So this is the hideous chunk of code:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from pathlib import Path
import h5py as hdf
def datarray(data):
'''works well for HDF files'''
return pd.DataFrame(np.array(data))
print( 'Modules imported')
print( 'Initialized')
pth=Path(r'C:\Users\open.Sourcerer\Desktop\1DTrimmedStruc')
geo=hdf.File(pth/'DB_RAS.g09.hdf','r')
struc=geo.get('Geometry').get('Structures').get('Attributes')
culs=geo.get('Geometry').get('Structures').get('Culvert Groups').get('Attributes')
brls=geo.get('Geometry').get('Structures').get('Culvert Groups').get('Barrels').get('Attributes')
struc=datarray(struc)
culs=datarray(culs)
brls=datarray(brls)
struc['RSReach']=struc['RS']+struc['Reach']
culs['RSReach']=culs['RS']+culs['Reach']
brls['RSReach']=brls['RS']+brls['Reach']
for df in (struc,culs,brls):
print(df)
I've tried a few ways of converting these 3 datasets to dataframes and adding a column iteratively, with no success. And no, I can't merge to 1 dataset, I used to feed them to a separate function from excel, but now I'm taking the datasets straight from HDF, so the output needs to look like this specifically. How could I boil it down from here? Thanks
Related
Download the Data Here
Hi, I have a data something like below, and would like to multi label the data.
something to like this: target
But the problem here is data lost when multilabel it, something like below:
issue
using the coding of:
from sklearn.preprocessing import MultiLabelBinarizer
mlb = MultiLabelBinarizer(sparse_output=True)
df_enc = df.drop('movieId', 1).join(df.movieId.str.join('|').str.get_dummies())
Someone can help me, feel free to download the dataset, thank you.
So that column when read in with pandas will be stored as a string. So first we'd need to convert that to an actual list.
From there use .explode() to expand out that list into a series (where the index will match the index it came from, and the column values will be the values in that list).
Then crosstab that from a series into each row and column being the value.
Then join that back up with the dataframe on the index values.
Keep in mind, when you do one-hot-encoding with high cardinality, you're table will blow up into a huge wide table. I just did this on the first 20 rows, and ended up with 233 columns. with the 225,000 + rows, it'll take a while (maybe a minute or so) to process and you end up with close to 1300 columns. This may be too complex for machine learning to do anything useful with it (although maybe would work with deep learning). You could still try it though and see what you get. What I would suggest to test out is find a way to simplify it a bit to make it less complex. Perhaps find a way to combine movie ids in a set number of genres or something like that? But then test to see if simplifying it improves your model/performance.
import pandas as pd
from ast import literal_eval
df = pd.read_csv('ratings_action.csv')
df.movieId = df.movieId.apply(literal_eval)
s = df['movieId'].explode()
df = df[['userId']].join(pd.crosstab(s.index, s))
I am completely new to Python (I started last week!), so while I looked at similar questions, I have difficulty understanding what's going on and even more difficulty adapting them to my situation.
I have a csv file where rows are dates and columns are different regions (see image 1). I would like to create a file that has 3 columns: Date, Region, and Indicator where for each date and region name the third column would have the correct indicator (see image 2).
I tried turning wide into long data, but I could not quite get it to work, as I said, I am completely new to Python. My second approach was to split it up by columns and then merge it again. I'd be grateful for any suggestions.
This gives your solution using stack() in pandas:
import pandas as pd
# In your case, use pd.read_csv instead of this:
frame = pd.DataFrame({
'Date': ['3/24/2020', '3/25/2020', '3/26/2020', '3/27/2020'],
'Algoma': [None,0,0,0],
'Brant': [None,1,0,0],
'Chatham': [None,0,0,0],
})
solution = frame.set_index('Date').stack().reset_index(name='Indicator').rename(columns={'level_1':'Region'})
solution.to_csv('solution.csv')
This is the inverse of doing a pivot, as explained here: Doing the opposite of pivot in pandas Python. As you can see there, you could also consider using the melt function as an alternative.
first, you're region column is currently 'one hot encoded'. What you are trying to do is to "reverse" one hot encode your region column. Maybe check if this link answers your question:
Reversing 'one-hot' encoding in Pandas.
I am doing a machine learning project with phone sensor data (accelerometer). I need to preprocess dataset before I export it to the ML model. I have 25 classes (alphabets in the datasets) and there are 20 subjects (how many times I got the alphabet) for each class. Since the lengths are different for each class and subject, I have to resample. I want to split a single csv file by class and subject to be able to resample. I have tried some things like groupby() or other things but did not work. I will be glad if you can share thoughts what I can do about this problem. This is my first time asking a question on this site if I made a mistake I would appreciate it if you warn me about my mistakes. Thank you from now.
I share some code and outputs to help you understand my question better.
what i got when i tried with groupby() but not exactly what i wanted
This is how my csv file looks like. It contains more than 300,000 data.
Some code snippet:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def read_data(file_path):
data = pd.read_csv(file_path)
return data
# read csv file
dataset = read_data('raw_data.csv')
df1 = pd.DataFrame( dataset.groupby(['alphabet', 'subject'])['x_axis'].count())
df1['x_axis'].head(20)
I also need to do this for every x_axis, y_axis and z_axis so what can I use other than groupby() function? I do not want to use only the lengths but also the values of all three to be able to resample.
First, calculate the greatest common number of sample
num_sample = df.groupby(['alphabet', 'subject'])['x_axis'].count().min()
Now you can sample
df.groupby(['alphabet', 'subject']).sample(num_sample)
I am brand new to python, I am attempting to convert the function I made in R to Python, R function described here:
How to optimize this process?
From my reading it looks like the best way to do this in python would be to use a for loop that would take the following form
for line 1 in probe test
find user in U_lookup
find movie in M_lookup
take the value found in U_lookup and retrieve that line number from knn_text
take the values found in that row of knn_text, and retrieve the line numbers from dfm
for those line numbers in dfm, retrieve column=U_lookup
take the average of the non zero values found
save value into pandas datafame in new column for that line
Is this the most efficient (in terms of speed of calculation) way to complete an operation like this? Coming from R so I wasn't sure if there was better functionality for something like this within the pandas package or not.
As a followup, is there an equivalent in python to the function dput() in R? dput essentially provides code to easily share a subset of data for questions like this.
You can use df.apply(my_func, axis=1) to apply the function/calculation to each row of a dataframe.
Where, my_func would contain the required calculations
I have over 500 files that I cleaned up using a pandas data frame, and read in later as a matrix. I now want to delete missing rows of data from multiple variables for the entirety of my files. Each variable is pretty lengthy for its shape, for example, tc and wspd have the shape (84479, 558) and pressure has the shape (558,). I have tried the following example before and has worked in the past for single dimensional arrays with the same shape, but will no longer work with a two dimensional array.
bad=[]
for i in range(len(p)):
if p[i]==-9999 or tc[i]==-9999:
bad.append(i)
p=numpy.delete(p, bad)
tc=numpy.delete(tc, bad)
I tried using the following code instead but with no success (unfortunately).
import numpy as n
import pandas as pd
wspd=pd.read_pickle('/home/wspd').as_matrix()
tc=pd.read_pickle('/home/tc').as_matrix()
press=n.load('/home/file1.npz')
p=press['press']
names=press['names']
length=n.arange(0,84479)
for i in range(len(names[0])): #using the first one as a trial to run faster
print i #used later to see how far we have come in the 558 files
bad=[]
for j in range(len(length)):
if (wspd[j,i]==n.nan or tc[j,i]==n.nan):
bad.append(j)
print bad
From there I plan on deleting missing data as I had done previously except indexing which dimension I am deleting from within my first forloop.
new_tc=n.delete(tc[j,:], bad)
Unfortunately, this has not worked. I have also tried masking the array which also has not worked.
The reason I need to delete the data is my next library does not understand nan values, it requires strictly integers, floats, etc.
I am open to new methods for removing rows of data if anyone has any guidance. I greatly appreciate it.
I would load your 2 dimensional arrays as pandas DataFrames and then use the dropna function to drop any rows that contain a null value
wspd = pd.read_pickle('/home/wspd').dropna()
tc = pd.read_pickle('/home/tc').dropna()
The documentation for pandas.DataFrame.dropna is here