I am trying to run a simple threading function within my simple class.
I am trying to call the Thread function within a method of a class. This Thread function within this method points to another method within the class. The way I tested it out is through the python terminal. Here is my class in increment_thread.py:
from threading import Thread
import time
class Increment:
def __init__(self):
self.count = 0
def add_one(self):
while True:
self.count = self.count + 1
time.sleep(5)
def start(self):
background_thread = Thread(target=add_one)
background_thread.start()
print("Started counting up")
return
def get_count(self):
return print(self.count)
In order to test this, I run python in my terminal, which prompt the python terminal.
Then, I run the following lines:
from increment_thread import Increment
inc = Increment()
inc.get_count() # Yields 0
inc.start()
I expect the thread to start and indicate "Started counting up", but instead I get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "~/python-sandbox/increment_thread.py", line 14, in start
background_thread = Thread(target=add_one)
NameError: name 'add_one' is not defined
Is what I am trying to do possible?
In the Thread constructor should it not be target=self.add_one rather than target=add_one
To pass parameters:
from threading import Thread
import time
class Increment:
count = None
def __init__(self):
self.count = 0
def add_one(self, start_at=0):
self.count = start_at
while True:
self.count = self.count + 1
time.sleep(5)
def start_inc(self, start_at=count):
# Pass args parameter as a tuple
background_thread = Thread(target=self.add_one, args=(start_at,))
background_thread.start()
print("Started counting up")
return
def get_count(self):
return print(self.count)
if __name__ == "__main__":
inc = Increment()
inc.get_count() # Yields 0
inc.start_inc(start_at=5)
while True:
inc.get_count()
time.sleep(2)
Just like class fields, class methods need to be referred to using self.method syntax. So
def start(self):
background_thread = Thread(target=self.add_one)
background_thread.start()
print("Started counting up")
return
Related
I am trying to call different functions based on the value for rb_selection, calling func1 if rb_selection value is 0 and calling func2 if rb_selection value is 1. Both functions take a different set of arguments.
I do not need folder argument(func2 values) when I call func1 and similarly I do not need batch, term arguments(func1 values) when I call func2
It throws me the below error when I try to call the second function, as the values for batch, term are not passed.
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\Himajak\Anaconda3\lib\tkinter\__init__.py", line 1705, in __call__
return self.func(*args)
File "<ipython-input-13-02b5f954b815>", line 122, in tb_click
ThreadedTask(self.queue,self.batch_name,self.term_name,self.course,self.rb_selection,self.folder).start()
AttributeError: 'GUI' object has no attribute 'batch_name'
Code looks similar to this:
class class1():
def def1(self):
self.queue = queue.Queue()
ThreadedTask(self.queue,self.rb_selection,self.batch_name,self.folder).start()
#self.master.after(10, self.process_queue)
class class2():
def __init__(self, queue,rb_selection, batch_name ,term_name, folder):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.queue = queue
self.rb_selection = rb_selection
self.batch = batch_name
self.term = term_name
self.folder = folder
def func1(self,batch,term):
time.sleep(5)
print("Fucntion 1 reached")
print(self.batch,self.term)
def func2(self,folder):
time.sleep(5)
print("Function 2 reached")
print(self.folder)
def run(self):
time.sleep(0) # Simulate long running process
if self.rb_selection == '0':
self.func1(self.batch,self.term)
elif self.rb_selection == '1':
self.func2(self.folder)
self.queue.put("Task finished")
Please suggest on how to resolve this issue, thanks in advance!
There is no concept of optional arguments, you can give default value when creating the function like
def __init__(self, queue,rb_selection ,term_name, folder, batch_name="default batch name"):
So that you need not pass batch_name while creating the Instance.
I have a python program with a thread and the thread should write into a file. I will spawn a thread from the main program. Now on new day trigger I will change the file pointer in the main program and I want the thread also to take the new file to write the data to the file.
I have a code which will take global variable and do this task. But is there any other better way of doing this?
#!/usr/bin/env python
import sys
import threading
import time
filePtr = None
import time
def fileWriteTh():
global filePtr
time.sleep(2)
filePtr.write("from the thrread this should in file 2")
def main():
global filePtr
filePtr = open("test1.txt","ab")
fileThread = threading.Thread(target=fileWriteTh)
fileThread.start()
if new_day_trigger:
filePtr.close()
filePtr = open("test2.txt","ab")
fileThread.join()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
This is the new code that is written:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import sys
import threading
import time
class SendPacket(object):
fileDesc = None
def __init__(self, fd):
super(SendPacket, self).__init__()
SendPacket.fileDesc = fd
def printFromInstance(self,var):
print var
SendPacket.fileDesc.write(var)
time.sleep(3)
print var
SendPacket.fileDesc.write(var)
def startabc(self, someVar):
self.printFromInstance(someVar)
#classmethod
def printVar(cls, printStr):
print printStr
cls.fileDesc.write(printStr)
#classmethod
def changeClsFile(cls, newFd):
cls.fileDesc = newFd
def main():
filePtr = open("test1.txt","ab")
sendPack_inst = SendPacket(filePtr)
fileThread = threading.Thread(target=sendPack_inst.startabc, args=("test1",))
fileThread.start()
time.sleep(2)
filePtr.close()
filePtr = open("test2.txt","ab")
SendPacket.changeClsFile(filePtr)
fileThread.join()
filePtr.close()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Like this:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import sys
import thread
import time
class _fileACT :
def __init__(self):
self.trigger = 0
self.flag = True
self.msg = ""
self.files = (open("test1.txt","ab"),open("test2.txt","ab"))
def run(self,pssrg):
while self.flag :
if self.msg != "" :
self.files[self.trigger].write(self.msg)
self.msg = ""
def test(self,pssrg):
for i in range(20):
time.sleep(1)
if i %2 != 0 :
self.trigger = 0
elif i %2 != 1:
self.trigger = 1
self.msg = "%0.3d test-1,asdasdasd\n"%i
time.sleep(0.5)
print "wait..."
self.flag = False
for e in self.files : e.close()
print "can exit !"
if __name__ == "__main__":
fileACT = _fileACT()
thread.start_new_thread(fileACT.run,(None,))
thread.start_new_thread(fileACT.test,(None,))
We have three variables, filename, last opened file name and message. Two files, only False and True will be sufficient (of course you can use index for multiple files). We've written a test function into the class because we don't want our main cycle to freeze. The file selection is done with ' trigger ', but the previous and next file name is not the same, the previous closes.
The important point in the thread is that the time delay is strictly unavailable! The time delay is always applied to the trigger. The time delay cannot be placed in the main loop. An instance of access from outside the class is also attached. I hope it helps.
When i run the code below, i got an exception
# System
import time
import logging
import sys
import os
import threading
# cv2 and helper:
import cv2
class inic_thread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, threadID, name, counter):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.threadID = threadID
self.name = name
self.counter = counter
def run(self):
print "Starting " + self.name
if self.counter == 1: capture_continuos()
elif self.counter == 2: face_search()
def capture_continuos():
#os.system('python capture_continuos.py')
while(1):
print 'a'
def face_search():
# atributes
pool = []
path_pool = './pool/'
while(1):
pool_get = os.listdir(path_pool)
if len(pool_get) > 0:
#print(str(len(pool_get))+' images in the pool')
for image in pool_get:
print(image)
os.system('python face_search.py -i '+str(image))
else:
print('Empty Pool')
try:
capture_continuos = inic_thread(1, "capture_continuos_1", 1)
face_search_2 = inic_thread(2, "face_search_2", 2)
capture_continuos.start()
face_search_2.start()
except:
print("Error: unable to start thread")
But it don't make sense to me, because one of the threads run normal, (face_search) but the other one give this exception.
Starting capture_continuos_1
Exception in thread capture_continuos_1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 801, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "main.py", line 44, in run
if self.counter == 1: capture_continuos()
TypeError: 'inic_thread' object is not callable
What i'm doing wrong?
I run in a Raspberry Pi 3 model B with Ubuntu MATE 14.04; Python 2.7.12
At the bottom of your script you redefine variable capture_continuos assigning thread object to it.
Also as was mentioned to terminate thread it's better to call os._exit() instead of sys.exit().
I'm using Python's multiprocessing library to process a list of inputs with the built-in map() method. Here's the relevant code segment:
subp_pool = Pool(self.subprocesses)
cases = subp_pool.map(self.get_case, input_list)
return cases
The function to be run in parallel is self.get_case(), and the list of inputs is input_list.
I wish to print a progress prompt to the standard output in the following format:
Working (25/100 cases processed)
How can I update a local variable inside the class that contains the Pool, so that whenever a subprocess finishes, the variable is incremented by 1 (and then printed to the standard output)?
There's no way to do this using multiprocessing.map, because it doesn't alert the main process about anything until it's completed all its tasks. However, you can get similar behavior by using apply_async in tandem with the callback keyword argument:
from multiprocessing.dummy import Pool
from functools import partial
import time
class Test(object):
def __init__(self):
self.count = 0
self.threads = 4
def get_case(self, x):
time.sleep(x)
def callback(self, total, x):
self.count += 1
print("Working ({}/{}) cases processed.".format(self.count, total))
def do_async(self):
thread_pool = Pool(self.threads)
input_list = range(5)
callback = partial(self.callback, len(input_list))
tasks = [thread_pool.apply_async(self.get_case, (x,),
callback=callback) for x in input_list]
return [task.get() for task in tasks]
if __name__ == "__main__":
t = Test()
t.do_async()
Call the print_data() from the get_case() method and you are done.
from threading import Lock
Class A(object):
def __init__(self):
self.mutex = Lock()
self.count = 0
def print_data(self):
self.mutex.acquire()
try:
self.count += 1
print('Working (' + str(self.count) + 'cases processed)')
finally:
self.mutex.release()
I am trying to write a method that counts down to a given time and unless a restart command is given, it will execute the task. But I don't think Python threading.Timer class allows for timer to be cancelable.
import threading
def countdown(action):
def printText():
print 'hello!'
t = threading.Timer(5.0, printText)
if (action == 'reset'):
t.cancel()
t.start()
I know the above code is wrong somehow. Would appreciate some kind guidance over here.
You would call the cancel method after you start the timer:
import time
import threading
def hello():
print "hello, world"
time.sleep(2)
t = threading.Timer(3.0, hello)
t.start()
var = 'something'
if var == 'something':
t.cancel()
You might consider using a while-loop on a Thread, instead of using a Timer.
Here is an example appropriated from Nikolaus Gradwohl's answer to another question:
import threading
import time
class TimerClass(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.event = threading.Event()
self.count = 10
def run(self):
while self.count > 0 and not self.event.is_set():
print self.count
self.count -= 1
self.event.wait(1)
def stop(self):
self.event.set()
tmr = TimerClass()
tmr.start()
time.sleep(3)
tmr.stop()
I'm not sure if I understand correctly. Do you want to write something like in this example?
>>> import threading
>>> t = None
>>>
>>> def sayHello():
... global t
... print "Hello!"
... t = threading.Timer(0.5, sayHello)
... t.start()
...
>>> sayHello()
Hello!
Hello!
Hello!
Hello!
Hello!
>>> t.cancel()
>>>
The threading.Timer class does have a cancel method, and although it won't cancel the thread, it will stop the timer from actually firing. What actually happens is that the cancel method sets a threading.Event, and the thread actually executing the threading.Timer will check that event after it's done waiting and before it actually executes the callback.
That said, timers are usually implemented without using a separate thread for each one. The best way to do it depends on what your program is actually doing (while waiting for this timer), but anything with an event loop, like GUI and network frameworks, all have ways to request a timer that is hooked into the eventloop.
Im not sure if best option but for me is woking like this:
t = timer_mgr(.....) append to list "timers.append(t)" and then after all created you can call:
for tm in timers:#threading.enumerate():
print "********", tm.cancel()
my timer_mgr() class is this:
class timer_mgr():
def __init__(self, st, t, hFunction, id, name):
self.is_list = (type(st) is list)
self.st = st
self.t = t
self.id = id
self.hFunction = hFunction
self.thread = threading.Timer(t, self.handle_function, [id])
self.thread.name = name
def handle_function(self, id):
if self.is_list:
print "run_at_time:", datetime.now()
self.hFunction(id)
dt = schedule_fixed_times(datetime.now(), self.st)
print "next:", dt
self.t = (dt-datetime.now()).total_seconds()
else:
self.t = self.st
print "run_every", self.t, datetime.now()
self.hFunction(id)
self.thread = threading.Timer(self.t, self.handle_function, [id])
self.thread.start()
def start(self):
self.thread.start()
def cancel(self):
self.thread.cancel()
Inspired by above post.
Cancelable and Resetting Timer in Python. It uses thread.
Features: Start, Stop, Restart, callback function.
Input: Timeout, sleep_chunk values, and callback_function.
Can use or inherit this class in any other program. Can also pass arguments to the callback function.
Timer should respond in middle also. Not just after completion of full sleep time. So instead of using one full sleep, using small chunks of sleep and kept checking event object in loop.
import threading
import time
class TimerThread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, timeout=3, sleep_chunk=0.25, callback=None, *args):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.timeout = timeout
self.sleep_chunk = sleep_chunk
if callback == None:
self.callback = None
else:
self.callback = callback
self.callback_args = args
self.terminate_event = threading.Event()
self.start_event = threading.Event()
self.reset_event = threading.Event()
self.count = self.timeout/self.sleep_chunk
def run(self):
while not self.terminate_event.is_set():
while self.count > 0 and self.start_event.is_set():
# print self.count
# time.sleep(self.sleep_chunk)
# if self.reset_event.is_set():
if self.reset_event.wait(self.sleep_chunk): # wait for a small chunk of timeout
self.reset_event.clear()
self.count = self.timeout/self.sleep_chunk # reset
self.count -= 1
if self.count <= 0:
self.start_event.clear()
#print 'timeout. calling function...'
self.callback(*self.callback_args)
self.count = self.timeout/self.sleep_chunk #reset
def start_timer(self):
self.start_event.set()
def stop_timer(self):
self.start_event.clear()
self.count = self.timeout / self.sleep_chunk # reset
def restart_timer(self):
# reset only if timer is running. otherwise start timer afresh
if self.start_event.is_set():
self.reset_event.set()
else:
self.start_event.set()
def terminate(self):
self.terminate_event.set()
#=================================================================
def my_callback_function():
print 'timeout, do this...'
timeout = 6 # sec
sleep_chunk = .25 # sec
tmr = TimerThread(timeout, sleep_chunk, my_callback_function)
tmr.start()
quit = '0'
while True:
quit = raw_input("Proceed or quit: ")
if quit == 'q':
tmr.terminate()
tmr.join()
break
tmr.start_timer()
if raw_input("Stop ? : ") == 's':
tmr.stop_timer()
if raw_input("Restart ? : ") == 'r':
tmr.restart_timer()