struggling in calling multiple interactive functions for a graph using ipywidgets - python

I'm looking to have a main image upon which I draw either spirals, ellipses etc with variables that change the shape on the imposed drawing. The main image also needs to have a contrast variable.
My code currently looks like this;
###############################################BASIC FIGURE PLOT####################################
plt.figure(figsize=(24,24))
#interact
def spiral(Spiral=False,n=2000,x1=50,y1=50,z1=50,k1=300):
if Spiral == False:
x = 0;
y = 0;
plt.scatter(x,y,s = 3, c = 'black');
else:
angle = np.linspace(x1,y1*1*np.pi, n)
radius = np.linspace(z1,k1,n)
x = radius * np.cos(angle) + 150
y = radius * np.sin(angle) + 150
plt.scatter(x,y,s = 3, c = 'black');
#interact
def contrast(vuc=(0.2,1,0.01),vlc=(0.1,1,0.01)):
vu = np.quantile(qphi, vuc);
vl = np.quantile(qphi, vlc);
print("upper =",vu, " lower=",vl);
plt.imshow(qphi, origin='lower',vmin=vl,vmax=vu);
plt.show()
This produces two plots;
visible here
One plot which creates a spiral I can edit freely and one plot that is the main image with variable contrast.
Any advise on how to combine the two plots would be much appreciated; Thank you!

There are several ways to approach controlling a matplotlib plot using ipywidgets. Below I've created the output I think you're looking for using each of the options. The methods are listed in what feels like the natural order of discovery, however, I would recommend trying them in this order: 4, 2, 1, 3
Approach 1 - inline backend
If you use %matplotlib inline then matplotlib figures will not be interactive and you will need to recreate the entire plot every time
%matplotlib inline
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from ipywidgets import interact
# load fake image data
from matplotlib import cbook
img = plt.imread(cbook.get_sample_data("grace_hopper.jpg")).mean(axis=-1)
#interact
def graph(
Spiral=True,
n=2000,
x1=50,
y1=50,
z1=50,
k1=300,
vlc=(0.1, 1, 0.01),
vuc=(0.1, 1, 0.01),
):
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12,5))
if Spiral == False:
x = 0
y = 0
else:
angle = np.linspace(x1, y1 * 1 * np.pi, n)
radius = np.linspace(z1, k1, n)
x = radius * np.cos(angle) + 150
y = radius * np.sin(angle) + 150
ax1.scatter(x, y, s=3, color="k")
vu = np.quantile(img, vuc)
vl = np.quantile(img, vlc)
ax2.imshow(img, vmin=vl, vmax=vu)
Approach 2 - interactive backend + cla
You can use one of the interactive maptlotlib backends to avoid having to completely regenerate the figure every time you change. To do this the first approach is to simply clear the axes everytime the sliders change using the cla method.
This will work with either %matplotlib notebook or %matplotlib ipympl. The former will only work in jupyter notebook and the latter will work in both jupyter notebook and juptyerlab. (Installation info for ipympl here: https://github.com/matplotlib/ipympl#installation)
%matplotlib ipympl
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from ipywidgets import interact, interactive, interactive_output
# load fake image data
from matplotlib import cbook
img = plt.imread(cbook.get_sample_data("grace_hopper.jpg")).mean(axis=-1)
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12,5))
#interact
def graph(
Spiral=True,
n=2000,
x1=50,
y1=50,
z1=50,
k1=300,
vlc=(0.1, 1, 0.01),
vuc=(0.1, 1, 0.01),
):
ax1.cla()
ax2.cla()
if Spiral == False:
x = 0
y = 0
else:
angle = np.linspace(x1, y1 * 1 * np.pi, n)
radius = np.linspace(z1, k1, n)
x = radius * np.cos(angle) + 150
y = radius * np.sin(angle) + 150
ax1.scatter(x, y, s=3, color="k")
vu = np.quantile(img, vuc)
vl = np.quantile(img, vlc)
ax2.imshow(img, vmin=vl, vmax=vu)
Approach 3 - interactive backend + set_data
Totally clearing the axes can be inefficient when you are plotting larger datasets or have some parts of the plot that you want to persist from one interaction to the next. So you can instead use the set_data and set_offsets methods to update what you have already drawn.
%matplotlib ipympl
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from ipywidgets import interact, interactive, interactive_output
# load fake image data
from matplotlib import cbook
img = plt.imread(cbook.get_sample_data("grace_hopper.jpg")).mean(axis=-1)
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12,5))
scat = ax1.scatter([0]*2000,[0]*2000,s=3, color='k')
im = ax2.imshow(img)
out = widgets.Output()
display(out)
#interact
def graph(
Spiral=True,
n=2000,
x1=50,
y1=50,
z1=50,
k1=300,
vlc=(0.1, 1, 0.01),
vuc=(0.1, 1, 0.01),
):
if Spiral == False:
x = 0
y = 0
else:
angle = np.linspace(x1, y1 * 1 * np.pi, n)
radius = np.linspace(z1, k1, n)
x = radius * np.cos(angle) + 150
y = radius * np.sin(angle) + 150
scat.set_offsets(np.c_[x, y])
# correctly scale the x and y limits
ax1.dataLim = scat.get_datalim(ax1.transData)
ax1.autoscale_view()
vu = np.quantile(img, vuc)
vl = np.quantile(img, vlc)
im.norm.vmin = vl
im.norm.vmax = vu
Approach 4 - mpl_interactions
Using set_offsets and equivalent set_data will be the most performant solution, but can also be tricky to figure out how to get it work and even trickier to remember. To make it easier I've creted a library (mpl-interactions) that automates the boilerplate of approach 3.
In addition to being easy and performant this has the advantage that you aren't responsible for updating the plots, only for returning the correct values. Which then has the ancillary benefit that now functions like spiral can be used in other parts of your code as they just return values rather than handle plotting.
The other advantage is that mpl-interactions can also create matplotlib widgets so this is the only approach that will also work outside of a notebook.
%matplotlib ipympl
import ipywidgets as widgets
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import mpl_interactions.ipyplot as iplt
img = plt.imread(cbook.get_sample_data("grace_hopper.jpg")).mean(axis=-1)
# define the functions to be plotted
def spiral(Spiral=False, n=2000, x1=50, y1=50, z1=50, k1=300):
if Spiral == False:
x = 0
y = 0
return x, y
else:
angle = np.linspace(x1, y1 * 1 * np.pi, n)
radius = np.linspace(z1, k1, n)
x = radius * np.cos(angle) + 150
y = radius * np.sin(angle) + 150
return x, y
def vmin(vuc, vlc):
return np.quantile(img, vlc)
def vmax(vlc, vuc):
return np.quantile(img, vuc)
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(12, 5))
controls = iplt.scatter(
spiral,
Spiral={(True, False)},
n=np.arange(1800, 2200),
x1=(25, 75),
y1=(25, 75),
z1=(25, 75),
k1=(200, 400),
parametric=True,
s=3,
c="black",
ax=ax1,
)
controls = iplt.imshow(
img,
vmin=vmin,
vmax=vmax,
vuc=(0.1, 1, 1000),
vlc=(0.1, 1, 1000),
controls=controls[None],
ax=ax2,
)

Related

Way to contour outer edge of selected grid region in Python

I have the following code:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.linspace(-np.pi/2, np.pi/2, 30)
y = np.linspace(-np.pi/2, np.pi/2, 30)
x,y = np.meshgrid(x,y)
z = np.sin(x**2+y**2)[:-1,:-1]
fig,ax = plt.subplots()
ax.pcolormesh(x,y,z)
Which gives this image:
Now lets say I want to highlight the edge certain grid boxes:
highlight = (z > 0.9)
I could use the contour function, but this would result in a "smoothed" contour. I just want to highlight the edge of a region, following the edge of the grid boxes.
The closest I've come is adding something like this:
highlight = np.ma.masked_less(highlight, 1)
ax.pcolormesh(x, y, highlight, facecolor = 'None', edgecolors = 'w')
Which gives this plot:
Which is close, but what I really want is for only the outer and inner edges of that "donut" to be highlighted.
So essentially I am looking for some hybrid of the contour and pcolormesh functions - something that follows the contour of some value, but follows grid bins in "steps" rather than connecting point-to-point. Does that make sense?
Side note: In the pcolormesh arguments, I have edgecolors = 'w', but the edges still come out to be blue. Whats going on there?
EDIT:
JohanC's initial answer using add_iso_line() works for the question as posed. However, the actual data I'm using is a very irregular x,y grid, which cannot be converted to 1D (as is required for add_iso_line().
I am using data which has been converted from polar coordinates (rho, phi) to cartesian (x,y). The 2D solution posed by JohanC does not appear to work for the following case:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy import ndimage
def pol2cart(rho, phi):
x = rho * np.cos(phi)
y = rho * np.sin(phi)
return(x, y)
phi = np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,30)
rho = np.linspace(0,2,30)
pp, rr = np.meshgrid(phi,rho)
xx,yy = pol2cart(rr, pp)
z = np.sin(xx**2 + yy**2)
scale = 5
zz = ndimage.zoom(z, scale, order=0)
fig,ax = plt.subplots()
ax.pcolormesh(xx,yy,z[:-1, :-1])
xlim = ax.get_xlim()
ylim = ax.get_ylim()
xmin, xmax = xx.min(), xx.max()
ymin, ymax = yy.min(), yy.max()
ax.contour(np.linspace(xmin,xmax, zz.shape[1]) + (xmax-xmin)/z.shape[1]/2,
np.linspace(ymin,ymax, zz.shape[0]) + (ymax-ymin)/z.shape[0]/2,
np.where(zz < 0.9, 0, 1), levels=[0.5], colors='red')
ax.set_xlim(*xlim)
ax.set_ylim(*ylim)
This post shows a way to draw such lines. As it is not straightforward to adapt to the current pcolormesh, the following code demonstrates a possible adaption.
Note that the 2d versions of x and y have been renamed, as the 1d versions are needed for the line segments.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.collections import LineCollection
x = np.linspace(-np.pi / 2, np.pi / 2, 30)
y = np.linspace(-np.pi / 2, np.pi / 2, 30)
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(x, y)
z = np.sin(xx ** 2 + yy ** 2)[:-1, :-1]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.pcolormesh(x, y, z)
def add_iso_line(ax, value, color):
v = np.diff(z > value, axis=1)
h = np.diff(z > value, axis=0)
l = np.argwhere(v.T)
vlines = np.array(list(zip(np.stack((x[l[:, 0] + 1], y[l[:, 1]])).T,
np.stack((x[l[:, 0] + 1], y[l[:, 1] + 1])).T)))
l = np.argwhere(h.T)
hlines = np.array(list(zip(np.stack((x[l[:, 0]], y[l[:, 1] + 1])).T,
np.stack((x[l[:, 0] + 1], y[l[:, 1] + 1])).T)))
lines = np.vstack((vlines, hlines))
ax.add_collection(LineCollection(lines, lw=1, colors=color))
add_iso_line(ax, 0.9, 'r')
plt.show()
Here is an adaption of the second answer, which can work with only 2d arrays:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.collections import LineCollection
from scipy import ndimage
x = np.linspace(-np.pi / 2, np.pi / 2, 30)
y = np.linspace(-np.pi / 2, np.pi / 2, 30)
x, y = np.meshgrid(x, y)
z = np.sin(x ** 2 + y ** 2)
scale = 5
zz = ndimage.zoom(z, scale, order=0)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.pcolormesh(x, y, z[:-1, :-1] )
xlim = ax.get_xlim()
ylim = ax.get_ylim()
xmin, xmax = x.min(), x.max()
ymin, ymax = y.min(), y.max()
ax.contour(np.linspace(xmin,xmax, zz.shape[1]) + (xmax-xmin)/z.shape[1]/2,
np.linspace(ymin,ymax, zz.shape[0]) + (ymax-ymin)/z.shape[0]/2,
np.where(zz < 0.9, 0, 1), levels=[0.5], colors='red')
ax.set_xlim(*xlim)
ax.set_ylim(*ylim)
plt.show()
I'll try to refactor add_iso_line method in order to make it more clear an open for optimisations. So, at first, there comes a must-do part:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.collections import LineCollection
x = np.linspace(-np.pi/2, np.pi/2, 30)
y = np.linspace(-np.pi/2, np.pi/2, 30)
x, y = np.meshgrid(x,y)
z = np.sin(x**2+y**2)[:-1,:-1]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.pcolormesh(x,y,z)
xlim, ylim = ax.get_xlim(), ax.get_ylim()
highlight = (z > 0.9)
Now highlight is a binary array that looks like this:
After that we can extract indexes of True cells, look for False neighbourhoods and identify positions of 'red' lines. I'm not comfortable enough with doing it in a vectorised manner (like here in add_iso_line method) so just using simple loop:
lines = []
cells = zip(*np.where(highlight))
for x, y in cells:
if x == 0 or highlight[x - 1, y] == 0: lines.append(([x, y], [x, y + 1]))
if x == highlight.shape[0] or highlight[x + 1, y] == 0: lines.append(([x + 1, y], [x + 1, y + 1]))
if y == 0 or highlight[x, y - 1] == 0: lines.append(([x, y], [x + 1, y]))
if y == highlight.shape[1] or highlight[x, y + 1] == 0: lines.append(([x, y + 1], [x + 1, y + 1]))
And, finally, I resize and center coordinates of lines in order to fit with pcolormesh:
lines = (np.array(lines) / highlight.shape - [0.5, 0.5]) * [xlim[1] - xlim[0], ylim[1] - ylim[0]]
ax.add_collection(LineCollection(lines, colors='r'))
plt.show()
In conclusion, this is very similar to JohanC solution and, in general, slower. Fortunately, we can reduce amount of cells significantly, extracting contours only using python-opencv package:
import cv2
highlight = highlight.astype(np.uint8)
contours, hierarchy = cv2.findContours(highlight, cv2.RETR_TREE, cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_NONE)
cells = np.vstack(contours).squeeze()
This is an illustration of cells being checked:

How to change the length of axes for 3D plots in matplotlib [duplicate]

I have this so far:
x,y,z = data.nonzero()
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
ax.scatter(x, y, z, zdir='z', c= 'red')
plt.savefig("plot.png")
Which creates:
What I'd like to do is stretch this out to make the Z axis 9 times taller and keep X and Y the same. I'd like to keep the same coordinates though.
So far I tried this guy:
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(4.,35.))
But that just stretches out the plot.png image.
The code example below provides a way to scale each axis relative to the others. However, to do so you need to modify the Axes3D.get_proj function. Below is an example based on the example provided by matplot lib: http://matplotlib.org/1.4.0/mpl_toolkits/mplot3d/tutorial.html#line-plots
(There is a shorter version at the end of this answer)
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d.axes3d import Axes3D
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import proj3d
import matplotlib as mpl
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
#Make sure these are floating point values:
scale_x = 1.0
scale_y = 2.0
scale_z = 3.0
#Axes are scaled down to fit in scene
max_scale=max(scale_x, scale_y, scale_z)
scale_x=scale_x/max_scale
scale_y=scale_y/max_scale
scale_z=scale_z/max_scale
#Create scaling matrix
scale = np.array([[scale_x,0,0,0],
[0,scale_y,0,0],
[0,0,scale_z,0],
[0,0,0,1]])
print scale
def get_proj_scale(self):
"""
Create the projection matrix from the current viewing position.
elev stores the elevation angle in the z plane
azim stores the azimuth angle in the x,y plane
dist is the distance of the eye viewing point from the object
point.
"""
relev, razim = np.pi * self.elev/180, np.pi * self.azim/180
xmin, xmax = self.get_xlim3d()
ymin, ymax = self.get_ylim3d()
zmin, zmax = self.get_zlim3d()
# transform to uniform world coordinates 0-1.0,0-1.0,0-1.0
worldM = proj3d.world_transformation(
xmin, xmax,
ymin, ymax,
zmin, zmax)
# look into the middle of the new coordinates
R = np.array([0.5, 0.5, 0.5])
xp = R[0] + np.cos(razim) * np.cos(relev) * self.dist
yp = R[1] + np.sin(razim) * np.cos(relev) * self.dist
zp = R[2] + np.sin(relev) * self.dist
E = np.array((xp, yp, zp))
self.eye = E
self.vvec = R - E
self.vvec = self.vvec / proj3d.mod(self.vvec)
if abs(relev) > np.pi/2:
# upside down
V = np.array((0, 0, -1))
else:
V = np.array((0, 0, 1))
zfront, zback = -self.dist, self.dist
viewM = proj3d.view_transformation(E, R, V)
perspM = proj3d.persp_transformation(zfront, zback)
M0 = np.dot(viewM, worldM)
M = np.dot(perspM, M0)
return np.dot(M, scale);
Axes3D.get_proj=get_proj_scale
"""
You need to include all the code above.
From here on you should be able to plot as usual.
"""
mpl.rcParams['legend.fontsize'] = 10
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5,5))
ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
theta = np.linspace(-4 * np.pi, 4 * np.pi, 100)
z = np.linspace(-2, 2, 100)
r = z**2 + 1
x = r * np.sin(theta)
y = r * np.cos(theta)
ax.plot(x, y, z, label='parametric curve')
ax.legend()
plt.show()
Standard output:
Scaled by (1, 2, 3):
Scaled by (1, 1, 3):
The reason I particularly like this method,
Swap z and x, scale by (3, 1, 1):
Below is a shorter version of the code.
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d.axes3d import Axes3D
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import proj3d
import matplotlib as mpl
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
mpl.rcParams['legend.fontsize'] = 10
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5,5))
ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
theta = np.linspace(-4 * np.pi, 4 * np.pi, 100)
z = np.linspace(-2, 2, 100)
r = z**2 + 1
x = r * np.sin(theta)
y = r * np.cos(theta)
"""
Scaling is done from here...
"""
x_scale=1
y_scale=1
z_scale=2
scale=np.diag([x_scale, y_scale, z_scale, 1.0])
scale=scale*(1.0/scale.max())
scale[3,3]=1.0
def short_proj():
return np.dot(Axes3D.get_proj(ax), scale)
ax.get_proj=short_proj
"""
to here
"""
ax.plot(z, y, x, label='parametric curve')
ax.legend()
plt.show()
Please note that the answer below simplifies the patch, but uses the same underlying principle as the answer by #ChristianSarofeen.
Solution
As already indicated in other answers, it is not a feature that is currently implemented in matplotlib. However, since what you are requesting is simply a 3D transformation that can be applied to the existing projection matrix used by matplotlib, and thanks to the wonderful features of Python, this problem can be solved with a simple oneliner:
ax.get_proj = lambda: np.dot(Axes3D.get_proj(ax), np.diag([scale_x, scale_y, scale_z, 1]))
where scale_x, scale_y and scale_z are values from 0 to 1 that will re-scale your plot along each of the axes accordingly. ax is simply the 3D axes which can be obtained with ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
Explanation
To explain, the function get_proj of Axes3D generates the projection matrix from the current viewing position. Multiplying it by a scaling matrix:
scale_x, 0, 0
0, scale_y, 0
0, 0, scale_z
0, 0, 1
includes the scaling into the projection used by the renderer. So, what we are doing here is substituting the original get_proj function with an expression taking the result of the original get_proj and multiplying it by the scaling matrix.
Example
To illustrate the result with the standard parametric function example:
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
theta = np.linspace(-4 * np.pi, 4 * np.pi, 100)
z = np.linspace(-2, 2, 100)
r = z ** 2 + 1
x = r * np.sin(theta)
y = r * np.cos(theta)
# OUR ONE LINER ADDED HERE:
ax.get_proj = lambda: np.dot(Axes3D.get_proj(ax), np.diag([0.5, 0.5, 1, 1]))
ax.plot(x, y, z)
plt.show()
for values 0.5, 0.5, 1, we get:
while for values 0.2, 1.0, 0.2, we get:
In my case I wanted to stretch z-axis 2 times for better point visibility
from mpl_toolkits import mplot3d
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# plt.rcParams["figure.figsize"] = (10,200)
# plt.rcParams["figure.autolayout"] = True
ax = plt.axes(projection='3d')
ax.set_box_aspect(aspect = (1,1,2))
ax.plot(dataX,dataY,dataZ)
I looks like by default, mplot3d will leave quite a bit of room at the top and bottom of a very tall plot. But, you can trick it into filling that space using fig.subplots_adjust, and extending the top and bottom out of the normal plotting area (i.e. top > 1 and bottom < 0). Some trial and error here is probably needed for your particular plot.
I've created some random arrays for x, y, and z with limits similar to your plot, and have found the parameters below (bottom=-0.15, top = 1.2) seem to work ok.
You might also want to change ax.view_init to set a nice viewing angle.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import axes3d
from numpy import random
# Make some random data with similar limits to the OP's example
x,y,z=random.rand(3,100)
z*=250
y*=800
y+=900
x*=350
x+=1200
fig=plt.figure(figsize=(4,35))
# Set the bottom and top outside the actual figure limits,
# to stretch the 3D axis
fig.subplots_adjust(bottom=-0.15,top=1.2)
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
# Change the viewing angle to an agreeable one
ax.view_init(2,None)
ax.scatter(x, y, z, zdir='z', c= 'red')
plt.savefig("plot.png")
Sounds like you're trying to adjust the scale of the plot. I don't think there's a way to stretch a linear scale to user specifications, but you can use set_yscale(), set_xscale(), set_zscale() to alter the scales with respect to each other.
Intuitively, set_yscale(log), set_xscale(log), set_zscale(linear) might solve your problems.
A likely better option: specify a stretch, set them all to symlog with the same log base and then specify the Z-axis's symlog scale with the linscalex/linscaley kwargs to your specifications.
More here:
http://matplotlib.org/mpl_toolkits/mplot3d/api.html
I found this while searching on a similar problem. After experimenting a bit, perhaps I can share some of my prelim findings here..matplotlib library is VAST!! (am a newcomer). Note that quite akin to this question, all i wanted was to 'visually' stretch the chart without distorting it.
Background story (only key code snippets are shown to avoid unnecessary clutter for those who know the library, and if you want a run-able code please drop a comment):
I have three 1-d ndarrays representing the X,Y and Z data points respectively. Clearly I can't use plot_surface (as it requires 2d ndarrays for each dim) so I went for the extremely useful plot_trisurf:
fig = plt.figure()
ax = Axes3D(fig)
3d_surf_obj = ax.plot_trisurf(X, Y, Z_defl, cmap=cm.jet,linewidth=0,antialiased=True)
You can think of the plot like a floating barge deforming in waves...As you can see, the axes stretch make it pretty deceiving visually (note that x is supposed to be at x6 times longer than y and >>>>> z). While the plot points are correct, I wanted something more visually 'stretched' at the very least. Was looking for A QUICK FIX, if I may. Long story cut short, I found a bit of success with...'figure.figsize' general setting (see snippet below).
matplotlib.rcParams.update({'font.serif': 'Times New Roman',
'font.size': 10.0,
'axes.labelsize': 'Medium',
'axes.labelweight': 'normal',
'axes.linewidth': 0.8,
###########################################
# THIS IS THE IMPORTANT ONE FOR STRETCHING
# default is [6,4] but...i changed it to
'figure.figsize':[15,5] # THIS ONE #
})
For [15,5] I got something like...
Pretty neat!!
So I started to push it.... and got up to [20,6] before deciding to settle there..
If you want to try for visually stretching the vertical axis, try with ratios like... [7,10], which in this case gives me ...
Not too shabby !
Should do it for visual prowess.
Multiply all your z values by 9,
ax.scatter(x, y, 9*z, zdir='z', c= 'red')
And then give the z-axis custom plot labels and spacing.
ax.ZTick = [0,-9*50, -9*100, -9*150, -9*200];
ax.ZTickLabel = {'0','-50','-100','-150','-200'};

Aligning maps made using basemap

Is there a way to align python basemaps like this figure below?
Here's some sample basemap code to produce a map:
from mpl_toolkits.basemap import Basemap
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8, 4.5))
plt.subplots_adjust(left=0.02, right=0.98, top=0.98, bottom=0.00)
m = Basemap(projection='robin',lon_0=0,resolution='c')
m.fillcontinents(color='gray',lake_color='white')
m.drawcoastlines()
plt.savefig('world.png',dpi=75)
I am not an expert with Matplotlib, but I found a way to get a similar result by using the data files included in the source folder of basemap. They can be combined into a meshgrid to plot some data, in the example below we plot the altitude at every point.
One of the tricks I used is to set matplotlib to an orthogonal projection so that there is no distortion in the vertical spacing of the maps.
I have put the parameters at the beginning of the code as you may find it useful to adjust.
One thing I couldn't get my head around is the shadow under the maps.
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import proj3d
from mpl_toolkits.basemap import Basemap
from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1.inset_locator import inset_axes
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Parameters
n_maps = 5 # Number of maps
z_spacing = 4. # Spacing of maps along z
z_reduction = 1E-8 # Reduction factor for Z data, makes the map look flat
view_angles = (14., -100.) # Set view port angles
colbar_bottom = 0.2 # Space at the bottom of colorbar column
colbar_spacing = .132 # Space between colorbars
colbar_height = 0.1 # Height of colorbars
# Set orthogonal projection
def orthogonal_proj(zfront, zback):
a = (zfront+zback)/(zfront-zback)
b = -2*(zfront*zback)/(zfront-zback)
return np.array([[1,0,0,0],
[0,1,0,0],
[0,0,a,b],
[0,0,-0.0001,zback]])
proj3d.persp_transformation = orthogonal_proj
fig = plt.figure(figsize=[30, 10*n_maps])
ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
etopo = np.loadtxt('etopo20data.gz')
lons = np.loadtxt('etopo20lons.gz')
lats = np.loadtxt('etopo20lats.gz')
# Create Basemap instance for Robinson projection.
m = Basemap(projection='robin', lon_0=0.5*(lons[0]+lons[-1]))
# Compute map projection coordinates for lat/lon grid.
X, Y = m(*np.meshgrid(lons,lats))
# Exclude the oceans
Z = etopo.clip(-1)
# Set the colormap
cmap = plt.cm.get_cmap("terrain")
cmap.set_under("grey")
for i in range(n_maps):
c = ax.contourf(X, Y, z_spacing*i + z_reduction*Z, 30, cmap=cmap, vmin=z_spacing*i, extend='neither')
cax = inset_axes(ax,
width="5%",
height="100%",
loc=3,
bbox_to_anchor=(.85, colbar_spacing*i+colbar_bottom, .2, colbar_height),
bbox_transform=ax.transAxes,
borderpad=0
)
cb = fig.colorbar(c, cax=cax)
cb.set_label("Altitude")
# Reset the ticks of the color bar to match initial data
cb.set_ticks([z_spacing * i + j/10. * z_reduction * Z.max() for j in range(11)])
cb.set_ticklabels([str(int(j/10. * Z.max())) for j in range(11)])
ax.set_axis_off()
ax.view_init(*view_angles)
ax.set_xlim3d(X.min(), X.max())
ax.set_ylim3d(Y.min(), Y.max())
ax.set_zlim3d(-1E-2, (n_maps-1)*z_spacing)
plt.savefig('world.png',dpi=75)
Edit:
If you want shadows and don't mind the extra compute time you can change the beginning of the for loop with something along the lines of:
shadow_Z = np.empty(Z.shape)
for i in range(n_maps):
c = ax.contourf(X, Y, z_spacing*i + z_reduction*Z, 30, cmap=cmaps[i], vmin=z_spacing*i, extend='neither')
for j in range(10):
shadow_Z.fill(z_spacing*i - 1E-2 * j)
s = ax.contourf((X - X.mean()) * (1 + 8E-3 * j) + X.mean() + 2E5,
(Y - Y.mean()) * (1 + 8E-3 * j) + Y.mean() - 2E5,
shadow_Z, colors='black', alpha=0.1 - j * 1E-2)

matplotlib (mplot3d) - how to increase the size of an axis (stretch) in a 3D Plot?

I have this so far:
x,y,z = data.nonzero()
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
ax.scatter(x, y, z, zdir='z', c= 'red')
plt.savefig("plot.png")
Which creates:
What I'd like to do is stretch this out to make the Z axis 9 times taller and keep X and Y the same. I'd like to keep the same coordinates though.
So far I tried this guy:
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(4.,35.))
But that just stretches out the plot.png image.
The code example below provides a way to scale each axis relative to the others. However, to do so you need to modify the Axes3D.get_proj function. Below is an example based on the example provided by matplot lib: http://matplotlib.org/1.4.0/mpl_toolkits/mplot3d/tutorial.html#line-plots
(There is a shorter version at the end of this answer)
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d.axes3d import Axes3D
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import proj3d
import matplotlib as mpl
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
#Make sure these are floating point values:
scale_x = 1.0
scale_y = 2.0
scale_z = 3.0
#Axes are scaled down to fit in scene
max_scale=max(scale_x, scale_y, scale_z)
scale_x=scale_x/max_scale
scale_y=scale_y/max_scale
scale_z=scale_z/max_scale
#Create scaling matrix
scale = np.array([[scale_x,0,0,0],
[0,scale_y,0,0],
[0,0,scale_z,0],
[0,0,0,1]])
print scale
def get_proj_scale(self):
"""
Create the projection matrix from the current viewing position.
elev stores the elevation angle in the z plane
azim stores the azimuth angle in the x,y plane
dist is the distance of the eye viewing point from the object
point.
"""
relev, razim = np.pi * self.elev/180, np.pi * self.azim/180
xmin, xmax = self.get_xlim3d()
ymin, ymax = self.get_ylim3d()
zmin, zmax = self.get_zlim3d()
# transform to uniform world coordinates 0-1.0,0-1.0,0-1.0
worldM = proj3d.world_transformation(
xmin, xmax,
ymin, ymax,
zmin, zmax)
# look into the middle of the new coordinates
R = np.array([0.5, 0.5, 0.5])
xp = R[0] + np.cos(razim) * np.cos(relev) * self.dist
yp = R[1] + np.sin(razim) * np.cos(relev) * self.dist
zp = R[2] + np.sin(relev) * self.dist
E = np.array((xp, yp, zp))
self.eye = E
self.vvec = R - E
self.vvec = self.vvec / proj3d.mod(self.vvec)
if abs(relev) > np.pi/2:
# upside down
V = np.array((0, 0, -1))
else:
V = np.array((0, 0, 1))
zfront, zback = -self.dist, self.dist
viewM = proj3d.view_transformation(E, R, V)
perspM = proj3d.persp_transformation(zfront, zback)
M0 = np.dot(viewM, worldM)
M = np.dot(perspM, M0)
return np.dot(M, scale);
Axes3D.get_proj=get_proj_scale
"""
You need to include all the code above.
From here on you should be able to plot as usual.
"""
mpl.rcParams['legend.fontsize'] = 10
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5,5))
ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
theta = np.linspace(-4 * np.pi, 4 * np.pi, 100)
z = np.linspace(-2, 2, 100)
r = z**2 + 1
x = r * np.sin(theta)
y = r * np.cos(theta)
ax.plot(x, y, z, label='parametric curve')
ax.legend()
plt.show()
Standard output:
Scaled by (1, 2, 3):
Scaled by (1, 1, 3):
The reason I particularly like this method,
Swap z and x, scale by (3, 1, 1):
Below is a shorter version of the code.
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d.axes3d import Axes3D
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import proj3d
import matplotlib as mpl
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
mpl.rcParams['legend.fontsize'] = 10
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5,5))
ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
theta = np.linspace(-4 * np.pi, 4 * np.pi, 100)
z = np.linspace(-2, 2, 100)
r = z**2 + 1
x = r * np.sin(theta)
y = r * np.cos(theta)
"""
Scaling is done from here...
"""
x_scale=1
y_scale=1
z_scale=2
scale=np.diag([x_scale, y_scale, z_scale, 1.0])
scale=scale*(1.0/scale.max())
scale[3,3]=1.0
def short_proj():
return np.dot(Axes3D.get_proj(ax), scale)
ax.get_proj=short_proj
"""
to here
"""
ax.plot(z, y, x, label='parametric curve')
ax.legend()
plt.show()
Please note that the answer below simplifies the patch, but uses the same underlying principle as the answer by #ChristianSarofeen.
Solution
As already indicated in other answers, it is not a feature that is currently implemented in matplotlib. However, since what you are requesting is simply a 3D transformation that can be applied to the existing projection matrix used by matplotlib, and thanks to the wonderful features of Python, this problem can be solved with a simple oneliner:
ax.get_proj = lambda: np.dot(Axes3D.get_proj(ax), np.diag([scale_x, scale_y, scale_z, 1]))
where scale_x, scale_y and scale_z are values from 0 to 1 that will re-scale your plot along each of the axes accordingly. ax is simply the 3D axes which can be obtained with ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
Explanation
To explain, the function get_proj of Axes3D generates the projection matrix from the current viewing position. Multiplying it by a scaling matrix:
scale_x, 0, 0
0, scale_y, 0
0, 0, scale_z
0, 0, 1
includes the scaling into the projection used by the renderer. So, what we are doing here is substituting the original get_proj function with an expression taking the result of the original get_proj and multiplying it by the scaling matrix.
Example
To illustrate the result with the standard parametric function example:
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.gca(projection='3d')
theta = np.linspace(-4 * np.pi, 4 * np.pi, 100)
z = np.linspace(-2, 2, 100)
r = z ** 2 + 1
x = r * np.sin(theta)
y = r * np.cos(theta)
# OUR ONE LINER ADDED HERE:
ax.get_proj = lambda: np.dot(Axes3D.get_proj(ax), np.diag([0.5, 0.5, 1, 1]))
ax.plot(x, y, z)
plt.show()
for values 0.5, 0.5, 1, we get:
while for values 0.2, 1.0, 0.2, we get:
In my case I wanted to stretch z-axis 2 times for better point visibility
from mpl_toolkits import mplot3d
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# plt.rcParams["figure.figsize"] = (10,200)
# plt.rcParams["figure.autolayout"] = True
ax = plt.axes(projection='3d')
ax.set_box_aspect(aspect = (1,1,2))
ax.plot(dataX,dataY,dataZ)
I looks like by default, mplot3d will leave quite a bit of room at the top and bottom of a very tall plot. But, you can trick it into filling that space using fig.subplots_adjust, and extending the top and bottom out of the normal plotting area (i.e. top > 1 and bottom < 0). Some trial and error here is probably needed for your particular plot.
I've created some random arrays for x, y, and z with limits similar to your plot, and have found the parameters below (bottom=-0.15, top = 1.2) seem to work ok.
You might also want to change ax.view_init to set a nice viewing angle.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import axes3d
from numpy import random
# Make some random data with similar limits to the OP's example
x,y,z=random.rand(3,100)
z*=250
y*=800
y+=900
x*=350
x+=1200
fig=plt.figure(figsize=(4,35))
# Set the bottom and top outside the actual figure limits,
# to stretch the 3D axis
fig.subplots_adjust(bottom=-0.15,top=1.2)
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
# Change the viewing angle to an agreeable one
ax.view_init(2,None)
ax.scatter(x, y, z, zdir='z', c= 'red')
plt.savefig("plot.png")
Sounds like you're trying to adjust the scale of the plot. I don't think there's a way to stretch a linear scale to user specifications, but you can use set_yscale(), set_xscale(), set_zscale() to alter the scales with respect to each other.
Intuitively, set_yscale(log), set_xscale(log), set_zscale(linear) might solve your problems.
A likely better option: specify a stretch, set them all to symlog with the same log base and then specify the Z-axis's symlog scale with the linscalex/linscaley kwargs to your specifications.
More here:
http://matplotlib.org/mpl_toolkits/mplot3d/api.html
I found this while searching on a similar problem. After experimenting a bit, perhaps I can share some of my prelim findings here..matplotlib library is VAST!! (am a newcomer). Note that quite akin to this question, all i wanted was to 'visually' stretch the chart without distorting it.
Background story (only key code snippets are shown to avoid unnecessary clutter for those who know the library, and if you want a run-able code please drop a comment):
I have three 1-d ndarrays representing the X,Y and Z data points respectively. Clearly I can't use plot_surface (as it requires 2d ndarrays for each dim) so I went for the extremely useful plot_trisurf:
fig = plt.figure()
ax = Axes3D(fig)
3d_surf_obj = ax.plot_trisurf(X, Y, Z_defl, cmap=cm.jet,linewidth=0,antialiased=True)
You can think of the plot like a floating barge deforming in waves...As you can see, the axes stretch make it pretty deceiving visually (note that x is supposed to be at x6 times longer than y and >>>>> z). While the plot points are correct, I wanted something more visually 'stretched' at the very least. Was looking for A QUICK FIX, if I may. Long story cut short, I found a bit of success with...'figure.figsize' general setting (see snippet below).
matplotlib.rcParams.update({'font.serif': 'Times New Roman',
'font.size': 10.0,
'axes.labelsize': 'Medium',
'axes.labelweight': 'normal',
'axes.linewidth': 0.8,
###########################################
# THIS IS THE IMPORTANT ONE FOR STRETCHING
# default is [6,4] but...i changed it to
'figure.figsize':[15,5] # THIS ONE #
})
For [15,5] I got something like...
Pretty neat!!
So I started to push it.... and got up to [20,6] before deciding to settle there..
If you want to try for visually stretching the vertical axis, try with ratios like... [7,10], which in this case gives me ...
Not too shabby !
Should do it for visual prowess.
Multiply all your z values by 9,
ax.scatter(x, y, 9*z, zdir='z', c= 'red')
And then give the z-axis custom plot labels and spacing.
ax.ZTick = [0,-9*50, -9*100, -9*150, -9*200];
ax.ZTickLabel = {'0','-50','-100','-150','-200'};

How to draw circle by data with matplotlib + python?

I can draw a circle by scatter, which has been shown in the image. But I want to draw them buy a line, because there are many circles in total, I need to link nodes together for a certain circle. Thanks.
I the order of the points is random, you can change X-Y to polar, and sort the data by angle:
create some random order points first:
import pylab as pl
import numpy as np
angle = np.arange(0, np.pi*2, 0.05)
r = 50 + np.random.normal(0, 2, angle.shape)
x = r * np.cos(angle)
y = r * np.sin(angle)
idx = np.random.permutation(angle.shape[0])
x = x[idx]
y = y[idx]
Then use arctan2() to calculate the angle, and sort the data by it:
angle = np.arctan2(x, y)
order = np.argsort(angle)
x = x[order]
y = y[order]
fig, ax = pl.subplots()
ax.set_aspect(1.0)
x2 = np.r_[x, x[0]]
y2 = np.r_[y, y[0]]
ax.plot(x, y, "o")
ax.plot(x2, y2, "r", lw=2)
here is the output:
Here is one way to do it. This answer uses different methods than the linked possible duplicate, so may be worth keeping.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib import patches
fig = plt.figure(figsize=plt.figaspect(1.0))
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
cen = (2.0,1.0); r = 3.0
circle = patches.Circle(cen, r, facecolor='none')
ax.add_patch(circle)
ax.set_xlim(-6.0, 6.0)
ax.set_ylim(-6.0, 6.0)
If all you have are the x and y points, you can use PathPatch. Here's a tutorial
If your data points are already in order, the plot command should work fine. If you're looking to generate a circle from scratch, you can use a parametric equation.
>>> import numpy as np
>>> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>>> t = np.linspace(0,2*np.pi, 100)
>>> x = np.cos(t)
>>> y = np.sin(t)
>>> plt.plot(x,y)

Categories