I am making a simple server/client chat program in Python. This program should allow for multiple users to connect at once, and then execute their requests concurrently. For this, I am using the asyncio module and sockets.
async def accept_new_connections(socket):
socket.listen(1)
while True:
connection, client_address = sock.accept()
print("accepted conn")
asyncio.create_task(accept_commands(socket, connection))
async def accept_commands(socket, connection):
print("accept cmd started")
while True:
# get and execute commands
def main():
asyncio.run(accept_new_connections(socket))
main()
What I would hope to do is running accept_commands for each of the connections, which would then execute commands concurrently. However, the current code only starts accept_commands for the first connection, and blocks the while loop (the one in accept_new_connections).
Any idea what I need to change to have accept_command started for each of the connections instead?
It is tough to tell because your example does have the implementation of accept_commands, but based on your issue it is likely you need to use the async socket methods on event loop itself so that your coroutine can yield execution and let something else happen.
The below example shows how to do this. This starts a socket on port 8080 and will send back any data it receives back to the client. You can see this work concurrently by connecting two clients with netcat or telnet and sending data.
import asyncio
import socket
socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
socket.bind(('localhost', 8080))
socket.listen(1)
socket.setblocking(False)
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
async def main():
while True:
connection, client_address = await loop.sock_accept(socket)
print('connected')
loop.create_task(accept_commands(connection))
async def accept_commands(connection):
while True:
request = await loop.sock_recv(connection, 16)
await loop.sock_sendall(connection, request)
loop.run_until_complete(main())
Related
I'm confused as to when and why the async/await syntax would be needed, or not, when using the low level asyncio.Protocol approach in python. Suppose I have a subclass of asyncio.Protocol, say EchoClientProtocol, and that has a method send_message that external code can use to send any message to an echo server. For example:
import asyncio
class EchoClientProtocol(asyncio.Protocol):
def __init__(self, message):
self.transport = None
self.message = message
def send_message(self,txt):
self.message = txt
self.transport.write(self.message.encode())
print('Data sent: {!r}'.format(self.message))
def connection_made(self, transport):
self.transport=transport
self.send_message(self.message)
def data_received(self, data):
print('Data received: {!r}'.format(data.decode()))
def connection_lost(self, exc):
print('The server closed the connection')
self.on_con_lost.set_result(True)
We can create and run the client with code that uses the familiar async/away syntax, with some auto-reconnect logic built in:
async def main():
while True:
try:
message="Initial message here"
transport, protocol = await loop.create_connection(
lambda: EchoClientProtocol(message),
'127.0.0.1',
8888
)
except OSError:
print("Server not up, retrying in 5 seconds...")
await asyncio.sleep(5)
else:
break
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
asyncio.run(main())
The above client class EchoClientProtocol does not declare send_message as async, and does not await the self.transport.write() method. I have seen code like this in many examples online. Why would this work if it uses asyncio? Isn't the async/await syntax necessary? Why or why not?
Suppose I have two clients in the same python script and both have to run simultaneously without blocking each other. For example, suppose that one echo client connects to a server at port 8888 and another connect to another client server at port 8899. I can use async.gather to make sure that both run simultaneously, but in that case do I have to declare send_message as async, and do I have to await self.transport.write()? In other words, what would I have to change in the EchoClientProtocol above so that I could run two or more such clients in the same script (connecting to different servers on different ports) to make them both run without blocking each other?
I have started with a friend of mine to dig deeper into network coding. Concurrency and parallelism are a big part of this.
We have created a server and client to connect them and this works fine. Now we want to create a thread in the server for checking for inputs from the keyboard while listing to connections on the socket. Maybe we get something totally wrong but we tried it with this code and a threadpoolexecution but the program get stuck at the first await call
i = await ainput.asyncInput()
We thought that after the await starts the thread wait for an input and the main thread goes on in execution but that seems to be wrong.
Here is the server module:
import socket
import asyncio
import asyncron_Input as ainput
def closeServer():
exit()
server_address = ('localhost',6969)
async def main():
#create TCP Socket
serverSock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
# prints the adress and the port of the server
print("starting up on: ")
print(server_address[0])
print("port: ")
print(server_address[1])
# binds the socket to the given adress
serverSock.bind(server_address)
#listen for connection
serverSock.listen(1)
print("End server with 1")
while True:
#close server with asynco inputs
i = await ainput.asyncInput()
if i == "1":
closeServer()
#wait for connection
print("waiting for conncetion")
conn,client_address = serverSock.accept()
try:
print("connected to",client_address)
while True:
data = conn.recv(16)
if data:
print("received:",data)
data = "succsessful"
else:
print("no data")
break
finally:
#close connection
conn.close
asyncio.run(main())
Here is the async input:
import asyncio
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
async def asyncInput():
with ThreadPoolExecutor(1,'Async Input') as executor:
return await asyncio.get_event_loop().run_in_executor(executor,input)
Thanks for your help in advance
There's two problems with your code:
You wait for input before accepting any socket connections, you can't use await if you want code proceeding it to happen concurrently, you need to use a Task.
You're using blocking sockets. sock.accept and sock.recv are blocking by default. They'll halt execution of your event loop, you need to use them in an await expression, which means making your sever socket non-blocking and then using them with special asyncio specific socket methods.
To fix this, you'll need to wrap listening for input in a task, make your server socket non-blocking, get the running event loop and then use the sock_accept and sock_recv methods of the event loop. Putting this all together, your code will look something like this:
import asyncio
import socket
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
async def asyncInput():
with ThreadPoolExecutor(1,'Async Input') as executor:
return await asyncio.get_event_loop().run_in_executor(executor,input)
def closeServer():
exit()
server_address = ('localhost',8000)
async def loop_for_input():
while True:
#close server with asynco inputs
i = await asyncInput()
if i == "1":
closeServer()
async def main():
#create TCP Socket
serverSock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, )
serverSock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
# prints the adress and the port of the server
print("starting up on: ")
print(server_address[0])
print("port: ")
print(server_address[1])
# binds the socket to the given adress
serverSock.bind(server_address)
serverSock.setblocking(False) #make your socket non-blocking
#listen for connection
serverSock.listen(1)
print("End server with 1")
loop = asyncio.get_running_loop() # get the running event loop
input_task = asyncio.create_task(loop_for_input()) # create an task to run your input loop
while True:
#wait for connection
print("waiting for conncetion")
conn,client_address = await loop.sock_accept(serverSock) # use the sock_accept coroutine to asynchronously listen for connections
try:
print("connected to",client_address)
while True: # you may also want to create a task for this loop.
data = await loop.sock_recv(conn, 16) # use the sock_recv coroutine to asynchronously listen for data
if data:
print("received:",data)
data = "succsessful"
else:
print("no data")
break
finally:
#close connection
conn.close()
asyncio.run(main())
There's potentially a third problem in that your code can only handle one client at a time since you enter an infinite loop for the first connection that comes in. This means any additional clients who connect will be blocked. If you want to solve that problem, any time a client connects, create a new Task to listen for data from the client, similar to what the code above does with asyncInput()
I am trying to create a sockets server (TCP/IP) and inside it based on few data from client I am scheduling few background jobs.
following code is working ->
import schedule
import time
def test1():
print('hi from 1')
def test2():
print('hi from test2')
while True:
schedule.run_pending()
time.sleep(1)
Then I tried following thing with socket server then its not executing the jobs/function. Can someone help me what's happening here.
Not working code
import schedule
import time
import socket
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
server_address = ('localhost', 8009)
print('starting up on {} port {}'.format(*server_address))
sock.bind(server_address)
# Listen for incoming connections
sock.listen(1)
def test1():
print('hi from 1')
def test2():
print('hi from test2')
schedule.every(1).minutes.do(test1)
schedule.every(2).minutes.do(test2)
while True:
schedule.run_pending()
time.sleep(1)
print('waiting for a connection')
connection, client_address = sock.accept()
data = connection.recv(1024)
result = data.decode('utf-8')
print('data recived from clinet : ', result)
Thing I am trying to achieve is I want to create python socket server which
will accept request from node client's and based on clients data I want to schedule few jobs in python. for this I am using socket, schedule moduls from python to create socket server and schedule jobs respective and net module at node js's client for sending data to python server.
Please explain your problem in more detail. sock.accept is blocking, so the loop is blocking, is this your problem?
To prevent the program from blocking you can run the scheduler loop in a separate thread and the acceptance loop also in a separate thread too. Create a main thread to manage your child threads. Have a look at the module threading.
Maybe it makes sense to use an other scheduler library that can handle threading, see here.
Disclosure: I'm one of the authors of the scheduler library
I have a server that gathers data from a bunch of GPS trackers, and want to ship this data out in real time to X connected clients via WebSockets. The trackers connect over TCP (each in their own thread) and send data regularly to the server. The data is merged in a thread called data_merger and put in that threads queue(). This mechanic works nicely and as intended, however I'm running into issues when I want to send this data to websocket connections.
I tried basing my solution on the websocket synchronization example, as this seemed like it applied to my usecase. I have a thread called outbound_worker that handles the websocket code. From thread.run():
def run(self):
self.data_merger.name = 'data_merger'
self.data_merger.start()
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
asyncio.set_event_loop(loop)
start_server = websockets.serve(self.handle_clients, 'localhost', self.port)
print("WebSocker server started for port %s at %s" % (self.port, datetime.now()))
loop.run_until_complete(start_server)
asyncio.get_event_loop().run_forever()
Then the handler method for the websocket server:
async def handle_clients(self, websocket, path):
while True:
try:
# Register the websocket to connected set
await self.register(websocket)
data = self.data_merger.queue.get()
await send_to_clients(data)
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
except websockets.ConnectionClosed:
print("Connection closed")
await self.unregister(websocket)
break
async def send_to_clients(self, data):
data = json.dumps(data)
if self.connected:
await asyncio.wait([ws.send(data) for ws in self.connected])
The register() and unregister() methods are identical to the example I linked above. The client I'm using is a basic loop that prints the data received:
async def hello():
uri = "ws://localhost:64000"
while True:
async with websockets.connect(uri) as websocket:
print("Awaiting data...")
data = await websocket.recv()
#print(f"{data}")
print(f"{json.loads(data)}")
asyncio.get_event_loop().run_until_complete(hello())
As I am new to asynchronous calls in Python and websockets in general, I'm not sure if my approach is correct here. Since I am trying to push data right after registering a new connection, the code seems to halt at the await send_to_clients(data) line. Should I rather handle this in the data_merger thread and pass the connected set?
Another issue is that if I simply use the client_handler to register() and unregister() the new connections, it seems to just loop over the register() part and I'm unable to connect a second client.
I guess my questions can be condensed into the following:
How do I accept and manage multiple open connections over websocket, similar to a multithreaded socket server?
Is there a way to trigger a function call (for instance register() only on new websocket connections, similar to socket.listen() and socket.accept()?
I have server, where I need to keep connection with client as long as possible. I need to allow for multiple clients connect to this server. Code:
class LoginServer(BaseServer):
def __init__(self, host, port):
super().__init__(host, port)
async def handle_connection(self, reader: StreamReader, writer: StreamWriter):
peername = writer.get_extra_info('peername')
Logger.info('[Login Server]: Accepted connection from {}'.format(peername))
auth = AuthManager(reader, writer)
while True:
try:
await auth.process()
except TimeoutError:
continue
finally:
await asyncio.sleep(1)
Logger.warning('[Login Server]: closing...')
writer.close()
#staticmethod
def create():
Logger.info('[Login Server]: init')
return LoginServer(Connection.LOGIN_SERVER_HOST.value, Connection.LOGIN_SERVER_PORT.value)
The problem: currently only one client can connect to this server. It seems socket do not closing properly. And because of this even previous client cannot reconnect. I think this is because infinite loop exists. How to fix this problem?
The while loop is correct.
If you wanted a server that waits on data from a client you would have the following loop in your handle_connection.
while 1:
data = await reader.read(100)
# Do something with the data
See the example echo server here for more details on reading / writing.
https://asyncio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tcp_echo.html
Your problem is likely that this function doesn't return and is looping itself without await'g anything. That would mean the asyncio loop would never regain control so new connections could not be made.
await auth.process()