Im using the below function to explode a deeply nested JSON (has nested struct and array).
# Flatten nested df
def flatten_df(nested_df):
for col in nested_df.columns:
array_cols = [c[0] for c in nested_df.dtypes if c[1][:5] == 'array']
for col in array_cols:
nested_df =nested_df.withColumn(col, F.explode_outer(nested_df[col]))
nested_cols = [c[0] for c in nested_df.dtypes if c[1][:6] == 'struct']
if len(nested_cols) == 0:
return nested_df
flat_cols = [c[0] for c in nested_df.dtypes if c[1][:6] != 'struct']
flat_df = nested_df.select(flat_cols +
[F.col(nc+'.'+c).alias(nc+'_'+c)
for nc in nested_cols
for c in nested_df.select(nc+'.*').columns])
return flatten_df(flat_df)
Im successfully able to explode. But I also want to add the order or the index of the elements in the exploded dataframe. So in the above code I replace the explode_outer function to posexplode_outer. But I get the below error
An error was encountered:
'The number of aliases supplied in the AS clause does not match the number of columns output by the UDTF expected 2 aliases'
I tried changing the nested_df.withColumn to nested_df.select but I wasn't successful. Can anyone help me explode the nested json but same time maintain the order of array elements as a column in the exploded dataframe.
Read json data as dataframe and create view or table.In spark SQL you can use number of laterviewexplode method using alias reference. If json data structure in struct type you can use dot to represent the structure. Level1.level2
Replace nested_df =nested_df.withColumn(col, F.explode_outer(nested_df[col])) with nested_df = df.selectExpr("*", f"posexplode({col}) as (position,col)").drop(col)
You might need to write some logic to replace the column names to original, but it should be simple
The error is because posexplode_outer returns two columns pos and col, so you cannot use it along withColumn(). This can be used in select as shown in the code below
from pyspark.sql import functions as F
from pyspark.sql.window import Window
tst= sqlContext.createDataFrame([(1,7,80),(1,8,40),(1,5,100),(5,8,90),(7,6,50),(0,3,60)],schema=['col1','col2','col3'])
tst_new = tst.withColumn("arr",F.array(tst.columns))
expr = tst.columns
expr.append(F.posexplode_outer('arr'))
#%%
tst_explode = tst_new.select(*expr)
results:
tst_explode.show()
+----+----+----+---+---+
|col1|col2|col3|pos|col|
+----+----+----+---+---+
| 1| 7| 80| 0| 1|
| 1| 7| 80| 1| 7|
| 1| 7| 80| 2| 80|
| 1| 8| 40| 0| 1|
| 1| 8| 40| 1| 8|
| 1| 8| 40| 2| 40|
| 1| 5| 100| 0| 1|
| 1| 5| 100| 1| 5|
| 1| 5| 100| 2|100|
| 5| 8| 90| 0| 5|
| 5| 8| 90| 1| 8|
| 5| 8| 90| 2| 90|
| 7| 6| 50| 0| 7|
| 7| 6| 50| 1| 6|
| 7| 6| 50| 2| 50|
| 0| 3| 60| 0| 0|
| 0| 3| 60| 1| 3|
| 0| 3| 60| 2| 60|
+----+----+----+---+---+
If you need to rename the columns, you can use the .withColumnRenamed() function
df_final=(tst_explode.withColumnRenamed('pos','position')).withColumnRenamed('col','column')
You can try select with list-comprehension to posexplode the ArrayType columns in your existing code:
for col in array_cols:
nested_df = nested_df.select([ F.posexplode_outer(col).alias(col+'_pos', col) if c == col else c for c in nested_df.columns ])
Example:
from pyspark.sql import functions as F
df = spark.createDataFrame([(1,"n1", ["a", "b", "c"]),(2,"n2", ["foo", "bar"])],["id", "name", "vals"])
#+---+----+----------+
#| id|name| vals|
#+---+----+----------+
#| 1| n1| [a, b, c]|
#| 2| n2|[foo, bar]|
#+---+----+----------+
col = "vals"
df.select([F.posexplode_outer(col).alias(col+'_pos', col) if c == col else c for c in df.columns]).show()
#+---+----+--------+----+
#| id|name|vals_pos|vals|
#+---+----+--------+----+
#| 1| n1| 0| a|
#| 1| n1| 1| b|
#| 1| n1| 2| c|
#| 2| n2| 0| foo|
#| 2| n2| 1| bar|
#+---+----+--------+----+
Related
I have a existing pyspark dataframe that has around 200 columns. I have a list of the column names (in the correct order and length).
How can I apply the list to the dataframe without using structtype?
Assuming the list of column names is in the right order and has a matching length you can use toDF
Preparing an example dataframe
import numpy as np
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
spark = SparkSession.builder.getOrCreate()
df = spark.createDataFrame(np.random.randint(1,10,(5,4)).tolist(), list('ABCD'))
df.show()
Output
+---+---+---+---+
| A| B| C| D|
+---+---+---+---+
| 6| 9| 4| 7|
| 6| 4| 7| 9|
| 2| 5| 2| 2|
| 3| 7| 4| 5|
| 8| 9| 6| 8|
+---+---+---+---+
Changing the column names
newcolumns = ['new_A','new_B','new_C','new_D']
df.toDF(*newcolumns).show()
Output
+-----+-----+-----+-----+
|new_A|new_B|new_C|new_D|
+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| 6| 9| 4| 7|
| 6| 4| 7| 9|
| 2| 5| 2| 2|
| 3| 7| 4| 5|
| 8| 9| 6| 8|
+-----+-----+-----+-----+
If you have list of columns pre-exiting, it would work fine:
df_list = ["newName_1", "newName_2", "newName_3", "newName_4"]
renamed_df = df.toDF(*df_list)
renamed_df.show()
But if you want to make it dynamic and without relying on list of
columns, here is alternate way of doing it:
df.select([col(col_name).alias(col_name) for col_name in df])
To give an example, suppose we have a stream of user actions as follows:
from pyspark.sql import *
spark = SparkSession.builder.appName('test').master('local[8]').getOrCreate()
df = spark.sparkContext.parallelize([
Row(user=1, action=1, time=1),
Row(user=1, action=1, time=2),
Row(user=2, action=1, time=3),
Row(user=1, action=2, time=4),
Row(user=2, action=2, time=5),
Row(user=2, action=2, time=6),
Row(user=1, action=1, time=7),
Row(user=2, action=1, time=8),
]).toDF()
df.show()
The dataframe looks like:
+----+------+----+
|user|action|time|
+----+------+----+
| 1| 1| 1|
| 1| 1| 2|
| 2| 1| 3|
| 1| 2| 4|
| 2| 2| 5|
| 2| 2| 6|
| 1| 1| 7|
| 2| 1| 8|
+----+------+----+
Then, I want to add a column next_alt_time to each row, giving the time when user changes action type in the following rows. For the input above, the output should be:
+----+------+----+-------------+
|user|action|time|next_alt_time|
+----+------+----+-------------+
| 1| 1| 1| 4|
| 1| 1| 2| 4|
| 2| 1| 3| 5|
| 1| 2| 4| 7|
| 2| 2| 5| 8|
| 2| 2| 6| 8|
| 1| 1| 7| null|
| 2| 1| 8| null|
+----+------+----+-------------+
I know I can create a window like this:
wnd = Window().partitionBy('user').orderBy('time').rowsBetween(1, Window.unboundedFollowing)
But then I don't know how to impose a condition over the window and select the first row that has a different action than current row, over the window defined above.
Here's how to do it. Spark cannot keep the dataframe order, but if you check the rows one by one, you can confirm that it's giving your expected answer:
from pyspark.sql import Row
from pyspark.sql.window import Window
import pyspark.sql.functions as F
df = spark.sparkContext.parallelize([
Row(user=1, action=1, time=1),
Row(user=1, action=1, time=2),
Row(user=2, action=1, time=3),
Row(user=1, action=2, time=4),
Row(user=2, action=2, time=5),
Row(user=2, action=2, time=6),
Row(user=1, action=1, time=7),
Row(user=2, action=1, time=8),
]).toDF()
win = Window().partitionBy('user').orderBy('time')
df = df.withColumn('new_action', F.lag('action').over(win) != F.col('action'))
df = df.withColumn('new_action_time', F.when(F.col('new_action'), F.col('time')))
df = df.withColumn('next_alt_time', F.first('new_action', ignorenulls=True).over(win.rowsBetween(1, Window.unboundedFollowing)))
df.show()
+----+------+----+----------+---------------+-------------+
|user|action|time|new_action|new_action_time|next_alt_time|
+----+------+----+----------+---------------+-------------+
| 1| 1| 1| null| null| 4|
| 1| 1| 2| false| null| 4|
| 1| 2| 4| true| 4| 7|
| 1| 1| 7| true| 7| null|
| 2| 1| 3| null| null| 5|
| 2| 2| 5| true| 5| 8|
| 2| 2| 6| false| null| 8|
| 2| 1| 8| true| 8| null|
+----+------+----+----------+---------------+-------------+
I want to replace NA with medain based on partition columns using window function in pyspark?
Sample Input:
Required Output:
Creating your dataframe:
list=([1,5,4],
[1,5,None],
[1,5,1],
[1,5,4],
[2,5,1],
[2,5,2],
[2,5,None],
[2,5,None],
[2,5,4])
df=spark.createDataFrame(list,['I_id','p_id','xyz'])
df.show()
+----+----+----+
|I_id|p_id| xyz|
+----+----+----+
| 1| 5| 4|
| 1| 5|null|
| 1| 5| 1|
| 1| 5| 4|
| 2| 5| 1|
| 2| 5| 2|
| 2| 5|null|
| 2| 5|null|
| 2| 5| 4|
+----+----+----+
To keep the solution as generic and dynamic as possible, I had to create many new columns to compute the median, and to be able to send it to the nulls. With that said, solution will not be slow, and will be scalable for big data.
from pyspark.sql.window import Window
from pyspark.sql import functions as F
from pyspark.sql.functions import when
w= Window().partitionBy("I_id","p_id").orderBy(F.col("xyz").asc_nulls_first())
w2= Window().partitionBy("I_id","p_id")
df.withColumn("xyz1",F.count(F.col("xyz").isNotNull()).over(w))\
.withColumn("xyz2", F.max(F.row_number().over(w)).over(w2))\
.withColumn("xyz3", F.first("xyz1").over(w))\
.withColumn("xyz10", F.col("xyz2")-F.col("xyz3"))\
.withColumn("xyz9", F.when((F.col("xyz2")-F.col("xyz3"))%2!=0, F.col("xyz2")-F.col("xyz3")+1).otherwise(F.col("xyz2")-F.col("xyz3")))\
.withColumn("xyz4", (F.col("xyz9")/2))\
.withColumn("xyz6", F.col("xyz4")+F.col("xyz3"))\
.withColumn("xyz7", F.when(F.col("xyz10")%2==0,(F.col("xyz4")+F.col("xyz3")+1)).otherwise(F.lit(None)))\
.withColumn("xyz5", F.row_number().over(w))\
.withColumn("medianr", F.when(F.col("xyz6")==F.col("xyz5"), F.col("xyz")).when(F.col("xyz7")==F.col("xyz5"),F.col("xyz")).otherwise(F.lit(None)))\
.withColumn("medianr2", (F.mean("medianr").over(w2)))\
.withColumn("xyz", F.when(F.col("xyz").isNull(), F.col("medianr2")).otherwise(F.col("xyz")))\
.select("I_id","p_id","xyz")\
.orderBy("I_id").show()
+----+----+---+
|I_id|p_id|xyz|
+----+----+---+
| 1| 5| 4|
| 1| 5| 1|
| 1| 5| 4|
| 1| 5| 4|
| 2| 5| 2|
| 2| 5| 2|
| 2| 5| 1|
| 2| 5| 2|
| 2| 5| 4|
+----+----+---+
I want to create new dataset based on original dataset for example
for example
my input1
my output should be2
I refer other code and got thiss
def duplicate_function(row):
data = [] # list of rows to return
to_duplicate = float(row["No_of_Occ"])
i = 0
while i < to_duplicate:
row_dict = row.asDict() # convert a Spark Row object to a Python dictionary
row_dict["No_of_Occ"] = str(i)
new_row = Row(**row_dict) # create a Spark Row object based on a Python dictionary
to_return.append(new_row) # adds this Row to the list
i += 1
return data # returns the final list
but how can I get the No_of_occ here?
The general idea is to duplicate in-line the values as many times as No_of_Occ and then use a posexplode to generate more lines.
Assuming df is your dataframe.
from pyspark.sql import functions as F, types as T
output_schema = T.ArrayType(df.drop("no_of_occ").schema)
#F.udf(output_schema)
def duplicate(no_of_occ, *args):
return list((args,) * no_of_occ)
df.select(
"no_of_occ",
F.posexplode(duplicate(*df.columns))
).select(
"no_of_occ",
(F.col("pos")+1).alias("occ_no"),
F.col("col.*")
).show()
+---------+------+------+------+
|no_of_occ|occ_no|value1|value2|
+---------+------+------+------+
| 2| 1| 2| 3|
| 2| 2| 2| 3|
| 3| 1| 3| 4|
| 3| 2| 3| 4|
| 3| 3| 3| 4|
| 4| 1| 5| 6|
| 4| 2| 5| 6|
| 4| 3| 5| 6|
| 4| 4| 5| 6|
| 2| 1| 7| 8|
| 2| 2| 7| 8|
| 1| 1| 8| 9|
+---------+------+------+------+
need to solve the case where no_of_occ = 0.
EDIT:
If you need to keep also the lines with 0 (as 1), then replace the UDF :
#F.udf(output_schema)
def duplicate(no_of_occ, *args):
dup_value = no_of_occ or 1
return list((args,) * dup_value)
I've got a dataframe like this and I want to duplicate the row n times if the column n is bigger than one:
A B n
1 2 1
2 9 1
3 8 2
4 1 1
5 3 3
And transform like this:
A B n
1 2 1
2 9 1
3 8 2
3 8 2
4 1 1
5 3 3
5 3 3
5 3 3
I think I should use explode, but I don't understand how it works...
Thanks
With Spark 2.4.0+, this is easier with builtin functions: array_repeat + explode:
from pyspark.sql.functions import expr
df = spark.createDataFrame([(1,2,1), (2,9,1), (3,8,2), (4,1,1), (5,3,3)], ["A", "B", "n"])
new_df = df.withColumn('n', expr('explode(array_repeat(n,int(n)))'))
>>> new_df.show()
+---+---+---+
| A| B| n|
+---+---+---+
| 1| 2| 1|
| 2| 9| 1|
| 3| 8| 2|
| 3| 8| 2|
| 4| 1| 1|
| 5| 3| 3|
| 5| 3| 3|
| 5| 3| 3|
+---+---+---+
The explode function returns a new row for each element in the given array or map.
One way to exploit this function is to use a udf to create a list of size n for each row. Then explode the resulting array.
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf, explode
from pyspark.sql.types import ArrayType, IntegerType
df = spark.createDataFrame([(1,2,1), (2,9,1), (3,8,2), (4,1,1), (5,3,3)] ,["A", "B", "n"])
+---+---+---+
| A| B| n|
+---+---+---+
| 1| 2| 1|
| 2| 9| 1|
| 3| 8| 2|
| 4| 1| 1|
| 5| 3| 3|
+---+---+---+
# use udf function to transform the n value to n times
n_to_array = udf(lambda n : [n] * n, ArrayType(IntegerType()))
df2 = df.withColumn('n', n_to_array(df.n))
+---+---+---------+
| A| B| n|
+---+---+---------+
| 1| 2| [1]|
| 2| 9| [1]|
| 3| 8| [2, 2]|
| 4| 1| [1]|
| 5| 3|[3, 3, 3]|
+---+---+---------+
# now use explode
df2.withColumn('n', explode(df2.n)).show()
+---+---+---+
| A | B | n |
+---+---+---+
| 1| 2| 1|
| 2| 9| 1|
| 3| 8| 2|
| 3| 8| 2|
| 4| 1| 1|
| 5| 3| 3|
| 5| 3| 3|
| 5| 3| 3|
+---+---+---+
I think the udf answer by #Ahmed is the best way to go, but here is an alternative method, that may be as good or better for small n:
First, collect the maximum value of n over the whole DataFrame:
max_n = df.select(f.max('n').alias('max_n')).first()['max_n']
print(max_n)
#3
Now create an array for each row of length max_n, containing numbers in range(max_n). The output of this intermediate step will result in a DataFrame like:
df.withColumn('n_array', f.array([f.lit(i) for i in range(max_n)])).show()
#+---+---+---+---------+
#| A| B| n| n_array|
#+---+---+---+---------+
#| 1| 2| 1|[0, 1, 2]|
#| 2| 9| 1|[0, 1, 2]|
#| 3| 8| 2|[0, 1, 2]|
#| 4| 1| 1|[0, 1, 2]|
#| 5| 3| 3|[0, 1, 2]|
#+---+---+---+---------+
Now we explode the n_array column, and filter to keep only the values in the array that are less than n. This will ensure that we have n copies of each row. Finally we drop the exploded column to get the end result:
df.withColumn('n_array', f.array([f.lit(i) for i in range(max_n)]))\
.select('A', 'B', 'n', f.explode('n_array').alias('col'))\
.where(f.col('col') < f.col('n'))\
.drop('col')\
.show()
#+---+---+---+
#| A| B| n|
#+---+---+---+
#| 1| 2| 1|
#| 2| 9| 1|
#| 3| 8| 2|
#| 3| 8| 2|
#| 4| 1| 1|
#| 5| 3| 3|
#| 5| 3| 3|
#| 5| 3| 3|
#+---+---+---+
However, we are creating a max_n length array for each row- as opposed to just an n length array in the udf solution. It's not immediately clear to me how this will scale vs. udf for large max_n, but I suspect the udf will win out.