Related
I need to generate nested dictionaries, so I wrote the function create_nested:
def create_nested():
key_dict = {}
for key in ['key1', 'key2']:
key_dict[key] = 0
nested_dict = {}
for dictionary in ['dict1', 'dict2']:
nested_dict[dictionary] = key_dict
return nested_dict
Which will always return something like this:
{'dict1': {'key1': 0, 'key2': 0}, 'dict2': {'key1': 0, 'key2': 0}}
When a try to change one of the values this way:
x=create_nested()
x['dict1']['key2'] = 2
It gives me {'dict1': {'key1': 0, 'key2': 2}, 'dict2': {'key1': 0, 'key2': 2}}
Instead of {'dict1': {'key1': 0, 'key2': 2}, 'dict2': {'key1': 0, 'key2': 0}}
What am I doing wrong?
Your dict1 and dict2 keys are referencing to the same dict object created before so any change performed on it will impact both key's values.
If you want to assign to your keys two different dicts, you should copy it:
import copy
def create_nested():
key_dict = {}
for key in ['key1', 'key2']:
key_dict[key] = 0
nested_dict = {}
for dictionary in ['dict1', 'dict2']:
nested_dict[dictionary] = copy.deepcopy(key_dict)
deepcopy will copy recursively all the elements inside your dict and will create an independent copy for you, so any change performed on it will impact only itself.
When you assign the key_dict to multiple values in nested_dict, they will refer to the same object in memory (I hope my terminology is correct. Python is Pass-by-object-reference, full explaination here https://robertheaton.com/2014/02/09/pythons-pass-by-object-reference-as-explained-by-philip-k-dick/ )
for dictionary in ['dict1', 'dict2']:
nested_dict[dictionary] = key_dict
return nested_dict
now if I change nested_dict['dict1'] I'm changing the same memory that nested_dict['dict2'] knows about. In general, know which types are mutable, and expect them to change if another reference to it changes it.
A simple fix for dictionaries that only have immutable values is:
for dictionary_name in ['dict1', 'dict2']: # The variable name dictionary for a string is very confusing, so changing that.
# create a new dictionary in memory
nested_dict[dictionary_name] = {k: v for k, v in key_dict.items()}
return nested_dict
If you have potentially values in key_dict that are mutable then you must make a deep copy. https://docs.python.org/3/library/copy.html
How do I add a key to an existing dictionary? It doesn't have an .add() method.
You create a new key/value pair on a dictionary by assigning a value to that key
d = {'key': 'value'}
print(d) # {'key': 'value'}
d['mynewkey'] = 'mynewvalue'
print(d) # {'key': 'value', 'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue'}
If the key doesn't exist, it's added and points to that value. If it exists, the current value it points to is overwritten.
I feel like consolidating info about Python dictionaries:
Creating an empty dictionary
data = {}
# OR
data = dict()
Creating a dictionary with initial values
data = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3}
# OR
data = dict(a=1, b=2, c=3)
# OR
data = {k: v for k, v in (('a', 1), ('b',2), ('c',3))}
Inserting/Updating a single value
data['a'] = 1 # Updates if 'a' exists, else adds 'a'
# OR
data.update({'a': 1})
# OR
data.update(dict(a=1))
# OR
data.update(a=1)
Inserting/Updating multiple values
data.update({'c':3,'d':4}) # Updates 'c' and adds 'd'
Python 3.9+:
The update operator |= now works for dictionaries:
data |= {'c':3,'d':4}
Creating a merged dictionary without modifying originals
data3 = {}
data3.update(data) # Modifies data3, not data
data3.update(data2) # Modifies data3, not data2
Python 3.5+:
This uses a new feature called dictionary unpacking.
data = {**data1, **data2, **data3}
Python 3.9+:
The merge operator | now works for dictionaries:
data = data1 | {'c':3,'d':4}
Deleting items in dictionary
del data[key] # Removes specific element in a dictionary
data.pop(key) # Removes the key & returns the value
data.clear() # Clears entire dictionary
Check if a key is already in dictionary
key in data
Iterate through pairs in a dictionary
for key in data: # Iterates just through the keys, ignoring the values
for key, value in d.items(): # Iterates through the pairs
for key in d.keys(): # Iterates just through key, ignoring the values
for value in d.values(): # Iterates just through value, ignoring the keys
Create a dictionary from two lists
data = dict(zip(list_with_keys, list_with_values))
To add multiple keys simultaneously, use dict.update():
>>> x = {1:2}
>>> print(x)
{1: 2}
>>> d = {3:4, 5:6, 7:8}
>>> x.update(d)
>>> print(x)
{1: 2, 3: 4, 5: 6, 7: 8}
For adding a single key, the accepted answer has less computational overhead.
"Is it possible to add a key to a Python dictionary after it has been created? It doesn't seem to have an .add() method."
Yes it is possible, and it does have a method that implements this, but you don't want to use it directly.
To demonstrate how and how not to use it, let's create an empty dict with the dict literal, {}:
my_dict = {}
Best Practice 1: Subscript notation
To update this dict with a single new key and value, you can use the subscript notation (see Mappings here) that provides for item assignment:
my_dict['new key'] = 'new value'
my_dict is now:
{'new key': 'new value'}
Best Practice 2: The update method - 2 ways
We can also update the dict with multiple values efficiently as well using the update method. We may be unnecessarily creating an extra dict here, so we hope our dict has already been created and came from or was used for another purpose:
my_dict.update({'key 2': 'value 2', 'key 3': 'value 3'})
my_dict is now:
{'key 2': 'value 2', 'key 3': 'value 3', 'new key': 'new value'}
Another efficient way of doing this with the update method is with keyword arguments, but since they have to be legitimate python words, you can't have spaces or special symbols or start the name with a number, but many consider this a more readable way to create keys for a dict, and here we certainly avoid creating an extra unnecessary dict:
my_dict.update(foo='bar', foo2='baz')
and my_dict is now:
{'key 2': 'value 2', 'key 3': 'value 3', 'new key': 'new value',
'foo': 'bar', 'foo2': 'baz'}
So now we have covered three Pythonic ways of updating a dict.
Magic method, __setitem__, and why it should be avoided
There's another way of updating a dict that you shouldn't use, which uses the __setitem__ method. Here's an example of how one might use the __setitem__ method to add a key-value pair to a dict, and a demonstration of the poor performance of using it:
>>> d = {}
>>> d.__setitem__('foo', 'bar')
>>> d
{'foo': 'bar'}
>>> def f():
... d = {}
... for i in xrange(100):
... d['foo'] = i
...
>>> def g():
... d = {}
... for i in xrange(100):
... d.__setitem__('foo', i)
...
>>> import timeit
>>> number = 100
>>> min(timeit.repeat(f, number=number))
0.0020880699157714844
>>> min(timeit.repeat(g, number=number))
0.005071878433227539
So we see that using the subscript notation is actually much faster than using __setitem__. Doing the Pythonic thing, that is, using the language in the way it was intended to be used, usually is both more readable and computationally efficient.
dictionary[key] = value
If you want to add a dictionary within a dictionary you can do it this way.
Example: Add a new entry to your dictionary & sub dictionary
dictionary = {}
dictionary["new key"] = "some new entry" # add new dictionary entry
dictionary["dictionary_within_a_dictionary"] = {} # this is required by python
dictionary["dictionary_within_a_dictionary"]["sub_dict"] = {"other" : "dictionary"}
print (dictionary)
Output:
{'new key': 'some new entry', 'dictionary_within_a_dictionary': {'sub_dict': {'other': 'dictionarly'}}}
NOTE: Python requires that you first add a sub
dictionary["dictionary_within_a_dictionary"] = {}
before adding entries.
The conventional syntax is d[key] = value, but if your keyboard is missing the square bracket keys you could also do:
d.__setitem__(key, value)
In fact, defining __getitem__ and __setitem__ methods is how you can make your own class support the square bracket syntax. See Dive Into Python, Classes That Act Like Dictionaries.
You can create one:
class myDict(dict):
def __init__(self):
self = dict()
def add(self, key, value):
self[key] = value
## example
myd = myDict()
myd.add('apples',6)
myd.add('bananas',3)
print(myd)
Gives:
>>>
{'apples': 6, 'bananas': 3}
This popular question addresses functional methods of merging dictionaries a and b.
Here are some of the more straightforward methods (tested in Python 3)...
c = dict( a, **b ) ## see also https://stackoverflow.com/q/2255878
c = dict( list(a.items()) + list(b.items()) )
c = dict( i for d in [a,b] for i in d.items() )
Note: The first method above only works if the keys in b are strings.
To add or modify a single element, the b dictionary would contain only that one element...
c = dict( a, **{'d':'dog'} ) ## returns a dictionary based on 'a'
This is equivalent to...
def functional_dict_add( dictionary, key, value ):
temp = dictionary.copy()
temp[key] = value
return temp
c = functional_dict_add( a, 'd', 'dog' )
Let's pretend you want to live in the immutable world and do not want to modify the original but want to create a new dict that is the result of adding a new key to the original.
In Python 3.5+ you can do:
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = {**params, **{'c': 3}}
The Python 2 equivalent is:
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = dict(params, **{'c': 3})
After either of these:
params is still equal to {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
and
new_params is equal to {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3}
There will be times when you don't want to modify the original (you only want the result of adding to the original). I find this a refreshing alternative to the following:
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = params.copy()
new_params['c'] = 3
or
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = params.copy()
new_params.update({'c': 3})
Reference: What does `**` mean in the expression `dict(d1, **d2)`?
There is also the strangely named, oddly behaved, and yet still handy dict.setdefault().
This
value = my_dict.setdefault(key, default)
basically just does this:
try:
value = my_dict[key]
except KeyError: # key not found
value = my_dict[key] = default
E.g.,
>>> mydict = {'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3}
>>> mydict.setdefault('d', 4)
4 # returns new value at mydict['d']
>>> print(mydict)
{'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3, 'd':4} # a new key/value pair was indeed added
# but see what happens when trying it on an existing key...
>>> mydict.setdefault('a', 111)
1 # old value was returned
>>> print(mydict)
{'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3, 'd':4} # existing key was ignored
This question has already been answered ad nauseam, but since my
comment
gained a lot of traction, here it is as an answer:
Adding new keys without updating the existing dict
If you are here trying to figure out how to add a key and return a new dictionary (without modifying the existing one), you can do this using the techniques below
Python >= 3.5
new_dict = {**mydict, 'new_key': new_val}
Python < 3.5
new_dict = dict(mydict, new_key=new_val)
Note that with this approach, your key will need to follow the rules of valid identifier names in Python.
If you're not joining two dictionaries, but adding new key-value pairs to a dictionary, then using the subscript notation seems like the best way.
import timeit
timeit.timeit('dictionary = {"karga": 1, "darga": 2}; dictionary.update({"aaa": 123123, "asd": 233})')
>> 0.49582505226135254
timeit.timeit('dictionary = {"karga": 1, "darga": 2}; dictionary["aaa"] = 123123; dictionary["asd"] = 233;')
>> 0.20782899856567383
However, if you'd like to add, for example, thousands of new key-value pairs, you should consider using the update() method.
Here's another way that I didn't see here:
>>> foo = dict(a=1,b=2)
>>> foo
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
>>> goo = dict(c=3,**foo)
>>> goo
{'c': 3, 'a': 1, 'b': 2}
You can use the dictionary constructor and implicit expansion to reconstruct a dictionary. Moreover, interestingly, this method can be used to control the positional order during dictionary construction (post Python 3.6). In fact, insertion order is guaranteed for Python 3.7 and above!
>>> foo = dict(a=1,b=2,c=3,d=4)
>>> new_dict = {k: v for k, v in list(foo.items())[:2]}
>>> new_dict
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
>>> new_dict.update(newvalue=99)
>>> new_dict
{'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'newvalue': 99}
>>> new_dict.update({k: v for k, v in list(foo.items())[2:]})
>>> new_dict
{'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'newvalue': 99, 'c': 3, 'd': 4}
>>>
The above is using dictionary comprehension.
First to check whether the key already exists:
a={1:2,3:4}
a.get(1)
2
a.get(5)
None
Then you can add the new key and value.
Add a dictionary (key,value) class.
class myDict(dict):
def __init__(self):
self = dict()
def add(self, key, value):
#self[key] = value # add new key and value overwriting any exiting same key
if self.get(key)!=None:
print('key', key, 'already used') # report if key already used
self.setdefault(key, value) # if key exit do nothing
## example
myd = myDict()
name = "fred"
myd.add('apples',6)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add('bananas',3)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add('jack', 7)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add(name, myd)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add('apples', 23)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add(name, 2)
print(myd)
I think it would also be useful to point out Python's collections module that consists of many useful dictionary subclasses and wrappers that simplify the addition and modification of data types in a dictionary, specifically defaultdict:
dict subclass that calls a factory function to supply missing values
This is particularly useful if you are working with dictionaries that always consist of the same data types or structures, for example a dictionary of lists.
>>> from collections import defaultdict
>>> example = defaultdict(int)
>>> example['key'] += 1
>>> example['key']
defaultdict(<class 'int'>, {'key': 1})
If the key does not yet exist, defaultdict assigns the value given (in our case 10) as the initial value to the dictionary (often used inside loops). This operation therefore does two things: it adds a new key to a dictionary (as per question), and assigns the value if the key doesn't yet exist. With the standard dictionary, this would have raised an error as the += operation is trying to access a value that doesn't yet exist:
>>> example = dict()
>>> example['key'] += 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
KeyError: 'key'
Without the use of defaultdict, the amount of code to add a new element would be much greater and perhaps looks something like:
# This type of code would often be inside a loop
if 'key' not in example:
example['key'] = 0 # add key and initial value to dict; could also be a list
example['key'] += 1 # this is implementing a counter
defaultdict can also be used with complex data types such as list and set:
>>> example = defaultdict(list)
>>> example['key'].append(1)
>>> example
defaultdict(<class 'list'>, {'key': [1]})
Adding an element automatically initialises the list.
Adding keys to dictionary without using add
# Inserting/Updating single value
# subscript notation method
d['mynewkey'] = 'mynewvalue' # Updates if 'a' exists, else adds 'a'
# OR
d.update({'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue'})
# OR
d.update(dict('mynewkey'='mynewvalue'))
# OR
d.update('mynewkey'='mynewvalue')
print(d) # {'key': 'value', 'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue'}
# To add/update multiple keys simultaneously, use d.update():
x = {3:4, 5:6, 7:8}
d.update(x)
print(d) # {'key': 'value', 'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue', 3: 4, 5: 6, 7: 8}
# update operator |= now works for dictionaries:
d |= {'c':3,'d':4}
# Assigning new key value pair using dictionary unpacking.
data1 = {4:6, 9:10, 17:20}
data2 = {20:30, 32:48, 90:100}
data3 = { 38:"value", 99:"notvalid"}
d = {**data1, **data2, **data3}
# The merge operator | now works for dictionaries:
data = data1 | {'c':3,'d':4}
# Create a dictionary from two lists
data = dict(zip(list_with_keys, list_with_values))
dico["new key"] = "value"
This question already has answers here:
Nested defaultdict of defaultdict
(11 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I want to deal with a nested dictionary in python for purpose of storing unique data. However, I don't know what the right way to do it. I tried the following:
my_dict = collections.defaultdict(dict)
my_dict[id1][id2][id2][id4] = value
but it causes KeyError.
What is the right way to do so?
If you want to create a nested defaultdict to as many depths as you want then you want to set the default type of the defaultdict to a function that returns a defaultdict with the same type. So it looks a bit recursive.
from collections import defaultdict
def nest_defaultdict():
return defaultdict(nest_defaultdict)
d = defaultdict(nest_defaultdict)
d[1][2][3] = 'some value'
print(d)
print(d[1][2][3])
# Or with lambda
f = lambda: defaultdict(f)
d = defaultdict(f)
If you don't require any arbitrary depth then Fuji Clado's answer demonstrates setting up the nested dict and accessing it.
One Simple Approach
mainDict = {}
mainDict['id1']={}
mainDict['id1']['id2'] ={}
mainDict['id1']['id2']['id3'] = 'actualVal'
print(mainDict)
# short explanation of defaultdict
import collections
# when a add some key to the mainDict, mainDict will assgin
# an empty dictionary as the value
mainDict = collections.defaultdict(dict)
# adding only key, The value will be auto assign.
mainDict['key1']
print(mainDict)
# defaultdict(<class 'dict'>, {'key1': {}})
# here adding the key 'key2' but we are assining value of 2
mainDict['key2'] = 2
print(mainDict)
#defaultdict(<class 'dict'>, {'key1': {}, 'key2': 2})
# here we are adding a key 'key3' into the mainDict
# mainDict will assign an empty dict as the value.
# we are adding the key 'inner_key' into that empty dictionary
# and the value as 10
mainDict['key3']['inner_key'] = 10
print(mainDict)
#defaultdict(<class 'dict'>, {'key1': {}, 'key2': 2, 'key3': {'inner_key': 10}})
Just getting started with python, trying to nest a dict inside other data structures, lists, sets, etc. When I nest the dict (like, if I create a list of dicts), I cant seem to reference the keys or values inside the individual dicts anymore. Is this a design feature or am I totally boning it?
You can absolutely do this with Python. You can use the [] operator more than once -- if a is a list, then a[0] is its first element. If that first element happens to be a dict, then you can see its keys with a[0].keys(), and you can get the values out of it like this: a[0]["here's a key"]
And just like you would loop over the keys of a dictionary like this:
for key in my_dict:
# get the value
val = my_dict[key]
# do something with it
You can use an element of a list, if it happens to be a dict:
for key in a[0]:
# get the value
val = a[0][key]
# do something with it
You can make lists of lists, lists of dicts, or even dicts where the values are lists (or more dicts), pretty easily. And to reference into them, you can either iterate over their values, or chain [] operations as needed.
About the only thing that you can't do is to use lists or dicts as keys to another dict. One of the rules is that dictionary keys have to be immutable. Numbers are OK, strings are OK, tuples are OK, but lists and dicts are not.
Here's a sample of interactive code, to show you how to build up lists of dicts, and extract their values again:
# Here's a dictionary
a = { 'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 2 }
# Check it out
>>> type(a)
<type 'dict'>
# Print it:
>>> a
{'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 2}
# Look inside
>>> a['key1']
'value1'
# Here's another one
b = { 'abc': 123, 'def': 456 }
# Now let's make a list of them
c = [a, b]
# Check that out, too
>>> type(c)
<type 'list'>
# Print it:
>>> c
[{'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 2}, {'def': 456, 'abc': 123}]
>>> c[0]
{'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 2}
# Dig deeper
>>> c[0]['key1']
'value1'
When you have nested dicts (or nested anything for that matter), you have to provide the index of the desired dict in the outside list, and then the index of the desired item. So, if you had a couple dicts in a list:
list_of_dicts = [{'a':1,'b':2,'c':3},{'d':4,'e':5,'f':6}]
to access element 'e' of the second dict, you would enter: list_of_dicts[1]['e']
To touch on a few things:
Adding a dict to a list.
mylist = []
mylist.append({'key1': 'val1'})
Adding a list to a set.
myset = set()
myset.add({'key1': 'val1'}) # Error - dicts are mutable, therefore not hashable.
Keeping track of distinct dictionaries.
mydicts = set([id(d) for d in mylist])
Retrieving elements.
# With Lists
mylist[0]['key1']
# With Sets
mydicts[0] # Error - sets do not support indexing.
x = [{"a":1},{"b":2}]
>>> x[1]["b"]
2
How do I add a key to an existing dictionary? It doesn't have an .add() method.
You create a new key/value pair on a dictionary by assigning a value to that key
d = {'key': 'value'}
print(d) # {'key': 'value'}
d['mynewkey'] = 'mynewvalue'
print(d) # {'key': 'value', 'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue'}
If the key doesn't exist, it's added and points to that value. If it exists, the current value it points to is overwritten.
I feel like consolidating info about Python dictionaries:
Creating an empty dictionary
data = {}
# OR
data = dict()
Creating a dictionary with initial values
data = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3}
# OR
data = dict(a=1, b=2, c=3)
# OR
data = {k: v for k, v in (('a', 1), ('b',2), ('c',3))}
Inserting/Updating a single value
data['a'] = 1 # Updates if 'a' exists, else adds 'a'
# OR
data.update({'a': 1})
# OR
data.update(dict(a=1))
# OR
data.update(a=1)
Inserting/Updating multiple values
data.update({'c':3,'d':4}) # Updates 'c' and adds 'd'
Python 3.9+:
The update operator |= now works for dictionaries:
data |= {'c':3,'d':4}
Creating a merged dictionary without modifying originals
data3 = {}
data3.update(data) # Modifies data3, not data
data3.update(data2) # Modifies data3, not data2
Python 3.5+:
This uses a new feature called dictionary unpacking.
data = {**data1, **data2, **data3}
Python 3.9+:
The merge operator | now works for dictionaries:
data = data1 | {'c':3,'d':4}
Deleting items in dictionary
del data[key] # Removes specific element in a dictionary
data.pop(key) # Removes the key & returns the value
data.clear() # Clears entire dictionary
Check if a key is already in dictionary
key in data
Iterate through pairs in a dictionary
for key in data: # Iterates just through the keys, ignoring the values
for key, value in d.items(): # Iterates through the pairs
for key in d.keys(): # Iterates just through key, ignoring the values
for value in d.values(): # Iterates just through value, ignoring the keys
Create a dictionary from two lists
data = dict(zip(list_with_keys, list_with_values))
To add multiple keys simultaneously, use dict.update():
>>> x = {1:2}
>>> print(x)
{1: 2}
>>> d = {3:4, 5:6, 7:8}
>>> x.update(d)
>>> print(x)
{1: 2, 3: 4, 5: 6, 7: 8}
For adding a single key, the accepted answer has less computational overhead.
"Is it possible to add a key to a Python dictionary after it has been created? It doesn't seem to have an .add() method."
Yes it is possible, and it does have a method that implements this, but you don't want to use it directly.
To demonstrate how and how not to use it, let's create an empty dict with the dict literal, {}:
my_dict = {}
Best Practice 1: Subscript notation
To update this dict with a single new key and value, you can use the subscript notation (see Mappings here) that provides for item assignment:
my_dict['new key'] = 'new value'
my_dict is now:
{'new key': 'new value'}
Best Practice 2: The update method - 2 ways
We can also update the dict with multiple values efficiently as well using the update method. We may be unnecessarily creating an extra dict here, so we hope our dict has already been created and came from or was used for another purpose:
my_dict.update({'key 2': 'value 2', 'key 3': 'value 3'})
my_dict is now:
{'key 2': 'value 2', 'key 3': 'value 3', 'new key': 'new value'}
Another efficient way of doing this with the update method is with keyword arguments, but since they have to be legitimate python words, you can't have spaces or special symbols or start the name with a number, but many consider this a more readable way to create keys for a dict, and here we certainly avoid creating an extra unnecessary dict:
my_dict.update(foo='bar', foo2='baz')
and my_dict is now:
{'key 2': 'value 2', 'key 3': 'value 3', 'new key': 'new value',
'foo': 'bar', 'foo2': 'baz'}
So now we have covered three Pythonic ways of updating a dict.
Magic method, __setitem__, and why it should be avoided
There's another way of updating a dict that you shouldn't use, which uses the __setitem__ method. Here's an example of how one might use the __setitem__ method to add a key-value pair to a dict, and a demonstration of the poor performance of using it:
>>> d = {}
>>> d.__setitem__('foo', 'bar')
>>> d
{'foo': 'bar'}
>>> def f():
... d = {}
... for i in xrange(100):
... d['foo'] = i
...
>>> def g():
... d = {}
... for i in xrange(100):
... d.__setitem__('foo', i)
...
>>> import timeit
>>> number = 100
>>> min(timeit.repeat(f, number=number))
0.0020880699157714844
>>> min(timeit.repeat(g, number=number))
0.005071878433227539
So we see that using the subscript notation is actually much faster than using __setitem__. Doing the Pythonic thing, that is, using the language in the way it was intended to be used, usually is both more readable and computationally efficient.
dictionary[key] = value
If you want to add a dictionary within a dictionary you can do it this way.
Example: Add a new entry to your dictionary & sub dictionary
dictionary = {}
dictionary["new key"] = "some new entry" # add new dictionary entry
dictionary["dictionary_within_a_dictionary"] = {} # this is required by python
dictionary["dictionary_within_a_dictionary"]["sub_dict"] = {"other" : "dictionary"}
print (dictionary)
Output:
{'new key': 'some new entry', 'dictionary_within_a_dictionary': {'sub_dict': {'other': 'dictionarly'}}}
NOTE: Python requires that you first add a sub
dictionary["dictionary_within_a_dictionary"] = {}
before adding entries.
The conventional syntax is d[key] = value, but if your keyboard is missing the square bracket keys you could also do:
d.__setitem__(key, value)
In fact, defining __getitem__ and __setitem__ methods is how you can make your own class support the square bracket syntax. See Dive Into Python, Classes That Act Like Dictionaries.
You can create one:
class myDict(dict):
def __init__(self):
self = dict()
def add(self, key, value):
self[key] = value
## example
myd = myDict()
myd.add('apples',6)
myd.add('bananas',3)
print(myd)
Gives:
>>>
{'apples': 6, 'bananas': 3}
This popular question addresses functional methods of merging dictionaries a and b.
Here are some of the more straightforward methods (tested in Python 3)...
c = dict( a, **b ) ## see also https://stackoverflow.com/q/2255878
c = dict( list(a.items()) + list(b.items()) )
c = dict( i for d in [a,b] for i in d.items() )
Note: The first method above only works if the keys in b are strings.
To add or modify a single element, the b dictionary would contain only that one element...
c = dict( a, **{'d':'dog'} ) ## returns a dictionary based on 'a'
This is equivalent to...
def functional_dict_add( dictionary, key, value ):
temp = dictionary.copy()
temp[key] = value
return temp
c = functional_dict_add( a, 'd', 'dog' )
Let's pretend you want to live in the immutable world and do not want to modify the original but want to create a new dict that is the result of adding a new key to the original.
In Python 3.5+ you can do:
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = {**params, **{'c': 3}}
The Python 2 equivalent is:
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = dict(params, **{'c': 3})
After either of these:
params is still equal to {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
and
new_params is equal to {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3}
There will be times when you don't want to modify the original (you only want the result of adding to the original). I find this a refreshing alternative to the following:
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = params.copy()
new_params['c'] = 3
or
params = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
new_params = params.copy()
new_params.update({'c': 3})
Reference: What does `**` mean in the expression `dict(d1, **d2)`?
There is also the strangely named, oddly behaved, and yet still handy dict.setdefault().
This
value = my_dict.setdefault(key, default)
basically just does this:
try:
value = my_dict[key]
except KeyError: # key not found
value = my_dict[key] = default
E.g.,
>>> mydict = {'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3}
>>> mydict.setdefault('d', 4)
4 # returns new value at mydict['d']
>>> print(mydict)
{'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3, 'd':4} # a new key/value pair was indeed added
# but see what happens when trying it on an existing key...
>>> mydict.setdefault('a', 111)
1 # old value was returned
>>> print(mydict)
{'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3, 'd':4} # existing key was ignored
This question has already been answered ad nauseam, but since my
comment
gained a lot of traction, here it is as an answer:
Adding new keys without updating the existing dict
If you are here trying to figure out how to add a key and return a new dictionary (without modifying the existing one), you can do this using the techniques below
Python >= 3.5
new_dict = {**mydict, 'new_key': new_val}
Python < 3.5
new_dict = dict(mydict, new_key=new_val)
Note that with this approach, your key will need to follow the rules of valid identifier names in Python.
If you're not joining two dictionaries, but adding new key-value pairs to a dictionary, then using the subscript notation seems like the best way.
import timeit
timeit.timeit('dictionary = {"karga": 1, "darga": 2}; dictionary.update({"aaa": 123123, "asd": 233})')
>> 0.49582505226135254
timeit.timeit('dictionary = {"karga": 1, "darga": 2}; dictionary["aaa"] = 123123; dictionary["asd"] = 233;')
>> 0.20782899856567383
However, if you'd like to add, for example, thousands of new key-value pairs, you should consider using the update() method.
Here's another way that I didn't see here:
>>> foo = dict(a=1,b=2)
>>> foo
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
>>> goo = dict(c=3,**foo)
>>> goo
{'c': 3, 'a': 1, 'b': 2}
You can use the dictionary constructor and implicit expansion to reconstruct a dictionary. Moreover, interestingly, this method can be used to control the positional order during dictionary construction (post Python 3.6). In fact, insertion order is guaranteed for Python 3.7 and above!
>>> foo = dict(a=1,b=2,c=3,d=4)
>>> new_dict = {k: v for k, v in list(foo.items())[:2]}
>>> new_dict
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
>>> new_dict.update(newvalue=99)
>>> new_dict
{'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'newvalue': 99}
>>> new_dict.update({k: v for k, v in list(foo.items())[2:]})
>>> new_dict
{'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'newvalue': 99, 'c': 3, 'd': 4}
>>>
The above is using dictionary comprehension.
First to check whether the key already exists:
a={1:2,3:4}
a.get(1)
2
a.get(5)
None
Then you can add the new key and value.
Add a dictionary (key,value) class.
class myDict(dict):
def __init__(self):
self = dict()
def add(self, key, value):
#self[key] = value # add new key and value overwriting any exiting same key
if self.get(key)!=None:
print('key', key, 'already used') # report if key already used
self.setdefault(key, value) # if key exit do nothing
## example
myd = myDict()
name = "fred"
myd.add('apples',6)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add('bananas',3)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add('jack', 7)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add(name, myd)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add('apples', 23)
print('\n', myd)
myd.add(name, 2)
print(myd)
I think it would also be useful to point out Python's collections module that consists of many useful dictionary subclasses and wrappers that simplify the addition and modification of data types in a dictionary, specifically defaultdict:
dict subclass that calls a factory function to supply missing values
This is particularly useful if you are working with dictionaries that always consist of the same data types or structures, for example a dictionary of lists.
>>> from collections import defaultdict
>>> example = defaultdict(int)
>>> example['key'] += 1
>>> example['key']
defaultdict(<class 'int'>, {'key': 1})
If the key does not yet exist, defaultdict assigns the value given (in our case 10) as the initial value to the dictionary (often used inside loops). This operation therefore does two things: it adds a new key to a dictionary (as per question), and assigns the value if the key doesn't yet exist. With the standard dictionary, this would have raised an error as the += operation is trying to access a value that doesn't yet exist:
>>> example = dict()
>>> example['key'] += 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
KeyError: 'key'
Without the use of defaultdict, the amount of code to add a new element would be much greater and perhaps looks something like:
# This type of code would often be inside a loop
if 'key' not in example:
example['key'] = 0 # add key and initial value to dict; could also be a list
example['key'] += 1 # this is implementing a counter
defaultdict can also be used with complex data types such as list and set:
>>> example = defaultdict(list)
>>> example['key'].append(1)
>>> example
defaultdict(<class 'list'>, {'key': [1]})
Adding an element automatically initialises the list.
Adding keys to dictionary without using add
# Inserting/Updating single value
# subscript notation method
d['mynewkey'] = 'mynewvalue' # Updates if 'a' exists, else adds 'a'
# OR
d.update({'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue'})
# OR
d.update(dict('mynewkey'='mynewvalue'))
# OR
d.update('mynewkey'='mynewvalue')
print(d) # {'key': 'value', 'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue'}
# To add/update multiple keys simultaneously, use d.update():
x = {3:4, 5:6, 7:8}
d.update(x)
print(d) # {'key': 'value', 'mynewkey': 'mynewvalue', 3: 4, 5: 6, 7: 8}
# update operator |= now works for dictionaries:
d |= {'c':3,'d':4}
# Assigning new key value pair using dictionary unpacking.
data1 = {4:6, 9:10, 17:20}
data2 = {20:30, 32:48, 90:100}
data3 = { 38:"value", 99:"notvalid"}
d = {**data1, **data2, **data3}
# The merge operator | now works for dictionaries:
data = data1 | {'c':3,'d':4}
# Create a dictionary from two lists
data = dict(zip(list_with_keys, list_with_values))
dico["new key"] = "value"