Suppose I have a large set of strings I want to parse to a set of datetime objects. I could use the dateutils.parser and iterate through the set but it is more computer intensive and takes a longer time than parsing one, retrieving the strptime format applied and just do datetime.strptime(string, model).
I wanted to create a function, a bit like the following:
def retrieve_format(datetime_object, string):
#do some things
return model
with the model being a string.
I have found nothing that explains the inner workings of the dateutils parser, and I believe the developers have the ability to add such a feature.
Any idea on how to do it ? It would save time and computing power.
Example
Suppose I have a set of string that are formatted the same way as this one:
myStr = '27/03/2020 - 16:20'
I could do
myDate = dateutils.parser.parse(myStr)
and get 'myDate' as being
datetime.datetime(2020, 3, 27, 16, 20)
but now I could use my function as such
>>> model = retrieve_format(myDate, myStr)
>>> print(model)
%d/%m/%Y - %H:%M
I could then do
datetime_set = {}
for formatted_string in set:
raw = datetime.datetime.strptime(formatted_string, model)
datetime_set.add(raw)
to treat all the other elements very efficiently.
Okay so thanks to snakecharmerb's comment on my question, I found this comment which uses the dateinfer library. Here, just the string is needed. Installation with pip is possible
pip install pydateinfer
A working example would be the following
import dateinfer
dateinfer.infer(['27/03/2020 - 16:20', '28/03/2020 - 14:56' ])
and the output is
'%d/%m/%Y - %H:%M'
The input is always a list, even if it contains only one element.
Depending on the ambiguity of the string, the list should have more or less elements. That is because for example in '04/04/2020', we have no means of distinguishing the day or the month.
Related
I need to return the date format from a string. Currently I am using parser to parse a string as a date, then replacing the year with a yyyy or yy. Similarly for other dates items. Is there some function I could use that would return mm-dd-yyyy when I send 12-05-2018?
Technically, it is an impossible question. If you send in 12-05-2018, there is no way for me to know whether you are sending in a mm-dd-yyyy (Dec 5, 2018) or dd-mm-yyyy (May 12, 2018).
One approach might be to do a regex replacement of anything which matches your expected date pattern, e.g.
date = "Here is a date: 12-05-2018 and here is another one: 10-31-2010"
date_masked = re.sub(r'\b\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}\b', 'mm-dd-yyyy', date)
print(date)
print(date_masked)
Here is a date: 12-05-2018 and here is another one: 10-31-2010
Here is a date: mm-dd-yyyy and here is another one: mm-dd-yyyy
Of course, the above script makes no effort to check whether the dates are actually valid. If you require that, you may use one of the date libraries available in Python.
I don't really understand what you plan to do with the format. There are two reasons I can think of why you might want it. (1) You want at some future point to convert a normalized datetime back into the original string. If that is what you want you would be better off just storing the normalized datetime and the original string. Or (2) you want to draw (dodgy) conclusions about person sending the data, because different nationalities will tend to use different formats. But, whatever you want it for, you can do it this way:
from dateutil import parser
def get_date_format(date_input):
date = parser.parse(date_input)
for date_format in ("%m-%d-%Y", "%d-%m-%Y", "%Y-%m-%d"):
# You can extend the list above to include formats with %y in addition to %Y, etc, etc
if date.strftime(date_format) == date_input:
return date_format
>>> date_input = "12-05-2018"
>>> get_date_format(date_input)
'%m-%d-%Y'
You mention in a comment you are prepared to make assumptions about ambiguous dates like 12-05-2018 (could be May or December) and 05-12-18 (could be 2018 or 2005). You can pass those assumptions to dateutil.parser.parse. It accepts boolean keyword parameters dayfirst and yearfirst which it will use in ambiguous cases.
Take a look at the datetime library. There you will find the function strptime(), which is exactly what you are looking for.
Here is the documentation: https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html#strftime-strptime-behavior
Here's an array of datetime values:
array = np.array(['2016-05-01T00:00:59.3+10:00', '2016-05-01T00:02:59.4+10:00',
'2016-05-01T00:03:59.4+10:00', '2016-05-01T00:13:00.1+10:00',
'2016-05-01T00:22:00.5+10:00', '2016-05-01T00:31:01.1+10:00'],
dtype=object)
pd.to_datetime is very good at inferring datetime formats.
array = pd.to_datetime(array)
print(array)
DatetimeIndex(['2016-04-30 14:00:59.300000', '2016-04-30 14:02:59.400000',
'2016-04-30 14:03:59.400000', '2016-04-30 14:13:00.100000',
'2016-04-30 14:22:00.500000', '2016-04-30 14:31:01.100000'],
dtype='datetime64[ns]', freq=None)
How can I dynamically figure out what datetime format pd.to_datetime inferred? Something like: %Y-%m-%dT... (sorry, my datetime foo is really bad).
I don't think it's possible to do this in full generality in pandas.
As mentioned in other comments and answers, the internal function _guess_datetime_format is close to being what you ask for, but it has strict criteria for what constitutes a guessable format and so it will only work for a restricted class of datetime strings.
These criteria are set out in the _guess_datetime_format function on these lines and you can also see some examples of good and bad formats in the test_parsing script.
Some of the main points are:
year, month and day must each be present and identifiable
the year must have four digits
exactly six digits must be used if using microseconds
you can't specify a timezone
This means that it will fail to guess the format for datetime strings in the question despite them being a valid ISO 8601 format:
>>> from pandas.core.tools.datetimes import _guess_datetime_format_for_array
>>> array = np.array(['2016-05-01T00:00:59.3+10:00'])
>>> _guess_datetime_format_for_array(array)
# returns None
In this case, dropping the timezone and padding the microseconds to six digits is enough to make pandas to recognise the format:
>>> array = np.array(['2016-05-01T00:00:59.300000']) # six digits, no tz
>>> _guess_datetime_format_for_array(array)
'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f'
This is probably as good as it gets.
If pd.to_datetime is not asked to infer the format of the array, or given a format string to try, it will just try and parse each string separately and hope that it is successful. Crucially, it does not need to infer a format in advance to do this.
First, pandas parses the string assuming it is (approximately) a ISO 8601 format. This begins in a call to _string_to_dts and ultimately hits the low-level parse_iso_8601_datetime function that does the hard work.
You can check if your string is able to be parsed in this way using the _test_parse_iso8601 function. For example:
from pandas._libs.tslib import _test_parse_iso8601
def is_iso8601(string):
try:
_test_parse_iso8601(string)
return True
except ValueError:
return False
The dates in the array you give are recognised as this format:
>>> is_iso8601('2016-05-01T00:00:59.3+10:00')
True
But this doesn't deliver what the question asks for and I don't see any realistic way to recover the exact format that is recognised by the parse_iso_8601_datetime function.
If parsing the string as a ISO 8601 format fails, pandas falls back to using the parse() function from the third-party dateutil library (called by parse_datetime_string). This allows a fantastic level of parsing flexibility but, again, I don't know of any good way to extract the recognised datetime format from this function.
If both of these two parsers fail, pandas either raises an error, ignores the string or defaults to NaT (depending on what the user specifies). No further attempt is made to parse the string or guess the format of the string.
DateInfer (PyDateInfer) library allows to infer dates based on the sequence of available dates:
github.com/wdm0006/dateinfer
Usage from docs:
>>> import dateinfer
>>> dateinfer.infer(['Mon Jan 13 09:52:52 MST 2014', 'Tue Jan 21 15:30:00 EST 2014'])
'%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Z %Y'
>>>
Disclaimer: I have used and then contributed to this library
You can use _guess_datetime_format from core.tools to get the format. ie
from pandas.core.tools import datetimes as tools
tools._guess_datetime_format(pd.to_datetime(array).format()[0][:10])
Output :
'%Y-%m-%d'
To know more about this method you can see here. Hope it helps.
I have a list of strings called 'entries'. Each entry includes a date and time in a format like this: 'Mon Jun 15 17:52:03 2015'
I'm parsing the dates/times from each entry with regex and then I need to put them into python's datetime format and change the timezone to UTC (which is local time +4 hrs). Here's my code:
from datetime import datetime
import pytz
local = pytz.timezone("Etc/GMT+4")
localdate = [None]*len(entries)
local_dt = [None]*len(entries)
utc_dt = [None]*len(entries)
utdate = [None]*len(entries)
for i in range(len(entries)):
localdate[i] = datetime.strptime(re.search(r'\w{3}\s*?\w{3}\s*?\d{1,2}\s*?
\d{1,2}:\d{2}:\d{2}\s*?\d{4}', entries[i]).group(0), "%c")
local_dt[i] = local.localize(localdate[i], is_dst=None)
utc_dt[i] = local_dt[i].astimezone(pytz.utc)
utdate[i] = utc_dt[i].strftime("%c")
utdate = map(str, utdate)
print utdate
It seems to work well line-by-line if I go through and print each step, but once it gets to the last step it reverts back to the original format of the dates/times rather than the python datetime format of 'yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss'. Anyone know what's wrong?
tl;dr
You're formatting the datetime object into a string with utdate[i] = utc_dt[i].strftime("%c"). The %c code formats the date according to the system's localization settings, not the format you're expecting.
The standard string representation of a datetime object will generate the format you're looking for – you can get a string from str(some_datetime), or print(some_datetime) to print it to the console.
Timezones
This is notoriously hard to keep track of, but you may want to double check which timezone you're using. As is, your code will take an input time and give an output time that's 4 hours earlier. If I'm understanding correctly, you expect it the other way around. You should know that the "Etc" timezones are labelled oppositely for weird reasons, and you may want to change the timezone used. It's a different question, but using a location-based timezone instead of a UTC offset may be a good idea for things like DST support.
Improvements
You can simplify and clarify what you're trying to do here with a few changes. It makes it a bit more "Pythonic" as well.
input_format = '%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y' # Change 1
converted_entries = [] # Change 2
for entry in entries: # Change 3
local_date = datetime.strptime(entry, input_format) # Change 1 (continued)
# Change 4
localized_date = local.localize(local_date)
utc_date = localized_date.astimezone(pytz.utc)
converted_entries.append(utc_date)
utdate = map(str, converted_entries)
print utdate
Changes
Use a strftime/strptime formatter. strftime and strptime are designed to parse strings, ordinarily regular expressions shouldn't be needed to process them first. The same goes for output formats – if specific format is needed that's not provided with a built-in method like datetime.isoformat, use a formatter.
In Python there's no need to initialize a list a length ahead of time (or with None). list_var = [] or list_var = list() will give you an empty list that will expand on demand.
Typically it's best and simplest to just iterate over a list, rather than jump through hoops to get a loop counter. It's more readable, and ultimately less to remember.
If you do need a counter, use enumerate, e.g.: for i, entry in enumerate(entries):
Use scoped variables. Temporary values like localdate and localdt can just be kept inside the for loop. Technically it's wasting memory, but more importantly it keeps the code simpler and more encapsulated.
If the values are needed for later, then do what I've done with the converted_entries list. Initialize it outside the loop, then just append the value to the list each time through.
No need for counter variables:
localized_dates = []
for # omitted ...
localized_date = local.localize(local_date)
localized_dates.append(localized_date)
I hope that's helpful for you. The beauty of Python is that it can be pretty simple, so just embrace it 😀
I have found answers to question like this one helpful but not complete for my problem.
I have a form where the user automatically produces a date. I would like to store that as a date time.
I don't need any of the information after the seconds, but I cannot find a datetime.datetime.strptime code to translate the remaining stuff. So I would either like a strptime code that works for python2.7 on google app engine, or a string editing trick for removing the extra information that is not needed.
date-from-user='2012-09-22 07:36:36.333373-05:00'
You can slice your string to only select the first 19 characters:
>>> datefromuser='2012-09-22 07:36:36.333373-05:00'
>>> datefromuser[:19]
'2012-09-22 07:36:36'
This let's you parse the date without having to bother with the microseconds and timezone.
Do note that you probably do want to parse the timezone too though. You can use the iso8601 module to handle the whole format, without the need to slice:
>>> import iso8601
>>> iso8601.parse_date(datefromuser)
datetime.datetime(2012, 9, 22, 7, 36, 36, 333373, tzinfo=<FixedOffset '-05:00'>)
The iso8601 module is written in pure python and works without problems on the Google App Engine.
Python Docs would be a good place to start. strptime() would be your best option.
import datetime
datefromuser = '2012-09-22 07:36:36.333373-05:00'
datetime.datetime.strptime(datefromuser.split(".")[0], "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
2012-09-22 07:36:36
http://docs.python.org/library/datetime.html#strftime-and-strptime-behavior
Does anyone know how to parse the format as described in the title using Pythons strptime method?
I have something similar to this:
import datetime
date = datetime.datetime.strptime(entry.published.text, '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.Z')
I can't seem to figure out what kind of timeformat this is. By the way, I'm a newbie at the Python language (I'm used to C#).
UPDATE
This is how I changed the code based on the advise (answers) below:
from dateutil.parser import *
from datetime import *
date = parse(entry.published.text)
That date is in ISO 8601, or more specifically RFC 3339, format.
Such dates can't be parsed with strptime. There's a Python issue that discusses this.
dateutil.parser.parse can handle a wide variety of dates, including the one in your example.
If you're using an external module for XML or RSS parsing, there is probably a routine in there to parse that date.
Here's a good way to find the answer: using strftime, construct a format string that will emit what you see. That string will, by definition, be the string needed to PARSE the time with strptime.
If you are trying to parse RSS or Atom feeds then use Universal Feed Parser. It supports many date/time formats.
>>> import feedparser # parse feed
>>> d = feedparser.parse("http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/question/3946689")
>>> t = d.entries[0].published_parsed # get date of the first entry as a time tuple
>>> import datetime
>>> datetime.datetime(*t[:6]) # convert time tuple to datetime object
datetime.datetime(2010, 10, 15, 22, 46, 56)
That's the standard XML datetime format, ISO 8601. If you're already using an XML library, most of them have datetime parsers built in. xml.utils.iso8601 works reasonably well.
import xml.utils.iso8601
date = xml.utils.iso8601.parse(entry.published.text)
You can look at a bunch of other ways to deal with that here:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/WorkingWithTime