I am using Python 3.9 on MacOS. Shortly, I have to make a plot with 4 subplots, and they share axis. The code looks like this:
#take some data
gs = gridspec.GridSpec(2, 2, height_ratios = [3, 1])
ax0 = plt.subplot(gs[0])
#plot data, make legend, etc.
ax2 = plt.subplot(gs[2], sharex = ax0)
#plot data, make legend, etc.
#take more data
ax1 = plt.subplot(gs[1], sharey = ax0)
#plot data, make legend, etc.
ax3 = plt.subplot(gs[3], sharex = ax1, sharey = ax2)
#plot data, make legend, etc.
plt.show()
As you can see, some plots share an axis with each other. The problem is that on the x-axis everything is fine, while it is not on the y-axis (see picture). Getting to the point: how can I remove the numbers on the vertical axis of the right plot but not on the left? I've seen many posts in which the problem was solved with things like
ax.set_yticklabels([])
but that removes the numbers from the left plot as well.
Try this:
ax1.tick_params('y', labelleft=False)
I have the following plot:
fig,ax = plt.subplots(5,2,sharex=True,sharey=True,figsize=fig_size)
and now I would like to give this plot common x-axis labels and y-axis labels. With "common", I mean that there should be one big x-axis label below the whole grid of subplots, and one big y-axis label to the right. I can't find anything about this in the documentation for plt.subplots, and my googlings suggest that I need to make a big plt.subplot(111) to start with - but how do I then put my 5*2 subplots into that using plt.subplots?
This looks like what you actually want. It applies the same approach of this answer to your specific case:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots(nrows=3, ncols=3, sharex=True, sharey=True, figsize=(6, 6))
fig.text(0.5, 0.04, 'common X', ha='center')
fig.text(0.04, 0.5, 'common Y', va='center', rotation='vertical')
Since I consider it relevant and elegant enough (no need to specify coordinates to place text), I copy (with a slight adaptation) an answer to another related question.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(5, 2, sharex=True, sharey=True, figsize=(6,15))
# add a big axis, hide frame
fig.add_subplot(111, frameon=False)
# hide tick and tick label of the big axis
plt.tick_params(labelcolor='none', which='both', top=False, bottom=False, left=False, right=False)
plt.xlabel("common X")
plt.ylabel("common Y")
This results in the following (with matplotlib version 2.2.0):
New in Matplotlib v3.4 (pip install matplotlib --upgrade)
supxlabel and supylabel
fig.supxlabel('common_x')
fig.supylabel('common_y')
See example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
for tl, cl in zip([True, False, False], [False, False, True]):
fig = plt.figure(constrained_layout=cl, tight_layout=tl)
gs = fig.add_gridspec(2, 3)
ax = dict()
ax['A'] = fig.add_subplot(gs[0, 0:2])
ax['B'] = fig.add_subplot(gs[1, 0:2])
ax['C'] = fig.add_subplot(gs[:, 2])
ax['C'].set_xlabel('Booger')
ax['B'].set_xlabel('Booger')
ax['A'].set_ylabel('Booger Y')
fig.suptitle(f'TEST: tight_layout={tl} constrained_layout={cl}')
fig.supxlabel('XLAgg')
fig.supylabel('YLAgg')
plt.show()
see more
Without sharex=True, sharey=True you get:
With it you should get it nicer:
fig, axes2d = plt.subplots(nrows=3, ncols=3,
sharex=True, sharey=True,
figsize=(6,6))
for i, row in enumerate(axes2d):
for j, cell in enumerate(row):
cell.imshow(np.random.rand(32,32))
plt.tight_layout()
But if you want to add additional labels, you should add them only to the edge plots:
fig, axes2d = plt.subplots(nrows=3, ncols=3,
sharex=True, sharey=True,
figsize=(6,6))
for i, row in enumerate(axes2d):
for j, cell in enumerate(row):
cell.imshow(np.random.rand(32,32))
if i == len(axes2d) - 1:
cell.set_xlabel("noise column: {0:d}".format(j + 1))
if j == 0:
cell.set_ylabel("noise row: {0:d}".format(i + 1))
plt.tight_layout()
Adding label for each plot would spoil it (maybe there is a way to automatically detect repeated labels, but I am not aware of one).
Since the command:
fig,ax = plt.subplots(5,2,sharex=True,sharey=True,figsize=fig_size)
you used returns a tuple consisting of the figure and a list of the axes instances, it is already sufficient to do something like (mind that I've changed fig,axto fig,axes):
fig,axes = plt.subplots(5,2,sharex=True,sharey=True,figsize=fig_size)
for ax in axes:
ax.set_xlabel('Common x-label')
ax.set_ylabel('Common y-label')
If you happen to want to change some details on a specific subplot, you can access it via axes[i] where i iterates over your subplots.
It might also be very helpful to include a
fig.tight_layout()
at the end of the file, before the plt.show(), in order to avoid overlapping labels.
It will look better if you reserve space for the common labels by making invisible labels for the subplot in the bottom left corner. It is also good to pass in the fontsize from rcParams. This way, the common labels will change size with your rc setup, and the axes will also be adjusted to leave space for the common labels.
fig_size = [8, 6]
fig, ax = plt.subplots(5, 2, sharex=True, sharey=True, figsize=fig_size)
# Reserve space for axis labels
ax[-1, 0].set_xlabel('.', color=(0, 0, 0, 0))
ax[-1, 0].set_ylabel('.', color=(0, 0, 0, 0))
# Make common axis labels
fig.text(0.5, 0.04, 'common X', va='center', ha='center', fontsize=rcParams['axes.labelsize'])
fig.text(0.04, 0.5, 'common Y', va='center', ha='center', rotation='vertical', fontsize=rcParams['axes.labelsize'])
Update:
This feature is now part of the proplot matplotlib package that I recently released on pypi. By default, when you make figures, the labels are "shared" between subplots.
Original answer:
I discovered a more robust method:
If you know the bottom and top kwargs that went into a GridSpec initialization, or you otherwise know the edges positions of your axes in Figure coordinates, you can also specify the ylabel position in Figure coordinates with some fancy "transform" magic.
For example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.transforms as mtransforms
bottom, top = 0.1, 0.9
fig, axs = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=1, bottom=bottom, top=top)
avepos = 0.5 * (bottom + top)
transform = mtransforms.blended_transform_factory(mtransforms.IdentityTransform(), fig.transFigure) # specify x, y transform
axs[0].yaxis.label.set_transform(transform) # changed from default blend (IdentityTransform(), axs[0].transAxes)
axs[0].yaxis.label.set_position((0, avepos))
axs[0].set_ylabel('Hello, world!')
...and you should see that the label still appropriately adjusts left-right to keep from overlapping with labels, just like normal, but will also position itself exactly between the desired subplots.
Notably, if you omit the set_position call, the ylabel will show up exactly halfway up the figure. I'm guessing this is because when the label is finally drawn, matplotlib uses 0.5 for the y-coordinate without checking whether the underlying coordinate transform has changed.
I ran into a similar problem while plotting a grid of graphs. The graphs consisted of two parts (top and bottom). The y-label was supposed to be centered over both parts.
I did not want to use a solution that depends on knowing the position in the outer figure (like fig.text()), so I manipulated the y-position of the set_ylabel() function. It is usually 0.5, the middle of the plot it is added to. As the padding between the parts (hspace) in my code was zero, I could calculate the middle of the two parts relative to the upper part.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.gridspec as gridspec
# Create outer and inner grid
outerGrid = gridspec.GridSpec(2, 3, width_ratios=[1,1,1], height_ratios=[1,1])
somePlot = gridspec.GridSpecFromSubplotSpec(2, 1,
subplot_spec=outerGrid[3], height_ratios=[1,3], hspace = 0)
# Add two partial plots
partA = plt.subplot(somePlot[0])
partB = plt.subplot(somePlot[1])
# No x-ticks for the upper plot
plt.setp(partA.get_xticklabels(), visible=False)
# The center is (height(top)-height(bottom))/(2*height(top))
# Simplified to 0.5 - height(bottom)/(2*height(top))
mid = 0.5-somePlot.get_height_ratios()[1]/(2.*somePlot.get_height_ratios()[0])
# Place the y-label
partA.set_ylabel('shared label', y = mid)
plt.show()
picture
Downsides:
The horizontal distance to the plot is based on the top part, the bottom ticks might extend into the label.
The formula does not take space between the parts into account.
Throws an exception when the height of the top part is 0.
There is probably a general solution that takes padding between figures into account.
I'm attempting to plot two bar charts using matplotlib.pyplot.subplots. I've created subplots within a function, but when I output the subplots they are too long in height and not long enough in width.
Here's the function that I wrote:
def corr_bar(data1, data2, method='pearson'):
# Basic configuration.
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2, figsize=(7, 7))
ax1, ax2 = axes
corr_matrix1 = data1.corr(method=method)
corr_matrix2 = data2.corr(method=method)
cmap = cm.get_cmap('coolwarm')
major_ticks = np.arange(0, 1.1, 0.1)
minor_ticks = np.arange(0, 1.1, 0.05)
# Values for plotting.
x1 = corr_matrix1['price'].sort_values(ascending=False).index
x2 = corr_matrix2['price'].sort_values(ascending=False).index
values1 = corr_matrix1['price'].sort_values(ascending=False).values
values2 = corr_matrix2['price'].sort_values(ascending=False).values
im1 = ax1.bar(x1, values1, color=cmap(values1))
im2 = ax2.bar(x2, values2, color=cmap(values2))
# Formatting for plot 1.
ax1.set_yticks(major_ticks)
ax1.set_yticks(minor_ticks, minor=True)
plt.setp(ax1.get_xticklabels(), rotation=45, ha='right', rotation_mode='anchor')
ax1.grid(which='both')
ax1.grid(which='minor', alpha=0.4)
ax1.grid(which='major', alpha=0.7)
ax1.xaxis.grid(False)
# Formatting for plot 2.
ax2.set_yticks(major_ticks)
ax2.set_yticks(minor_ticks, minor=True)
plt.setp(ax2.get_xticklabels(), rotation=45, ha='right', rotation_mode='anchor')
ax2.grid(which='both')
ax2.grid(which='minor', alpha=0.4)
ax2.grid(which='major', alpha=0.7)
ax2.xaxis.grid(False)
fig.tight_layout()
plt.show()
This function (when run with two Pandas DataFrames) outputs an image like the following:
I purposely captured the blank right side of the image as well in an attempt to better depict my predicament. What I want is for the bar charts to be appropriately sized in height and width as to take up the entire space, rather than be elongated and pushed to the left.
I've tried to use the ax.set(aspect='equal') method but it "scrunches up" the bar chart. Would anybody happen to know what I could do to solve this issue?
Thank you.
When you define figsize=(7,7) you are setting the size of the entire figure and not the subplots. So your entire figure must be a square in this case. You should change it to figsize=(14,7) or use a number larger than 14 to get a little bit of extra space.
The answer to this question suggests that I play around with the set_ylim/get_ylim in order to align two twin axes. However, this does not seem to be working out for me.
Code snippet:
fig, ax1 = plt.subplots()
yLim = [minY, maxY]
xLim = [0, 0.01]
for x in analysisNumbers:
ax1.plot(getData(x), vCoords, **getStyle(x))
ax1.set_yticks(vCoords)
ax1.grid(True, which='major')
ax2 = ax1.twinx()
ax2.set_yticks(ax1.get_yticks())
ax2.set_ylim(ax1.get_ylim())
ax2.set_ylim(ax1.get_ylim())
plt.xlim(xLim[0], xLim[1])
plt.ylim(yLim[0], yLim[1])
plt.minorticks_on()
plt.show()
Graph output (open image in a new window):
The twin axes should be the same, but they are not. Their labels are the same, but their alignment is not (see that the zeroes do not line up). What's wrong?
As tcaswell points out in a comment, plt.ylim() only affects one of the axes. If you replace these lines:
ax2.set_ylim(ax1.get_ylim())
ax2.set_ylim(ax1.get_ylim())
plt.xlim(xLim[0], xLim[1])
plt.ylim(yLim[0], yLim[1])
with this:
ax1.set_ylim(yLim[0], yLim[1])
ax2.set_ylim(ax1.get_ylim())
plt.xlim(xLim[0], xLim[1])
It'll work as I'm guessing you intended.
In my plot, a secondary x axis is used to display the value of another variable for some data. Now, the original axis is log scaled. Unfortunaltely, the twinned axis puts the ticks (and the labels) referring to the linear scale of the original axis and not as intended to the log scale. How can this be overcome?
Here the code example that should put the ticks of the twinned axis in the same (absolute axes) position as the ones for the original axis:
def conv(x):
"""some conversion function"""
# ...
return x2
ax = plt.subplot(1,1,1)
ax.set_xscale('log')
# get the location of the ticks of ax
axlocs,axlabels = plt.xticks()
# twin axis and set limits as in ax
ax2 = ax.twiny()
ax2.set_xlim(ax.get_xlim())
#Set the ticks, should be set referring to the log scale of ax, but are set referring to the linear scale
ax2.set_xticks(axlocs)
# put the converted labels
ax2.set_xticklabels(map(conv,axlocs))
An alternative way would be (the ticks are then not set in the same position, but that doesn't matter):
from matplotlib.ticker import FuncFormatter
ax = plt.subplot(1,1,1)
ax.set_xscale('log')
ax2 = ax.twiny()
ax2.set_xlim(ax.get_xlim())
ax2.xaxis.set_major_formatter(FuncFormatter(lambda x,pos:conv(x)))
Both approaches work well as long as no log scale is used.
Perhaps there exists an easy fix. Is there something I missed in the documentation?
As a workaround, I tried to obtain the ax.transAxes coordinates of the ticks of ax and put the ticks at the very same position in ax2. But there does not exist something like
ax2.set_xticks(axlocs,transform=ax2.transAxes)
TypeError: set_xticks() got an unexpected keyword argument 'transform'
This has been asked a while ago, but I stumbled over it with the same question.
I eventually managed to solve the problem by introducing a logscaled (semilogx) transparent (alpha=0) dummy plot.
Example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def conversion_func(x): # some arbitrary transformation function
return 2 * x**0.5 # from x to z
x = np.logspace(0, 5, 100)
y = np.sin(np.log(x))
fig = plt.figure()
ax = plt.gca()
ax.semilogx(x, y, 'k')
ax.set_xlim(x[0], x[-1]) # this is important in order that limits of both axes match
ax.set_ylabel("$y$")
ax.set_xlabel("$x$", color='C0')
ax.tick_params(axis='x', which='both', colors='C0')
ax.axvline(100, c='C0', lw=3)
ticks_x = np.logspace(0, 5, 5 + 1) # must span limits of first axis with clever spacing
ticks_z = conversion_func(ticks_x)
ax2 = ax.twiny() # get the twin axis
ax2.semilogx(ticks_z, np.ones_like(ticks_z), alpha=0) # transparent dummy plot
ax2.set_xlim(ticks_z[0], ticks_z[-1])
ax2.set_xlabel("$z \equiv f(x)$", color='C1')
ax2.xaxis.label.set_color('C1')
ax2.tick_params(axis='x', which='both', colors='C1')
ax2.axvline(20, ls='--', c='C1', lw=3) # z=20 indeed matches x=100 as desired
fig.show()
In the above example the vertical lines demonstrate that first and second axis are indeed shifted to one another as wanted. x = 100 gets shifted to z = 2*x**0.5 = 20. The colours are just to clarify which vertical line goes with which axis.
Don't need to cover them, just Eliminate the ticks!
d= [7,9,14,17,35,70];
j= [100,80,50,40,20,10];
plt.figure()
plt.xscale('log')
plt.plot(freq, freq*spec) #plot some spectrum
ax1 = plt.gca() #define my first axis
ax1.yaxis.set_ticks_position('both')
ax1.tick_params(axis='y',which='both',direction='in');
ax1.tick_params(axis='x',which='both',direction='in');
ax2 = ax1.twiny() #generates second axis (top)
ax2.set_xlim(ax1.get_xlim()); #same limits
plt.xscale('log') #make it log
ax2.set_xticks(freq[d]); #my own 'major' ticks OVERLAPS!!!
ax2.set_xticklabels(j); #change labels
ax2.tick_params(axis='x',which='major',direction='in');
ax2.tick_params(axis='x',which='minor',top=False); #REMOVE 'MINOR' TICKS
ax2.grid()
I think you can fix your issue by calling ax2.set_xscale('log').
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.semilogx(np.logspace(1.0, 5.0, 20), np.random.random([20]))
new_tick_locations = np.array([10., 100., 1000., 1.0e4])
def tick_function(X):
V = X / 1000.
return ["%.3f" % z for z in V]
ax2 = ax.twiny()
ax2.set_xscale('log')
ax2.set_xlim(ax.get_xlim())
ax2.set_xticks(new_tick_locations)
ax2.set_xticklabels(tick_function(new_tick_locations))
ax2.set_xlabel(r"Modified x-axis: $X/1000$")