We Keep Coding

Python Script input via Bash Shell

I have a python script which i am calling from bash script and this bash script get call from cron
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit
set -o xtrace
echo "Verify/Update Firmware"
/usr/bin/python -u /usr/bin/Update.py
Now when this python run it ask for some input(from keyboard), but i am not able to capture it. How my python can get input in this scenario?
Python script look like below
ip = raw_input('Enter IP for Switch')
tn = telnetlib.Telnet ( ip, 23, 600 )

For giving command line arguments to a bash script you can use $1, $2, $3 etc. The tutorial here talks about this: http://linuxcommand.org/lc3_wss0120.php
For the python part you can use something like argparse to do this pretty nicely. This also had loads of tutorials out there.

For a single line of input use this:
echo "input" | command arg1 arg2
For multiple lines write the expected input to a file, then redirect the input:
command arg1 arg2 < inputfile
It is not guaranteed to work depending on many details.
Please consider the risk of blindly giving input without reading what the program wants.
For a more sophisticated solution check the expect utility.

Call a bash function within a python script

I have a python script (e.g. test.py) and a commands.txt file which contains a custom bash function (e.g. my_func) along with its parameters, e.g.
my_func arg1 arv2; my_func arg3 arg4; my_func arg5 arg6;
This function is included in the ~/.bash_profile.
What I have tried to do is:
subprocess.call(['.', path/to/commands.txt], shell=True)
I know this is not the best case, in terms of setting the shell argument into True, but I cannot seem to implement it even in this way. What I get when I run test.py is:
my_func: command not found

You will need to invoke bash directly, and instruct it to process both files.
At the command-line, this is:
bash -c '. ~/.bash_profile; . commands.txt'
Wrapping it in python:
subprocess.call(['bash', '-c', '. ~/.bash_profile; . commands.txt'])
You could also source ~/.bash_profile at the top of commands.txt. Then you'd be able to run a single file.
It may make sense to extract the function to a separate file, since .bash_profile is intended to be used by login shells, not like this.

If the first line of your commands.txt file had the correct shebang (for example #!/bin/bash) making your file executable (chmod +x commands.txt) will be enough :
subprocess.call("path/to/commands.txt")

How to execute a bash script from a Python string in Jupyter Notebook?

I am using Jupyter Notebook and would like to execute a bash script from a python string. I have a python cell creating the bash script which then I need to print, copy to another cell, and then run it. Is it possible to use something like exec('print('hello world!')')?
Here is an example of my bash script:
%%bash -s "$folder_dir" "$name_0" "$name_1" "$name_2" "$name_3" "$name_4" "$name_5" "$name_6" "$name_7" "$name_8" "$name_9" "$name_10" "$name_11"
cd $1
ds9 ${2} ${3} ${4} ${5} ${6} ${7} ${8} ${9} ${10} ${11} ${12} ${13}
If not possible, then how can I go to a different directory, and run
ds9 dir1 dir2 dir3 ...
within my Jupyter Notebook since I only can initialize dir's using python. Note that the number of dir's is not fixed every time I run my code. ds9 is just a command to open multiple astronomical images at the same time.
I know I can save my bash script to a .sh file and execute that, but I am looking for a classier solution.

The subprocess module is the Right Thing for invoking external software -- in a shell or otherwise -- from Python.
import subprocess
folder_dir="/" # your directory
names=["name_one", "name_two"] # this is your list of names you want to open
subprocess.check_call(
['cd "$1" || exit; shift; exec ds9 "$#"', "_", folder_dir] + names,
shell=True)
How it works (Python)
When passing a Python list with shell=True, the first item in that list is the script to run; the second is the value of $0 when that script is running, and subsequent items are values for $1 and onward.
Note that this runs sh -c '...' with your command. sh is not bash, but (in modern systems) a POSIX sh interpreter. It's thus important not to use bash-only syntax in this context.
How it works (Shell)
Let's go over this line-by-line:
cd "$1" || exit # try to cd to the directory passed as $1; abort if that fails
shift # remove $1 from our argument list; the old $2 is now $1, &c.
exec ds9 "$#" # replace the shell in memory with the "ds9" program (as an efficiency
# ...measure), with our argument list appended to it.
Note that "$1" and "$#" are quoted. Any unquoted expansion will be string-split and glob-expanded; without this change, you won't be able to open files with spaces in their names.

bash wrap a piped command with a python script

Is there a way to create a python script which wraps an entire bash command including the pipes.
For example, if I have the following simple script
import sys
print sys.argv
and call it like so (from bash or ipython), I get the expected outcome:
[pkerp#pendari trell]$ python test.py ls
['test.py', 'ls']
If I add a pipe, however, the output of the script gets redirected to the pipe sink:
[pkerp#pendari trell]$ python test.py ls > out.txt
And the > out.txt portion is not in sys.argv. I understand that the shell automatically process this output, but I'm curious if there's a way to force the shell to ignore it and pass it to the process being called.
The point of this is to create something like a wrapper for the shell. I'd like to run the commands regularly, but keep track of the strace output for each command (including the pipes). Ideally I'd like to keep all of the bash features, such as tab-completion and up and down arrows and history search, and then just pass the completed command through a python script which invokes a subprocess to handle it.
Is this possible, or would I have to write my own shell to do this?
Edit
It appears I'm asking the exact same thing as this question.

The only thing you can do is pass the entire shell command as a string, then let Python pass it back to a shell for execution.
$ python test.py "ls > out.txt"
Inside test.py, something like
subprocess.call("strace " + sys.argv[1], shell=True, executable="/bin/bash")
to ensure the entire string is passed to the shell (and bash, specifically).

Well, I don't quite see what you are trying to do. The general approach would be to give the desired output destination to the script using command line options: python test.py ls --output=out.txt. Incidentally, strace writes to stderr. You could capture everything using strace python test.py > out 2> err if you want to save everything...
Edit: If your script writes to stderr as well you could use strace -o strace_out python test.py > script_out 2> script_err
Edit2: Okay, I understand better what you want. My suggestion is this: Write a bash helper:
function process_and_evaluate()
{
strace -o /tmp/output/strace_output "$#"
/path/to/script.py /tmp/output/strace_output
}
Put this in a file like ~/helper.sh. Then open a bash, source it using . ~/helper.sh.
Now you can run it like this: process_and_evaluate ls -lA.
Edit3:
To capture output / error you could extend the macro like this:
function process_and_evaluate()
{
out=$1
err=$2
shift 2
strace -o /tmp/output/strace_output "$#" > "$out" 2> "$err"
/path/to/script.py /tmp/output/strace_output
}
You would have to use the (less obvious ) process_and_evaluate out.txt err.txt ls -lA.
This is the best that I can come up with...

At least in your simple example, you could just run the python script as an argument to echo, e.g.
$ echo $(python test.py ls) > test.txt
$ more test.txt
['test.py','ls']
Enclosing a command in parenthesis with a dollar sign first executes the contents then passes the output as an argument to echo.

Shell Script: Execute a python program from within a shell script

I've tried googling the answer but with no luck.
I need to use my works supercomputer server, but for my python script to run, it must be executed via a shell script.
For example I want job.sh to execute python_script.py
How can this be accomplished?

Just make sure the python executable is in your PATH environment variable then add in your script
python path/to/the/python_script.py
Details:
In the file job.sh, put this
#!/bin/sh
python python_script.py
Execute this command to make the script runnable for you : chmod u+x job.sh
Run it : ./job.sh

Method 1 - Create a shell script:
Suppose you have a python file hello.py
Create a file called job.sh that contains
#!/bin/bash
python hello.py
mark it executable using
$ chmod +x job.sh
then run it
$ ./job.sh
Method 2 (BETTER) - Make the python itself run from shell:
Modify your script hello.py and add this as the first line
#!/usr/bin/env python
mark it executable using
$ chmod +x hello.py
then run it
$ ./hello.py

Save the following program as print.py:
#!/usr/bin/python3
print('Hello World')
Then in the terminal type:
chmod +x print.py
./print.py

You should be able to invoke it as python scriptname.py e.g.
# !/bin/bash
python /home/user/scriptname.py
Also make sure the script has permissions to run.
You can make it executable by using chmod u+x scriptname.py.

Imho, writing
python /path/to/script.py
Is quite wrong, especially in these days. Which python? python2.6? 2.7? 3.0? 3.1? Most of times you need to specify the python version in shebang tag of python file. I encourage to use #!/usr/bin/env python2 #or python2.6 or python3 or even python3.1 for compatibility.
In such case, is much better to have the script executable and invoke it directly:
#!/bin/bash
/path/to/script.py
This way the version of python you need is only written in one file. Most of system these days are having python2 and python3 in the meantime, and it happens that the symlink python points to python3, while most people expect it pointing to python2.

This works for me:
Create a new shell file job. So let's say:
touch job.sh and add command to run python script (you can even add command line arguments to that python, I usually predefine my command line arguments).
chmod +x job.sh
Inside job.sh add the following py files, let's say:
python_file.py argument1 argument2 argument3 >> testpy-output.txt && echo "Done with python_file.py"
python_file1.py argument1 argument2 argument3 >> testpy-output.txt && echo "Done with python_file1.py"
Output of job.sh should look like this:
Done with python_file.py
Done with python_file1.py
I use this usually when I have to run multiple python files with different arguments, pre defined.
Note: Just a quick heads up on what's going on here:
python_file.py argument1 argument2 argument3 >> testpy-output.txt && echo "completed with python_file.py" .
Here shell script will run the file python_file.py and add multiple command-line arguments at run time to the python file.
This does not necessarily means, you have to pass command line arguments as well.
You can just use it like: python python_file.py, plain and simple.
Next up, the >> will print and store the output of this .py file in the testpy-output.txt file.
&& is a logical operator that will run only after the above is executed successfully and as an optional echo "completed with python_file.py" will be echoed on to your cli/terminal at run time.

This works best for me:
Add this at the top of the script:
#!c:/Python27/python.exe
(C:\Python27\python.exe is the path to the python.exe on my machine)
Then run the script via:
chmod +x script-name.py && script-name.py

I use this and it works fine
#/bin/bash
/usr/bin/python python python_script.py

Since the other posts say everything (and I stumbled upon this post while looking for the following).
Here is a way how to execute a python script from another python script:
Python 2:
execfile("somefile.py", global_vars, local_vars)
Python 3:
with open("somefile.py") as f:
code = compile(f.read(), "somefile.py", 'exec')
exec(code, global_vars, local_vars)
and you can supply args by providing some other sys.argv

Here I have demonstrated an example to run python script within a shell script. For different purposes you may need to read the output from a shell command, execute both python script and shell command within the same file.
To execute a shell command from python use os.system() method. To read output from a shell command use os.popen().
Following is an example which will grep all processes having the text sample_program.py inside of it. Then after collecting the process IDs (using python) it will kill them all.
#!/usr/bin/python3
import os
# listing all matched processes and taking the output into a variable s
s = os.popen("ps aux | grep 'sample_program.py'").read()
s = '\n'.join([l for l in s.split('\n') if "grep" not in l]) # avoiding killing the grep itself
print("To be killed:")
print(s)
# now manipulating this string s and finding the process IDs and killing them
os.system("kill -9 " + ' '.join([x.split()[1] for x in s.split('\n') if x]))
References:
Execute a python program from within a shell script
Assign output of os.system to a variable and prevent it from being displayed on the screen

If you have a bash script and you need to run inside of it a python3 script (with external modules), I recommend that you point in your bash script to your python path like this.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
-- bash code --
/usr/bin/python3 your_python.py
-- bash code --