We Keep Coding

Is it possible to use 2 different frameworks in 1 backend of a web app?

I am an 11th grade student and I'm learning how to build a web app, with my teammates. Currently, We're making a website showing the school schedule (also to show students' marks) and helping the users to create their to-do lists, of course this web serves students like me. In the backend of the web, we use Python as the main language, Flask as the framework and MySQL to manipulate our database. Now, everything is ok and we're trying to make something like an admin interface for people who host the web. Specifically, it is where teachers can insert their students' grade, and maybe adjust the school timetable. The problem is, we're learning how to use Flask Admin to code that function, and we've found out this tech is only compatible with SQL Server. However, we have a better understand in MySQL therefore we could create multiple tasks, in contrast, we don't know how to use SQL Server to create those funcs. Now I have 2 main questions:
Could we use 2 different SQL in the backend of our web? It is the quickest way we know, however we have to learn how to use SQL Server.
Could we use 2 different Python backend frameworks in the backend of our web? We haven't searched which framework to use yet because we don't know if it's possible to do this.
We don't know any other ways to solve this problem except getting rid of MySQL and use SQL Server instead. However this is not the way we prefer and we hope those 2 questions answered. If there is anything wrong in our knowledge please just straightly comment to let us know, and we greatly welcome any other solutions. Thanks for answering!!

Directly from the flask-admin docs https://flask-admin.readthedocs.io/en/latest/advanced/#using-different-database-backends is the following:
Using Different Database Backends Other than SQLAlchemy… There are
five different backends for you to choose from, depending on which
database you would like to use for your application. If, however, you
need to implement your own database backend, have a look at Adding A
Model Backend.
If you don’t know where to start, but you’re familiar with relational
databases, then you should probably look at using SQLAlchemy. It
is a full-featured toolkit, with support for SQLite, PostgreSQL,
MySQL, Oracle and MS-SQL amongst others. It really comes into its own once you have lots of data, and a fair amount of relations between
your data models. If you want to track spatial data like
latitude/longitude points, you should look into GeoAlchemy, as well.
Regarding the original question, it is possible to use two different frameworks in the backend of a web app. One way to do so would be to set up a reverse proxy server (see https://www.nginx.com/resources/glossary/reverse-proxy-server/#:~:text=A%20reverse%20proxy%20server%20is,traffic%20between%20clients%20and%20servers.), but I would recommend giving SQLAlchemy before doing so.

Why do you think that flask-admin is tied to SqlServer? Flask (and flask-admin) can handle different connections to various databases:
https://github.com/flask-admin/flask-admin#introduction
https://flask-admin.readthedocs.io/en/v1.0.9/db/
My guess is you are currently using SqlAlchemy. As explained here, you can use different backends:
The string form of the URL is dialect[+driver]://user:password#host/dbname[?key=value..], where dialect is a database name such as mysql, oracle, postgresql, etc., and driver the name of a DBAPI, such as psycopg2, pyodbc, cx_oracle, etc.
Alternatively, the URL can be an instance of URL.
(https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/13/core/engines.html#sqlalchemy.create_engine)
More on Engine here
Flask-admin is a admin view on your database tables - you cannot run it on a "different" db then the tables it should modify. It needs to have access to the database tables you want it to modify, so you cannot run "admin" on MS and "your data backend" on another database(-connection).
Some other things to think about:
MS-(T-)Sql and MySql are infrastructural choices, language wise they are very closely related so adapting MySql knowledge to T-SQL Syntax should be possible. Choosing SqlServer may force you to license it - and afaik that comes with fees (eiter on premise or as a azure subscription wich might or might not be free for schools (no idea - but you should check that)).
This sounds like an ambitious project for school - depending on where you live, privat data protection laws come into play especially considering you connect names with schedules with grades which would need you to implement a lot more to comply.

For first question, I checked flask-admin documentation and found that the framework already included serval built-in ORM library, i.e. SQLAlchemy, MongoEngine, pymongo and Peewee. This means you can just directly import the ORM library from the flask-admin package and use it to access your database. For your case, you should look for SQLAlchemy as you are using SQL Database. Both SQL Server and MySQL are supported by SQLAlchemy.
The Adding Model Views section in their official doc also mentioned it as well:
https://flask-admin.readthedocs.io/en/latest/introduction/#getting-started
For the second question, it is technically not possible to apply two different frameworks in one single backend application.

In a Flask application that is using SQLAlchemy, is it ok to permanently put `session.rollback` at the beginning of the app?

I'm new to Flask and web development in general. I have a Flask web-application that is using SQLAlchemy, is it ok to put session.rollback at the beginning of the app in order to keep it running even after a transaction fails?
I had a problem with my website when it stopped working after I was attempting to delete records of one table. The error log showed that the deletion failed due to entries in another table still referencing these records as their foreign key. The error log suggested using session.rollback to rollback this change, so I put it at the beginning of my app just after binding my database and creating the session and my website worked. This gave me the hint to leave that line there. Is my move right, safe and ok? Can anyone tell me what is the correct thing to do if this is somewhat endangering the functionality or logic of my website by any chance?

I'd say by that you are by definition cargo cult coding and should try to determine why you're finding these errors in the first place instead of just including a bit of code for a reason you don't understand.
The problem you're describing is the result of using foreign keys to ensure data integrity in your database. Typically SQLAlchemy will nullify all of the depending foreign keys, but since I don't know anything about your set up I can't explain why it wasn't. It is perhaps a difference between databases.
One massive problem with putting the rollback at the beginning of a route (or the entire global app) is that you might rollback data which you didn't want to. You haven't provided an MVCE so no one can really help you debug your problem.
Cargo cult coding in circumstances like this is understandable, but it's never a good practice. To solve this problem, investigate the cascades in SQLAlchemy. Also, fire up your actual SQL db interface and look at the data's structure, and set SQLALCHEMY_ECHO = 1 in your config file to see what's actually getting emitted.
Good luck!

You should not use the rollback at the beginning but when a database operation fails.
The error is due to an integrity condition in your database. Some rows in your table are being referenced by another table. So, you have to remove referencing rows first.

Importing data from multiple related tables in mySQL to SQLite3 or postgreSQL

I'm updating from an ancient language to Django. I want to keep the data from the old project into the new.
But old project is mySQL. And I'm currently using SQLite3 in dev mode. But read that postgreSQL is most capable. So first question is: Is it better to set up postgreSQL while in development. Or is it an easy transition to postgreSQL from SQLite3?
And for the data in the old project. I am bumping up the table structure from the old mySQL structure. Since it got many relation db's. And this is handled internally with foreignkey and manytomany in SQLite3 (same in postgreSQL I guess).
So I'm thinking about how to transfer the data. It's not really much data. Maybe 3-5.000 rows.
Problem is that I don't want to have same table structure. So a import would be a terrible idea. I want to have the sweet functionality provided by SQLite3/postgreSQL.
One idea I had was to join all the data and create a nested json for each post. And then define into what table so the relations are kept.
But this is just my guessing. So I'm asking you if there is a proper way to do this?
Thanks!

better create the postgres database. write down the python script which take the data from the mysql database and import in postgres database.

How do I handle migrations in sqlalchemy without any framework?

I have seen sqlalchemy-migrate and alembic, but I do not want to use those frameworks. How can I write the migration script? Most of the migrations as I understand revolve around altering/dropping existing tables? Additionally, I use sqlalchemy mostly at orm level than schema/core/engine level?
The reasons I wish to do-it-myself is mostly a learning purpose and understanding how django orm automatically generates a migration script?

You should just use alembic to execute raw sql to start. Then if you decide to try to use more alembic features you'll be all set.
For example after creating a new revision named drop nick you can execute raw sql:
op.execute ('ALTER TABLE users DROP COLUMN nickname')
This way alembic can handle the version numbers but you can, or rather have to, do all the sql manipulations manually.

Is it possible to manually set a django foreignkey ID to an item that doesn't exist yet?

I'm designing a bulk import tool from an old system into a new Django based system.
I'd like to retain all of the current IDs of objects (they are just 5 digit strings), now due to the design in the current system there are lots of references between these objects.
To import I can see 2 possible techniques - import a known object, and carefully recurse through these relationships making sure to import in the right way and only set relationships as soon as I know they exist
... or start at item 00001 set the foreignkeys to values I know exist and just grab everything in order, knowing that once we get to item 99999 all the relationships will exist.
So is there a way to set a foreignkey to the ID of an item that doesn't exist, but will, even for imports only?
To add further complexity, not all of these relationships are straightforward foreignkeys, some are ManyToMany relationships as well.

To be able to handle any database that Django supports and not have to deal with peculiarities of the backend, I'd export the old database in the format that Django loaddata can read, and then give this exported file to loaddata. This command has no issue importing the type of structure you are talking about.
Creating the file that loaddata will read could be done by writing your own converter that reads the old database and dumps an appropriate file. However, a way which might be easier would be to create a throwaway Django project with models that have the same structure as the tables in the old database, point the Django project to the old database, and use dumpdata to create the file. If table details between the old database and the new database have changed, you'd still have to modify the file but at least some of the conversion work would have already been done.
A more direct way would be to bypass Django completely to do the import in SQL but turn off foreign key constraints for the time of the import. For MySQL this would be done by setting foreign_key_checks to 0 for the time of the import, and then back to 1 when done. For SQLite this would be done by using PRAGMA foreign_keys = OFF; and then ON when done.
Postgresql does not allow just turning off these constraints but Django creates foreign key constraints as DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED, which means that the constraint is not checked until the end of a transaction. So initiating a transaction, importing and then committing should work. If something prevents this, then you have to drop the constraint before importing and add it back afterwards.

Sounds like you need a database migration tool like South, the standard for Django. Worth noting that Django 1.7 Beta 1 was released recently and it provides in-built migration.