We Keep Coding

Is it possible to gradually read data from sql with read_sql to dataframe and at the same time write to parquet using pandas?

I have a large dataset which is really big to handle as a dataframe. Besides, It takes a long time reading whole data from database every time. Once I tried to write my data to parquet format, and read the data with read_parquet which was very faster.
So my question is: Can I read the data from database in chunk read_sql, write it to parquet with pandas to_parquet, read another chunk (when I delete previous one to save RAM) and append it to the parquet file and so on?

We can try using pyarrow to write from database directly to parquet:
import pyarrow as pa
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
chunk = 1_000_000
pqwriter = None
for i, df in enumerate(pd.read_sql(query, con=con, chunksize=chunk):
table = pa.Table.from_pandas(df)
if i == 0:
pqwriter = pq.ParquetWriter('output.parquet', table.schema)
pqwriter.write_table(table)
print('One Chunk Written')
if pqwriter:
pqwriter.close()

How can I chunk through a CSV using Arrow?

What I am trying to do
I am using PyArrow to read some CSVs and convert them to Parquet. Some of the files I read have plenty of columns and have a high memory footprint (enough to crash the machine running the job). I am trying to chunk through the file while reading the CSV in a similar way to how Pandas read_csv with chunksize works.
For example this is how the chunking code would work in pandas:
chunks = pandas.read_csv(data, chunksize=100, iterator=True)
# Iterate through chunks
for chunk in chunks:
do_stuff(chunk)
I want to port a similar functionality to Arrow
What I have tried to do
I noticed that Arrow has ReadOptions which include a block_size parameter, and I thought maybe I could use it like:
# Reading in-memory csv file
arrow_table = arrow_csv.read_csv(
input_file=input_buffer,
read_options=arrow_csv.ReadOptions(
use_threads=True,
block_size=4096
)
)
# Iterate through batches
for batch in arrow_table.to_batches():
do_stuff(batch)
As this (block_size) does not seem to return an iterator, I am under the impression that this will still make Arrow read the entire table in memory and thus recreate my problem.
Lastly, I am aware that I can first read the csv using Pandas and chunk through it then convert to Arrow tables. But I am trying to avoid using Pandas and only use Arrow.
I am happy to provide additional information if needed

The function you are looking for is pyarrow.csv.open_csv which returns a pyarrow.csv.CSVStreamingReader. The size of the batches will be controlled by the block_size option you noticed. For a complete example:
import pyarrow as pa
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow.csv
in_path = '/home/pace/dev/benchmarks-proj/benchmarks/data/nyctaxi_2010-01.csv.gz'
out_path = '/home/pace/dev/benchmarks-proj/benchmarks/data/temp/iterative.parquet'
convert_options = pyarrow.csv.ConvertOptions()
convert_options.column_types = {
'rate_code': pa.utf8(),
'store_and_fwd_flag': pa.utf8()
}
writer = None
with pyarrow.csv.open_csv(in_path, convert_options=convert_options) as reader:
for next_chunk in reader:
if next_chunk is None:
break
if writer is None:
writer = pq.ParquetWriter(out_path, next_chunk.schema)
next_table = pa.Table.from_batches([next_chunk])
writer.write_table(next_table)
writer.close()
This example also highlights one of the challenges the streaming CSV reader introduces. It needs to return batches with consistent data types. However, when parsing CSV you typically need to infer the data type. In my example data the first few MB of the file have integral values for the rate_code column. Somewhere in the middle of the batch there is a non-integer value (* in this case) for that column. To work around this issue you can specify the types for columns up front as I am doing here.

pandas write dataframe to parquet format with append

I am trying to write a pandas dataframe to parquet file format (introduced in most recent pandas version 0.21.0) in append mode. However, instead of appending to the existing file, the file is overwritten with new data. What am i missing?
the write syntax is
df.to_parquet(path, mode='append')
the read syntax is
pd.read_parquet(path)

Looks like its possible to append row groups to already existing parquet file using fastparquet. This is quite a unique feature, since most libraries don't have this implementation.
Below is from pandas doc:
DataFrame.to_parquet(path, engine='auto', compression='snappy', index=None, partition_cols=None, **kwargs)
we have to pass in both engine and **kwargs.
engine{‘auto’, ‘pyarrow’, ‘fastparquet’}
**kwargs - Additional arguments passed to the parquet library.
**kwargs - here we need to pass is: append=True (from fastparquet)
import pandas as pd
import os.path
file_path = "D:\\dev\\output.parquet"
df = pd.DataFrame(data={'col1': [1, 2,], 'col2': [3, 4]})
if not os.path.isfile(file_path):
df.to_parquet(file_path, engine='fastparquet')
else:
df.to_parquet(file_path, engine='fastparquet', append=True)
If append is set to True and the file does not exist then you will see below error
AttributeError: 'ParquetFile' object has no attribute 'fmd'
Running above script 3 times I have below data in parquet file.
If I inspect the metadata, I can see that this resulted in 3 row groups.
Note:
Append could be inefficient if you write too many small row groups. Typically recommended size of a row group is closer to 100,000 or 1,000,000 rows. This has a few benefits over very small row groups. Compression will work better, since compression operates within a row group only. There will also be less overhead spent on storing statistics, since each row group stores its own statistics.

To append, do this:
import pandas as pd
import pyarrow.parquet as pq
import pyarrow as pa
dataframe = pd.read_csv('content.csv')
output = "/Users/myTable.parquet"
# Create a parquet table from your dataframe
table = pa.Table.from_pandas(dataframe)
# Write direct to your parquet file
pq.write_to_dataset(table , root_path=output)
This will automatically append into your table.

I used aws wrangler library. It works like charm
Below are the reference docs
https://aws-data-wrangler.readthedocs.io/en/latest/stubs/awswrangler.s3.to_parquet.html
I have read from kinesis stream and used kinesis-python library to consume the message and writing to s3 . processing logic of json I have not included as this post deals with problem unable to append data to s3. Executed in aws sagemaker jupyter
Below is the sample code I used:
!pip install awswrangler
import awswrangler as wr
import pandas as pd
evet_data=pd.DataFrame({'a': [a], 'b':[b],'c':[c],'d':[d],'e': [e],'f':[f],'g': [g]},columns=['a','b','c','d','e','f','g'])
#print(evet_data)
s3_path="s3://<your bucker>/table/temp/<your folder name>/e="+e+"/f="+str(f)
try:
wr.s3.to_parquet(
df=evet_data,
path=s3_path,
dataset=True,
partition_cols=['e','f'],
mode="append",
database="wat_q4_stg",
table="raw_data_v3",
catalog_versioning=True # Optional
)
print("write successful")
except Exception as e:
print(str(e))
Any clarifications ready to help. In few more posts I have read to read data and overwrite again. But as the data gets larger it will slow down the process. It is inefficient

There is no append mode in pandas.to_parquet(). What you can do instead is read the existing file, change it, and write back to it overwriting it.

Use the fastparquet write function
from fastparquet import write
write(file_name, df, append=True)
The file must already exist as I understand it.
API is available here (for now at least): https://fastparquet.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html#fastparquet.write

Pandas to_parquet() can handle both single files as well as directories with multiple files in it. Pandas will silently overwrite the file, if the file is already there. To append to a parquet object just add a new file to the same parquet directory.
os.makedirs(path, exist_ok=True)
# write append (replace the naming logic with what works for you)
filename = f'{datetime.datetime.utcnow().timestamp()}.parquet'
df.to_parquet(os.path.join(path, filename))
# read
pd.read_parquet(path)

Pandas MemoryError when reading large CSV followed by `.iloc` slicing columns

I've been trying to process a 1.4GB CSV file with Pandas, but keep having memory problems. I have tried different things in attempt to make Pandas read_csv work to no avail.
It didn't work when I used the iterator=True and chunksize=number parameters. Moreover, the smaller the chunksize, the slower it is to process the same amount of data.
(Simple heavier overhead doesn't explain it because it was way too slower when number of chunks is big. I suspect when processing every chunk, panda needs to go though all the chunks before it to "get to it", instead of jumping right to the start of the chunk. This seems the only way this can be explained.)
Then as a last resort, I split the CSV files into 6 parts, and tried to read them one by one, but still get MemoryError.
(I have monitored the memory usage of python when running the code below, and found that each time python finishes processing a file and moves on to the next, the memory usage goes up. It seemed quite obvious that panda didn't release memory for the previous file when it's already finished processing it.)
The code may not make sense but that's because I removed the part where it writes into an SQL database to simplify it and isolate the problem.
import csv,pandas as pd
import glob
filenameStem = 'Crimes'
counter = 0
for filename in glob.glob(filenameStem + '_part*.csv'): # reading files Crimes_part1.csv through Crimes_part6.csv
chunk = pd.read_csv(filename)
df = chunk.iloc[:,[5,8,15,16]]
df = df.dropna(how='any')
counter += 1
print(counter)

you may try to parse only those columns that you need (as #BrenBarn said in comments):
import os
import glob
import pandas as pd
def get_merged_csv(flist, **kwargs):
return pd.concat([pd.read_csv(f, **kwargs) for f in flist], ignore_index=True)
fmask = 'Crimes_part*.csv'
cols = [5,8,15,16]
df = get_merged_csv(glob.glob(fmask), index_col=None, usecols=cols).dropna(how='any')
print(df.head())
PS this will include only 4 out of at least 17 columns in your resulting data frame

Thanks for the reply.
After some debugging, I have located the problem. The "iloc" subsetting of pandas created a circular reference, which prevented garbage recollection. Detailed discussion can be found here

I have found same issues in csv file. First to make csv as chunks and fix the chunksize.use the chunksize or iterator parameter to return the data in chunks.
Syntax:
csv_onechunk = padas.read_csv(filepath, sep = delimiter, skiprows = 1, chunksize = 10000)
then concatenate the chunks (Only valid with C parser)

Large, persistent DataFrame in pandas

I am exploring switching to python and pandas as a long-time SAS user.
However, when running some tests today, I was surprised that python ran out of memory when trying to pandas.read_csv() a 128mb csv file. It had about 200,000 rows and 200 columns of mostly numeric data.
With SAS, I can import a csv file into a SAS dataset and it can be as large as my hard drive.
Is there something analogous in pandas?
I regularly work with large files and do not have access to a distributed computing network.

Wes is of course right! I'm just chiming in to provide a little more complete example code. I had the same issue with a 129 Mb file, which was solved by:
import pandas as pd
tp = pd.read_csv('large_dataset.csv', iterator=True, chunksize=1000) # gives TextFileReader, which is iterable with chunks of 1000 rows.
df = pd.concat(tp, ignore_index=True) # df is DataFrame. If errors, do `list(tp)` instead of `tp`

In principle it shouldn't run out of memory, but there are currently memory problems with read_csv on large files caused by some complex Python internal issues (this is vague but it's been known for a long time: http://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/407).
At the moment there isn't a perfect solution (here's a tedious one: you could transcribe the file row-by-row into a pre-allocated NumPy array or memory-mapped file--np.mmap), but it's one I'll be working on in the near future. Another solution is to read the file in smaller pieces (use iterator=True, chunksize=1000) then concatenate then with pd.concat. The problem comes in when you pull the entire text file into memory in one big slurp.

This is an older thread, but I just wanted to dump my workaround solution here. I initially tried the chunksize parameter (even with quite small values like 10000), but it didn't help much; had still technical issues with the memory size (my CSV was ~ 7.5 Gb).
Right now, I just read chunks of the CSV files in a for-loop approach and add them e.g., to an SQLite database step by step:
import pandas as pd
import sqlite3
from pandas.io import sql
import subprocess
# In and output file paths
in_csv = '../data/my_large.csv'
out_sqlite = '../data/my.sqlite'
table_name = 'my_table' # name for the SQLite database table
chunksize = 100000 # number of lines to process at each iteration
# columns that should be read from the CSV file
columns = ['molecule_id','charge','db','drugsnow','hba','hbd','loc','nrb','smiles']
# Get number of lines in the CSV file
nlines = subprocess.check_output('wc -l %s' % in_csv, shell=True)
nlines = int(nlines.split()[0])
# connect to database
cnx = sqlite3.connect(out_sqlite)
# Iteratively read CSV and dump lines into the SQLite table
for i in range(0, nlines, chunksize):
df = pd.read_csv(in_csv,
header=None, # no header, define column header manually later
nrows=chunksize, # number of rows to read at each iteration
skiprows=i) # skip rows that were already read
# columns to read
df.columns = columns
sql.to_sql(df,
name=table_name,
con=cnx,
index=False, # don't use CSV file index
index_label='molecule_id', # use a unique column from DataFrame as index
if_exists='append')
cnx.close()

Below is my working flow.
import sqlalchemy as sa
import pandas as pd
import psycopg2
count = 0
con = sa.create_engine('postgresql://postgres:pwd#localhost:00001/r')
#con = sa.create_engine('sqlite:///XXXXX.db') SQLite
chunks = pd.read_csv('..file', chunksize=10000, encoding="ISO-8859-1",
sep=',', error_bad_lines=False, index_col=False, dtype='unicode')
Base on your file size, you'd better optimized the chunksize.
for chunk in chunks:
chunk.to_sql(name='Table', if_exists='append', con=con)
count += 1
print(count)
After have all data in Database, You can query out those you need from database.

If you want to load huge csv files, dask might be a good option. It mimics the pandas api, so it feels quite similar to pandas
link to dask on github

You can use Pytable rather than pandas df.
It is designed for large data sets and the file format is in hdf5.
So the processing time is relatively fast.