I have a MxN array of values taken from an experiment. Some of these values are invalid and are set to 0 to indicate such. I can construct a mask of valid/invalid values using
mask = (mat1 == 0) & (mat2 == 0)
which produces an MxN array of bool. It should be noted that the masked locations do not neatly follow columns or rows of the matrix - so simply cropping the matrix is not an option.
Now, I want to take the mean along one axis of my array (E.G end up with a 1xN array) while excluding those invalid values in the mean calculation. Intuitively I thought
np.mean(mat1[mask],axis=1)
should do it, but the mat1[mask] operation produces a 1D array which appears to just be the elements where mask is true - which doesn't help when I only want a mean across one dimension of the array.
Is there a 'python-esque' or numpy way to do this? I suppose I could use the mask to set masked elements to NaN and use np.nanmean - but that still feels kind of clunky. Is there a way to do this 'cleanly'?
I think the best way to do this would be something along the lines of:
masked = np.ma.masked_where(mat1 == 0 && mat2 == 0, array_to_mask)
Then take the mean with
masked.mean(axis=1)
One similarly clunky but efficient way is to multiply your array with the mask, setting the masked values to zero. Then of course you'll have to divide by the number of non-masked values manually. Hence clunkiness. But this will work with integer-valued arrays, something that can't be said about the nan case. It also seems to be fastest for both small and larger arrays (including the masked array solution in another answer):
import numpy as np
def nanny(mat, mask):
mat = mat.astype(float).copy() # don't mutate the original
mat[~mask] = np.nan # mask values
return np.nanmean(mat, axis=0) # compute mean
def manual(mat, mask):
# zero masked values, divide by number of nonzeros
return (mat*mask).sum(axis=0)/mask.sum(axis=0)
# set up dummy data for testing
N,M = 400,400
mat1 = np.random.randint(0,N,(N,M))
mask = np.random.randint(0,2,(N,M)).astype(bool)
print(np.array_equal(nanny(mat1, mask), manual(mat1, mask))) # True
Related
I have a 3 dimensional array of hape (365, x, y) where 36 corresponds to =daily data. In some cases, all the elements along the time axis axis=0 are np.nan.
The time series for each point along the axis=0 looks something like this:
I need to find the index at which the maximum value (peak data) occurs and then the two minimum values on each side of the peak.
import numpy as np
a = np.random.random(365, 3, 3) * 10
a[:, 0, 0] = np.nan
peak_mask = np.ma.masked_array(a, np.isnan(a))
peak_indexes = np.nanargmax(peak_mask, axis=0)
I can find the minimum before the peak using something like this:
early_minimum_indexes = np.full_like(peak_indexes, fill_value=0)
for i in range(peak_indexes.shape[0]):
for j in range(peak_indexes.shape[1]):
if peak_indexes[i, j] == 0:
early_minimum_indexes[i, j] = 0
else:
early_mask = np.ma.masked_array(a, np.isnan(a))
early_loc = np.nanargmin(early_mask[:peak_indexes[i, j], i, j], axis=0)
early_minimum_indexes[i, j] = early_loc
With the resulting peak and trough plotted like this:
This approach is very unreasonable time-wise for large arrays (1m+ elements). Is there a better way to do this using numpy?
While using masked arrays may not be the most efficient solution in this case, it will allow you to perform masked operations on specific axes while more-or-less preserving shape, which is a great convenience. Keep in mind that in many cases, the masked functions will still end up copying the masked data.
You have mostly the right idea in your current code, but you missed a couple of tricks, like being able to negate and combine masks. Also the fact that allocating masks as boolean up front is more efficient, and little nitpicks like np.full(..., 0) -> np.zeros(..., dtype=bool).
Let's work through this backwards. Let's say you had a well-behaved 1-D array with a peak, say a1. You can use masking to easily find the maxima and minima (or indices) like this:
peak_index = np.nanargmax(a1)
mask = np.zeros(a1.size, dtype=np.bool)
mask[peak:] = True
trough_plus = np.nanargmin(np.ma.array(a1, mask=~mask))
trough_minus = np.nanargmin(np.ma.array(a1, mask=mask))
This respects the fact that masked arrays flip the sense of the mask relative to normal numpy boolean indexing. It's also OK that the maximum value appears in the calculation of trough_plus, since it's guaranteed not to be a minimum (unless you have the all-nan situation).
Now if a1 was a masked array already (but still 1D), you could do the same thing, but combine the masks temporarily. For example:
a1 = np.ma.array(a1, mask=np.isnan(a1))
peak_index = a1.argmax()
mask = np.zeros(a1.size, dtype=np.bool)
mask[peak:] = True
trough_plus = np.ma.masked_array(a1, mask=a.mask | ~mask).argmin()
trough_minus (np.ma.masked_array(a1, mask=a.mask | mask).argmin()
Again, since masked arrays have reversed masks, it's important to combine the masks using | instead of &, as you would for normal numpy boolean masks. In this case, there is no need for calling the nan version of argmax and argmin, since all the nans are already masked out.
Hopefully, the generalization to multiple dimensions becomes clear from here, given the prevalence of the axis keyword in numpy functions:
a = np.ma.array(a, mask=np.isnan(a))
peak_indices = a.argmax(axis=0).reshape(1, *a.shape[1:])
mask = np.arange(a.shape[0]).reshape(-1, *(1,) * (a.ndim - 1)) >= peak_indices
trough_plus = np.ma.masked_array(a, mask=~mask | a.mask).argmin(axis=0)
trough_minus = np.ma.masked_array(a, mask=mask | a.mask).argmin(axis=0)
N-dimensional masking technique comes from Fill mask efficiently based on start indices, which was asked just for this purpose.
Here is a method that
copies the data
saves all nan positions and replaces all nans with global min-1
finds the rowwise argmax
subtracts its value from the entire row
note that each row now has only non-positive values with the max value now being zero
zeros all nan positions
flips the sign of all values right of the max
this is the main idea; it creates a new row-global max at the position where before there was the right hand min; at the same time it ensures that the left hand min is now row-global
retrieves the rowwise argmin and argmax, these are the postitions of the left and right mins in the original array
finds all-nan rows and overwrites the max and min indices at these positions with INVALINT
Code:
INVALINT = -9999
t,x,y = a.shape
t,x,y = np.ogrid[:t,:x,:y]
inval = np.isnan(a)
b = np.where(inval,np.nanmin(a)-1,a)
pk = b.argmax(axis=0)
pkval = b[pk,x,y]
b -= pkval
b[inval] = 0
b[t>pk[None]] *= -1
ltr = b.argmin(axis=0)
rtr = b.argmax(axis=0)
del b
inval = inval.all(axis=0)
pk[inval] = INVALINT
ltr[inval] = INVALINT
rtr[inval] = INVALINT
# result is now in ltr ("left trough"), pk ("peak") and rtr
I have a numpy boolean vector of shape 1 x N, and an 2d array with shape 160 x N. What is a fast way of subsetting the columns of the 2d array such that for each index of the boolean vector that has True in it, the column is kept, and for each index of the boolean vector that has False in it, the column is discarded?
If you call the vector mask and the array features, i've found the following to be far too slow: np.array([f[mask] for f in features])
Is there a better way? I feel like there has to be, right?
You can try this,
new_array = 2d_array[:,bool_array==True]
So depending on the axes you can select which one you want to remove. In case you get a 1-d array, then you can just reshape it and get the required array. This method will be faster also.
I have a 2D numpy array that I need to mask based on a condition so that I can apply an operation to the masked array then revert the masked values back to the original.
For example:
import numpy as np
array = np.random.random((3,3))
condition = np.random.randint(0, 2, (3,3))
masked = np.ma.array(array, mask=condition)
masked += 2.0
But how can I change the masked values back to the original and "remove" the mask after applying a given operation to the masked array?
The reason why I need to do this is that I am generating a boolean array based on a set of conditions and I need to modify the elements of the array that satisfy the condition.
I could use boolean indexing to do this with a 1D array, but with the 2D array I need to retain its original shape ie. not return a 1D array with only the values satisfying the condition(s).
The accepted answer doesn't answer the question. Assigning the mask to False works in practice but many algorithms do not support masked arrays (e.g. scipy.linalg.lstsq()) and this method doesn't get rid of it. So you will experience an error like this:
ValueError: masked arrays are not supported
The only way to really get rid of the mask is assigning the variable only to the data of the masked array.
import numpy as np
array = np.random.random((3,3))
condition = np.random.randint(0, 2, (3,3))
masked = np.ma.array(array, mask=condition)
masked += 2.0
masked.mask = False
hasattr(masked, 'mask')
>> True
Assigning the variable to the data using the MaskedArray data attribute:
masked = masked.data
hasattr(masked, 'mask')
>> False
You already have it: it's called array!
This is because while masked makes sure you only increment certain values in the matrix, the data is never actually copied. So once your code executes, array has the elements at condition incremented, and the rest remain unchanged.
I have a 2-D array of values and need to mask certain elements of that array (with indices taken from a list of ~ 100k tuple-pairs) before drawing random samples from the remaining elements without replacement.
I need something that is both quite fast/efficient (hopefully avoiding for loops) and has a small memory footprint because in practice the master array is ~ 20000 x 20000.
For now I'd be content with something like (for illustration):
xys=[(1,2),(3,4),(6,9),(7,3)]
gxx,gyy=numpy.mgrid[0:100,0:100]
mask = numpy.where((gxx,gyy) not in set(xys)) # The bit I can't get right
# Now sample the masked array
draws=numpy.random.choice(master_array[mask].flatten(),size=40,replace=False)
Fortunately for now I don't need the x,y coordinates of the drawn fluxes - but bonus points if you know an efficient way to do this all in one step (i.e. it would be acceptable for me to identify those coordinates first and then use them to fetch the corresponding master_array values; the illustration above is a shortcut).
Thanks!
Linked questions:
Numpy mask based on if a value is in some other list
Mask numpy array based on index
Implementation of numpy in1d for 2D arrays?
You can do it efficently using sparse coo matrix
from scipy import sparse
xys=[(1,2),(3,4),(6,9),(7,3)]
coords = zip(*xys)
mask = sparse.coo_matrix((numpy.ones(len(coords[0])), coords ), shape= master_array.shape, dtype=bool)
draws=numpy.random.choice( master_array[~mask.toarray()].flatten(), size=10)
I have a np.ndarray with numbers that indicate spots of interest, I am interested in the spots which have values 1 and 9.
Right now they are being extracted as such:
maskindex.append(np.where(extract.variables['mask'][0] == 1) or np.where(megadatalist[0].variables['mask'][0] == 9))
xval = maskindex[0][1]
yval = maskindex[0][0]
I need to apply these x and y values to the arrays that I am operating on, to speed things up.
I have 140 arrays that are each 734 x 1468, I need the mean, max, min, std calculated for each field. And I was hoping there was an easy way for applying the masked array to speed up the operations, right now I am simply doing it on the entire arrays as such:
Average_List = np.mean([megadatalist[i].variables['analysed_sst'][0] for i in range(0,Numbers_of_datasets)], axis=0)
Average_Error_List = np.mean([megadatalist[i].variables['analysis_error'][0] for i in range(0,Numbers_of_datasets)], axis=0)
Std_List = np.std([megadatalist[i].variables['analysed_sst'][0] for i in range(0,Numbers_of_datasets)], axis=0)
Maximum_List = np.maximum.reduce([megadatalist[i].variables['analysed_sst'][0] for i in range(0,Numbers_of_datasets)])
Minimum_List = np.minimum.reduce([megadatalist[i].variables['analysed_sst'][0] for i in range(0,Numbers_of_datasets)])
Any ideas on how to speed things up would be highly appreciated
I may have solved it partially, depending on what you're aiming for. The following code reduces an array arr to a 1d array with only the relevant indicies. You can then do the needed calculations without considering the unwanted locations
arr = np.array([[0,9,9,0,0,9,9,1],[9,0,1,9,0,0,0,1]])
target = [1,9] # wanted values
index = np.where(np.in1d(arr.ravel(), target).reshape(arr.shape))
no_zeros = arr[index]
At this stage "all you need" is to reinsert the values "no_zeros" on an array of zeroes with appropriate shape, on the indices given in "index". One way is to flatten the index array and recalculate the indices, so that they match a flattened arr array. Then use numpy.insert(np.zeroes(arr.shape),new_index,no_zeroes) and then reshaping to the appropriate shape afterwards. Reshaping is constant time in numpy. Admittedly, I have not figured out a fast numpy way to create the new_index array.
Hope it helps.