I have a python script that is used to submit spark jobs using the spark-submit tool. I want to execute the command and write the output both to STDOUT and a logfile in real time. i'm using python 2.7 on a ubuntu server.
This is what I have so far in my SubmitJob.py script
#!/usr/bin/python
# Submit the command
def submitJob(cmd, log_file):
with open(log_file, 'w') as fh:
process = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
while True:
output = process.stdout.readline()
if output == '' and process.poll() is not None:
break
if output:
print output.strip()
fh.write(output)
rc = process.poll()
return rc
if __name__ == "__main__":
cmdList = ["dse", "spark-submit", "--spark-master", "spark://127.0.0.1:7077", "--class", "com.spark.myapp", "./myapp.jar"]
log_file = "/tmp/out.log"
exist_status = submitJob(cmdList, log_file)
print "job finished with status ",exist_status
The strange thing is, when I execute the same command direcly in the shell it works fine and produces output on screen as the proggram proceeds.
So it looks like something is wrong in the way I'm using the subprocess.PIPE for stdout and writing the file.
What's the current recommended way to use subprocess module for writing to stdout and log file in real time line by line? I see bunch of options on the internet but not sure which is correct or latest.
thanks
Figured out what the problem was.
I was trying to redirect both stdout n stderr to pipe to display on screen. This seems to block the stdout when stderr is present. If I remove the stderr=stdout argument from Popen, it works fine. So for spark-submit it looks like you don't need to redirect stderr explicitly as it already does this implicitly
To print the Spark log
One can call the commandList given by user330612
cmdList = ["spark-submit", "--spark-master", "spark://127.0.0.1:7077", "--class", "com.spark.myapp", "./myapp.jar"]
Then it can be printed by using subprocess, remember to use communicate() to prevent deadlocks https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html
Warning Deadlock when using stdout=PIPE and/or stderr=PIPE and the child process generates enough output to a pipe such that it blocks waiting for the OS pipe buffer to accept more data. Use communicate() to avoid that. Here below is the code to print the log.
import subprocess
p = subprocess.Popen(cmdList,stdout=subprocess.PIPE,stdout=subprocess.PIPE,stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
stdout, stderr = p.communicate()
stderr=stderr.splitlines()
stdout=stdout.splitlines()
for line in stderr:
print line #now it can be printed line by line to a file or something else, for the log
for line in stdout:
print line #for the output
More information about subprocess and printing lines can be found at:
https://pymotw.com/2/subprocess/
The following code I got from http://forums.devshed.com/python-programming-11/redirect-stdout-stderr-file-500952.html which tells how to redirect a stderr to a file. I tried it but the error message is not getting saved to the file. While I am not using
sys.stderr = file_err
the error is displayed in the idle terminal, when I am assigning file_err to sys.stderr the error is not displayed in the idle terminal, and it is not being copied to the file_name.log
import sys
original_stderr = sys.stderr
file_err = open('file_name.log', 'w') # I tried with .txt also
sys.stderr = file_err
print(list[file]) # Used to create a NameError
sys.stderr = original_stderr
file_err.close()
Am I supposed to write it to the file or is there an error in the program?
Your code works fine (I mean: the redirection to stderr.). Note however than from python3.5 you can use contextlib.redirect_stderr's context manager to do this:
from contextlib import redirect_stderr
with open('filename.log', 'w') as stderr, redirect_stderr(stderr):
# errors from here are logged to the file.
Note:
You don't have to explicitly call close.
You don't have to explicitly save the old stderr and restore it at the end.
By the way: instead of saving the old stderr value you could simply use sys.__stderr__.
i have a python script on the server
#!/usr/bin/env python
import cgi
import cgitb; #cgitb.enable()
import sys, os
from subprocess import call
import time
import subprocess
form = cgi.FieldStorage()
component = form.getvalue('component')
command = form.getvalue('command')
success = True
print """Content-Type: text/html\n"""
if component=="Engine" and command=="Start":
try:
process = subprocess.Popen(['/usr/sbin/telepath','engine','start'], shell=False, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
print "{ans:12}"
except Exception, e:
success = False
print "{ans:0}"
When I run this script and add the component and command parameters to be "Engine" and "Start" respectively - it starts the process and prints to the shell
"""Content-Type: text/html\n"""
{ans:12}
but most importantly - it starts the process!
however, when I run the script by POSTing to it, it returns {ans:12} but does not run the process which was the whole intention in the first place. Any logical explanation?
I suspect it's one of two things, firstly your process is probably running but your python code doesn't handle the output so do:
process = subprocess.Popen(['/usr/sbin/telepath','engine','start'], shell=False, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
print process.stdout.read()
This is the most likely and explains why you see the output from the command line and not the browser, or secondly because the script is run through the browsers as the user apache and not with your userid check the permission for /usr/sbin/telepath.
I am trying to run a Python program to see if the screen program is running. If it is, then the program should not run the rest of the code. This is what I have and it's not working:
#!/usr/bin/python
import os
var1 = os.system ('screen -r > /root/screenlog/screen.log')
fd = open("/root/screenlog/screen.log")
content = fd.readline()
while content:
if content == "There is no screen to be resumed.":
os.system ('/etc/init.d/tunnel.sh')
print "The tunnel is now active."
else:
print "The tunnel is running."
fd.close()
I know there are probably several things here that don't need to be and quite a few that I'm missing. I will be running this program in cron.
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
def screen_is_running():
out = Popen("screen -list",shell=True,stdout=PIPE).communicate()[0]
return not out.startswith("This room is empty")
Maybe the error message that you redirect on the first os.system call is written on the standard error instead of the standard output. You should try replacing this line with:
var1 = os.system ('screen -r 2> /root/screenlog/screen.log')
Note the 2> to redirect standard error to your file.
I would like to log all the output of a Python script. I tried:
import sys
log = []
class writer(object):
def write(self, data):
log.append(data)
sys.stdout = writer()
sys.stderr = writer()
Now, if I "print 'something' " it gets logged. But if I make for instance some syntax error, say "print 'something# ", it wont get logged - it will go into the console instead.
How do I capture also the errors from Python interpreter?
I saw a possible solution here:
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1868822&postcount=3
but the second example logs into /dev/null - this is not what I want. I would like to log it into a list like my example above or StringIO or such...
Also, preferably I don't want to create a subprocess (and read its stdout and stderr in separate thread).
I have a piece of software I wrote for work that captures stderr to a file like so:
import sys
sys.stderr = open('C:\\err.txt', 'w')
so it's definitely possible.
I believe your problem is that you are creating two instances of writer.
Maybe something more like:
import sys
class writer(object):
log = []
def write(self, data):
self.log.append(data)
logger = writer()
sys.stdout = logger
sys.stderr = logger
You can't do anything in Python code that can capture errors during the compilation of that same code. How could it? If the compiler can't finish compiling the code, it won't run the code, so your redirection hasn't even taken effect yet.
That's where your (undesired) subprocess comes in. You can write Python code that redirects the stdout, then invokes the Python interpreter to compile some other piece of code.
I can't think of an easy way. The python process's standard error is living on a lower level than a python file object (C vs. python).
You could wrap the python script in a second python script and use subprocess.Popen. It's also possible you could pull some magic like this in a single script:
import os
import subprocess
import sys
cat = subprocess.Popen("/bin/cat", stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
os.close(sys.stderr.fileno())
os.dup2(cat.stdin.fileno(), sys.stderr.fileno())
And then use select.poll() to check cat.stdout regularly to find output.
Yes, that seems to work.
The problem I foresee is that most of the time, something printed to stderr by python indicates it's about to exit. The more usual way to handle this would be via exceptions.
---------Edit
Somehow I missed the os.pipe() function.
import os, sys
r, w = os.pipe()
os.close(sys.stderr.fileno())
os.dup2(w, sys.stderr.fileno())
Then read from r
To route the output and errors from Windows, you can use the following code outside of your Python file:
python a.py 1> a.out 2>&1
Source: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/110930/redirecting-error-messages-from-command-prompt-stderr-stdout
Since python 3.5 you can use contextlib.redirect_stderr
with open('help.txt', 'w') as f:
with redirect_stdout(f):
help(pow)
For such a request, usually it would be much easier to do it in the OS instead of in Python.
For example, if you're going to run "a.py" and record all the messages it will generate into file "a.out", it would just be
python a.py 2>&1 > a.out
The first part 2>&1 redirects stderr to stdout (0: stdin, 1:stdout, 2:stderr), and the second redirects that to a file called a.out.
And as far as I know, this command works in Windows, Linux or MacOS! For other file redirection techniques, just search the os plus "file redirection"
I found this approach to redirecting stderr particularly helpful. Essentially, it is necessary to understand if your output is stdout or stderr. The difference? Stdout is any output posted by a shell command (think an 'ls' list) while sterr is any error output.
It may be that you want to take a shell commands output and redirect it to a log file only if it is normal output. Using ls as an example here, with an all files flag:
# Imports
import sys
import subprocess
# Open file
log = open("output.txt", "w+")
# Declare command
cmd = 'ls -a'
# Run shell command piping to stdout
result = subprocess.run(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True)
# Assuming utf-8 encoding
txt = result.stdout.decode('utf-8')
# Write and close file
log.write(txt)
log.close()
If you wanted to make this an error log, you could do the same with stderr. It's exactly the same code as stdout with stderr in its place. This pipes an error messages that get sent to the console to the log. Doing so actually keeps it from flooding your terminal window as well!
Saw this was a post from a while ago, but figured this could save someone some time :)
import sys
import tkinter
# ********************************************
def mklistenconsswitch(*printf: callable) -> callable:
def wrapper(*fcs: callable) -> callable:
def newf(data):
[prf(data) for prf in fcs]
return newf
stdoutw, stderrw = sys.stdout.write, sys.stderr.write
funcs = [(wrapper(sys.stdout.write, *printf), wrapper(sys.stderr.write, *printf)), (stdoutw, stderrw)]
def switch():
sys.stdout.write, sys.stderr.write = dummy = funcs[0]
funcs[0] = funcs[1]
funcs[1] = dummy
return switch
# ********************************************
def datasupplier():
i = 5.5
while i > 0:
yield i
i -= .5
def testloop():
print(supplier.__next__())
svvitch()
root.after(500, testloop)
root = tkinter.Tk()
cons = tkinter.Text(root)
cons.pack(fill='both', expand=True)
supplier = datasupplier()
svvitch = mklistenconsswitch(lambda text: cons.insert('end', text))
testloop()
root.mainloop()
Python will not execute your code if there is an error. But you can import your script in another script an catch exceptions. Example:
Script.py
print 'something#
FinalScript.py
from importlib.machinery import SourceFileLoader
try:
SourceFileLoader("main", "<SCRIPT PATH>").load_module()
except Exception as e:
# Handle the exception here
To add to Ned's answer, it is difficult to capture the errors on the fly during the compilation.
You can write several print statements in your script and you can stdout to a file, it will stop writing to the file when the error occurs. To debug the code you could check the last logged output and check your script after that point.
Something like this:
# Add to the beginning of the script execution(eg: if __name__ == "__main__":).
from datetime import datetime
dt = datetime.now()
script_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) # gets the path of the script
stdout_file = script_dir+r'\logs\log'+('').join(str(dt.date()).split("-"))+r'.log'
sys.stdout = open(stdout_file, 'w')
This will create a log file and stream the print statements to the file.
Note: Watch out for escape characters in your filepath while concatenating with script_dir in the second line from the last in the code. You might want something similar to raw string. You can check this thread for this.