I have a list of products:
list = [['product 1', 2.4, 322], ['product 2', 5.35, 124], ['product 3', 8.41, 521]]
How can I loop through the list to find the product with lowest number at the index [1]?
You can use a key for min:
min(data, key=lambda p: p[1])
product = min(list, key=lambda item: item[1])[2]
Do not use list as a variable name, since list already refers to a list constructor.
You can use an external variable. And if any value is less than that you simply replace the array.
data = [['product 1', 2.4, 322], ['product 2', 5.35, 124], ['product 3', 8.41, 521]]
min_arr = data[0]
for arr in data:
min_arr = arr if arr[1] < min_arr[1] else min_arr
print(min_arr)
#Output
['product 1', 2.4, 322]
Related
I'm trying to add values from List2 if the type is the same in List1. All the data is strings within lists. This isn't the exact data I'm using, just a representation. This is my first programme so please excuse any misunderstandings.
List1 = [['Type A =', 'Value 1', 'Value 2', 'Value 3'], ['Type B =', 'Value 4', 'Value 5']]
List2 = [['Type Z =', 'Value 6', 'Value 7', 'Value 8'], ['Type A =', 'Value 9', 'Value 10', 'Value 11'], ['Type A =', 'Value 12', 'Value 13']]
Desired result:
new_list =[['Type A =', 'Value 1', 'Value 2', 'Value 3', 'Value 9', 'Value 10', 'Value 11', 'Value 12', 'Value 13'], ['Type B =', 'Value 4', 'Value 5']]
Current attempt:
newlist = []
for values in List1:
for valuestoadd in List2:
if values[0] == valuestoadd[0]:
newlist = [List1 + [valuestoadd[1:]]]
else:
print("Types don't match")
return newlist
This works for me if there weren't two Type A's in List2 as this causes my code to create two instances of List1. If I was able to add the values at a specific index of the list then that would be great but I can work around that.
It's probably easier to use a dictionary for this:
def merge(d1, d2):
return {k: v + d2[k] if k in d2 else v for k, v in d1.items()}
d1 = {'A': [1, 2, 3], 'B': [4, 5, 6]}
d2 = {'A': [7, 8, 9], 'C': [0]}
print(merge(d1, d2))
If you must use a list, it's fairly easy to temporarily convert to a dictionary and back to a list:
from collections import defaultdict
def list_to_dict(xss):
d = defaultdict(list)
for xs in xss:
d[xs[0]].extend(xs[1:])
return d
def dict_to_list(d):
return [[k, *v] for k, v in d.items()]
Rather than using List1 + [valuestoadd[1:]], you should be using newlist[0].append(valuestoadd[1:]) so that it doesn't ever create a new list and only appends to the old one. The [0] is necessary so that it appends to the first sublist rather than the whole list.
newlist = List1 #you're doing this already - might as well initialize the new list with this code
for values in List1:
for valuestoadd in List2:
if values[0] == valuestoadd[0]:
newlist[0].append(valuestoadd[1:]) #adds the values on to the end of the first list
else:
print("Types don't match")
Output:
[['Type A =', 'Value 1', 'Value 2', 'Value 3', ['Value 9', 'Value 10', 'Value 11'], ['Value 12', 'Value 13']], ['Type B =', 'Value 4', 'Value 5']]
This does, sadly, input the values as a list - if you want to split them into individual values, you would need to iterate through the lists you're adding on, and append individual values to newlist[0].
This could be achieved with another for loop, like so:
if values[0] == valuestoadd[0]:
for subvalues in valuestoadd[1:]: #splits the list into subvalues
newlist[0].append(subvalues) #appends those subvalues
Output:
[['Type A =', 'Value 1', 'Value 2', 'Value 3', 'Value 9', 'Value 10', 'Value 11', 'Value 12', 'Value 13'], ['Type B =', 'Value 4', 'Value 5']]
I agree with the other answers that it would be better to use a dictionary right away. But if you want, for some reason, stick to the data structure you have, you could transform it into a dictionary and back:
type_dict = {}
for tlist in List1+List2:
curr_type = tlist[0]
type_dict[curr_type] = tlist[1:] if not curr_type in type_dict else type_dict[curr_type]+tlist[1:]
new_list = [[k] + type_dict[k] for k in type_dict]
In the creation of new_list, you can take the keys from a subset of type_dict only if you do not want to include all of them.
I have two lists of lists.
I want to get the elements from second list of lists, based on a value from the first list of lists.
I if I have simple lists, everything go smooth, but once I have list of list, I'm missing something at the end.
Here is the code working for two lists (N = names, and V = values):
N = ['name 1', 'name 2','name 3','name 4','name 5','name 6','name 7','name 8','name 9','name 10']
V = ['val 1', 'val 2','val 3','val 4','val 5','val 6','val 7','val 8','val 9','val 10']
bool_ls = []
NN = N
for i in NN:
if i == 'name 5':
i = 'y'
else:
i = 'n'
bool_ls.append(i)
# GOOD INDEXES = GI
GI = [i for i, x in enumerate(bool_ls) if x == 'y']
# SELECT THE GOOD VALUES = "GV" FROM V
GV = [V[index] for index in GI]
if I define a function, works well applied to the two lists:
def GV(N,V,name):
bool_ls = []
NN = N
for i in NN:
if i == name:
i = 'y'
else:
i = 'n'
bool_ls.append(i)
GI = [i for i, x in enumerate(bool_ls) if x == 'y']
GV = [V[index] for index in GI]
return GV
Once I try "list of list", I cannot get the similar results. My code looks like below so far:
NN = [['name 1', 'name 2','name 3'], ['name 1', 'name 2','name 3'], ['name 1', 'name 2','name 3'], ['name 1', 'name 2','name 3'], ['name 1', 'name 2','name 3'], ['name 1', 'name 2','name 3']]
VV = [['val 1', 'val 2', 'val 3'], ['val 1', 'val 2', 'val 3'], ['val 1', 'val 2', 'val 3'], ['val 1', 'val 2', 'val 3'], ['val 1', 'val 2', 'val 3']]
def GV(NN,VV,name):
bool_ls = []
NNN = NN
for j in NNN:
for i in j:
if i == name:
i = 'y'
else:
i = 'n'
bool_ls.append(i)
# here is where I'm lost
Help greatly appreciated! Thank you.
You can generate pair-wise combinations from both list using zip and then filter in a list comprehension.
For the flat lists:
def GV(N, V, name):
return [j for i, j in zip(N, V) if i==name]
For the nested lists, you'll add an extra nesting:
def GV(NN,VV,name):
return [j for tup in zip(NN, VV) for i, j in zip(*tup) if i==name]
In case you want a list of lists, you can move the nesting into new lists inside the parent comprehension.
There's an easier way to do what your function is doing, but, to answer your question, you just need two loops (one for each level of lists): the first list iterates over the list of lists, the second iterates over the inner lists and does the somewhat odd y or n thing to chose a value.
I want to generate a large number of key value pairs to put in my dictionary using a for loop. For example, the dictionary looks like this:
my_dict = dict()
my_dict["r0"] = "tag 0"
my_dict["r1"] = "tag 1"
my_dict["r2"] = "tag 2"
...
Note that both the key and value follows a pattern, i.e., the number increase by 1. Now I cannot do this 1M times and would prefer an automatic way to initialize my dictionary.
The most efficient way to do this is probably with a dict comprehension:
mydict={'r%s'%n : 'tag %s'%n for n in range(10)}
Which is equivalent to:
mydict=dict()
for n in range(10):
mydict.update({'r%s'%n:'tag %s'%n})
... but more efficient. Just change range(10) as necessary.
You could also use .format() formatting instead of percent (C-like) formatting in the dict:
mydict={'r{}'.format(n) : 'tag {}'.format(n) for n in range(10)}
If you are using Python2 replace all the range() functions with xrange() functions
my_dict = dict()
for i in range(0, 1000000):
key = "r{}".format(i)
value = "tag {}".format(i)
my_dict[key] = value
EDIT: As pointed out by others, if you are using python 2 use xrange instead since it is lazy (so more efficient). In Python 3 range does the same thing as xrange in python 2
my_dict = dict()
for i in xrange(1000000):
my_dict["r%s" % i] = "tag %s" % i
my_dict = dict()
for x in range(1000000):
key="r"+str(x)
val="tag " +str(x)
my_dict[key]=val
simple way is to do the following
#using python format strings
keyf = "r{}"
valf = "tag {}"
#dictionary comprehension
a = {keyf.format(i) : valf.format(i) for i in range(5)}
# can modify range to handle 1,000,000 if you wanted
print(a)
{'r0': 'tag 0', 'r1': 'tag 1', 'r2': 'tag 2', 'r3': 'tag 3', 'r4': 'tag 4', 'r5': 'tag 5'}
if you wanted to quickly append this to another dictionary you would use the dictionary equivalent of extend, which is called update.
b = dict{"x":1,"y":2}
b.update(a)
print(b)
{'x': 1, 'y': 2, 'r0': 'tag 0', 'r1': 'tag 1', 'r2': 'tag 2', 'r3': 'tag 3', 'r4': 'tag 4'}
you could also shorten the original comprehension by doing this:
a = {"r{}".format(i) : "tag {}".format(i) for i in range(5)}
You wouldn't even need to make keyf, or valf
Python can build dicts from lists:
$ python2 -c "print dict(map(lambda x: ('r' + str(x), 'tag ' + str(x)), range(10)))"
{'r4': 'tag 4', 'r5': 'tag 5', 'r6': 'tag 6', 'r7': 'tag 7', 'r0': 'tag 0', 'r1': 'tag 1', 'r2': 'tag 2', 'r3': 'tag 3', 'r8': 'tag 8', 'r9': 'tag 9'}
This question already has answers here:
How do I make a flat list out of a list of lists?
(34 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
If you had a long list of lists in the format [['A',1,2],['B',3,4]] and you wanted to combine it into ['A, 1, 2', 'B, 3, 4'] is there a easy list comprehension way to do so?
I do it like this:
this_list = [['A',1,2],['B',3,4]]
final = list()
for x in this_list:
final.append(', '.join([str(x) for x in x]))
But is this possible to be done as a one-liner?
Thanks for the answers. I like the map() based one. I have a followup question - if the sublists were instead of the format ['A',0.111,0.123456] would it be possible to include a string formatting section in the list comprehension to truncate such as to get out 'A, 0.1, 0.12'
Once again with my ugly code it would be like:
this_list = [['A',0.111,0.12345],['B',0.1,0.2]]
final = list()
for x in this_list:
x = '{}, {:.1f}, {:.2f}'.format(x[0], x[1], x[2])
final.append(x)
I solved my own question:
values = ['{}, {:.2f}, {:.3f}'.format(c,i,f) for c,i,f in values]
>>> lis = [['A',1,2],['B',3,4]]
>>> [', '.join(map(str, x)) for x in lis ]
['A, 1, 2', 'B, 3, 4']
You can use nested list comprehensions with str.join:
>>> lst = [['A',1,2],['B',3,4]]
>>> [", ".join([str(y) for y in x]) for x in lst]
['A, 1, 2', 'B, 3, 4']
>>>
li = [['A',1,2],['B',3,4],['A',0.111,0.123456]]
print [', '.join(map(str,sli)) for sli in li]
def func(x):
try:
return str(int(str(x)))
except:
try:
return '%.2f' % float(str(x))
except:
return str(x)
print map(lambda subli: ', '.join(map(func,subli)) , li)
return
['A, 1, 2', 'B, 3, 4', 'A, 0.111, 0.123456']
['A, 1, 2', 'B, 3, 4', 'A, 0.11, 0.12']
I have a list of tuples and a dictionary of lists as follows.
# List of tuples
lot = [('Item 1', 43), ('Item 4', 82), ('Item 12', 33), ('Item 10', 21)]
# dict of lists
dol = {
'item_category_one': ['Item 3', 'Item 4'],
'item_category_two': ['Item 1'],
'item_category_thr': ['Item 2', 'Item 21'],
}
Now I want to do a look-up where any item in any list within dol exists in any of the tuples given in lot. If this requirement is met, then i want to add another variable to that respective tuple.
Currently I am doing this as follows (which looks incredibly inefficient and ugly). I would want to know the most efficient and neat way of achieving this. what are the possibilities ?
PS: I am also looking to preserve the order of lot while doing this.
merged = [x[0] for x in lot]
for x in dol:
for item in dol[x]:
if item in merged:
for x in lot:
if x[0] == item:
lot[lot.index(x)] += (True, )
First, build a set of all your values inside of the dol structure:
from itertools import chain
dol_values = set(chain.from_iterable(dol.itervalues()))
Now membership testing is efficient, and you can use a list comprehension:
[tup + (True,) if tup[0] in dol_values else tup for tup in lot]
Demo:
>>> from itertools import chain
>>> dol_values = set(chain.from_iterable(dol.itervalues()))
>>> dol_values
set(['Item 3', 'Item 2', 'Item 1', 'Item 21', 'Item 4'])
>>> [tup + (True,) if tup[0] in dol_values else tup for tup in lot]
[('Item 1', 43, True), ('Item 4', 82, True), ('Item 12', 33), ('Item 10', 21)]