I want to have a production ready Django app with Lighsail and for that I'm following two tutorials to achieve this
Deploy Django-based application onto Amazon Lightsail
Deploy A Django Project
From the Bitnami article can see that the AWS documentation follows its Approach B: Self-Contained Bitnami Installations.
According to:
AWS's documentation, my blocker appears in 5. Host the application using Apache, step g.
Bitnami's documentation, where it says
On Linux, you can run the application with mod_wsgi in daemon mode.
Add the following code in
/opt/bitnami/apps/django/django_projects/PROJECT/conf/httpd-app.conf:
The blocker relates to the code I'm being asked to add, in particular the final part that has
Alias /tutorial/static "/opt/bitnami/apps/django/lib/python3.7/site-packages/Django-2.2.9-py3.7.egg/django/contrib/admin/static"
WSGIScriptAlias /tutorial '/opt/bitnami/apps/django/django_projects/tutorial/tutorial/wsgi.py'
More specifically, /home/bitnami/apps/django/. In /home/bitnami/ can only see the following folders
. bitnami_application_password
. bitnami_credentials
. htdocs
. stack
and from them the one that most likely resembles /opt/bitnami/apps/ is /home/bitnami/stack/. Thing is, inside of that particular folder, there's no django folder - at least as far as I can tell (already checked inside some of its folders, like the python one).
The workaround for me at this particular stage is to move to a different approach, Approach A: Bitnami Installations Using System Packages (which I've done and managed to make it work as wrote in this blog post), but I'd like to get it to work using Approach B and hence this question.
The problem here is in the mentioning of the paths for both the project and Django.
In my case, projects are under /home/bitnami/projects/ where I created a Django project named tutorial.
Also, if I run the command
python -c "
import sys
sys.path = sys.path[1:]
import django
print(django.__path__)"
it'll print me the location where Django is installed
['/opt/bitnami/python/lib/python3.8/site-packages/django']
So, the httpd-app.conf should have instead at the end
Alias /tutorial/static "/opt/bitnami/python/lib/python3.8/site-packages/django/contrib/admin/static"
WSGIScriptAlias /tutorial '/home/bitnami/projects/tutorial/tutorial/wsgi.py'
Related
I am new to Django and was following the tutorial here (https://simpleisbetterthancomplex.com/series/2017/09/04/a-complete-beginners-guide-to-django-part-1.html#hello-world) to get my first application running. I could not reference my application so I decided to name everything exactly as is in the tutorial in another Python project. I am unable to import view from boards no matter what I do (change it to projectname.appname and a number of different variations that I found on here). I have tried this tutorial on another computer I do not have access to at the moment and can confirm that it works usually. Is this an issue with PyCharm/my Python environment?
Project Structure
Error I am receiving
Fixed
To resolve this I marked my Django Project Folder (not Python Project Folder) as root.
I have a Django project which I would like to run on my shared webspace (1und1 Webspace) running on linux. I don't have root access and therefore can not edit apache's httpd.conf or install software system wide.
What I did so far:
installed squlite locally since it is not available on the server
installed Python 3.5.1 in ~/.localpython
installed virtualenv for my local python
created a virtual environment in ~/ve_tc_lb
installed Django and Pillow in my virtual environment
cloned my django project from git server
After these steps, I'm able to run python manage.py runserver in my project directory and it seems to be running (I can access the login screen using lynx on my local machine).
I read many postings on how to configure fastCGI environments, but since I'm using Django 1.9.1, I'm depening on wsgi. I saw a lot about configuring django for wsgi and virtualenv, but all examples required access to httpd.conf.
The shared web server is apache.
I can create a new directory in my home with a sample hello.py and it is working when I enter the url, but it is (of course) using the python provided by the server and not my local installation.
When I change the first line indicating which python version to use to my virtual environment (#!/path/to/home/ve_tc_lb/bin/python), it seems to use the correct version in the virtual environment. Since I'm using different systems for developing and deployment, I'm not sure whether it is a good idea to e.g. add such a line in my djangoproject/wsgi.py.
Update 2016-06-02
A few more things I tried:
I learned that I don't have access to the apache error logs
read a lot about mod_wsgi and django in various sources which I just want to share here in case someone needs them in the future:
modwsgi - IntegrationWithDjango.wiki
debug mod_wsgi installation (only applicable if you are root)
mod_wsgi configuration guide
I followed the wsgi test script installation here - but the wsgi-file is just displayed in my browser instead of beeing executed.
All in all it seems like my provider 1und1 did not install wsgi extensions (even though the support told me a week ago it would be installed)
Update 2016-06-12: I got a reply from support (after a week or so :-S ) confirming that they dont have mod_wsgi but wsgiref...
So I'm a bit stuck here - which steps should I do next?
I'll update the question regularly based on comments and remarks. Any help is appreciated.
Since your apache is shared, I don't expect you can change the httpd.conf but use instead your solution. My suggestion is:
If you have multiple servers you will deploy your project (e.g. testing, staging, production), then do the following steps for each deploy target.
In each server, create a true wsgi.py file which you will never put in versioning systems. Pretty much like you would do with a local_settings.py file. This file will be named wsgy.py since most likely you cannot edit the apache settings (since it is shared) and that name will be expected for your wsgi file.
The content for the file will be:
#!/path/to/your/virtualenv/python
from my_true_wsgi import *
Which will be different for each deploy server, but the difference will be, most likely, in the shebang line to locate the proper python interpreter.
You will have a file named my_true_wsgi to have it matching the import in the former code. That file will be in the versioning systems, unlike the wsgi.py file. The contents of such file is the usual contents of the wsgi.py on any regular django project, just that you are not using that name directly.
With this solution you can have several different wsgi files with no conflict on shebangs.
You'll have to use a webhost that supports Django. See https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoFriendlyWebHosts. Personally, I've used WebFaction and was quite happy with it, their support was great and customer service very responsive.
Im in the process of launching a Django app on ec2, but have hit a wall trying to install my code on my AMI instance. This is my situation: I have a bitnami AMI up and running that has Django, apache, Postgresql, and nearly all my dependancies pre installed, and I have my fully functional Django app running on my local machine that I have been testing thus far with the Django Dev server. After quite a bit of googling, the most common methods of installing an app to an ec2 instance seem either using ssh/sftp/scp to drop a tarball in the instance, or creating a repository and importing code from there. If anyone can tell me the method they prefer, and guide me through the process, or provide a link to a good tutorial, it would be hugely appreciated!
tar -pczf yourfile.tar.gz MyProject
scp -i /home/user/.cert/yourcert.pem yourfile.tar.gz user#serveripaddress:/home/user
tar -xvf /home/user/yourfile.tar
I usually simply scp -R my whole site directory into /home/bitnami of my AMI. I'm using Apache/NGINX/Django with mod_wsgi. So the directory (for example /home/bitnami/djangosites/) gets referred to based on my mod_wsgi path in my apache cfg file.
In other words, why not just move the whole directory recursively (scp -R) instead of making a tarball etc?
Directly copy the folder where your project resides may work. However you mention that you are using a BitNami image, so it is likely that you are using the BitNami Django Stack Amazon image. BitNami also provides a native version of the BitNami Django Stack so I would suggest that you first try to deploy your application on top of the native installer and see what exact steps you need to follow. For instance you may need to install python dependencies or if you plan to use Apache on production instead of the Django development server you will need to configure Apache to serve your project. I'm a BitNami developer and I mention this because make easier the deployment in different platforms (including ec2) is one of the goal of BitNami and as you are already using it you can take advantage of this.
Can one run Django in a chroot? Notably, what's necessary in order to set up (for example) /var/www as a chroot'd directory and then have Django run in that chroot'd directory?
Thank you - I'm grateful for any input.
There are many reasons mod_wsgi is preferred for Python web app deployment. One is stability, another is the variety of configuration options... one of which is ability to chroot the mod_wsgi daemon (starting with version 3.00).
The chroot option is not yet documented for the WSGIDaemonProcess directive at http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationDirectives#WSGIDaemonProcess but there is enough documentation in Changes in Version 3.0.
You can also read a disussion of the feature at http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/issues/detail?id=106
You will have to add a Python interpreter to that directory and add Django to it ofcourse.
After you've got the environment set-up you will have to create a wrapper script that does something like os.chroot('/var/www/') and you're done :)
To create a sandboxed/chrooted environment for Python try one of the following options: http://wiki.python.org/moin/Asking%20for%20Help/How%20can%20I%20run%20an%20untrusted%20Python%20script%20safely%20%28i.e.%20Sandbox%29?highlight=%28chroot%29
The PyPy option seems to be getting popular since Google started using it with the App-Engine.
To deploy a site with Python/Django/MySQL I had to do these on the server (RedHat Linux):
Install MySQLPython
Install ModPython
Install Django (using python setup.py install)
Add some directives on httpd.conf file (or use .htaccess)
But, when I deployed another site with PHP (using CodeIgniter) I had to do nothing. I faced some problems while deploying a Django project on a shared server. Now, my questions are:
Can the deployment process of Django project be made easier?
Am I doing too much?
Can some of the steps be omitted?
What is the best way to deploy django site on a shared server?
To enable easy Django deployement I would to the following:
Fisrt-time server configuration
Install mod_wsgi which allow you to run in embedded mode OR in daemon mode.
Install python and virtualenv
In your development environment
Use virtualenv. Take a look at mod_wsgi and virtualenv configuration
Install Django your django version (using python setup.py install)
Install your python libs
Develop your project
Every time you want to deploy
Copy your virtual environment to the production server
Just add an Include directive in your httpd.conf file (or use .htaccess) to your project's apache configuration. As stated in mod_wsgi integration with django documentation, one example of how Apache included file could be configured would be:
Alias /media/ /usr/local/django/mysite/media/
<Directory /usr/local/django/mysite/media>
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
</Directory>
WSGIScriptAlias / /usr/local/django/mysite/apache/django.wsgi
<Directory /usr/local/django/mysite/apache>
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
</Directory>
Automating deployement
I would consider using Fabric to automate deployement
Can the deployment process of django project be made easier?
No. You can script some of this, if you want. However, you're never going to install MySQL, MySQLPuthon, mod_wsgi (or mod_python), or Django again.
You will, however, tweak your application all the time.
Am I doing too much?
No. Python (and Django) are not part of Apache. PHP is embedded in Apache. PHP is exactly like mod_python (or mod_wsgi). Just one piece of the pie. (Apparently, some hosts handle the PHP installation for you, but don't handle the mod_wsgi or mod_python installation.)
Can some of the steps be omitted?
No. However, you only do it once.
What is the best way to deploy django site on a shared server?
You're doing it correctly.
When I deployed another site with php (using CodeIgniter) I had to do nothing
Certainly an unfair comparison. Apparently, they already installed PHP and the database for you. Nice of them.
Also, PHP is not Python. PHP is a plug-in to Apache. Python is "just" a programming language, that requires a separate plug-in to Apache (i.e., mod_python or mod_wsgi).
See How nicely does Python 'flow' with HTML as compared to PHP?
Django hosting support is not as widespread as for PHP, but there are some good options. I can recommend WebFaction - they provide an easy-to-use control panel which offers various combinations of Django versions, Python versions, mod_python, mod_wsgi, MySQL, PostgreSQL etc. They're cost-effective, too. If you use their setup, you get SSH access but just about all of the setting up can be done via their control panel, apart from the actual uploading of your project folder.
Disclaimer: apart from being a happy customer I have no other connection with them.
You didn't have to do anything when deploying a PHP site because your hosting provider had already installed it. Web hosts which support Django typically install and configure it for you.
You just install this already made solution if your allowed to run an image on a virtual machine. I can imagine installations will be done this way in future as complicated security configuration can be done automatically.
Most shared hosting sites run the LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) stack so deployment is just a matter of copying some files over. If you were using one of the PHP frameworks like CakePHP or something the service hasn't installed (like an imaging library) you'd be going through extra deployment steps as well.
With Django (or Rails, or any other complex framework) you have to set up the stack yourself that one time, then you're good to go.
However, you'll also want to think about post-deployment updating. If it's something you're going to do often you may also want to look into Fabric or Capistrano to help automate that.
P.S. I'll second that WebFaction recommendation. It's as close to one-button installation as I've seen. Pretty happy customer although I mostly use them for test-sites and prototyping.
You can use Python virtualenv and pip (see also "Tools of the Modern Python Hacker: Virtualenv, Fabric and Pip"). I developed my Django project in the virtual environment. I copy the virtual environment file to the production machine when I deploy my application. I use mod_wsgi. You must write that in the mod_wsig file:
import site
site.addsitedir('C:\PythonVirtualEnv\IntegralEnv\Lib\site-packages')