I have a NumPy array, for example:
>>> import numpy as np
>>> x = np.random.randint(0, 10, size=(5, 5))
>>> x
array([[4, 7, 3, 7, 6],
[7, 9, 5, 7, 8],
[3, 1, 6, 3, 2],
[9, 2, 3, 8, 4],
[0, 9, 9, 0, 4]])
Is there a way to get a view (or copy) that contains indices 1:3 of the first row, indices 2:4 of the second row and indices 3:5 of the forth row?
So, in the above example, I wish to get:
>>> # What to write here?
array([[7, 3],
[5, 7],
[8, 4]])
Obviously, I would like a general method that would work efficiently also for multi-dimensional large arrays (and not only for the toy example above).
Try:
>>> np.array([x[0, 1:3], x[1, 2:4], x[3, 3:5]])
array([[7, 3],
[5, 7],
[8, 4]])
You can use numpy.lib.stride_tricks.as_strided as long as the offsets between rows are uniform:
# How far to step along the rows
offset = 1
# How wide the chunk of each row is
width = 2
view = np.lib.stride_tricks.as_strided(x, shape=(x.shape[0], width), strides=(x.strides[0] + offset * x.strides[1],) + x.strides[1:])
The result is guaranteed to be a view into the original data, not a copy.
Since as_strided is ridiculously powerful, be very careful how you use it. For example, make absolutely sure that the view does not go out of bounds in the last few rows.
If you can avoid it, try not to assign anything into a view returned by as_strided. Assignment just increases the dangers of unpredictable behavior and crashing a thousandfold if you don't know exactly what you're doing.
I guess something like this :D
In:
import numpy as np
x = np.random.randint(0, 10, size=(5, 5))
Out:
array([[7, 3, 3, 1, 9],
[6, 1, 3, 8, 7],
[0, 2, 2, 8, 4],
[8, 8, 1, 8, 8],
[1, 2, 4, 3, 4]])
In:
list_of_indicies = [[0,1,3], [1,2,4], [3,3,5]] #[row, start, stop]
def func(array, row, start, stop):
return array[row, start:stop]
for i in range(len(list_of_indicies)):
print(func(x,list_of_indicies[i][0],list_of_indicies[i][1], list_of_indicies[i][2]))
Out:
[3 3]
[3 8]
[3 4]
So u can modify it for your needs. Good luck!
I would extract diagonal vectors and stack them together, like this:
def diag_slice(x, start, end):
n_rows = min(*x.shape)-end+1
columns = [x.diagonal(i)[:n_rows, None] for i in range(start, end)]
return np.hstack(columns)
In [37]: diag_slice(x, 1, 3)
Out[37]:
array([[7, 3],
[5, 7],
[3, 2]])
For the general case it will be hard to beat a row by row list comprehension:
In [28]: idx = np.array([[0,1,3],[1,2,4],[4,3,5]])
In [29]: [x[i,j:k] for i,j,k in idx]
Out[29]: [array([7, 8]), array([2, 0]), array([9, 2])]
If the resulting arrays are all the same size, they can be combined into one 2d array:
In [30]: np.array(_)
Out[30]:
array([[7, 8],
[2, 0],
[9, 2]])
Another approach is to concatenate the indices before. I won't get into the details, but create something like this:
In [27]: x[[0,0,1,1,3,3],[1,2,2,3,3,4]]
Out[27]: array([7, 8, 2, 0, 3, 8])
Selecting from different rows complicates this 2nd approach. Conceptually the first is simpler. Past experience suggests the speed is about the same.
For uniform length slices, something like the as_strided trick may be faster, but it requires more understanding.
Some masking based approaches have also been suggested. But the details are more complicated, so I'll leave those to people like #Divakar who have specialized in them.
Someone has already pointed out the as_strided tricks, and yes, you should really use it with caution.
Here is a broadcast / fancy index approach which is less efficient than as_strided but still works pretty well IMO
window_size, step_size = 2, 1
# index within window
index = np.arange(2)
# offset
offset = np.arange(1, 4, step_size)
# for your case it's [0, 1, 3], I'm not sure how to generalize it without further information
fancy_row = np.array([0, 1, 3]).reshape(-1, 1)
# array([[1, 2],
# [2, 3],
# [3, 4]])
fancy_col = offset.reshape(-1, 1) + index
x[fancy_row, fancy_col]
Related
I am trying to extract several values at once from an array but I can't seem to find a way to do it in a one-liner in Numpy.
Simply put, considering an array:
a = numpy.arange(10)
> array([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])
I would like to be able to extract, say, 2 values, skip the next 2, extract the 2 following values etc. This would result in:
array([0, 1, 4, 5, 8, 9])
This is an example but I am ideally looking for a way to extract x values and skip y others.
I thought this could be done with slicing, doing something like:
a[:2:2]
but it only returns 0, which is the expected behavior.
I know I could obtain the expected result by combining several slicing operations (similarly to Numpy Array Slicing) but I was wondering if I was not missing some numpy feature.
If you want to avoid creating copies and allocating new memory, you could use a window_view of two elements:
win = np.lib.stride_tricks.sliding_window_view(a, 2)
array([[0, 1],
[1, 2],
[2, 3],
[3, 4],
[4, 5],
[5, 6],
[6, 7],
[7, 8],
[8, 9]])
And then only take every 4th window view:
win[::4].ravel()
array([0, 1, 4, 5, 8, 9])
Or directly go with the more dangerous as_strided, but heed the warnings in the documentation:
np.lib.stride_tricks.as_strided(a, shape=(3,2), strides=(32,8))
You can use a modulo operator:
x = 2 # keep
y = 2 # skip
out = a[np.arange(a.shape[0])%(x+y)<x]
Output: array([0, 1, 4, 5, 8, 9])
Output with x = 2 ; y = 3:
array([0, 1, 5, 6])
I have a 2D numpy array that I want to extract a submatrix from.
I get the submatrix by slicing the array as below.
Here I want a 3*3 submatrix around an item at the index of (2,3).
>>> import numpy as np
>>> a = np.array([[0, 1, 2, 3],
... [4, 5, 6, 7],
... [8, 9, 0, 1],
... [2, 3, 4, 5]])
>>> a[1:4, 2:5]
array([[6, 7],
[0, 1],
[4, 5]])
But what I want is that for indexes that are out of range, it goes back to the beginning of array and continues from there. This is the result I want:
array([[6, 7, 4],
[0, 1, 8],
[4, 5, 2]])
I know that I can do things like getting mod of the index to the width of the array; but I'm looking for a numpy function that does that.
And also for an one dimensional array this will cause an index out of range error, which is not really useful...
This is one way using np.pad with wraparound mode.
>>> a = np.array([[0, 1, 2, 3],
[4, 5, 6, 7],
[8, 9, 0, 1],
[2, 3, 4, 5]])
>>> pad_width = 1
>>> i, j = 2, 3
>>> startrow, endrow = i-1+pad_width, i+2+pad_width # for 3 x 3 submatrix
>>> startcol, endcol = j-1+pad_width, j+2+pad_width
>>> np.pad(a, (pad_width, pad_width), 'wrap')[startrow:endrow, startcol:endcol]
array([[6, 7, 4],
[0, 1, 8],
[4, 5, 2]])
Depending on the shape of your patch (eg. 5 x 5 instead of 3 x 3) you can increase the pad_width and start and end row and column indices accordingly.
np.take does have a mode parameter which can wrap-around out of bound indices. But it's a bit hacky to use np.take for multidimensional arrays since the axis must be a scalar.
However, In your particular case you could do this:
a = np.array([[0, 1, 2, 3],
[4, 5, 6, 7],
[8, 9, 0, 1],
[2, 3, 4, 5]])
np.take(a, np.r_[2:5], axis=1, mode='wrap')[1:4]
Output:
array([[6, 7, 4],
[0, 1, 8],
[4, 5, 2]])
EDIT
This function might be what you are looking for (?)
def select3x3(a, idx):
x,y = idx
return np.take(np.take(a, np.r_[x-1:x+2], axis=0, mode='wrap'), np.r_[y-1:y+2], axis=1, mode='wrap')
But in retrospect, i recommend using modulo and fancy indexing for this kind of operation (it's basically what the mode='wrap' is doing internally anyways):
def select3x3(a, idx):
x,y = idx
return a[np.r_[x-1:x+2][:,None] % a.shape[0], np.r_[y-1:y+2][None,:] % a.shape[1]]
The above solution is also generalized for any 2d shape on a.
I have a 2d and 1d array. I am looking to find the two rows that contain at least once the values from the 1d array as follows:
import numpy as np
A = np.array([[0, 3, 1],
[9, 4, 6],
[2, 7, 3],
[1, 8, 9],
[6, 2, 7],
[4, 8, 0]])
B = np.array([0,1,2,3])
results = []
for elem in B:
results.append(np.where(A==elem)[0])
This works and results in the following array:
[array([0, 5], dtype=int64),
array([0, 3], dtype=int64),
array([2, 4], dtype=int64),
array([0, 2], dtype=int64)]
But this is probably not the best way of proceeding. Following the answers given in this question (Search Numpy array with multiple values) I tried the following solutions:
out1 = np.where(np.in1d(A, B))
num_arr = np.sort(B)
idx = np.searchsorted(B, A)
idx[idx==len(num_arr)] = 0
out2 = A[A == num_arr[idx]]
But these give me incorrect values:
In [36]: out1
Out[36]: (array([ 0, 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17], dtype=int64),)
In [37]: out2
Out[37]: array([0, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 0])
Thanks for your help
If you need to know whether each row of A contains ANY element of array B without interest in which particular element of B it is, the following script can be used:
input:
np.isin(A,B).sum(axis=1)>0
output:
array([ True, False, True, True, True, True])
Since you're dealing with a 2D array* you can use broadcasting to compare B with raveled version of A. This will give you the respective indices in a raveled shape. Then you can reverse the result and get the corresponding indices in original array using np.unravel_index.
In [50]: d = np.where(B[:, None] == A.ravel())[1]
In [51]: np.unravel_index(d, A.shape)
Out[51]: (array([0, 5, 0, 3, 2, 4, 0, 2]), array([0, 2, 2, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2]))
^
# expected result
* From documentation: For 3-dimensional arrays this is certainly efficient in terms of lines of code, and, for small data sets, it can also be computationally efficient. For large data sets, however, the creation of the large 3-d array may result in sluggish performance.
Also, Broadcasting is a powerful tool for writing short and usually intuitive code that does its computations very efficiently in C. However, there are cases when broadcasting uses unnecessarily large amounts of memory for a particular algorithm. In these cases, it is better to write the algorithm's outer loop in Python. This may also produce more readable code, as algorithms that use broadcasting tend to become more difficult to interpret as the number of dimensions in the broadcast increases.
Is something like this what you are looking for?
import numpy as np
from itertools import combinations
A = np.array([[0, 3, 1],
[9, 4, 6],
[2, 7, 3],
[1, 8, 9],
[6, 2, 7],
[4, 8, 0]])
B = np.array([0,1,2,3])
for i in combinations(A, 2):
if np.all(np.isin(B, np.hstack(i))):
print(i[0], ' ', i[1])
which prints the following:
[0 3 1] [2 7 3]
[0 3 1] [6 2 7]
note: this solution does NOT require the rows be consecutive. Please let me know if that is required.
I have split a numpy array like so:
x = np.random.randn(10,3)
x_split = np.split(x,5)
which splits x equally into five numpy arrays each with shape (2,3) and puts them in a list. What is the best way to combine a subset of these back together (e.g. x_split[:k] and x_split[k+1:]) so that the resulting shape is similar to the original x i.e. (something,3)?
I found that for k > 0 this is possible with you do:
np.vstack((np.vstack(x_split[:k]),np.vstack(x_split[k+1:])))
but this does not work when k = 0 as x_split[:0] = [] so there must be a better and cleaner way. The error message I get when k = 0 is:
ValueError: need at least one array to concatenate
The comment by Paul Panzer is right on target, but since NumPy now gently discourages vstack, here is the concatenate version:
x = np.random.randn(10, 3)
x_split = np.split(x, 5, axis=0)
k = 0
np.concatenate(x_split[:k] + x_split[k+1:], axis=0)
Note the explicit axis argument passed both times (it has to be the same); this makes it easy to adapt the code to work for other axes if needed. E.g.,
x_split = np.split(x, 3, axis=1)
k = 0
np.concatenate(x_split[:k] + x_split[k+1:], axis=1)
np.r_ can turn several slices into a list of indices.
In [20]: np.r_[0:3, 4:5]
Out[20]: array([0, 1, 2, 4])
In [21]: np.vstack([xsp[i] for i in _])
Out[21]:
array([[9, 7, 5],
[6, 4, 3],
[9, 8, 0],
[1, 2, 2],
[3, 3, 0],
[8, 1, 4],
[2, 2, 5],
[4, 4, 5]])
In [22]: np.r_[0:0, 1:5]
Out[22]: array([1, 2, 3, 4])
In [23]: np.vstack([xsp[i] for i in _])
Out[23]:
array([[9, 8, 0],
[1, 2, 2],
[3, 3, 0],
[8, 1, 4],
[3, 2, 0],
[0, 3, 8],
[2, 2, 5],
[4, 4, 5]])
Internally np.r_ has a lot of ifs and loops to handle the slices and their boundaries, but it hides it all from us.
If the xsp (your x_split) was an array, we could do xsp[np.r_[...]], but since it is a list we have to iterate. Well we could also hide that iteration with an operator.itemgetter object.
In [26]: operator.itemgetter(*Out[22])
Out[26]: operator.itemgetter(1, 2, 3, 4)
In [27]: np.vstack(operator.itemgetter(*Out[22])(xsp))
So I have a 4 by 4 matrix. [[1,2,3,4],[2,3,4,5],[3,4,5,6],[4,5,6,7]]
I need to subtract the second row by [1,2,3,4]
no numpy if possible. I'm a beginner and don't know how to use that
thnx
With regular Python loops:
a = [[1,2,3,4],[2,3,4,5],[3,4,5,6],[4,5,6,7]]
b = [1,2,3,4]
for i in range(4):
a[1][i] -= b[i]
Simply loop over the entries in the b list and subtract from the corresponding entries in a[1], the second list (ie row) of the a matrix.
However, NumPy can do this for you faster and easier and isn't too hard to learn:
In [47]: import numpy as np
In [48]: a = np.array([[1,2,3,4],[2,3,4,5],[3,4,5,6],[4,5,6,7]])
In [49]: a
Out[49]:
array([[1, 2, 3, 4],
[2, 3, 4, 5],
[3, 4, 5, 6],
[4, 5, 6, 7]])
In [50]: a[1] -= [1,2,3,4]
In [51]: a
Out[51]:
array([[1, 2, 3, 4],
[1, 1, 1, 1],
[3, 4, 5, 6],
[4, 5, 6, 7]])
Note that NumPy vectorizes many of its operations (such as subtraction), so the loops involved are handled for you (in fast, pre-compiled C-code).