I defined a board object as follow:
class Board(models.Model):
#let's do the relational part after I've done the other fields
Title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
Description = models.TextField(blank=True)
#where I got the image https://mixkit.co/blog/trello-backgrounds-awesome-free-illustrations-for-
trello-boards/
ImageUrl = models.URLField(
default="https://mixkit.imgix.net/art/preview/mixkit-starry-night-sky-over-hills-and-water-85-
original-large.png?q=80&auto=format%2Ccompress&h=700&q=80&dpr=1",
blank=True, null=False)
CreatedAt = models.DateTimeField(default=timezone.now)
EndsAt = Board.return_date_time_in_one_year()
def __str__(self):
return self.title
def return_date_time_in_one_year(self):
now = timezone.now()
return now + timedelta(years=1)
When I try to migrate I get the following error, I'm not sure where I went wrong in how I defined the classes, I'm new to both python and django.
File "C:\Users\Ameer\Documents\GitHub\Squasha_trello_clone\squasha\board\models.py", line 16,
in Board
EndsAt = Board.return_date_time_in_one_year()
NameError: name 'Board' is not defined
You are inside the class Board. Therefore, you refer inside the Board class to itself using this.
The line Board.return_date_time_in_one_year() would then become self.return_date_time_in_one_year()
Related
I have a model built like this
class ApiPartner(models.Model):
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=30, verbose_name=_('Name'))
api_key = models.CharField(max_length=50, verbose_name=_('API key'), null=True)
secret_key = models.CharField(max_length=50, verbose_name=_('Secret key'), null=True)
client_key = models.CharField(max_length=50, verbose_name=_('Client key'), null=True)
endpoint = models.CharField(max_length=50, verbose_name=_('Endpoint'), null=True)
logo = models.ImageField(upload_to='logos/', null=True)
evey API partner has its own method to retrieve data, for example
def get_youtube_posts(endpoint,api_key):
results=list(requests.get(endpoint+'?key='+api_key).json())
return results[0:50]
def get_instagram_posts(endpoint,api_key,secret_key):
return requests.get(endpoint+'?key='+api_key+'&secret='+secret_key)
the question is: how do i assign the 'get_posts' function to the model so i can call a generic ApiPartner.get_posts() and it will retrieve the posts using the given function?
I'm thinking about like a models.FunctionField but i know that doesn't exist.
I think this is more a logical problem than a technical one but i can't find a way. Thank you
Maybe I'm understanding the question wrong; but you can just assign it as a property on the model class:
class MyModel(models.Model):
fields...
#property
def youtube_posts(self):
results=list(requests.get(self.endpoint+'?key='+self.api_key).json())
return results[0:50]
#property
def instagram_posts(self):
return requests.get(self.endpoint+'?key='+self.api_key+'&secret='+self.secret_key)
Then you can call it with the instance of your model.
mymodel = MyModel.objects.all().first()
youtube_posts = mymodel.youtube_posts
# or
instagram_posts = mymodel.instagram_posts
But this will only return one or the other since your models are based on one specific endpoint.
To create a more generic method on the model, use the above methods, plus this:
#property
def platform_posts(self)
if "instagram" in self.endpoint:
return self.instagram_posts
elif "youtube" in self.endpoint:
return self.youtube_posts
... You get the gist.
I am fairly new to django and I am trying the following:
I am making an ordering web app for a nearby business. I am trying to add all the calories in a combo.
I have a model "Consumable", this represent the different food and drinks there are.
Here is the code for the "Consumable" Model:
class Consumable(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=80, unique=True)
category = models.ForeignKey(FoodCategory, null=True, on_delete=models.SET_NULL)
price= models.FloatField(default=0.00)
calories = models.IntegerField(blank=False)
image = models.ImageField(upload_to="images/Food/")
description = RichTextField(blank=True, max_length=500)
restaurant = models.ForeignKey(Place, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
added = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
updated = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)
def __str__(self):
return self.name
Then, I have a model called "Meal" which has the following code:
class Meal(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
image = models.ImageField(upload_to='images/photos/meals')
consumables = models.ManyToManyField(Consumable, related_name="consumable")
restaurant = models.ForeignKey(Place, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
price = models.FloatField()
def add_cals(meal_consumables):
total_calories = 0
for x in meal_consumables.values():
global total_calories += float(x.calories)
return total_calories
I am trying to call this model's function, add_cals from my HTML file using the DTL (Django Template Language).
For example, if you have a model stored with the variable x in your view, and it is in the view's context dictionary, you could simply call the model by using <p>{{x}}</p>, for example. And if the model has a variable x1, you could call it as <p>{{x.x1}}</p> and it works fine. However, if the x model from my example has a function
add_x(x):
return x
then it wouldn't work when you call it as <p>{{x.add_x(1)}}</p> for some reason. Could some wise individual out there in this world be so humble to share his or her knowledge with me in order to help me?
Thanks to everyone who tries.
I have the following two model class in django.
class Rule(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
user = models.ForeignKey(User, related_name='rules', null=True, blank=True)
threshold = models.CharField(max_length=50, null=True, blank=True)
alert_value = models.CharField(max_length=50, null=True, blank=True)
is_internal = models.BooleanField(default=False)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
def to_json(self):
return {
'name': self.name,
'threshold': self.threshold,
'alert_value': self.alert_value
}
class Module(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
description = models.TextField(null=True, blank=True)
is_internal = models.BooleanField(default=False)
rules = models.ManyToManyField(Rule)
def to_json(self):
return {
'name': self.name,
'description': self.description,
'rules': [r.to_json() for r in self.rules.all()]
}
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
Now I have the following code to save a Module object which implicitly contains a rules object in my view.py
def create_module(request):
if request.method == 'POST':
module_name = request.POST.get('name')
module_description = request.POST.get('description')
rule_ids = request.POST.getlist('rule_id')
rules = None
for rule_id in rule_ids:
try:
rules = models.Rule.objects.filter(pk__in=rule_id)
except models.Rule.DoesNotExist:
pass
module = models.Module(name=module_name,
description=module_description,
rules=rules)
module.save()
I get the rules correctly here but when save gets called I get an error
Exception Type: TypeError at /modules/create/
Exception Value: 'rules' is an invalid keyword argument for this function
How to overcome this when I want to save an object graph.
rules is not really a field on the model, it's an entry in a linking table - so it can't be saved until the Module entry exists. Also note that your loop is such that it will never consist of more than one Rules object, because you overwrite the rules variable each time. Instead you should simply get all the Rules and add them in one go.
module = models.Module(name=module_name,
description=module_description)
module.save()
rules = models.Rule.objects.filter(pk__in=rule_ids)
module.rules = rules
There's no need to save again after that: assigning to a related queryset does the database operation automatically. Also note that filter will not raise a DoesNotExist exception: if there is no matching rule, then there simply won't be an element in the resulting queryset.
you are overriding the rules queryset inside try and filter() doesnot raise DoesNotExist exception btw..
try this:
module = models.Module(name=module_name,description=module_description)
module.save()
#first save 'module' and add 'rules' from filter()-result
rules = models.Rule.objects.filter(pk__in=rule_ids)
module.rules = rules
module.save()
more about how to save m2m in django
I'm asking if I set up the create method up correctly. Or does it need to be added for the other two models as well? How would this be changed?
class PointModel(models.Model):
x = models.IntegerField()
y = models.IntegerField()
index = models.IntegerField()
class DatetimeRangeModel(models.Model):
start_datetime = models.CharField(max_length=14)
end_datetime = models.CharField(max_length=14)
class PlanModel(models.Model):
data_number = models.IntegerField()
data_datetime_range = models.ForeignKey(DatetimeRangeModel, blank=True, null=True, on_delete=models.SET_NULL)
data_polygon = models.ForeignKey(PointModel, blank=True, null=True, on_delete=models.SET_NULL)
#classmethod
def create(cls, data_number, data_datetime_range, data_polygon):
plan = cls(data_number=data_number, data_datetime_range = data_datetime_range,
data_polygon=data_polygon)
return plan
EDIT: I change the structure which fixed the undefined and added some logic that prevents the PlanModel from being deleted with the "blank=True, null=True, on_delete=models.SET_NULL"
Does this look right?
see the docs for creating objects
#classmethod
def create(cls, title):
book = cls(title=title)
# do something with the book
return book
there's no much reason to add those unless you have something to add there on the # do something with the book line
EDIT: instead of calling create you're usually do:
plan = PlanModel(data_number=1, ....)
plan.save()
or sometimes:
plan = PlanModel()
plan.data_number=1
...
plan.save()
edit: I completely rewrote the question as the original one didn't clearly explain my question
I want to run a function which is specific to each particular model instance.
Ideally I want something like this:
class MyModel(models.Model):
data = models.CharField(max_length=100)
perform_unique_action = models.FunctionField() #stores a function specific to this instance
x = MyModel(data='originalx', perform_unique_action=func_for_x)
x.perform_unique_action() #will do whatever is specified for instance x
y = MyModel(data='originaly', perform_unique_action=func_for_y)
y.perform_unique_action() #will do whatever is specified for instance y
However there is no datatype FunctionField. Normally this would be solvable with inheritance, and creating subclasses of MyModel, maybe like this:
class MyModel(models.Model):
data = models.CharField(max_length=100)
perform_unique_action = default_function
class MyModelX(MyModel):
perform_unique_action = function_X
class MyModelY(MyModel):
perform_unique_action = function_Y
x = MyModelX(data='originalx')
x.perform_unique_action() #will do whatever is specified for instance x
y = MyModelY(data='originaly')
y.perform_unique_action() #will do whatever is specified for instance y
Unfortunately, I don't think I can use inheritance because I am trying to access the function this way:
class MyModel(models.Model):
data = models.CharField(max_length=100)
perform_unique_action = default_function
class SecondModel(models.Model):
other_data = models.IntegerField()
mymodel = models.ForeignKey(MyModel)
secondmodel = SecondModel.objects.get(other_data=3)
secondmodel.mymodel.perform_unique_action()
The problem seems to be that I don't know what type the foreign key is going to be in SecondModel if I override the perform_unique_action in subclasses.
Can I access MyModel from SecondModel as a foreign key and still have a unique function for each instance of MyModel?
This works for me. I haven't tested it, but you should be able to create another class and override their methods and it'll work. Check the class Meta line, it'll treat it as an abstract class. Here's an example of my actual classes that I'm working on right now.
EDIT: Added VoteComment class and tested it. It works as expected!
class Vote(models.Model):
VOTE_ENUM = (
(VoteEnum.DOWN_VOTE, VoteEnum.toString(VoteEnum.DOWN_VOTE)),
(VoteEnum.NONE, VoteEnum.toString(VoteEnum.NONE)),
(VoteEnum.UP_VOTE, VoteEnum.toString(VoteEnum.UP_VOTE)),
)
question = models.ForeignKey(Question, null=False, editable=False, blank=False)
voter = models.ForeignKey(User, blank=False, null=False, editable=False)
vote_type = models.SmallIntegerField(default=0, null=False, blank=False, choices=VOTE_ENUM)
class Meta:
abstract = True
def is_upvote(self):
return self.vote_type > 0
def is_downvote(self):
return self.vote_type < 0
class VoteAnswer(Vote):
answer = models.ForeignKey(Answer, null=False, editable=False, blank=False)
class Meta:
unique_together = (("voter", "answer"),) # to prevent user from voting on the same question/answer/comment again
def __unicode__(self):
vote_type = "UP" if vote_type > 0 else ("DOWN" if vote_type < 0 else "NONE")
return u"{0}: [{1}] {2}".format(user.username, vote_type, answer.text[:32])
def is_upvote(self):
return "FOO! "+str(super(VoteAnswer, self).is_upvote())
class VoteComment(Vote):
comment = models.ForeignKey(Comment, null=False, editable=False, blank=False)
class Meta:
unique_together = (("voter", "comment"),) # to prevent user from voting on the same question/answer/comment again
def __unicode__(self):
vote_type = "UP" if vote_type > 0 else ("DOWN" if vote_type < 0 else "NONE")
return u"{0}: [{1}] {2}".format(user.username, vote_type, comment.text[:32])
def is_upvote(self):
return "BAR!"
I came up with two ways of having a specific function defined for each object. One was using marshal to create bytecode which can be stored in the database (not a good way), and the other was by storing a reference to the function to be run, as suggested by Randall. Here is my solution using a stored reference:
class MyModel(models.Model):
data = models.CharField(max_length=100)
action_module = models.CharField(max_length=100)
action_function = models.CharField(max_length=100)
class SecondModel(models.Model):
other_data = models.IntegerField()
mymodel = models.ForeignKey(MyModel)
secondmodel_obj = SecondModel.objects.get(other_data=3)
#The goal is to run a function specific to the instance
#of MyModel referred to in secondmodel_obj
module_name = secondmodel_obj.mymodel.action_module
func_name = secondmodel_obj.mymodel.action_function
module = __import__(module_name)
func = vars(module)[func_name]
func()
Thanks to everyone who replied, I couldn't have got to this answer if it weren't for your help.
You could achive some similar behavior overriding the save method. And providing special callbacks to your instances.
Something like:
def default_function(instance):
#do something with the model instance
class ParentModel(model.Model):
data = models.CharField()
callback_function = default_function
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
if hasattr(self, 'callback_function'):
self.callback_function(self)
super(ParentModel, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
class ChildModel():
different_data = models.CharField()
callback_function = other_fun_specific_to_this_model
instance = ChildModel()
#Specific function to this particular instance
instance.callback_function = lambda inst: print inst.different_data
instance.save()
You can write endpoints on your server and limit their access to just your self. Then store in each model instance corresponding url. For example:
views.py
def funx_x(request):
pass
def func_y(request):
pass
models.py:
class MyModel(models.Model):
data = models.CharField(max_length=100)
perform_unique_action = models.URLField()
and then:
x = MyModel(data='originalx', perform_unique_action='http://localhost/funx_x')
requests.post(x.perform_unique_action)
i dont know whether i understand u correct or not. but you can check out this example here.
Example:
A string representing an attribute on the model. This behaves almost the same as the callable, but self in this context is the model instance. Here's a full model example:
class Person(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
birthday = models.DateField()
def decade_born_in(self):
return self.birthday.strftime('%Y')[:3] + "0's"
decade_born_in.short_description = 'Birth decade'
class PersonAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
list_display = ('name', 'decade_born_in')