We Keep Coding

How do I make a Python script work in a game?

I made a script to do something in game and it works but it doesn't do anything in the game it types the characters but the game doesn't do anything with that:
import pyautogui as pg
import time
time.sleep(10)
loop_end = time.time() +60 * 10
while time.time() < loop_end:
pg.click(button="Left")
a_loop_end = time.time() +3
while time.time() < a_loop_end:
pg.press("w")
b_loop_end = time.time() +1.5
while time.time() < b_loop_end:
pg.press("a")
c_loop_end = time.time() +3
while time.time() < c_loop_end:
pg.press("s")
d_loop_end = time.time() +1.5
while time.time() < d_loop_end:
pg.press("d")

Problem with showing elapsed time in python

I have a problem with function time.time().
I've written a code, which has 3 different hash functions and then it counts how long does they execute.
start_time = time.time()
arr.add(Book1, 1)
end_time = time.time()
elapsed_time = start_time - end_time
print(elapsed_time)
When I execute this in pycharm/IDLE/Visual it shows 0. When I do this in online compiler (https://www.programiz.com/python-programming/online-compiler/) it shows a good result. Why is that?
Here is the full code if needed.
import time
class Ksiazka:
def __init__(self, nazwa, autor, wydawca, rok, strony):
self.nazwa = nazwa
self.autor = autor
self.wydawca = wydawca
self.rok = rok
self.strony = strony
def hash_1(self):
h = 0
for char in self.nazwa:
h += ord(char)
return h
def hash_2(self):
h = 0
for char in self.autor:
h += ord(char)
return h
def hash_3(self):
h = self.strony + self.rok
return h
class HashTable:
def __init__(self):
self.size = 6
self.arr = [None for i in range(self.size)]
def add(self, key, c):
if c == 1:
h = Ksiazka.hash_1(key) % self.size
print("Hash 1: ", h)
if c == 2:
h = Ksiazka.hash_2(key) % self.size
print("Hash 2: ", h)
if c == 3:
h = Ksiazka.hash_3(key) % self.size
print("Hash 3: ", h)
self.arr[h] = key
arr = HashTable()
Book1 = Ksiazka("Harry Potter", "J.K Rowling", "foo", 1990, 700)
start_time = time.time()
arr.add(Book1, 1)
end_time = time.time()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print(elapsed_time)
start_time = time.time()
arr.add(Book1, 2)
end_time = time.time()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print(elapsed_time)
start_time = time.time()
arr.add(Book1, 3)
end_time = time.time()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print(elapsed_time)

I looks like 0 might just be a return value for successful script execution. You need to add a print statement to show anything. Also you might want to change the order of the subtraction:
start_time = time.time()
arr.add(Book1, 1)
end_time = time.time()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print(elapsed_time)
Edit b/c of updated questions:
If it still shows 0, it might just happen, that your add operation is extremely fast. In that case, try averaging over several runs, i.e. instead of your add operation use a version like this:
start_time = time.time()
for _ in range(10**6):
arr.add(Book1, 1)
end_time = time.time()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print(elapsed_time) # indicates the average microseconds for a single run

The documentation for time.time says:
Note that even though the time is always returned as a floating point number, not all systems provide time with a better precision than 1 second. While this function normally returns non-decreasing values, it can return a lower value than a previous call if the system clock has been set back between the two calls.
So, depending on your OS, anything that is faster than 1 second might be displayed as a difference of 0.
I suggest you use time.perf_counter instead:
Return the value (in fractional seconds) of a performance counter, i.e. a clock with the highest available resolution to measure a short duration.

Time residual function in Python

I have 2 fields in the database: confirmed_at and preparation_time
I would like to get two simple functions that should return:
(a) the time residual
and
(b) the % of time remaining.
This is my logic which I am trying to achieve:
when order is confirmed_at I update the database with datetime.now() and preparation_time is indicated in minutes and stored as integer (for example 5 min is stored as 5)
completed_time is confirmed_at + preparation_time
time_remaining is completed_time - now()
order status is completed_time / now() * 100
These are my functions but I cannot make them work:
def get_remaining_time(self):
start_time = datetime(self.confirmed_at)
end_time = (start_time + datetime.timedelta(0,self.preparation_time*60)).time() # days, seconds.
return end_time - datetime.now()
def get_order_status(self):
end_time = (datetime(self.confirmed_at) + datetime.timedelta(0,self.preparation_time*60)).time()
return end_time / datetime.now() * 100

What kind of type returned from functions? If it's timedelta - just turn it into date.

So here it is the solution that I've managed to work out
def get_remaining_time(self):
start_time = self.confirmed_at
end_time = start_time + timedelta(
0, self.preparation_time * 60
) # days, seconds.
return end_time - timezone.now()
def get_time_left(self):
left = self.get_remaining_time()
sec = int(left.total_seconds())
if sec > 60:
return "{} minutes".format(int(sec / 60))
elif sec < 60 and sec > 0:
return "{} seconds".format(sec)
else:
return 0
def get_order_status(self):
left = int(self.get_remaining_time().total_seconds())
if left < 0:
return 100
else:
return round((1 - left / (self.preparation_time * 60)) * 100)

"How to print list data on a specific time delay list ?"

I want to print list data on the specific delays which are on another list. I Want to loop this process for a specific time, but I'm unable to implement it in a thread.
from time import sleep
import datetime
now = datetime.datetime.now()
Start_Time = datetime.datetime.now()
Str_time = Start_Time.strftime("%H:%M:%S")
End_Time = '11:15:00'
class sampleTest:
#staticmethod
def test():
list1 = ["Hello", "Hi", "Ola"]
list2 = [5, 10, 7]
# print(f"{data} delay {delay} & time is {t} ")
# sleep(delay)
i = 0
while i < len(list1):
t = datetime.datetime.now().strftime('%H:%M:%S')
print(f"{list1[i]} delay {list2[i]} & time is {t} ")
sleep(list2[i])
i += 1
else:
print("All Data is printed")
if __name__ == '__main__':
obj = sampleTest
while Str_time < End_Time:
obj.test()
Str_time = datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%H:%M:%S")
else:
print("Time Is done")
Expected output: On first, loop it should print all list data but in the second loop, it should run as per the delay.
1st time: Hello, Hi, Ola
after that
1. Every 5 seconds it should print Hello
2. Every 10 seconds it should print Hi
3. Every 7seconds it should print Ola
Actual Output: List of data is getting printed as per the delay.
Hello delay 5 & time is 11:41:45
Hi delay 10 & time is 11:41:50
Ola delay 3 & time is 11:42:00
All Data is printed
Hello delay 5 & time is 11:42:03
Hi delay 10 & time is 11:42:08
Ola delay 3 & time is 11:42:18

You can try comparing the current time with the start time, for example:
time.sleep(1);
diff = int(time.time() - start_time)
if (diff % wait_time == 0):
print(text_to_print)
Here is the full code implementing this:
from time import sleep
import time
import datetime
now = datetime.datetime.now()
Start_Time = datetime.datetime.now()
Str_time = Start_Time.strftime("%H:%M:%S")
End_Time = '11:15:00'
starttime=time.time()
diff = 0
class sampleTest:
#staticmethod
def test():
list1 = ["Hello", "Hi", "Ola"]
list2 = [5, 10, 7]
for i in range(len(list1)):
if (diff % list2[i] == 0):
t = datetime.datetime.now().strftime('%H:%M:%S')
print(f"{list1[i]} delay {list2[i]} & time is {t} ")
if __name__ == '__main__':
obj = sampleTest
while Str_time < End_Time:
obj.test()
time.sleep(1);
diff = int(time.time() - starttime)
Str_time = datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%H:%M:%S")
else:
print("Time Is done")

In accordance with your desired output, I believe threads are the best option, which means:
from time import sleep
import datetime
import threading
now = datetime.datetime.now()
Start_Time = datetime.datetime.now()
Str_time = Start_Time.strftime("%H:%M:%S")
End_Time = '11:15:00'
class sampleTest:
def __init__(self):
self.run = True
print ("1st time: Hello, Hi, Ola")
print ("Now: " + datetime.datetime.now().strftime('%H:%M:%S'))
def test(self, i):
list1 = ["Hello", "Hi", "Ola"]
list2 = [5, 10, 7]
while self.run:
sleep(list2[i])
t = datetime.datetime.now().strftime('%H:%M:%S')
print(f"{list1[i]} delay {list2[i]} & time is {t}")
def stop(self):
self.run = False
if __name__ == '__main__':
obj = sampleTest()
t1 = threading.Thread(target=obj.test,args=(0,))
t2 = threading.Thread(target=obj.test,args=(1,))
t3 = threading.Thread(target=obj.test,args=(2,))
t1.start()
t2.start()
t3.start()
while Str_time < End_Time:
Str_time = datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%H:%M:%S")
else:
obj.stop()
t1.join()
t2.join()
t3.join()
print("All data is printed")
print("Time Is done")

Fast random element from set - Python

I'm looking for a faster of way of sampling a single element at random from a large Python set. Below I've benchmarked three obvious examples. Is there a faster way of doing this?
import random
import time
test_set = set(["".join(["elem-", str(l)]) for l in range(0, 1000000)])
t0 = time.time()
random_element = random.choice(list(test_set))
print(time.time() - t0)
t0 = time.time()
random_element = random.sample(test_set, 1)
print(time.time() - t0)
t0 = time.time()
rand_idx = random.randrange(0, len(test_set)-1)
random_element = list(test_set)[rand_idx]
print(time.time() - t0)
Output:
0.0692291259765625
0.06741929054260254
0.07094502449035645

You could use numpy and add it to your benchmarks.
import numpy
random_num = numpy.randit(0, 1000000)
element = 'elem-' + str(random_num)
test_array = numpy.array([x for x in test_set])
Specifically, this is a piece of code that benchmarks the different methods:
random_choice_times = []
random_sample_times = []
random_randrange_times = []
numpy_choince_times = []
for i in range(0,10):
t0 = time.time()
random_element = random.choice(list(test_set))
time_elps = time.time() - t0
random_choice_times.append(time_elps)
t0 = time.time()
random_element = random.sample(test_set, 1)
time_elps = time.time() - t0
random_sample_times.append(time_elps)
t0 = time.time()
rand_idx = random.randrange(0, len(test_set)-1)
random_element = list(test_set)[rand_idx]
time_elps = time.time() - t0
random_randrange_times.append(time_elps)
t0 = time.time()
random_num = numpy.random.choice(numpy.array(test_array))
time_elps = time.time() - t0
numpy_choince_times.append(time_elps)
print("Avg time for random.choice: ", sum(random_choice_times) /10)
print("Avg time for random.sample: ", sum(random_sample_times) /10)
print("Avg time for random.randrange: ", sum(random_randrange_times) /10)
print("Avg time for numpy.choice: ", sum(numpy_choince_times) /10)
Here are the times
>>> Avg time for random.choice: 0.06497154235839844
>>> Avg time for random.sample: 0.06054067611694336
>>> Avg time for random.randrange: 0.05938301086425781
>>> Avg time for numpy.choice: 0.017636775970458984

You could try this.
def random_set_ele(set_: set):
copy = set_
return copy.pop()
test_set = set(["".join(["elem-", str(l)]) for l in range(0, 1000000)])
start = perf_counter()
print(random_set_ele(test_set))
print(perf_counter()-start)
Result:
elem-57221
0.00016391400276916102
The .pop() method for a set randomly extracts and returns an element and pops it out of the set. We make a copy of the set before popping the element so that the original list is not modified.