Related
In Python, what happens when two modules attempt to import each other? More generally, what happens if multiple modules attempt to import in a cycle?
See also What can I do about "ImportError: Cannot import name X" or "AttributeError: ... (most likely due to a circular import)"? for the common problem that may result, and advice on how to rewrite code to avoid such imports. See Why do circular imports seemingly work further up in the call stack but then raise an ImportError further down? for technical details on why and how the problem occurs.
If you do import foo (inside bar.py) and import bar (inside foo.py), it will work fine. By the time anything actually runs, both modules will be fully loaded and will have references to each other.
The problem is when instead you do from foo import abc (inside bar.py) and from bar import xyz (inside foo.py). Because now each module requires the other module to already be imported (so that the name we are importing exists) before it can be imported.
There was a really good discussion on this over at comp.lang.python last year. It answers your question pretty thoroughly.
Imports are pretty straightforward really. Just remember the following:
'import' and 'from xxx import yyy' are executable statements. They execute
when the running program reaches that line.
If a module is not in sys.modules, then an import creates the new module
entry in sys.modules and then executes the code in the module. It does not
return control to the calling module until the execution has completed.
If a module does exist in sys.modules then an import simply returns that
module whether or not it has completed executing. That is the reason why
cyclic imports may return modules which appear to be partly empty.
Finally, the executing script runs in a module named __main__, importing
the script under its own name will create a new module unrelated to
__main__.
Take that lot together and you shouldn't get any surprises when importing
modules.
Cyclic imports terminate, but you need to be careful not to use the cyclically-imported modules during module initialization.
Consider the following files:
a.py:
print "a in"
import sys
print "b imported: %s" % ("b" in sys.modules, )
import b
print "a out"
b.py:
print "b in"
import a
print "b out"
x = 3
If you execute a.py, you'll get the following:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
b out
a out
On the second import of b.py (in the second a in), the Python interpreter does not import b again, because it already exists in the module dict.
If you try to access b.x from a during module initialization, you will get an AttributeError.
Append the following line to a.py:
print b.x
Then, the output is:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "a.py", line 4, in <module>
import b
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/b.py", line 2, in <module>
import a
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/a.py", line 7, in <module>
print b.x
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'x'
This is because modules are executed on import and at the time b.x is accessed, the line x = 3 has not be executed yet, which will only happen after b out.
As other answers describe this pattern is acceptable in python:
def dostuff(self):
from foo import bar
...
Which will avoid the execution of the import statement when the file is imported by other modules. Only if there is a logical circular dependency, this will fail.
Most Circular Imports are not actually logical circular imports but rather raise ImportError errors, because of the way import() evaluates top level statements of the entire file when called.
These ImportErrors can almost always be avoided if you positively want your imports on top:
Consider this circular import:
App A
# profiles/serializers.py
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
class SimplifiedProfileSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
name = serializers.CharField()
class ProfileSerializer(SimplifiedProfileSerializer):
recent_images = SimplifiedImageSerializer(many=True)
App B
# images/serializers.py
from profiles.serializers import SimplifiedProfileSerializer
class SimplifiedImageSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
title = serializers.CharField()
class ImageSerializer(SimplifiedImageSerializer):
profile = SimplifiedProfileSerializer()
From David Beazleys excellent talk Modules and Packages: Live and Let Die! - PyCon 2015, 1:54:00, here is a way to deal with circular imports in python:
try:
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
except ImportError:
import sys
SimplifiedImageSerializer = sys.modules[__package__ + '.SimplifiedImageSerializer']
This tries to import SimplifiedImageSerializer and if ImportError is raised, because it already is imported, it will pull it from the importcache.
PS: You have to read this entire post in David Beazley's voice.
To my surprise, no one has mentioned cyclic imports caused by type hints yet.
If you have cyclic imports only as a result of type hinting, they can be avoided in a clean manner.
Consider main.py which makes use of exceptions from another file:
from src.exceptions import SpecificException
class Foo:
def __init__(self, attrib: int):
self.attrib = attrib
raise SpecificException(Foo(5))
And the dedicated exception class exceptions.py:
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo):
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
This will raise an ImportError since main.py imports exception.py and vice versa through Foo and SpecificException.
Because Foo is only required in exceptions.py during type checking, we can safely make its import conditional using the TYPE_CHECKING constant from the typing module. The constant is only True during type checking, which allows us to conditionally import Foo and thereby avoid the circular import error.
Something to note is that by doing so, Foo is not declared in exceptions.py at runtime, which leads to a NameError. To avoid that, we add from __future__ import annotations which transforms all type annotations in the module to strings.
Hence, we get the following code for Python 3.7+:
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo): # Foo becomes 'Foo' because of the future import
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.6, the future import does not exist, so Foo has to be a string:
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: 'Foo'): # Foo has to be a string
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.5 and below, the type hinting functionality did not exist yet.
In future versions of Python, the annotations feature may become mandatory, after which the future import will no longer be necessary. Which version this will occur in is yet to be determined.
This answer is based on Yet another solution to dig you out of a circular import hole in Python by Stefaan Lippens.
Module a.py :
import b
print("This is from module a")
Module b.py
import a
print("This is from module b")
Running "Module a" will output:
>>>
'This is from module a'
'This is from module b'
'This is from module a'
>>>
It output this 3 lines while it was supposed to output infinitival because of circular importing.
What happens line by line while running"Module a" is listed here:
The first line is import b. so it will visit module b
The first line at module b is import a. so it will visit module a
The first line at module a is import b but note that this line won't be executed again anymore, because every file in python execute an import line just for once, it does not matter where or when it is executed. so it will pass to the next line and print "This is from module a".
After finish visiting whole module a from module b, we are still at module b. so the next line will print "This is from module b"
Module b lines are executed completely. so we will go back to module a where we started module b.
import b line have been executed already and won't be executed again. the next line will print "This is from module a" and program will be finished.
I got an example here that struck me!
foo.py
import bar
class gX(object):
g = 10
bar.py
from foo import gX
o = gX()
main.py
import foo
import bar
print "all done"
At the command line: $ python main.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "m.py", line 1, in <module>
import foo
File "/home/xolve/foo.py", line 1, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/xolve/bar.py", line 1, in <module>
from foo import gX
ImportError: cannot import name gX
There are a lot of great answers here. While there are usually quick solutions to the problem, some of which feel more pythonic than others, if you have the luxury of doing some refactoring, another approach is to analyze the organization of your code, and try to remove the circular dependency. You may find, for example, that you have:
File a.py
from b import B
class A:
#staticmethod
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
A.save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
File b.py
from a import A
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
A.save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In this case, just moving one static method to a separate file, say c.py:
File c.py
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
will allow removing the save_result method from A, and thus allow removing the import of A from a in b:
Refactored File a.py
from b import B
from c import save_result
class A:
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
Refactored File b.py
from c import save_result
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In summary, if you have a tool (e.g. pylint or PyCharm) that reports on methods that can be static, just throwing a staticmethod decorator on them might not be the best way to silence the warning. Even though the method seems related to the class, it might be better to separate it out, especially if you have several closely related modules that might need the same functionality and you intend to practice DRY principles.
I completely agree with pythoneer's answer here. But I have stumbled on some code that was flawed with circular imports and caused issues when trying to add unit tests. So to quickly patch it without changing everything you can resolve the issue by doing a dynamic import.
# Hack to import something without circular import issue
def load_module(name):
"""Load module using imp.find_module"""
names = name.split(".")
path = None
for name in names:
f, path, info = imp.find_module(name, path)
path = [path]
return imp.load_module(name, f, path[0], info)
constants = load_module("app.constants")
Again, this isn't a permanent fix but may help someone that wants to fix an import error without changing too much of the code.
Cheers!
Circular imports can be confusing because import does two things:
it executes imported module code
adds imported module to importing module global symbol table
The former is done only once, while the latter at each import statement. Circular import creates situation when importing module uses imported one with partially executed code. In consequence it will not see objects created after import statement. Below code sample demonstrates it.
Circular imports are not the ultimate evil to be avoided at all cost. In some frameworks like Flask they are quite natural and tweaking your code to eliminate them does not make the code better.
main.py
print 'import b'
import b
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
print 'import a'
import a
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
if __name__ == '__main__':
print 'imports done'
print 'b has y {}, a is b.a {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'), a is b.a)
b.by
print "b in, __name__ = {}".format(__name__)
x = 3
print 'b imports a'
import a
y = 5
print "b out"
a.py
print 'a in, __name__ = {}'.format(__name__)
print 'a imports b'
import b
print 'b has x {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'x'))
print 'b has y {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'))
print "a out"
python main.py output with comments
import b
b in, __name__ = b # b code execution started
b imports a
a in, __name__ = a # a code execution started
a imports b # b code execution is already in progress
b has x True
b has y False # b defines y after a import,
a out
b out
a in globals() False # import only adds a to main global symbol table
import a
a in globals() True
imports done
b has y True, a is b.a True # all b objects are available
Suppose you are running a test python file named request.py
In request.py, you write
import request
so this also most likely a circular import.
Solution:
Just change your test file to another name such as aaa.py, other than request.py.
Do not use names that are already used by other libs.
I solved the problem the following way, and it works well without any error.
Consider two files a.py and b.py.
I added this to a.py and it worked.
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
a.py:
import b
y = 2
def main():
print ("a out")
print (b.x)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
b.py:
import a
print ("b out")
x = 3 + a.y
The output I get is
>>> b out
>>> a out
>>> 5
Ok, I think I have a pretty cool solution.
Let's say you have file a and file b.
You have a def or a class in file b that you want to use in module a, but you have something else, either a def, class, or variable from file a that you need in your definition or class in file b.
What you can do is, at the bottom of file a, after calling the function or class in file a that is needed in file b, but before calling the function or class from file b that you need for file a, say import b
Then, and here is the key part, in all of the definitions or classes in file b that need the def or class from file a (let's call it CLASS), you say from a import CLASS
This works because you can import file b without Python executing any of the import statements in file b, and thus you elude any circular imports.
For example:
File a:
class A(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
CLASS = A("me")
import b
go = B(6)
go.dostuff
File b:
class B(object):
def __init__(self, number):
self.number = number
def dostuff(self):
from a import CLASS
print "Hello " + CLASS.name + ", " + str(number) + " is an interesting number."
Voila.
bar.py
print('going to import foo')
from foo import printx
foo.py
print('trying to import bar')
import bar
def printx():
print('x')
$ python bar.py
going to import foo
trying to import bar
going to import foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py", line 2, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
ImportError: cannot import name 'printx' from partially initialized module 'foo' (most likely due to a circular import) (/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py)
In Python, what happens when two modules attempt to import each other? More generally, what happens if multiple modules attempt to import in a cycle?
See also What can I do about "ImportError: Cannot import name X" or "AttributeError: ... (most likely due to a circular import)"? for the common problem that may result, and advice on how to rewrite code to avoid such imports. See Why do circular imports seemingly work further up in the call stack but then raise an ImportError further down? for technical details on why and how the problem occurs.
If you do import foo (inside bar.py) and import bar (inside foo.py), it will work fine. By the time anything actually runs, both modules will be fully loaded and will have references to each other.
The problem is when instead you do from foo import abc (inside bar.py) and from bar import xyz (inside foo.py). Because now each module requires the other module to already be imported (so that the name we are importing exists) before it can be imported.
There was a really good discussion on this over at comp.lang.python last year. It answers your question pretty thoroughly.
Imports are pretty straightforward really. Just remember the following:
'import' and 'from xxx import yyy' are executable statements. They execute
when the running program reaches that line.
If a module is not in sys.modules, then an import creates the new module
entry in sys.modules and then executes the code in the module. It does not
return control to the calling module until the execution has completed.
If a module does exist in sys.modules then an import simply returns that
module whether or not it has completed executing. That is the reason why
cyclic imports may return modules which appear to be partly empty.
Finally, the executing script runs in a module named __main__, importing
the script under its own name will create a new module unrelated to
__main__.
Take that lot together and you shouldn't get any surprises when importing
modules.
Cyclic imports terminate, but you need to be careful not to use the cyclically-imported modules during module initialization.
Consider the following files:
a.py:
print "a in"
import sys
print "b imported: %s" % ("b" in sys.modules, )
import b
print "a out"
b.py:
print "b in"
import a
print "b out"
x = 3
If you execute a.py, you'll get the following:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
b out
a out
On the second import of b.py (in the second a in), the Python interpreter does not import b again, because it already exists in the module dict.
If you try to access b.x from a during module initialization, you will get an AttributeError.
Append the following line to a.py:
print b.x
Then, the output is:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "a.py", line 4, in <module>
import b
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/b.py", line 2, in <module>
import a
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/a.py", line 7, in <module>
print b.x
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'x'
This is because modules are executed on import and at the time b.x is accessed, the line x = 3 has not be executed yet, which will only happen after b out.
As other answers describe this pattern is acceptable in python:
def dostuff(self):
from foo import bar
...
Which will avoid the execution of the import statement when the file is imported by other modules. Only if there is a logical circular dependency, this will fail.
Most Circular Imports are not actually logical circular imports but rather raise ImportError errors, because of the way import() evaluates top level statements of the entire file when called.
These ImportErrors can almost always be avoided if you positively want your imports on top:
Consider this circular import:
App A
# profiles/serializers.py
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
class SimplifiedProfileSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
name = serializers.CharField()
class ProfileSerializer(SimplifiedProfileSerializer):
recent_images = SimplifiedImageSerializer(many=True)
App B
# images/serializers.py
from profiles.serializers import SimplifiedProfileSerializer
class SimplifiedImageSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
title = serializers.CharField()
class ImageSerializer(SimplifiedImageSerializer):
profile = SimplifiedProfileSerializer()
From David Beazleys excellent talk Modules and Packages: Live and Let Die! - PyCon 2015, 1:54:00, here is a way to deal with circular imports in python:
try:
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
except ImportError:
import sys
SimplifiedImageSerializer = sys.modules[__package__ + '.SimplifiedImageSerializer']
This tries to import SimplifiedImageSerializer and if ImportError is raised, because it already is imported, it will pull it from the importcache.
PS: You have to read this entire post in David Beazley's voice.
To my surprise, no one has mentioned cyclic imports caused by type hints yet.
If you have cyclic imports only as a result of type hinting, they can be avoided in a clean manner.
Consider main.py which makes use of exceptions from another file:
from src.exceptions import SpecificException
class Foo:
def __init__(self, attrib: int):
self.attrib = attrib
raise SpecificException(Foo(5))
And the dedicated exception class exceptions.py:
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo):
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
This will raise an ImportError since main.py imports exception.py and vice versa through Foo and SpecificException.
Because Foo is only required in exceptions.py during type checking, we can safely make its import conditional using the TYPE_CHECKING constant from the typing module. The constant is only True during type checking, which allows us to conditionally import Foo and thereby avoid the circular import error.
Something to note is that by doing so, Foo is not declared in exceptions.py at runtime, which leads to a NameError. To avoid that, we add from __future__ import annotations which transforms all type annotations in the module to strings.
Hence, we get the following code for Python 3.7+:
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo): # Foo becomes 'Foo' because of the future import
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.6, the future import does not exist, so Foo has to be a string:
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: 'Foo'): # Foo has to be a string
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.5 and below, the type hinting functionality did not exist yet.
In future versions of Python, the annotations feature may become mandatory, after which the future import will no longer be necessary. Which version this will occur in is yet to be determined.
This answer is based on Yet another solution to dig you out of a circular import hole in Python by Stefaan Lippens.
Module a.py :
import b
print("This is from module a")
Module b.py
import a
print("This is from module b")
Running "Module a" will output:
>>>
'This is from module a'
'This is from module b'
'This is from module a'
>>>
It output this 3 lines while it was supposed to output infinitival because of circular importing.
What happens line by line while running"Module a" is listed here:
The first line is import b. so it will visit module b
The first line at module b is import a. so it will visit module a
The first line at module a is import b but note that this line won't be executed again anymore, because every file in python execute an import line just for once, it does not matter where or when it is executed. so it will pass to the next line and print "This is from module a".
After finish visiting whole module a from module b, we are still at module b. so the next line will print "This is from module b"
Module b lines are executed completely. so we will go back to module a where we started module b.
import b line have been executed already and won't be executed again. the next line will print "This is from module a" and program will be finished.
I got an example here that struck me!
foo.py
import bar
class gX(object):
g = 10
bar.py
from foo import gX
o = gX()
main.py
import foo
import bar
print "all done"
At the command line: $ python main.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "m.py", line 1, in <module>
import foo
File "/home/xolve/foo.py", line 1, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/xolve/bar.py", line 1, in <module>
from foo import gX
ImportError: cannot import name gX
There are a lot of great answers here. While there are usually quick solutions to the problem, some of which feel more pythonic than others, if you have the luxury of doing some refactoring, another approach is to analyze the organization of your code, and try to remove the circular dependency. You may find, for example, that you have:
File a.py
from b import B
class A:
#staticmethod
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
A.save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
File b.py
from a import A
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
A.save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In this case, just moving one static method to a separate file, say c.py:
File c.py
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
will allow removing the save_result method from A, and thus allow removing the import of A from a in b:
Refactored File a.py
from b import B
from c import save_result
class A:
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
Refactored File b.py
from c import save_result
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In summary, if you have a tool (e.g. pylint or PyCharm) that reports on methods that can be static, just throwing a staticmethod decorator on them might not be the best way to silence the warning. Even though the method seems related to the class, it might be better to separate it out, especially if you have several closely related modules that might need the same functionality and you intend to practice DRY principles.
I completely agree with pythoneer's answer here. But I have stumbled on some code that was flawed with circular imports and caused issues when trying to add unit tests. So to quickly patch it without changing everything you can resolve the issue by doing a dynamic import.
# Hack to import something without circular import issue
def load_module(name):
"""Load module using imp.find_module"""
names = name.split(".")
path = None
for name in names:
f, path, info = imp.find_module(name, path)
path = [path]
return imp.load_module(name, f, path[0], info)
constants = load_module("app.constants")
Again, this isn't a permanent fix but may help someone that wants to fix an import error without changing too much of the code.
Cheers!
Circular imports can be confusing because import does two things:
it executes imported module code
adds imported module to importing module global symbol table
The former is done only once, while the latter at each import statement. Circular import creates situation when importing module uses imported one with partially executed code. In consequence it will not see objects created after import statement. Below code sample demonstrates it.
Circular imports are not the ultimate evil to be avoided at all cost. In some frameworks like Flask they are quite natural and tweaking your code to eliminate them does not make the code better.
main.py
print 'import b'
import b
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
print 'import a'
import a
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
if __name__ == '__main__':
print 'imports done'
print 'b has y {}, a is b.a {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'), a is b.a)
b.by
print "b in, __name__ = {}".format(__name__)
x = 3
print 'b imports a'
import a
y = 5
print "b out"
a.py
print 'a in, __name__ = {}'.format(__name__)
print 'a imports b'
import b
print 'b has x {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'x'))
print 'b has y {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'))
print "a out"
python main.py output with comments
import b
b in, __name__ = b # b code execution started
b imports a
a in, __name__ = a # a code execution started
a imports b # b code execution is already in progress
b has x True
b has y False # b defines y after a import,
a out
b out
a in globals() False # import only adds a to main global symbol table
import a
a in globals() True
imports done
b has y True, a is b.a True # all b objects are available
Suppose you are running a test python file named request.py
In request.py, you write
import request
so this also most likely a circular import.
Solution:
Just change your test file to another name such as aaa.py, other than request.py.
Do not use names that are already used by other libs.
I solved the problem the following way, and it works well without any error.
Consider two files a.py and b.py.
I added this to a.py and it worked.
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
a.py:
import b
y = 2
def main():
print ("a out")
print (b.x)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
b.py:
import a
print ("b out")
x = 3 + a.y
The output I get is
>>> b out
>>> a out
>>> 5
Ok, I think I have a pretty cool solution.
Let's say you have file a and file b.
You have a def or a class in file b that you want to use in module a, but you have something else, either a def, class, or variable from file a that you need in your definition or class in file b.
What you can do is, at the bottom of file a, after calling the function or class in file a that is needed in file b, but before calling the function or class from file b that you need for file a, say import b
Then, and here is the key part, in all of the definitions or classes in file b that need the def or class from file a (let's call it CLASS), you say from a import CLASS
This works because you can import file b without Python executing any of the import statements in file b, and thus you elude any circular imports.
For example:
File a:
class A(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
CLASS = A("me")
import b
go = B(6)
go.dostuff
File b:
class B(object):
def __init__(self, number):
self.number = number
def dostuff(self):
from a import CLASS
print "Hello " + CLASS.name + ", " + str(number) + " is an interesting number."
Voila.
bar.py
print('going to import foo')
from foo import printx
foo.py
print('trying to import bar')
import bar
def printx():
print('x')
$ python bar.py
going to import foo
trying to import bar
going to import foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py", line 2, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
ImportError: cannot import name 'printx' from partially initialized module 'foo' (most likely due to a circular import) (/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py)
Given the following files:
a.py
-----
class CommonClass(object):
def do_thing(self):
pass
b.py
-----
from a import CommonClass
class SubClassA(CommonClass):
def do_thing(self):
print("I am A")
class SubClassB(CommonClass):
def do_thing(self):
print("I am B")
c.py
-----
from a import CommonClass
from b import SubClassA
if __name__ == "__main__":
for member in CommonClass.__subclasses__():
member().do_thing()
I would expect only SubClassA is imported, and visible when looping through subclasses of CommonClass, but it seems SubClassB is imported as well.
I am running Python 3.8.5 and this is the output of python3 c.py:
$ python3 c.py
I am A
I am B
How can I only import the classes I want?
You did import only SubClassA to c.py. This can be tested by doing
x = SubClassB()
or
x = b.SubClassB()
Both will result in a NameError.
The thing is, that when you import a file, it is actually being ran, even when using from x import y!
This can be easily seen by adding a print("I'm from b.py") at the end of b.py and then running c.py.
This makes both SubClassA and SubClassB be subclasses of CommonClass, which you imported. So, while you don't have access to the SubClassB name, it is still a subclass of CommonClass and you can access it from there.
In general you don't have to import a module to be able to use its objects. Importing expands your namespace to include that module so you can create an object directly. You can still use this module's objects even without importing it if you acquired them in some other way (like importing a third module which returns objects from the second one).
Anyway right now, you are not really using even the imported SubClassA. If you want to "allow" certain classes to be considered only from an external source, you can create an allowed set of classes:
from a import CommonClass
from b import SubClassA
allowed_classes = {SubClassA}
if __name__ == "__main__":
for member in CommonClass.__subclasses__():
if member in allowed_classes:
member().do_thing()
Which only prints I am A
from a import CommonClass
from b import SubClassA
if __name__ == "__main__":
h = CommonClass.__subclasses__()[0]()
h.do_thing()
You can do this.
In Python, what happens when two modules attempt to import each other? More generally, what happens if multiple modules attempt to import in a cycle?
See also What can I do about "ImportError: Cannot import name X" or "AttributeError: ... (most likely due to a circular import)"? for the common problem that may result, and advice on how to rewrite code to avoid such imports. See Why do circular imports seemingly work further up in the call stack but then raise an ImportError further down? for technical details on why and how the problem occurs.
If you do import foo (inside bar.py) and import bar (inside foo.py), it will work fine. By the time anything actually runs, both modules will be fully loaded and will have references to each other.
The problem is when instead you do from foo import abc (inside bar.py) and from bar import xyz (inside foo.py). Because now each module requires the other module to already be imported (so that the name we are importing exists) before it can be imported.
There was a really good discussion on this over at comp.lang.python last year. It answers your question pretty thoroughly.
Imports are pretty straightforward really. Just remember the following:
'import' and 'from xxx import yyy' are executable statements. They execute
when the running program reaches that line.
If a module is not in sys.modules, then an import creates the new module
entry in sys.modules and then executes the code in the module. It does not
return control to the calling module until the execution has completed.
If a module does exist in sys.modules then an import simply returns that
module whether or not it has completed executing. That is the reason why
cyclic imports may return modules which appear to be partly empty.
Finally, the executing script runs in a module named __main__, importing
the script under its own name will create a new module unrelated to
__main__.
Take that lot together and you shouldn't get any surprises when importing
modules.
Cyclic imports terminate, but you need to be careful not to use the cyclically-imported modules during module initialization.
Consider the following files:
a.py:
print "a in"
import sys
print "b imported: %s" % ("b" in sys.modules, )
import b
print "a out"
b.py:
print "b in"
import a
print "b out"
x = 3
If you execute a.py, you'll get the following:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
b out
a out
On the second import of b.py (in the second a in), the Python interpreter does not import b again, because it already exists in the module dict.
If you try to access b.x from a during module initialization, you will get an AttributeError.
Append the following line to a.py:
print b.x
Then, the output is:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "a.py", line 4, in <module>
import b
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/b.py", line 2, in <module>
import a
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/a.py", line 7, in <module>
print b.x
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'x'
This is because modules are executed on import and at the time b.x is accessed, the line x = 3 has not be executed yet, which will only happen after b out.
As other answers describe this pattern is acceptable in python:
def dostuff(self):
from foo import bar
...
Which will avoid the execution of the import statement when the file is imported by other modules. Only if there is a logical circular dependency, this will fail.
Most Circular Imports are not actually logical circular imports but rather raise ImportError errors, because of the way import() evaluates top level statements of the entire file when called.
These ImportErrors can almost always be avoided if you positively want your imports on top:
Consider this circular import:
App A
# profiles/serializers.py
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
class SimplifiedProfileSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
name = serializers.CharField()
class ProfileSerializer(SimplifiedProfileSerializer):
recent_images = SimplifiedImageSerializer(many=True)
App B
# images/serializers.py
from profiles.serializers import SimplifiedProfileSerializer
class SimplifiedImageSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
title = serializers.CharField()
class ImageSerializer(SimplifiedImageSerializer):
profile = SimplifiedProfileSerializer()
From David Beazleys excellent talk Modules and Packages: Live and Let Die! - PyCon 2015, 1:54:00, here is a way to deal with circular imports in python:
try:
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
except ImportError:
import sys
SimplifiedImageSerializer = sys.modules[__package__ + '.SimplifiedImageSerializer']
This tries to import SimplifiedImageSerializer and if ImportError is raised, because it already is imported, it will pull it from the importcache.
PS: You have to read this entire post in David Beazley's voice.
To my surprise, no one has mentioned cyclic imports caused by type hints yet.
If you have cyclic imports only as a result of type hinting, they can be avoided in a clean manner.
Consider main.py which makes use of exceptions from another file:
from src.exceptions import SpecificException
class Foo:
def __init__(self, attrib: int):
self.attrib = attrib
raise SpecificException(Foo(5))
And the dedicated exception class exceptions.py:
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo):
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
This will raise an ImportError since main.py imports exception.py and vice versa through Foo and SpecificException.
Because Foo is only required in exceptions.py during type checking, we can safely make its import conditional using the TYPE_CHECKING constant from the typing module. The constant is only True during type checking, which allows us to conditionally import Foo and thereby avoid the circular import error.
Something to note is that by doing so, Foo is not declared in exceptions.py at runtime, which leads to a NameError. To avoid that, we add from __future__ import annotations which transforms all type annotations in the module to strings.
Hence, we get the following code for Python 3.7+:
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo): # Foo becomes 'Foo' because of the future import
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.6, the future import does not exist, so Foo has to be a string:
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: 'Foo'): # Foo has to be a string
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.5 and below, the type hinting functionality did not exist yet.
In future versions of Python, the annotations feature may become mandatory, after which the future import will no longer be necessary. Which version this will occur in is yet to be determined.
This answer is based on Yet another solution to dig you out of a circular import hole in Python by Stefaan Lippens.
Module a.py :
import b
print("This is from module a")
Module b.py
import a
print("This is from module b")
Running "Module a" will output:
>>>
'This is from module a'
'This is from module b'
'This is from module a'
>>>
It output this 3 lines while it was supposed to output infinitival because of circular importing.
What happens line by line while running"Module a" is listed here:
The first line is import b. so it will visit module b
The first line at module b is import a. so it will visit module a
The first line at module a is import b but note that this line won't be executed again anymore, because every file in python execute an import line just for once, it does not matter where or when it is executed. so it will pass to the next line and print "This is from module a".
After finish visiting whole module a from module b, we are still at module b. so the next line will print "This is from module b"
Module b lines are executed completely. so we will go back to module a where we started module b.
import b line have been executed already and won't be executed again. the next line will print "This is from module a" and program will be finished.
I got an example here that struck me!
foo.py
import bar
class gX(object):
g = 10
bar.py
from foo import gX
o = gX()
main.py
import foo
import bar
print "all done"
At the command line: $ python main.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "m.py", line 1, in <module>
import foo
File "/home/xolve/foo.py", line 1, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/xolve/bar.py", line 1, in <module>
from foo import gX
ImportError: cannot import name gX
There are a lot of great answers here. While there are usually quick solutions to the problem, some of which feel more pythonic than others, if you have the luxury of doing some refactoring, another approach is to analyze the organization of your code, and try to remove the circular dependency. You may find, for example, that you have:
File a.py
from b import B
class A:
#staticmethod
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
A.save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
File b.py
from a import A
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
A.save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In this case, just moving one static method to a separate file, say c.py:
File c.py
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
will allow removing the save_result method from A, and thus allow removing the import of A from a in b:
Refactored File a.py
from b import B
from c import save_result
class A:
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
Refactored File b.py
from c import save_result
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In summary, if you have a tool (e.g. pylint or PyCharm) that reports on methods that can be static, just throwing a staticmethod decorator on them might not be the best way to silence the warning. Even though the method seems related to the class, it might be better to separate it out, especially if you have several closely related modules that might need the same functionality and you intend to practice DRY principles.
I completely agree with pythoneer's answer here. But I have stumbled on some code that was flawed with circular imports and caused issues when trying to add unit tests. So to quickly patch it without changing everything you can resolve the issue by doing a dynamic import.
# Hack to import something without circular import issue
def load_module(name):
"""Load module using imp.find_module"""
names = name.split(".")
path = None
for name in names:
f, path, info = imp.find_module(name, path)
path = [path]
return imp.load_module(name, f, path[0], info)
constants = load_module("app.constants")
Again, this isn't a permanent fix but may help someone that wants to fix an import error without changing too much of the code.
Cheers!
Circular imports can be confusing because import does two things:
it executes imported module code
adds imported module to importing module global symbol table
The former is done only once, while the latter at each import statement. Circular import creates situation when importing module uses imported one with partially executed code. In consequence it will not see objects created after import statement. Below code sample demonstrates it.
Circular imports are not the ultimate evil to be avoided at all cost. In some frameworks like Flask they are quite natural and tweaking your code to eliminate them does not make the code better.
main.py
print 'import b'
import b
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
print 'import a'
import a
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
if __name__ == '__main__':
print 'imports done'
print 'b has y {}, a is b.a {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'), a is b.a)
b.by
print "b in, __name__ = {}".format(__name__)
x = 3
print 'b imports a'
import a
y = 5
print "b out"
a.py
print 'a in, __name__ = {}'.format(__name__)
print 'a imports b'
import b
print 'b has x {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'x'))
print 'b has y {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'))
print "a out"
python main.py output with comments
import b
b in, __name__ = b # b code execution started
b imports a
a in, __name__ = a # a code execution started
a imports b # b code execution is already in progress
b has x True
b has y False # b defines y after a import,
a out
b out
a in globals() False # import only adds a to main global symbol table
import a
a in globals() True
imports done
b has y True, a is b.a True # all b objects are available
Suppose you are running a test python file named request.py
In request.py, you write
import request
so this also most likely a circular import.
Solution:
Just change your test file to another name such as aaa.py, other than request.py.
Do not use names that are already used by other libs.
I solved the problem the following way, and it works well without any error.
Consider two files a.py and b.py.
I added this to a.py and it worked.
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
a.py:
import b
y = 2
def main():
print ("a out")
print (b.x)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
b.py:
import a
print ("b out")
x = 3 + a.y
The output I get is
>>> b out
>>> a out
>>> 5
Ok, I think I have a pretty cool solution.
Let's say you have file a and file b.
You have a def or a class in file b that you want to use in module a, but you have something else, either a def, class, or variable from file a that you need in your definition or class in file b.
What you can do is, at the bottom of file a, after calling the function or class in file a that is needed in file b, but before calling the function or class from file b that you need for file a, say import b
Then, and here is the key part, in all of the definitions or classes in file b that need the def or class from file a (let's call it CLASS), you say from a import CLASS
This works because you can import file b without Python executing any of the import statements in file b, and thus you elude any circular imports.
For example:
File a:
class A(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
CLASS = A("me")
import b
go = B(6)
go.dostuff
File b:
class B(object):
def __init__(self, number):
self.number = number
def dostuff(self):
from a import CLASS
print "Hello " + CLASS.name + ", " + str(number) + " is an interesting number."
Voila.
bar.py
print('going to import foo')
from foo import printx
foo.py
print('trying to import bar')
import bar
def printx():
print('x')
$ python bar.py
going to import foo
trying to import bar
going to import foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py", line 2, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
ImportError: cannot import name 'printx' from partially initialized module 'foo' (most likely due to a circular import) (/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py)
In Python, what happens when two modules attempt to import each other? More generally, what happens if multiple modules attempt to import in a cycle?
See also What can I do about "ImportError: Cannot import name X" or "AttributeError: ... (most likely due to a circular import)"? for the common problem that may result, and advice on how to rewrite code to avoid such imports. See Why do circular imports seemingly work further up in the call stack but then raise an ImportError further down? for technical details on why and how the problem occurs.
If you do import foo (inside bar.py) and import bar (inside foo.py), it will work fine. By the time anything actually runs, both modules will be fully loaded and will have references to each other.
The problem is when instead you do from foo import abc (inside bar.py) and from bar import xyz (inside foo.py). Because now each module requires the other module to already be imported (so that the name we are importing exists) before it can be imported.
There was a really good discussion on this over at comp.lang.python last year. It answers your question pretty thoroughly.
Imports are pretty straightforward really. Just remember the following:
'import' and 'from xxx import yyy' are executable statements. They execute
when the running program reaches that line.
If a module is not in sys.modules, then an import creates the new module
entry in sys.modules and then executes the code in the module. It does not
return control to the calling module until the execution has completed.
If a module does exist in sys.modules then an import simply returns that
module whether or not it has completed executing. That is the reason why
cyclic imports may return modules which appear to be partly empty.
Finally, the executing script runs in a module named __main__, importing
the script under its own name will create a new module unrelated to
__main__.
Take that lot together and you shouldn't get any surprises when importing
modules.
Cyclic imports terminate, but you need to be careful not to use the cyclically-imported modules during module initialization.
Consider the following files:
a.py:
print "a in"
import sys
print "b imported: %s" % ("b" in sys.modules, )
import b
print "a out"
b.py:
print "b in"
import a
print "b out"
x = 3
If you execute a.py, you'll get the following:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
b out
a out
On the second import of b.py (in the second a in), the Python interpreter does not import b again, because it already exists in the module dict.
If you try to access b.x from a during module initialization, you will get an AttributeError.
Append the following line to a.py:
print b.x
Then, the output is:
$ python a.py
a in
b imported: False
b in
a in
b imported: True
a out
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "a.py", line 4, in <module>
import b
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/b.py", line 2, in <module>
import a
File "/home/shlomme/tmp/x/a.py", line 7, in <module>
print b.x
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'x'
This is because modules are executed on import and at the time b.x is accessed, the line x = 3 has not be executed yet, which will only happen after b out.
As other answers describe this pattern is acceptable in python:
def dostuff(self):
from foo import bar
...
Which will avoid the execution of the import statement when the file is imported by other modules. Only if there is a logical circular dependency, this will fail.
Most Circular Imports are not actually logical circular imports but rather raise ImportError errors, because of the way import() evaluates top level statements of the entire file when called.
These ImportErrors can almost always be avoided if you positively want your imports on top:
Consider this circular import:
App A
# profiles/serializers.py
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
class SimplifiedProfileSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
name = serializers.CharField()
class ProfileSerializer(SimplifiedProfileSerializer):
recent_images = SimplifiedImageSerializer(many=True)
App B
# images/serializers.py
from profiles.serializers import SimplifiedProfileSerializer
class SimplifiedImageSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
title = serializers.CharField()
class ImageSerializer(SimplifiedImageSerializer):
profile = SimplifiedProfileSerializer()
From David Beazleys excellent talk Modules and Packages: Live and Let Die! - PyCon 2015, 1:54:00, here is a way to deal with circular imports in python:
try:
from images.serializers import SimplifiedImageSerializer
except ImportError:
import sys
SimplifiedImageSerializer = sys.modules[__package__ + '.SimplifiedImageSerializer']
This tries to import SimplifiedImageSerializer and if ImportError is raised, because it already is imported, it will pull it from the importcache.
PS: You have to read this entire post in David Beazley's voice.
To my surprise, no one has mentioned cyclic imports caused by type hints yet.
If you have cyclic imports only as a result of type hinting, they can be avoided in a clean manner.
Consider main.py which makes use of exceptions from another file:
from src.exceptions import SpecificException
class Foo:
def __init__(self, attrib: int):
self.attrib = attrib
raise SpecificException(Foo(5))
And the dedicated exception class exceptions.py:
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo):
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
This will raise an ImportError since main.py imports exception.py and vice versa through Foo and SpecificException.
Because Foo is only required in exceptions.py during type checking, we can safely make its import conditional using the TYPE_CHECKING constant from the typing module. The constant is only True during type checking, which allows us to conditionally import Foo and thereby avoid the circular import error.
Something to note is that by doing so, Foo is not declared in exceptions.py at runtime, which leads to a NameError. To avoid that, we add from __future__ import annotations which transforms all type annotations in the module to strings.
Hence, we get the following code for Python 3.7+:
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: Foo): # Foo becomes 'Foo' because of the future import
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.6, the future import does not exist, so Foo has to be a string:
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING: # Only imports the below statements during type checking
from src.main import Foo
class SpecificException(Exception):
def __init__(self, cause: 'Foo'): # Foo has to be a string
self.cause = cause
def __str__(self):
return f'Expected 3 but got {self.cause.attrib}.'
In Python 3.5 and below, the type hinting functionality did not exist yet.
In future versions of Python, the annotations feature may become mandatory, after which the future import will no longer be necessary. Which version this will occur in is yet to be determined.
This answer is based on Yet another solution to dig you out of a circular import hole in Python by Stefaan Lippens.
Module a.py :
import b
print("This is from module a")
Module b.py
import a
print("This is from module b")
Running "Module a" will output:
>>>
'This is from module a'
'This is from module b'
'This is from module a'
>>>
It output this 3 lines while it was supposed to output infinitival because of circular importing.
What happens line by line while running"Module a" is listed here:
The first line is import b. so it will visit module b
The first line at module b is import a. so it will visit module a
The first line at module a is import b but note that this line won't be executed again anymore, because every file in python execute an import line just for once, it does not matter where or when it is executed. so it will pass to the next line and print "This is from module a".
After finish visiting whole module a from module b, we are still at module b. so the next line will print "This is from module b"
Module b lines are executed completely. so we will go back to module a where we started module b.
import b line have been executed already and won't be executed again. the next line will print "This is from module a" and program will be finished.
I got an example here that struck me!
foo.py
import bar
class gX(object):
g = 10
bar.py
from foo import gX
o = gX()
main.py
import foo
import bar
print "all done"
At the command line: $ python main.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "m.py", line 1, in <module>
import foo
File "/home/xolve/foo.py", line 1, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/xolve/bar.py", line 1, in <module>
from foo import gX
ImportError: cannot import name gX
There are a lot of great answers here. While there are usually quick solutions to the problem, some of which feel more pythonic than others, if you have the luxury of doing some refactoring, another approach is to analyze the organization of your code, and try to remove the circular dependency. You may find, for example, that you have:
File a.py
from b import B
class A:
#staticmethod
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
A.save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
File b.py
from a import A
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
A.save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In this case, just moving one static method to a separate file, say c.py:
File c.py
def save_result(result):
print('save the result')
will allow removing the save_result method from A, and thus allow removing the import of A from a in b:
Refactored File a.py
from b import B
from c import save_result
class A:
#staticmethod
def do_something_a_ish(param):
save_result(A.use_param_like_a_would(param))
#staticmethod
def do_something_related_to_b(param):
B.do_something_b_ish(param)
Refactored File b.py
from c import save_result
class B:
#staticmethod
def do_something_b_ish(param):
save_result(B.use_param_like_b_would(param))
In summary, if you have a tool (e.g. pylint or PyCharm) that reports on methods that can be static, just throwing a staticmethod decorator on them might not be the best way to silence the warning. Even though the method seems related to the class, it might be better to separate it out, especially if you have several closely related modules that might need the same functionality and you intend to practice DRY principles.
I completely agree with pythoneer's answer here. But I have stumbled on some code that was flawed with circular imports and caused issues when trying to add unit tests. So to quickly patch it without changing everything you can resolve the issue by doing a dynamic import.
# Hack to import something without circular import issue
def load_module(name):
"""Load module using imp.find_module"""
names = name.split(".")
path = None
for name in names:
f, path, info = imp.find_module(name, path)
path = [path]
return imp.load_module(name, f, path[0], info)
constants = load_module("app.constants")
Again, this isn't a permanent fix but may help someone that wants to fix an import error without changing too much of the code.
Cheers!
Circular imports can be confusing because import does two things:
it executes imported module code
adds imported module to importing module global symbol table
The former is done only once, while the latter at each import statement. Circular import creates situation when importing module uses imported one with partially executed code. In consequence it will not see objects created after import statement. Below code sample demonstrates it.
Circular imports are not the ultimate evil to be avoided at all cost. In some frameworks like Flask they are quite natural and tweaking your code to eliminate them does not make the code better.
main.py
print 'import b'
import b
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
print 'import a'
import a
print 'a in globals() {}'.format('a' in globals())
if __name__ == '__main__':
print 'imports done'
print 'b has y {}, a is b.a {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'), a is b.a)
b.by
print "b in, __name__ = {}".format(__name__)
x = 3
print 'b imports a'
import a
y = 5
print "b out"
a.py
print 'a in, __name__ = {}'.format(__name__)
print 'a imports b'
import b
print 'b has x {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'x'))
print 'b has y {}'.format(hasattr(b, 'y'))
print "a out"
python main.py output with comments
import b
b in, __name__ = b # b code execution started
b imports a
a in, __name__ = a # a code execution started
a imports b # b code execution is already in progress
b has x True
b has y False # b defines y after a import,
a out
b out
a in globals() False # import only adds a to main global symbol table
import a
a in globals() True
imports done
b has y True, a is b.a True # all b objects are available
Suppose you are running a test python file named request.py
In request.py, you write
import request
so this also most likely a circular import.
Solution:
Just change your test file to another name such as aaa.py, other than request.py.
Do not use names that are already used by other libs.
I solved the problem the following way, and it works well without any error.
Consider two files a.py and b.py.
I added this to a.py and it worked.
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
a.py:
import b
y = 2
def main():
print ("a out")
print (b.x)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main ()
b.py:
import a
print ("b out")
x = 3 + a.y
The output I get is
>>> b out
>>> a out
>>> 5
Ok, I think I have a pretty cool solution.
Let's say you have file a and file b.
You have a def or a class in file b that you want to use in module a, but you have something else, either a def, class, or variable from file a that you need in your definition or class in file b.
What you can do is, at the bottom of file a, after calling the function or class in file a that is needed in file b, but before calling the function or class from file b that you need for file a, say import b
Then, and here is the key part, in all of the definitions or classes in file b that need the def or class from file a (let's call it CLASS), you say from a import CLASS
This works because you can import file b without Python executing any of the import statements in file b, and thus you elude any circular imports.
For example:
File a:
class A(object):
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
CLASS = A("me")
import b
go = B(6)
go.dostuff
File b:
class B(object):
def __init__(self, number):
self.number = number
def dostuff(self):
from a import CLASS
print "Hello " + CLASS.name + ", " + str(number) + " is an interesting number."
Voila.
bar.py
print('going to import foo')
from foo import printx
foo.py
print('trying to import bar')
import bar
def printx():
print('x')
$ python bar.py
going to import foo
trying to import bar
going to import foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py", line 2, in <module>
import bar
File "/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/bar.py", line 2, in <module>
from foo import printx
ImportError: cannot import name 'printx' from partially initialized module 'foo' (most likely due to a circular import) (/home/suhail/Desktop/temp/circularimport/foo.py)