singular AND camel cased (99.9%)
class Replenishment(models.Model):
# attributes are normally lower case and snake cased (99.9%)
# try not to do this, a CharField??, unless you're using a guid? if so use UUIDField()
# https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/ref/models/fields/#uuidfield
id = models.CharField(db_column='Id', max_length=100, primary_key=True, verbose_name='references')
name = models.CharField(db_column='Name', max_length=200)
quantity = models.FloatField(db_column='Quantity', default=0)
net_amount = models.FloatField(db_column='NetAmount', default=0)
# deleted your field "Supplier" -- with this change you can join to the other table and get what you need without having to duplicate anything
supplier = models.ForeignKey(Supplier, db_column='SupplierID')
sell_price = models.DecimalField(db_column='SellPrice', default=0, max_digits=6, decimal_places=2) # You're asking for trouble if you keep this as FloatField
stock_on_order = models.IntegerField(db_column='StockOnOrder', default=0) # how can you have ordered a .5 for your stock? changed to IntegerField
stock_on_hand = models.IntegerField(db_column='StockOnHand', default=0) # how can you have a .5 of your stock? changed to IntegerField
class Meta:
db_table = 'replenishment' # try not to do this either.. let django come up with the name.. unless you're using an existing database/table?
...
# models/classes in python are singular AND camel cased (99.9%)
# django has a standard that they normally postfix forms with "Form" at the end of the class (no matter if it's a ModelForm or regular Form)
class ProcurementOperationRecordForm(forms.ModelForm)
class Meta:
model = Replenishment
fields = ('id', 'quantity', 'net_amount', 'supplier', 'sell_price')
# I would remove the "id", the client shouldn't care or know about it..
Now to create and update. (This would live inside a view)
# creating?
form = ProcurementOperationRecordForm(data=request.POST)
if form.is_valid():
form.save()
return redirect(..) or render(..)
# updating?
replenishment = Replenishment.objects.get(id='...something')
form = ProcurementOperationRecordForm(data=request.POST, instance=replenishment)
if form.is_valid():
form.save()
return redirect(..) or render(..)
This is just a general idea. You can try something like this.
First get the user input values of quantity and supplier like this from the valid form.
quantity = form.cleaned_data.get('quantity')
supplier = form.cleaned_data.get('supplier')
Then you can update your replenishment model
replenishment.objects.filter(Supplier=supplier).update(StockOnOrder=quantity)
The goal of this project is to create an API that refreshes hourly with the most up to date betting odds for a list of games that I'll be scraping hourly from the internet. The goal structure for the JSON returned will be each game as the parent object and the nested children will be the top 1 record for each of linesmakers being scraped by updated date. My understanding is that the best way to accomplish this is to modify the to_representation function within the ListSerializer to return the appropriate queryset.
Because I need the game_id of the parent element to grab the children of the appropriate game, I've attempted to pull the game_id out of the data that gets passed. The issue is that this line looks to be populated correctly when I see what it contains through an exception, but when I let the full code run, I get a list index is out of range exception.
For ex.
class OddsMakerListSerializer(serializers.ListSerializer):
def to_representation(self, data):
game = data.all()[0].game_id
#if I put this here it evaluates to 1 which should run the raw sql below correctly
raise Exception(game)
data = OddsMaker.objects.filter(odds_id__in = RawSQL(''' SELECT o.odds_id
FROM gamesbackend_oddsmaker o
INNER JOIN (
SELECT game_id
, oddsmaker
, max(updated_datetime) as last_updated
FROM gamesbackend_oddsmaker
WHERE game_id = %s
GROUP BY game_id
, oddsmaker
) l on o.game_id = l.game_id
and o.oddsmaker = l.oddsmaker
and o.updated_datetime = l.last_updated
''', [game]))
#if I put this here the data appears to be populated correctly and contain the right data
raise Exception(data)
data = [game for game in data]
return data
Now, if I remove these raise Exceptions, I get the list index is out of range. My initial thought was that there's something else that depends on "data" being returned as a list, so I created the list comprehension snippet, but that doesn't resolve the issue.
So, my question is 1) Is there an easier way to accomplish what I'm going for? I'm not using a postgres backend so distinct on isn't available to me. and 2) If not, its not clear to me what instance is that's being passed in or what is expected to be returned. I've consulted the documentation and it looks as though it expects a dictionary and that might be part of the issue, but again the error message references a list. https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/serializers/#overriding-serialization-and-deserialization-behavior
I appreciate any help in understanding what is going on here in advance.
Edit:
The rest of the serializers:
class OddsMakerSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
list_serializer_class = OddsMakerListSerializer
model = OddsMaker
fields = ('odds_id','game_id','oddsmaker','home_ml',
'away_ml','home_spread','home_spread_odds',
'away_spread_odds','total','total_over_odds',
'total_under_odds','updated_datetime')
class GameSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
oddsmaker_set = OddsMakerSerializer(many=True, read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Game
fields = ('game_id','date','sport', 'home_team',
'away_team','home_score', 'away_score',
'home_win','away_win', 'game_completed',
'oddsmaker_set')
models.py:
class Game(models.Model):
game_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
date = models.DateTimeField(null=True)
sport=models.CharField(max_length=256, null=True)
home_team = models.CharField(max_length=256, null=True)
away_team = models.CharField(max_length=256, null=True)
home_score = models.IntegerField(default=0, null=True)
away_score = models.IntegerField(default=0, null=True)
home_win = models.BooleanField(default=0, null=True)
away_win = models.BooleanField(default=0, null=True)
game_completed = models.BooleanField(default=0, null=True)
class OddsMaker(models.Model):
odds_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
game = models.ForeignKey('Game', on_delete = models.CASCADE)
oddsmaker = models.CharField(max_length=256)
home_ml = models.IntegerField(default=999999)
away_ml = models.IntegerField(default=999999)
home_spread = models.FloatField(default=999)
home_spread_odds = models.IntegerField(default=9999)
away_spread_odds = models.IntegerField(default=9999)
total = models.FloatField(default=999)
total_over_odds = models.IntegerField(default=999)
total_under_odds = models.IntegerField(default=999)
updated_datetime = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)
views.py:
class GameView(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = Game.objects.all()
serializer_class = GameSerializer
Thanks
To answer the question in the title:
The instance being passed to the Serializer.to_representation() is the instance you pass when initializing the serializer
queryset = MyModel.objects.all()
Serializer(queryset, many=True)
instance = MyModel.objects.all().first()
Serializer(data)
Usually you don't have to inherit from ListSerializer per se. You can inherit from BaseSerializer and whenever you pass many=True during initialization, it will automatically 'becomeaListSerializer`. You can see this in action here
To answer your problem
from django.db.models import Max
class OddsMakerListSerializer(serializers.ListSerializer):
def to_representation(self, data): # data passed is a queryset of oddsmaker
# Do your filtering here
latest_date = data.aggregate(
latest_date=Max('updated_datetime')
).get('latest_date').date()
latest_records = data.filter(
updated_date_time__year=latest_date.year,
updated_date_time__month=latest_date.month,
updated_date_time__day=latest_date.day
)
return super().to_representation(latest_records)
I have a function which data like this :
my_workouts = Workouts.objects.groupby('my_date').filter(
my_date__year=year, my_date__month=month)
I want to do the same with another model where I want to group the weight by date:
Models.py
class Quiz(models.Model):
owner = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE, related_name='quizzes')
scheduled_date = models.DateTimeField(max_length=255, default=0)
weight = models.IntegerField(default=0)
What I tried:
data = Quiz.objects.orderby('scheduled_date').
filter(owner_id=request.user.pk,my_date__year=year, my_date__month=month).
annotate(c=Sum('weight')).values('c')
But this is not working, Please Help!
check your syntax
orderby must be order_by
data = Quiz.objects.order_by('scheduled_date').
filter(owner_id=request.user.pk,my_date__year=year, my_date__month=month).
annotate(c=Sum('weight')).values('c')
refer this
With the following model in my Django app:
class Story(models.Model):
#1:1 Fields
title = models.CharField(max_length=100, unique=True)
tagline = models.TextField(blank=True, null=True)
contents = models.TextField()
updated = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
slug = models.SlugField(unique=True)
full_length_book = models.BooleanField(default=False)
publish_now = models.BooleanField(default=False)
date_added = models.DateTimeField('date added to archive')
def __unicode__(self):
return self.title
class Meta:
verbose_name_plural = "Stories"
ordering = ['title']
I have several views that query the data from this model and use .order_by('title'), for example:
newlist = Story.objects.filter(tag=tag, publish_now=True).order_by('title')
The Problem: in the query results, as well as when I use the 'sort column' arrows in the django admin for the story group, it lists stories in order of last changed, and alphabetized within that ordering. I need the stories ordered firstly and solely by title, alphabetically. Why does it put recently changed entries at the end of the list?
I may be misunderstanding something about SQLite- even when I go into the database manager and call SELECT * FROM table_name ORDER BY LOWER(title) , the order is still by update first and then alphabetically within that.
edit The SQL Django is calling is as follows:
'SELECT "app_story"."id", "app_story"."title", "app_story"."tagline", "app_story"."contents", "app_story"."updated", "app_story"."slug", "app_story"."full_length_book", "app_story"."publish_now", "app_story","date_added" FROM "app_story" ORDER BY "app_story"."title" ASC'
This looks like it should order by title, so I still don't know why the order is coming up with newly edited items on the end of the list.