'Europe/Madrid' timezone doesn't match 'Etc/GMT+1' - python

I'm trying to convert a UTC timestamp to one in the Spanish timezone.
>>> import datetime as dt
>>> import pytz
>>> today = dt.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(1573516800)
datetime.datetime(2019, 11, 12, 0, 0)
>>> today.replace(tzinfo=pytz.timezone('Europe/Madrid')).timestamp()
1573517700.0
>>> today.replace(tzinfo=pytz.timezone('Etc/GMT+1')).timestamp()
1573520400.0
I'm surprised that I get different results for Europe/Madrid and Etc/GMT+1. Why is this? Should Europe/Madrid be used differently, or it is possibly a bug?

A few things:
Europe/Madrid is UTC+1 during standard time, and UTC+2 during summer time (aka daylight saving time).
Etc/GMT+1 is UTC-1 for the entire year. Note the sign is opposite what you might expect. See the explanation in the tzdata sources, and on Wikipedia.
Since Madrid is on UTC+1 on the date you gave, you would get the same result for that date if you used Etc/GMT-1. However, I don't recommend that, as you would then later get the wrong result for a date during summer time.
The Etc/GMT±X zones are intended to be used primarily for non-localizable scenarios such as tracking time onboard ships at sea - not for populated locations on land.
As Mason's answer showed, you should be using the localize function rather than replace to assign a time zone. This is covered in the pytz documentation.

UTC Timestamp: The number of seconds since January 1st, 1970 at UTC.
Python datetime: A nice way of seeing this time that is user friendly
The UTC timestamp is not effected by timezones, but the datetime is.
This code takes the given timestamp and converts it to a UTC datetime and a Europe/Madrid timezone.
import datetime as dt
import pytz
# define the old and new timezones
old_timezone = pytz.timezone("UTC")
new_timezone = pytz.timezone("Europe/Madrid")
# get an 'offset-aware' datetime
today = dt.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(1573516800)
my_datetime = old_timezone.localize(today)
# returns datetime in the new timezone
my_datetime_in_new_timezone = my_datetime.astimezone(new_timezone)
print("Old:", str(my_datetime), "\nNew:", str(my_datetime_in_new_timezone), "\nDifference:",
str(my_datetime - my_datetime_in_new_timezone))
Output:
Old: 2019-11-12 00:00:00+00:00
New: 2019-11-12 01:00:00+01:00
Difference: 0:00:00
Code adapted from:
Python: How do you convert datetime/timestamp from one timezone to another timezone?

Related

Converting local times to UTC for different countries

I would like to convert local times to UTC tine for different countries. I'm trying to do that with this way:
tz = pytz.timezone('Europe/Berlin')
x=tz.normalize(tz.localize(datetime.now())).astimezone(pytz.utc)
It gives me right result. But when I try to do that for Europe/Lisbon, I get wrong result. Can it be a problem or am I doing something wrong? There is no difference between two time zones but it gives me 3 hours difference as below.
Thanks in advance.
I am not sure why you get the wrong times. I tried this way and I get the right ones. It's just that I have frozen the current time to a variable and used it to check as a debug.
Lisbon has the time as UTC - no difference
P.S. I am in local time zone though, and hence you may see my time as different from yours but the difference seems to be right. Berlin is 1 hour ahead of UTC while Lisbon is same as UTC
import pytz
from datetime import datetime
tz = pytz.timezone('Europe/Berlin')
tb = tz.localize(datetime.now())
print(f"Berlin Time: {tb}")
x=tz.normalize(tb).astimezone(pytz.utc)
print(f"Berin to UTC: {x}")
tz2 = pytz.timezone('Europe/Lisbon')
tl = tz2.localize(datetime.now())
print(f"Lisbon Time: {tl}")
y=tz2.normalize(tl).astimezone(pytz.utc)
print(f"Lisbon to UTC: {tl}")
Here is the result:
Berlin Time: 2022-01-05 20:19:28.576504+01:00
Berin to UTC: 2022-01-05 19:19:28.576504+00:00
Lisbon Time: 2022-01-05 20:19:28.578506+00:00
Lisbon to UTC: 2022-01-05 20:19:28.578506+00:00
Process finished with exit code 0
This should work well for converting your local time to a timezone aware UTC datetime object
I'm guessing you might have issues with DST. The call to localize() requires you to specify if the timezone is serving DST or not. It defaults to False.
Other possibility is simply the fact that you're using your local times (considering you're not yourself in lisbon) and since you localize that time to lisbon timezone, of course it would result in incorrect time.
import pytz
import datetime
timezone = pytz.timezone('Europe/Lisbon')
original_time = datetime.datetime(2021, 10, 15, 13, 15) # change this to sample datetime to test different values
local_timezone_datetime = timezone.localize(original_time, False) # change False to True if DST is enabled on the timezone
converted_datetime = local_timezone_datetime.astimezone(pytz.utc)
print(converted_datetime)
Lemme know if you need a function to help you determine whether a timezone is serving DST.

When subtracting a datetime that was converted from string, total_seconds() is wrong

The total_seconds() is incorrect when I do this:
from datetime import timedelta, datetime
from pytz import timezone
timezone = timezone('Australia/Sydney')
startDate = datetime.now(timezone)
dateStr = '2020-05-18 20:12:30' # In our brain we know this time is in Sydney Time
endDate = datetime.strptime(dateStr, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S').replace(tzinfo=timezone)
diff = endDate - startDate
print(diff.total_seconds()) # incorrect answer
When both datetime objects are datetime objects originally, and you substract them, they are right
from datetime import timedelta, datetime
from pytz import timezone
timezone = timezone('Australia/Sydney')
startDate = datetime.now(timezone)
endDate = datetime.now(timezone) + timedelta(hours=2, seconds=32)
diff = endDate - startDate
print(diff.total_seconds()) # correct answer
How can I fix my issue ?
So it seems like all things in the horrible world of date-times, timezones and offsets this is one of these weird and wonderful things. the issue seems to stem from the fact that pytz.timezone will return a timezone object with several timezones.
{
(datetime.timedelta(seconds=36300), datetime.timedelta(0), 'LMT'): <DstTzInfo 'Australia/Sydney' LMT+10:05:00 STD>,
(datetime.timedelta(seconds=36000), datetime.timedelta(0), 'AEST'): <DstTzInfo 'Australia/Sydney' AEST+10:00:00 STD>,
(datetime.timedelta(seconds=39600), datetime.timedelta(seconds=3600), 'AEDT'): <DstTzInfo 'Australia/Sydney' AEDT+11:00:00 DST>
}
It seems when you are passing the timezone to the now method it's picking the timezone from your choice of 3 based on probably some local TZINFO in your setup. However, when passing the timezone to replace, it's just picking the LMT which is different by 300. A quick mention about LMT:
Local Mean Time Today: While Local Mean Time does not directly
determine civil time these days, it is still used to make sure our
clocks follow the Sun as closely as possible. UT1, a version of
Universal Time is the Local Mean Time at the prime meridian in
Greenwich, London. It is one of the components used to calculate
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the time scale used to determine
local times worldwide.
LMT is also used by astronomers around the world to time their
observations.
Essentially your issue spans from datetime.now() acting on the local timezone and datetime.replace() acting on the LMT timezone. So as I mentioned in my post create your dates consistently either create them both via replace (although you will still be off by 5 mins in terms of actual time, the difference will be correct.)
UPDATE
If you want both datetime objects to be in local Sydney time then you can create your stardate as you did before using datetime.now(). But you should create your end date from your timezone objects asking it to localize it for you like.
from datetime import datetime
from pytz import timezone
timezone = timezone('Australia/Sydney')
startDate = datetime.now(timezone)
dateStr = '2020-05-18 18:52:30' # In our brain we know this time is in Sydney Time
endDate = timezone.localize(datetime.strptime(dateStr, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S'))
print(startDate, endDate, sep="\n")
diff = endDate - startDate
print(diff.total_seconds())
OUTPUT
2020-05-18 18:51:24.722614+10:00
2020-05-18 18:52:30+10:00
65.277386

Python - Convert ISO 8601 to BST time

So basically I have learned a bit with ISO 8601 where the format is
"2018-07-06T07:00:00.000"
and basically what I have achieved is that I starting of to change the ISO to a more formal timestamp which is:
etatime = str(datetime.datetime.strptime("2018-07-06T07:00:00.000", "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f"))
which will give an output of:
2018-07-06 07:00:00
However I noticed the time is 1 hour behind the BST (British time) which should be added one hour.
My question is, is there possible to go from (2018-07-06T07:00:00.000) to (2018-07-06 08:00:00 BST)?
Assumptions: the input represents a UTC timestamp, and you want to localise that to London time. You probably do not want to localise it to BST time, since BST is the DST variation of GMT, and an actual location like London will switch between BST and GMT depending on the time of year. You'll want to install the pytz module.
from datetime import datetime, timezone
import pytz
date = '2018-07-06T07:00:00.000'
utc_date = datetime.strptime(date, '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f').replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc)
london_date = utc_date.astimezone(pytz.timezone('Europe/London'))
datetime.datetime(2018, 7, 6, 8, 0, tzinfo=<DstTzInfo 'Europe/London' BST+1:00:00 DST>)
strptime gives you a naïve datetime object (without timezone information), .replace gives you an aware datetime object (with timezone information), which then enables you to simply convert that to a different timezone.
One suggestion is that you can use the timedelta function from datetime module:
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
etatime = datetime.strptime("2018-07-06T07:00:00.000", "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f")
# Before adding one hour
print(etatime)
etatime = etatime + timedelta(hours=1)
# After adding one hour
print(etatime)
Output:
2018-07-06 07:00:00
2018-07-06 08:00:00

python converting string in localtime to UTC epoch timestamp

I have strings in YMD hms format that had the timezone stripped. But I know they are in Eastern time with daylight savings time.
I am trying to convert them into epoch timestamps for UTC time.
I wrote the following function:
def ymdhms_timezone_dst_to_epoch(input_str, tz="US/Eastern"):
print(input_str)
dt = datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(time.mktime(time.strptime(input_str,'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')))
local_dt = pytz.timezone(tz).localize(dt)
print(local_dt.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z%z'))
utc_dt = local_dt.astimezone(pytz.utc)
print(utc_dt.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z%z'))
e = int(utc_dt.strftime("%s"))
print(e)
return e
Given string `2015-04-20 21:12:07` this prints:
2015-04-20 21:12:07
2015-04-20 21:12:07 EDT-0400 #<- so far so good?
2015-04-21 01:12:07 UTC+0000 #<- so far so good?
1429596727
which looks ok up to the epoch timestamp. But http://www.epochconverter.com/epoch/timezones.php?epoch=1429596727 says it should mao to
Greenwich Mean Time Apr 21 2015 06:12:07 UTC.
What is wrong?
I have strings in YMD hms format that had the timezone stripped. But I know they are in Eastern time with daylight savings time.
A portable way is to use pytz:
#!/usr/bin/env python
from datetime import datetime
import pytz # $ pip install pytz
naive_dt = datetime.strptime('2015-04-20 21:12:07', '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')
tz = pytz.timezone('US/Eastern')
eastern_dt = tz.normalize(tz.localize(naive_dt))
print(eastern_dt)
# -> 2015-04-20 21:12:07-04:00
I am trying to convert them into epoch timestamps for UTC time.
timestamp = (eastern_dt - datetime(1970, 1, 1, tzinfo=pytz.utc)).total_seconds()
# -> 1429578727.0
See Converting datetime.date to UTC timestamp in Python.
There are multiple issues in your code:
time.mktime() may return a wrong result for ambiguous input time (50% chance) e.g., during "fall back" DST transition in the Fall
time.mktime() and datetime.fromtimestamp() may fail for past/future dates if they have no access to a historical timezone database on a system (notably, Windows)
localize(dt) may return a wrong result for ambiguous or non-existent time i.e., during DST transitions. If you know that the time corresponds to the summer time then use is_dst=True. tz.normalize() is necessary here, to adjust possible non-existing times in the input
utc_dt.strftime("%s") is not portable and it does not respect tzinfo object. It interprets input as a local time i.e., it returns a wrong result unless your local timezone is UTC.
Can I just always set is_dst=True?
You can, if you don't mind getting imprecise results for ambiguous or non-existent times e.g., there is DST transition in the Fall in America/New_York time zone:
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> import pytz # $ pip install pytz
>>> tz = pytz.timezone('America/New_York')
>>> ambiguous_time = datetime(2015, 11, 1, 1, 30)
>>> time_fmt = '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S%z (%Z)'
>>> tz.localize(ambiguous_time).strftime(time_fmt)
'2015-11-01 01:30:00-0500 (EST)'
>>> tz.localize(ambiguous_time, is_dst=False).strftime(time_fmt) # same
'2015-11-01 01:30:00-0500 (EST)'
>>> tz.localize(ambiguous_time, is_dst=True).strftime(time_fmt) # different
'2015-11-01 01:30:00-0400 (EDT)'
>>> tz.localize(ambiguous_time, is_dst=None).strftime(time_fmt)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
pytz.exceptions.AmbiguousTimeError: 2015-11-01 01:30:00
The clocks are turned back at 2a.m. on the first Sunday in November:
is_dst disambiguation flag may have three values:
False -- default, assume the winter time
True -- assume the summer time
None -- raise an exception for ambiguous/non-existent times.
is_dst value is ignored for existing unique local times.
Here's a plot from PEP 0495 -- Local Time Disambiguation that illustrates the DST transition:
The local time repeats itself twice in the fold (summer time -- before the fold, winter time -- after).
To be able to disambiguate the local time automatically, you need some additional info e.g., if you read a series of local times then it may help if you know that they are sorted: Parsing of Ordered Timestamps in Local Time (to UTC) While Observing Daylight Saving Time.
First of all '%s' is not supported on all platforms , its actually working for you because your platform C library’s strftime() function (that is called by Python) supports it. This function is what is causing the issue most probably, I am guessing its not timezone aware , hence when taking difference from epoch time it is using your local timezone, which is most probably EST(?)
Instead of relying on '%s' , which only works in few platforms (linux, I believe) , you should manually subtract the datetime you got from epoch (1970/1/1 00:00:00) to get the actual seconds since epoch . Example -
e = (utc_dt - datetime.datetime(1970,1,1,0,0,0,tzinfo=pytz.utc)).total_seconds()
Demo -
>>> (utc_dt - datetime.datetime(1970,1,1,0,0,0,tzinfo=pytz.utc)).total_seconds()
1429578727.0
This correctly corresponds to the date-time you get.
I don't exactly know why but you have to remove the timezone info from your utc_dt before using %s to print it.
e = int(utc_dt.replace(tzinfo=None).strftime("%s"))
print(e)
return e

get UTC timestamp in python with datetime

Is there a way to get the UTC timestamp by specifying the date? What I would expect:
datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
should result in
1199145600
Creating a naive datetime object means that there is no time zone information. If I look at the documentation for datetime.utcfromtimestamp, creating a UTC timestamp means leaving out the time zone information. So I would guess, that creating a naive datetime object (like I did) would result in a UTC timestamp. However:
then = datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
datetime.utcfromtimestamp(float(then.strftime('%s')))
results in
2007-12-31 23:00:00
Is there still any hidden time zone information in the datetime object? What am I doing wrong?
Naïve datetime versus aware datetime
Default datetime objects are said to be "naïve": they keep time information without the time zone information. Think about naïve datetime as a relative number (ie: +4) without a clear origin (in fact your origin will be common throughout your system boundary).
In contrast, think about aware datetime as absolute numbers (ie: 8) with a common origin for the whole world.
Without timezone information you cannot convert the "naive" datetime towards any non-naive time representation (where does +4 targets if we don't know from where to start ?). This is why you can't have a datetime.datetime.toutctimestamp() method. (cf: http://bugs.python.org/issue1457227)
To check if your datetime dt is naïve, check dt.tzinfo, if None, then it's naïve:
datetime.now() ## DANGER: returns naïve datetime pointing on local time
datetime(1970, 1, 1) ## returns naïve datetime pointing on user given time
I have naïve datetimes, what can I do ?
You must make an assumption depending on your particular context:
The question you must ask yourself is: was your datetime on UTC ? or was it local time ?
If you were using UTC (you are out of trouble):
import calendar
def dt2ts(dt):
"""Converts a datetime object to UTC timestamp
naive datetime will be considered UTC.
"""
return calendar.timegm(dt.utctimetuple())
If you were NOT using UTC, welcome to hell.
You have to make your datetime non-naïve prior to using the former
function, by giving them back their intended timezone.
You'll need the name of the timezone and the information about
if DST was in effect when producing the target naïve datetime (the
last info about DST is required for cornercases):
import pytz ## pip install pytz
mytz = pytz.timezone('Europe/Amsterdam') ## Set your timezone
dt = mytz.normalize(mytz.localize(dt, is_dst=True)) ## Set is_dst accordingly
Consequences of not providing is_dst:
Not using is_dst will generate incorrect time (and UTC timestamp)
if target datetime was produced while a backward DST was put in place
(for instance changing DST time by removing one hour).
Providing incorrect is_dst will of course generate incorrect
time (and UTC timestamp) only on DST overlap or holes. And, when
providing
also incorrect time, occuring in "holes" (time that never existed due
to forward shifting DST), is_dst will give an interpretation of
how to consider this bogus time, and this is the only case where
.normalize(..) will actually do something here, as it'll then
translate it as an actual valid time (changing the datetime AND the
DST object if required). Note that .normalize() is not required
for having a correct UTC timestamp at the end, but is probably
recommended if you dislike the idea of having bogus times in your
variables, especially if you re-use this variable elsewhere.
and AVOID USING THE FOLLOWING: (cf: Datetime Timezone conversion using pytz)
dt = dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone('Europe/Amsterdam')) ## BAD !!
Why? because .replace() replaces blindly the tzinfo without
taking into account the target time and will choose a bad DST object.
Whereas .localize() uses the target time and your is_dst hint
to select the right DST object.
OLD incorrect answer (thanks #J.F.Sebastien for bringing this up):
Hopefully, it is quite easy to guess the timezone (your local origin) when you create your naive datetime object as it is related to the system configuration that you would hopefully NOT change between the naive datetime object creation and the moment when you want to get the UTC timestamp. This trick can be used to give an imperfect question.
By using time.mktime we can create an utc_mktime:
def utc_mktime(utc_tuple):
"""Returns number of seconds elapsed since epoch
Note that no timezone are taken into consideration.
utc tuple must be: (year, month, day, hour, minute, second)
"""
if len(utc_tuple) == 6:
utc_tuple += (0, 0, 0)
return time.mktime(utc_tuple) - time.mktime((1970, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0))
def datetime_to_timestamp(dt):
"""Converts a datetime object to UTC timestamp"""
return int(utc_mktime(dt.timetuple()))
You must make sure that your datetime object is created on the same timezone than the one that has created your datetime.
This last solution is incorrect because it makes the assumption that the UTC offset from now is the same than the UTC offset from EPOCH. Which is not the case for a lot of timezones (in specific moment of the year for the Daylight Saving Time (DST) offsets).
Another possibility is:
d = datetime.datetime.utcnow()
epoch = datetime.datetime(1970,1,1)
t = (d - epoch).total_seconds()
This works as both "d" and "epoch" are naive datetimes, making the "-" operator valid, and returning an interval. total_seconds() turns the interval into seconds. Note that total_seconds() returns a float, even d.microsecond == 0
Also note the calendar.timegm() function as described by this blog entry:
import calendar
calendar.timegm(utc_timetuple)
The output should agree with the solution of vaab.
A simple solution without using external modules:
from datetime import datetime, timezone
dt = datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
int(dt.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc).timestamp())
If input datetime object is in UTC:
>>> dt = datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>>> timestamp = (dt - datetime(1970, 1, 1)).total_seconds()
1199145600.0
Note: it returns float i.e., microseconds are represented as fractions of a second.
If input date object is in UTC:
>>> from datetime import date
>>> utc_date = date(2008, 1, 1)
>>> timestamp = (utc_date.toordinal() - date(1970, 1, 1).toordinal()) * 24*60*60
1199145600
See more details at Converting datetime.date to UTC timestamp in Python.
I feel like the main answer is still not so clear, and it's worth taking the time to understand time and timezones.
The most important thing to understand when dealing with time is that time is relative!
2017-08-30 13:23:00: (a naive datetime), represents a local time somewhere in the world, but note that 2017-08-30 13:23:00 in London is NOT THE SAME TIME as 2017-08-30 13:23:00 in San Francisco.
Because the same time string can be interpreted as different points-in-time depending on where you are in the world, there is a need for an absolute notion of time.
A UTC timestamp is a number in seconds (or milliseconds) from Epoch (defined as 1 January 1970 00:00:00 at GMT timezone +00:00 offset).
Epoch is anchored on the GMT timezone and therefore is an absolute point in time. A UTC timestamp being an offset from an absolute time therefore defines an absolute point in time.
This makes it possible to order events in time.
Without timezone information, time is relative, and cannot be converted to an absolute notion of time without providing some indication of what timezone the naive datetime should be anchored to.
What are the types of time used in computer system?
naive datetime: usually for display, in local time (i.e. in the browser) where the OS can provide timezone information to the program.
UTC timestamps: A UTC timestamp is an absolute point in time, as mentioned above, but it is anchored in a given timezone, so a UTC timestamp can be converted to a datetime in any timezone, however it does not contain timezone information. What does that mean? That means that 1504119325 corresponds to 2017-08-30T18:55:24Z, or 2017-08-30T17:55:24-0100 or also 2017-08-30T10:55:24-0800. It doesn't tell you where the datetime recorded is from. It's usually used on the server side to record events (logs, etc...) or used to convert a timezone aware datetime to an absolute point in time and compute time differences.
ISO-8601 datetime string: The ISO-8601 is a standardized format to record datetime with timezone. (It's in fact several formats, read on here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601) It is used to communicate timezone aware datetime information in a serializable manner between systems.
When to use which? or rather when do you need to care about timezones?
If you need in any way to care about time-of-day, you need timezone information. A calendar or alarm needs time-of-day to set a meeting at the correct time of the day for any user in the world. If this data is saved on a server, the server needs to know what timezone the datetime corresponds to.
To compute time differences between events coming from different places in the world, UTC timestamp is enough, but you lose the ability to analyze at what time of day events occured (ie. for web analytics, you may want to know when users come to your site in their local time: do you see more users in the morning or the evening? You can't figure that out without time of day information.
Timezone offset in a date string:
Another point that is important, is that timezone offset in a date string is not fixed. That means that because 2017-08-30T10:55:24-0800 says the offset -0800 or 8 hours back, doesn't mean that it will always be!
In the summer it may well be in daylight saving time, and it would be -0700
What that means is that timezone offset (+0100) is not the same as timezone name (Europe/France) or even timezone designation (CET)
America/Los_Angeles timezone is a place in the world, but it turns into PST (Pacific Standard Time) timezone offset notation in the winter, and PDT (Pacific Daylight Time) in the summer.
So, on top of getting the timezone offset from the datestring, you should also get the timezone name to be accurate.
Most packages will be able to convert numeric offsets from daylight saving time to standard time on their own, but that is not necessarily trivial with just offset. For example WAT timezone designation in West Africa, is UTC+0100 just like CET timezone in France, but France observes daylight saving time, while West Africa does not (because they're close to the equator)
So, in short, it's complicated. VERY complicated, and that's why you should not do this yourself, but trust a package that does it for you, and KEEP IT UP TO DATE!
There is indeed a problem with using utcfromtimestamp and specifying time zones. A nice example/explanation is available on the following question:
How to specify time zone (UTC) when converting to Unix time? (Python)
The accepted answer seems not work for me. My solution:
import time
utc_0 = int(time.mktime(datetime(1970, 01, 01).timetuple()))
def datetime2ts(dt):
"""Converts a datetime object to UTC timestamp"""
return int(time.mktime(dt.utctimetuple())) - utc_0
Simplest way:
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> dt = datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>>> dt.strftime("%s")
'1199163600'
Edit: #Daniel is correct, this would convert it to the machine's timezone. Here is a revised answer:
>>> from datetime import datetime, timezone
>>> epoch = datetime(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, timezone.utc)
>>> dt = datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, timezone.utc)
>>> int((dt-epoch).total_seconds())
'1199145600'
In fact, its not even necessary to specify timezone.utc, because the time difference is the same so long as both datetime have the same timezone (or no timezone).
>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> epoch = datetime(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>>> dt = datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
>>> int((dt-epoch).total_seconds())
1199145600
I think the correct way to phrase your question is
Is there a way to get the timestamp by specifying the date in UTC?, because timestamp is just a number which is absolute, not relative. The relative (or timezone aware) piece is the date.
I find pandas very convenient for timestamps, so:
import pandas as pd
dt1 = datetime(2008, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0)
ts1 = pd.Timestamp(dt1, tz='utc').timestamp()
# make sure you get back dt1
datetime.utcfromtimestamp(ts1)

Categories