We Keep Coding

extract ridges and valleys from finger Image

for my class project I am trying to extract ridges and Valleys from the finger image. An example is given below.
#The code I am using
import cv2
import numpy as np
import fingerprint_enhancer
clip_hist_percent=25
image = cv2.imread("")
gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
# Calculate grayscale histogram
hist = cv2.calcHist([gray],[0],None,[256],[0,256])
hist_size = len(hist)
# Calculate cumulative distribution from the histogram
accumulator = []
accumulator.append(float(hist[0]))
for index in range(1, hist_size):
accumulator.append(accumulator[index -1] + float(hist[index]))
# Locate points to clip
maximum = accumulator[-1]
clip_hist_percent *= (maximum/100.0)
clip_hist_percent /= 2.0
# Locate left cut
minimum_gray = 0
while accumulator[minimum_gray] < clip_hist_percent:
minimum_gray += 1
# Locate right cut
maximum_gray = hist_size -1
while accumulator[maximum_gray] >= (maximum - clip_hist_percent):
maximum_gray -= 1
# Calculate alpha and beta values
alpha = 255 / (maximum_gray - minimum_gray)
beta = -minimum_gray * alpha
auto_result = cv2.convertScaleAbs(image, alpha=alpha, beta=beta)
gray = cv2.cvtColor(auto_result, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
# compute gamma = log(mid*255)/log(mean)
mid = 0.5
mean = np.mean(gray)
gamma = math.log(mid*255)/math.log(mean)
# do gamma correction
img_gamma1 = np.power(auto_result,gamma).clip(0,255).astype(np.uint8)
g1 = cv2.cvtColor(img_gamma2, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
# blur = cv2.GaussianBlur(g1,(2,1),0)
thresh2 = cv2.adaptiveThreshold(g1, 255, cv2.ADAPTIVE_THRESH_GAUSSIAN_C,
cv2.THRESH_BINARY, 199, 3)
# blur = cv2.GaussianBlur(thresh2,(2,1),0)
blur=((3,3),1)
erode_=(5,5)
dilate_=(3, 3)
dilate = cv2.dilate(cv2.erode(cv2.GaussianBlur(thresh2/255, blur[0],
blur[1]), np.ones(erode_)), np.ones(dilate_))*255
out = fingerprint_enhancer.enhance_Fingerprint(dilate)
I am having difficulty extracting the lines on the finger. I tried to adjust the brightness and contrast, applied calcHist, adaptive thresholding, applied blur, then applied the Gabor filters (as per UTKARSH code). The result look like above.
We could clearly see that the lower part of the image has many spurious lines. My project requirement is to get clear lines from the RGB image. Could anyone help me with the steps and the code?
Thank you in advance
reference:
https://github.com/Utkarsh-Deshmukh/Fingerprint-Enhancement-Python
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7358782

There are several strange things (IMO) about your code.
First you do a contrast stretch that sets the 12.5% darkest pixels to black and the 12.5% brightest pixels to white. You probably already have this number of white pixels, so not much happens there, but you do remove all the information in the darkest region of the finger print.
Next you threshold. Here you remove most of the remaining information. Thresholding is something you should leave until the very last step of any processing. In particular, the algorithm implemented in fingerprint_enhancer.enhance_Fingerprint() takes a gray-scale image as input. You should not binarize its input at all!
I would start with a local contrast stretch, then you can directly apply the enhancement algorithm:
import cv2
import fingerprint_enhancer
image = cv2.imread("zMxbO.jpg")
gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
# Apply local contrast stretch
se = cv2.getStructuringElement(cv2.MORPH_ELLIPSE, (25, 25)) # larger than the width of the widest ridges
low = cv2.morphologyEx(gray, cv2.MORPH_OPEN, se) # locally lowest grayvalue
high = cv2.morphologyEx(gray, cv2.MORPH_CLOSE, se) # locally highest grayvalue
gray = (gray - o) / (c - o + 1e-6)
# Apply fingerprint enhancement
out = fingerprint_enhancer.enhance_Fingerprint(gray, resize=True)
The local contrast stretch yields this:
The finger print enhancement algorithm now yields this:
Note things go wrong around the edges, where the background was cut out and replaced with white, as well as in the dark region, where the noise dominates and the enhancement algorithm hallucinates a bit. I don't think you can extract meaningful information from that area, a better illumination would be necessary.

Approximating edge with rough outline - OpenCV

I've been researching and trying a couple functions to get what I want and I feel like I might be overthinking it.
One version of my code is below. The sample image is here.
My end goal is to find the angle (yellow) of the approximated line with respect to the frame (green line) Final
I haven't even got to the angle portion of the program yet.
The results I was obtaining from the below code were as follows. Canny Closed Small Removed
Anybody have a better way of creating the difference and establishing the estimated line?
Any help is appreciated.
import cv2
import numpy as np
pX = int(512)
pY = int(768)
img = cv2.imread('IMAGE LOCATION', cv2.IMREAD_COLOR)
imgS = cv2.resize(img, (pX, pY))
aimg = cv2.imread('IMAGE LOCATION', cv2.IMREAD_GRAYSCALE)
# Blur image to reduce noise and resize for viewing
blur = cv2.medianBlur(aimg, 5)
rblur = cv2.resize(blur, (384, 512))
canny = cv2.Canny(rblur, 120, 255, 1)
cv2.imshow('canny', canny)
kernel = np.ones((2, 2), np.uint8)
#fringeMesh = cv2.dilate(canny, kernel, iterations=2)
#fringeMesh2 = cv2.dilate(fringeMesh, None, iterations=1)
#cv2.imshow('fringeMesh', fringeMesh2)
closing = cv2.morphologyEx(canny, cv2.MORPH_CLOSE, kernel)
cv2.imshow('Closed', closing)
nb_components, output, stats, centroids = cv2.connectedComponentsWithStats(closing, connectivity=8)
#connectedComponentswithStats yields every separated component with information on each of them, such as size
sizes = stats[1:, -1]; nb_components = nb_components - 1
min_size = 200 #num_pixels
fringeMesh3 = np.zeros((output.shape))
for i in range(0, nb_components):
if sizes[i] >= min_size:
fringeMesh3[output == i + 1] = 255
#contours, _ = cv2.findContours(fringeMesh3, cv2.RETR_EXTERNAL, cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_NONE)
#cv2.drawContours(fringeMesh3, contours, -1, (0, 255, 0), 1)
cv2.imshow('final', fringeMesh3)
#cv2.imshow("Natural", imgS)
#cv2.imshow("img", img)
cv2.imshow("aimg", aimg)
cv2.imshow("Blur", rblur)
cv2.waitKey()
cv2.destroyAllWindows()

You can fit a straight line to the first white pixel you encounter in each column, starting from the bottom.
I had to trim your image because you shared a screen grab of it with a window decoration, title and frame rather than your actual image:
import cv2
import math
import numpy as np
# Load image as greyscale
im = cv2.imread('trimmed.jpg', cv2.IMREAD_GRAYSCALE)
# Get index of first white pixel in each column, starting at the bottom
yvals = (im[::-1,:]>200).argmax(axis=0)
# Make the x values 0, 1, 2, 3...
xvals = np.arange(0,im.shape[1])
# Fit a line of the form y = mx + c
z = np.polyfit(xvals, yvals, 1)
# Convert the slope to an angle
angle = np.arctan(z[0]) * 180/math.pi
Note 1: The value of z (the result of fitting) is:
array([ -0.74002694, 428.01463745])
which means the equation of the line you are looking for is:
y = -0.74002694 * x + 428.01463745
i.e. the y-intercept is at row 428 from the bottom of the image.
Note 2: Try to avoid JPEG format as an intermediate format in image processing - it is lossy and changes your pixel values - so where you have thresholded and done your morphology you are expecting values of 255 and 0, JPEG will lossily alter those values and you end up testing for a range or thresholding again.

Your 'Closed' image seems to quite clearly segment the two regions, so I'd suggest you focus on turning that boundary into a line that you can do something with. Connected components analysis and contour detection don't really provide any useful information here, so aren't necessary.
One quite simple approach to finding the line angle is to find the first white pixel in each row. To get only the rows that are part of your diagonal, don't include rows where that pixel is too close to either side (e.g. within 5%). That gives you a set of points (pixel locations) on the boundary of your two types of grass.
From there you can either do a linear regression to get an equation for the straight line, or you can get two points by averaging the x values for the top and bottom half of the rows, and then calculate the gradient angle from that.
An alternative approach would be doing another morphological close with a very large kernel, to end up with just a solid white region and a solid black region, which you could turn into a line with canny or findContours. From there you could either get some points by averaging, use the endpoints, or given a smooth enough result from a large enough kernel you could detect the line with hough lines.

How can I remove these parallel lines noise on my image using opencv

I'm new to opencv and I m trying to remove all these diagonal parallel lines that are noise in my image.
I have tried using HoughLinesP after some erosion/dilatation but the result is poo (and keeping only the one with a near 135 degree angle).
img = cv2.imread('images/dungeon.jpg')
ret,img = cv2.threshold(img,180,255,0)
element = cv2.getStructuringElement(cv2.MORPH_CROSS,(5,5))
eroded = cv2.erode(img,element)
dilate = cv2.dilate(eroded, element)
skeleton = cv2.subtract(img, dilate)
gray = cv2.cvtColor(skeleton,cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
minLineLength = 10
lines = cv2.HoughLinesP(gray, 1, np.pi/180, 1, 10, 0.5)
for line in lines:
for x1,y1,x2,y2 in line:
angle = math.atan2(y2-y1,x2-x1)
if (angle > -0.1 and angle < 0.1):
cv2.line(img,(x1,y1),(x2,y2),(0,255,0),1)
cv2.imshow("result", img)
cv2.waitKey(0)
cv2.destroyAllWindows()
My thinking here was to detect these lines in order to remove them afterwards but I m not even sure that's the good way to do this.

I guess you are trying to get the contours of the walls, right? Here’s a possible path to the solution using mainly spatial filtering. You will still need to clean the results to get where you want. The idea is to try and compute a mask of the parallel lines (high-frequency noise) of the image and calculate the difference between the (binary) input and this mask. These are the steps:
Convert the input image to grayscale
Apply Gaussian Blur to get rid of the high-frequency noise you are trying to eliminate
Get a binary image of the blurred image
Apply area filters to get rid of everything that is not noise, to get a noise mask
Compute the difference between the original binary mask and the noise mask
Clean up the difference image
Compute contours on this image
Let’s see the code:
import cv2
import numpy as np
# Set image path
path = "C://opencvImages//"
fileName = "map.png"
# Read Input image
inputImage = cv2.imread(path+fileName)
# Convert BGR to grayscale:
grayscaleImage = cv2.cvtColor(inputImage, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
# Apply Gaussian Blur:
blurredImage = cv2.GaussianBlur(grayscaleImage, (3, 3), cv2.BORDER_DEFAULT)
# Threshold via Otsu:
_, binaryImage = cv2.threshold(blurredImage, 0, 255, cv2.THRESH_BINARY+cv2.THRESH_OTSU)
# Save a copy of the binary mask
binaryCopy = cv2.cvtColor(binaryImage, cv2.COLOR_GRAY2BGR)
This is the output:
Up until now you get this binary mask. The process so far has smoothed the noise and is creating thick black blobs where the noise is located. Again, the idea is to generate a noise mask that can be subtracted to this image.
Let’s apply an area filter and try to remove the big white blobs, which are NOT the noise we are interested to preserve. I’ll define the function towards the end, for now I just want to present the general idea:
# Set the minimum pixels for the area filter:
minArea = 50000
# Perform an area filter on the binary blobs:
filteredImage = areaFilter(minArea, binaryImage)
The filter will suppress every white blob that is above the minimum threshold. The value is big because in this particular case we are interested in preserving only the black blobs. This is the result:
We have a pretty solid mask. Let’s subtract this from the original binary mask we created earlier:
# Get the difference between the binary image and the mask:
imgDifference = binaryImage - filteredImage
This is what we get:
The difference image has some small noise. Let’s apply the area filter again to get rid of it. This time with a more traditional threshold value:
# Set the minimum pixels for the area filter:
minArea = 20
# Perform an area filter on the binary blobs:
filteredImage = areaFilter(minArea, imgDifference)
Cool. This is the final mask:
Just for completeness. Let’s compute contours on this input, which is very straightforward:
# Find the big contours/blobs on the filtered image:
contours, hierarchy = cv2.findContours(filteredImage, cv2.RETR_CCOMP, cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE)
# Draw the contours on the mask image:
cv2.drawContours(binaryCopy, contours, -1, (0, 255, 0), 3)
Let’s see the result:
As you see it is not perfect. However, there’s still some room for improvement, perhaps you can polish a little bit more this idea to get a potential solution. Here's the definition and implementation of the areaFilter function:
def areaFilter(minArea, inputImage):
# Perform an area filter on the binary blobs:
componentsNumber, labeledImage, componentStats, componentCentroids = \
cv2.connectedComponentsWithStats(inputImage, connectivity=4)
# Get the indices/labels of the remaining components based on the area stat
# (skip the background component at index 0)
remainingComponentLabels = [i for i in range(1, componentsNumber) if componentStats[i][4] >= minArea]
# Filter the labeled pixels based on the remaining labels,
# assign pixel intensity to 255 (uint8) for the remaining pixels
filteredImage = np.where(np.isin(labeledImage, remainingComponentLabels) == True, 255, 0).astype('uint8')
return filteredImage

Robust Algorithm to detect uneven illumination in images [Detection Only Needed]

One of the biggest challenges in tesseract OCR text recognition is the uneven illumination of images.
I need an algorithm that can decide the image is containing uneven illuminations or not.
Test Images
I Attached the images of no illumination image, glare image( white-spotted image) and shadow containing image.
If we give an image to the algorithm, the algorithm should divide into two class like
No uneven illumination - our no illumination image will fall into this category.
Uneven illumination - Our glare image( white-spotted image), shadow containing image will fall in this category.
No Illumination Image - Category A
UnEven Illumination Image (glare image( white-spotted image)) Category B
Uneven Illumination Image (shadow containing an image) Category B
Initial Approach
Change colour space to HSV
Histogram analysis of the value channel of HSV to identify the uneven illumination.
Instead of the first two steps, we can use the perceived brightness
channel instead of the value channel of HSV
Set a low threshold value to get the number of pixels which are less than the low threshold
Set a high threshold value to get the number of pixels which are higher than the high threshold
percentage of low pixels values and percentage of high pixel values to detect uneven lightning condition (The setting threshold for percentage as well )
But I could not find big similarities between uneven illumination
images. I just found there are some pixels that have low value and
some pixels have high value with histogram analysis.
Basically what I feel is if setting some threshold values in the low and to find how many pixels are less than the low threshold and setting some high threshold value to find how many pixels are greater than that threshold. with the pixels counts can we come to a conclusion to detect uneven lightning conditions in images? Here we need to finalize two threshold values and the percentage of the number of pixels to come to the conclusion.
def show_hist_v(img_path):
img = cv2.imread(img_path)
hsv_img = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2HSV)
h,s,v = cv2.split(hsv_img)
histr =cv2.calcHist(v, [0], None, [255],[0,255])
plt.plot(histr)
plt.show()
low_threshold =np.count_nonzero(v < 50)
high_threshold =np.count_nonzero(v >200)
total_pixels = img.shape[0]* img.shape[1]
percenet_low =low_threshold/total_pixels*100
percenet_high =high_threshold/total_pixels*100
print("Total Pixels - {}\n Pixels More than 200 - {} \n Pixels Less than 50 - {} \n Pixels percentage more than 200 - {} \n Pixel spercentage less than 50 - {} \n".format(total_pixels,high_threshold,low_threshold,percenet_low,percenet_high))
return total_pixels,high_threshold,low_threshold,percenet_low,percenet_high
So can someone improve my initial approach or give better than this approach to detect uneven illumination in images for general cases?
Also, I tried perceived brightness instead of the value channel since the value channel takes the maximum of (b,g,r) values the perceive brightness is a good choice as I think
def get_perceive_brightness( float_img):
float_img = np.float64(float_img) # unit8 will make overflow
b, g, r = cv2.split(float_img)
float_brightness = np.sqrt(
(0.241 * (r ** 2)) + (0.691 * (g ** 2)) + (0.068 * (b ** 2)))
brightness_channel = np.uint8(np.absolute(float_brightness))
return brightness_channel
def show_hist_v(img_path):
img = cv2.imread(img_path)
v = get_perceive_brightness(img)
histr =cv2.calcHist(v, [0], None, [255],[0,255])
plt.plot(histr)
plt.show()
low_threshold =np.count_nonzero(v < 50)
high_threshold =np.count_nonzero(v >200)
total_pixels = img.shape[0]* img.shape[1]
percenet_low =low_threshold/total_pixels*100
percenet_high =high_threshold/total_pixels*100
print("Total Pixels - {}\n Pixels More than 200 - {} \n Pixels Less than 50 - {} \n Pixels percentage more than 200 - {} \n Pixel spercentage less than 50 - {} \n".format(total_pixels,high_threshold,low_threshold,percenet_low,percenet_high))
return total_pixels,high_threshold,low_threshold,percenet_low,percenet_high
Histogram analysis of perceived brightness channel
As Ahmet suggested.
def get_percentage_of_binary_pixels(img=None, img_path=None):
if img is None:
if img_path is not None:
gray_img = cv2.imread(img_path, 0)
else:
return "No img or img_path"
else:
print(img.shape)
if len(img.shape) > 2:
gray_img = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
else:
gray_img = img
h, w = gray_img.shape
guassian_blur = cv2.GaussianBlur(gray_img, (5, 5), 0)
thresh_value, otsu_img = cv2.threshold(guassian_blur, 0, 255,
cv2.THRESH_BINARY + cv2.THRESH_OTSU)
cv2.imwrite("binary/{}".format(img_path.split('/')[-1]), otsu_img)
black_pixels = np.count_nonzero(otsu_img == 0)
# white_pixels = np.count_nonzero(otsu_img == 255)
black_pixels_percentage = black_pixels / (h * w) * 100
# white_pixels_percentage = white_pixels / (h * w) * 100
return black_pixels_percentage
when we get more than 35% of black_ pixels percentage with otsu binarization, we can detect the uneven illumination images around 80 percentage. When the illumination occurred in a small region of the image, the detection fails.
Thanks in advance

I suggest using the division trick to separate text from the background, and then calculate statistics on the background only. After setting some reasonable thresholds it is easy to create classifier for the illumination.
def get_image_stats(img_path, lbl):
img = cv2.imread(img_path)
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
blurred = cv2.GaussianBlur(gray, (25, 25), 0)
no_text = gray * ((gray/blurred)>0.99) # select background only
no_text[no_text<10] = no_text[no_text>20].mean() # convert black pixels to mean value
no_bright = no_text.copy()
no_bright[no_bright>220] = no_bright[no_bright<220].mean() # disregard bright pixels
print(lbl)
std = no_bright.std()
print('STD:', std)
bright = (no_text>220).sum()
print('Brigth pixels:', bright)
plt.figure()
plt.hist(no_text.reshape(-1,1), 25)
plt.title(lbl)
if std>25:
print("!!! Detected uneven illumination")
if no_text.mean()<200 and bright>8000:
print("!!! Detected glare")
This results in:
good_img
STD: 11.264569863071165
Brigth pixels: 58
glare_img
STD: 15.00149131296984
Brigth pixels: 15122
!!! Detected glare
uneven_img
STD: 57.99510339944441
Brigth pixels: 688
!!! Detected uneven illumination
Now let's analyze the histograms and apply some common sense. We expect background to be even and have low variance, like it is the case in "good_img". If it has high variance, then its standard deviation would be high and it is the case of uneven brightness. On the lower image you can see 3 (smaller) peaks that are responsible for the 3 different illuminated areas. The largest peak in the middle is the result of setting all black pixels to the mean value. I believe it is safe to call images with STD above 25 as "uneven illumination" case.
It is easy to spot a high amount of bright pixels when there is glare (see image on right). Glared image looks like a good image, besided the hot spot. Setting threshold of bright pixels to something like 8000 (1.5% of total image size) should be good to detect such images. There is a possibility that the background is very bright everywhere, so if the mean of no_text pixels is above 200, then it is the case and there is no need to detect hot spots.

Why don't you remove the lightning effect from the images?
For instance:
If we want to read with pytesseract output will be ' \n\f'
But if we remove the lightning:
import cv2
import pytesseract
img = cv2.imread('img2.jpg')
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
smooth = cv2.GaussianBlur(gray, (95, 95), 0)
division = cv2.divide(gray, smooth, scale=192)
And read with the pytesseract, some part of the output will be:
.
.
.
Dosage & use
See package insert for compicic
information,
Instruction:
Keep all medicines out of the re.
Read the instructions carefully
Storage:
Store at temperature below 30°C.
Protect from Heat, light & moisture. BATCH NO. : 014C003
MFG. DATE - 03-2019
—— EXP. DATE : 03-2021
GENIX Distributed
AS Exclusi i :
genx PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED Cevoka Pv 2 A ‘<
» 45-B, Kore ci
Karachi-75190, | Pakisier al Pei yaa fans
www.genixpharma.com
Repeat for the last image:
And read with the pytesseract, some part of the output will be:
.
.
.
Dosage & use
See package insert for complete prescribing
information. Rx Only
Instruction:
Keep all medicines out of the reach of children.
Read the instructions carefully before using.
Storage:
Store at temperature below 30°C. 5
Protect from Neat, light & moisture. BATCH NO, : 0140003
MFG. DATE : 03-2019
EXP. DATE : 03-2021
Manufactured by:
GENI N Exclusively Distributed by:
GENIX PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED Ceyoka (Pvt) Ltd.
44, 45-B, Korangi Creek Road, 55, Negombe Road,
Karachi-75190, Pakistan. Peliyagoda, Snianka,
www. genixpharma.com
Update
You can find the illuminated part using erode and dilatation methods.
Result:
Code:
import cv2
import imutils
import numpy as np
from skimage import measure
from imutils import contours
img = cv2.imread('img2.jpg')
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
blurred = cv2.GaussianBlur(gray, (95, 95), 0)
thresh = cv2.threshold(blurred, 200, 255, cv2.THRESH_BINARY)[1]
thresh = cv2.erode(thresh, None, iterations=2)
thresh = cv2.dilate(thresh, None, iterations=4)
labels = measure.label(thresh, neighbors=8, background=0)
mask = np.zeros(thresh.shape, dtype="uint8")
for label in np.unique(labels):
if label == 0:
continue
labelMask = np.zeros(thresh.shape, dtype="uint8")
labelMask[labels == label] = 255
numPixels = cv2.countNonZero(labelMask)
if numPixels > 300:
mask = cv2.add(mask, labelMask)
cnts = cv2.findContours(mask.copy(), cv2.RETR_EXTERNAL,
cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE)
cnts = imutils.grab_contours(cnts)
cnts = contours.sort_contours(cnts)[0]
for (i, c) in enumerate(cnts):
(x, y, w, h) = cv2.boundingRect(c)
((cX, cY), radius) = cv2.minEnclosingCircle(c)
cv2.circle(img, (int(cX), int(cY)), int(radius),
(0, 0, 255), 3)
cv2.putText(img, "#{}".format(i + 1), (x, y - 15),
cv2.FONT_HERSHEY_SIMPLEX, 0.45, (0, 0, 255), 2)
cv2.imshow("Image", img)
cv2.waitKey(0)
Though I only tested with the second-image. You may need to change the parameters for the other images.

Here is a quick solution in ImageMagick. But it can easily be implemented in Python/OpenCV as shown further down.
Use division normalization.
Read the input
Optionally convert to grayscale
Copy the image and blur it
Divide the blurred image by the original
Save the results
Input:
convert 8W0bp.jpg \( +clone -blur 0x13 \) +swap -compose divide -composite x1.png
convert ob87W.jpg \( +clone -blur 0x13 \) +swap -compose divide -composite x2.png
convert HLJuA.jpg \( +clone -blur 0x13 \) +swap -compose divide -composite x3.png
Results:
In Python/OpenCV:
import cv2
import numpy as np
import skimage.filters as filters
# read the image
img = cv2.imread('8W0bp.jpg')
#img = cv2.imread('ob87W.jpg')
#img = cv2.imread('HLJuA.jpg')
# convert to gray
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img,cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
# blur
smooth = cv2.GaussianBlur(gray, (33,33), 0)
# divide gray by morphology image
division = cv2.divide(gray, smooth, scale=255)
# sharpen using unsharp masking
sharp = filters.unsharp_mask(division, radius=1.5, amount=2.5, multichannel=False, preserve_range=False)
sharp = (255*sharp).clip(0,255).astype(np.uint8)
# save results
cv2.imwrite('8W0bp_division.jpg',division)
cv2.imwrite('8W0bp_division_sharp.jpg',sharp)
#cv2.imwrite('ob87W_division.jpg',division)
#cv2.imwrite('ob87W_division_sharp.jpg',sharp)
#cv2.imwrite('HLJuA_division.jpg',division)
#cv2.imwrite('HLJuA_division_sharp.jpg',sharp)
# show results
cv2.imshow('smooth', smooth)
cv2.imshow('division', division)
cv2.imshow('sharp', sharp)
cv2.waitKey(0)
cv2.destroyAllWindows()
Results:

Here my pipeline:
%matplotlib inline
import numpy as np
import cv2
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from scipy.signal import find_peaks
I use the functions:
def get_perceived_brightness( float_img):
float_img = np.float64(float_img) # unit8 will make overflow
b, g, r = cv2.split(float_img)
float_brightness = np.sqrt((0.241 * (r ** 2)) + (0.691 * (g ** 2)) + (0.068 * (b ** 2)))
brightness_channel = np.uint8(np.absolute(float_brightness))
return brightness_channel
# from: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46300577/find-locale-minimum-in-histogram-1d-array-python
def smooth(x,window_len=11,window='hanning'):
if x.ndim != 1:
raise ValueError("smooth only accepts 1 dimension arrays.")
if x.size < window_len:
raise ValueError("Input vector needs to be bigger than window size.")
if window_len<3:
return x
if not window in ['flat', 'hanning', 'hamming', 'bartlett', 'blackman']:
raise ValueError("Window is on of 'flat', 'hanning', 'hamming', 'bartlett', 'blackman'")
s=np.r_[x[window_len-1:0:-1],x,x[-2:-window_len-1:-1]]
if window == 'flat': #moving average
w=np.ones(window_len,'d')
else:
w=eval('np.'+window+'(window_len)')
y=np.convolve(w/w.sum(),s,mode='valid')
return y
I load the image
image_file_name = 'im3.jpg'
image = cv2.imread(image_file_name)
# image category
category = 0
# gray convertion
image_gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
height = image.shape[0]
width = image.shape[1]
First test. Does the image have any big white spots?
# First test. Does the image have any big white spots?
saturation_thresh = 250
raw_saturation_region = cv2.threshold(image_gray, saturation_thresh, 255, cv2.THRESH_BINARY)[1]
num_raw_saturation_regions, raw_saturation_regions,stats, _ = cv2.connectedComponentsWithStats(raw_saturation_region)
# index 0 is the background -> to remove
area_raw_saturation_regions = stats[1:,4]
min_area_bad_spot = 1000 # this can be calculated as percentage of the image area
if (np.max(area_raw_saturation_regions) > min_area_bad_spot):
category = 2 # there is at least one spot
The result for the image normal:
The result for the image with spots:
The result for the image with shadows:
If the image pass the first test, I process the second test. Is the image dark?
# Second test. Is the image dark?
min_mean_intensity = 60
if category == 0 :
mean_intensity = np.mean(image_gray)
if (mean_intensity < min_mean_intensity):
category = 3 # dark image
If the image pass also the second test, I process the third test. Is the image uniformy illuminatad?
window_len = 15 # odd number
delay = int((window_len-1)/2) # delay is the shift introduced from the smoothing. It's half window_len
# for example if the window_len is 15, the delay is 7
# infact hist.shape = 256 and smooted_hist.shape = 270 (= 256 + 2*delay)
if category == 0 :
perceived_brightness = get_perceived_brightness(image)
hist,bins = np.histogram(perceived_brightness.ravel(),256,[0,256])
# smoothed_hist is shifted from the original one
smoothed_hist = smooth(hist,window_len)
# smoothed histogram syncronized with the original histogram
sync_smoothed_hist = smoothed_hist[delay:-delay]
# if number the peaks with:
# 20<bin<250
# prominance >= mean histogram value
# the image could have shadows (but it could have also a background with some colors)
mean_hist = int(height*width / 256)
peaks, _ = find_peaks(sync_smoothed_hist, prominence=mean_hist)
selected_peaks = peaks[(peaks > 20) & (peaks < 250)]
if (selected_peaks.size>1) :
category = 4 # there are shadows
The histogram for the image normal:
The histogram for the image with spots:
The histogram for the image with shadows:
If the image pass all the tests, than it's normal
# all tests are passed. The image is ok
if (category == 0) :
category=1 # the image is ok

Replacing a solid green region with another image with OpenCV

The image below has a green region that I'm looking to replace with any other image. It's not necessary for its perspective to match.
I've been able to create a mask. But haven't really been successful with resizing and aligning the other image to this one with the green region. Most resources I've found online mention both images' need for the same size, but I'm only looking to resize the new image to fit inside the green rectangle instead of having two square images overlapping with one of them with a cutout.
What's a good approach here?

Here is one solution using Python OpenCV.
Read both images.
Measure and enter 4 corresponding sets of x,y control points.
Compute homography (perspective coefficients)
Warp the source image using the homography -- the background will be black
Create a binary mask from the dst image using the green color range.
Invert the mask.
Apply the inverted mask to the dst image to blacken the inside of the region of interest (where the src will go)
Add the warped src to the masked dst to form the result
src:
dst:
#!/python3.7
import cv2
import numpy as np
# Read source image.
src = cv2.imread('original.jpg')
# Four corners of source image
# Coordinates are in x,y system with x horizontal to the right and y vertical downward
# listed clockwise from top left
pts_src = np.float32([[0, 0], [325, 0], [325, 472], [0, 472]])
# Read destination image.
dst = cv2.imread('green_rect.png')
# Four corners of destination image.
pts_dst = np.float32([[111, 59], [206, 60], [216, 215], [121, 225]])
# Calculate Homography if more than 4 points
# h = forward transformation matrix
#h, status = cv2.findHomography(pts_src, pts_dst)
# Alternate if only 4 points
h = cv2.getPerspectiveTransform(pts_src,pts_dst)
# Warp source image to destination based on homography
# size argument is width x height, so have to reverse shape values
src_warped = cv2.warpPerspective(src, h, (dst.shape[1],dst.shape[0]))
# Set BGR color ranges
lowerBound = np.array([0, 255, 0]);
upperBound = np.array([0, 255, 0]);
# Compute mask (roi) from ranges in dst
mask = cv2.inRange(dst, lowerBound, upperBound);
# Dilate mask, if needed, when green border shows
kernel = np.ones((3,3),np.uint8)
mask = cv2.dilate(mask,kernel,iterations = 1)
# Invert mask
inv_mask = cv2.bitwise_not(mask)
# Mask dst with inverted mask
dst_masked = cv2.bitwise_and(dst, dst, mask=inv_mask)
# Put src_warped over dst
result = cv2.add(dst_masked, src_warped)
# Save outputs
cv2.imwrite('warped_src.jpg', src_warped)
cv2.imwrite('inverted_mask.jpg', inv_mask)
cv2.imwrite('masked_dst.jpg', dst_masked)
cv2.imwrite('perspective_composite.jpg', result)
warped_src:
inverted_mask:
masked_dst:
result:
I will leave it to the reader to filter the excess green border or edit the control points in the dst image to make the region of interest larger.
Note: if the aspect ratio of the src does not match that of the green rectangle, then the src will get distorted with this method.

Per request in comments to my previous answer doing it in perspective, here is one way to do it with a simple scale and translation affine warp.
Read both images
Measure the height of the green region and get the height of the src image
Measure the center (x,y) of the green region and get the center of the src image
Compute the affine matrix coefficients for scale and translation only (no rotation or skew)
Warp the source image using the affine matrix -- the background will be black
Create a binary mask from the warped src image making everything not black into white
Invert the mask
Apply the inverted mask to the dst image
Add the warped src over the masked dst to form the result
src:
dst:
#!/python3.7
import cv2
import numpy as np
# Read source image.
src = cv2.imread('original.jpg')
h_src, w_src = src.shape[:2]
# Read destination image.
dst = cv2.imread('green_rect.png')
h_dst, w_dst = dst.shape[:2]
# compute scale from height of src and height of green region
h_green=170
scale = h_green/h_src
# compute offsets from center of scaled src and center of green
x_src = (scale)*w_src/2
y_src = (scale)*h_src/2
x_green = 165
y_green = 140
xoff = (x_green - x_src)
yoff = (y_green - y_src)
# build affine matrix for scale and translate only
affine_matrix = np.float32([ [scale,0,xoff], [0,scale,yoff] ])
# do affine warp
# add 1 to src to ensure no pure black
src_warped = cv2.warpAffine(src+1, affine_matrix, (w_dst, h_dst), cv2.INTER_AREA)
# Compute mask (roi) in warped src
_, mask = cv2.threshold(src_warped,1,255,cv2.THRESH_BINARY)
# Invert single channel of mask
inv_mask = cv2.bitwise_not(mask[:,:,0])
# Mask dst with inverted mask
dst_masked = cv2.bitwise_and(dst, dst, mask=inv_mask)
# Put warped src over masked dst
result = cv2.add(dst_masked,src_warped)
# Save outputs
cv2.imwrite('warped_src.jpg', src_warped)
cv2.imwrite('masked_src.jpg', mask)
cv2.imwrite('affine_composite.jpg', result)
warped_src:
inverted mask:
masked dst
result: