I have the following structure of Parent and Child models, where the child references the parent.
class ParentModel(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
class ChildModel(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
parent = models.ForeignKey(
ParentModel, related_name='children', on_delete=models.CASCADE
)
created_by = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
class ParentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = ParentModel
fields = (
'name',
'children',
)
class ChildSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
models = ChildModel
fields = (
'name'
)
class ParentViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = ParentSerializer
queryset = ParentModel.objects.all()
class ChildViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = ChildSerializer
def get_queryset(self):
user = self.request.user
return ChildModel.objects.filter(created_by=user)
I would like for ParentSerializer.children to only include the ChildModel objects with created_by as self.request.user.
What is the correct way to filter ParentSerializer.children to the current user?
I am open to changing the models as well.
First I think you got a n+1 issue with your code.
When DRF will serialize ParentModel, accessing current_parent.children.all() will produce an SQL query for each parent.
To prevent this you can use prefetch_related so:
class ParentViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = ParentSerializer
queryset = ParentModel.objects.prefetch_related(Prefetch("children"))
This will result in 2 SQL queries instead of N+1 (with N being the number of ParentModel row).
Additionnaly you can use prefetch_related to filter the related model:
class ParentViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = ParentSerializer
def get_queryset(self):
user = self.request.user
return ParentModel.objects.prefetch_related(Prefetch("children", queryset=ChildrenModel.objects.filter(created_by=user)))
Which is what you are looking for I think.
I am trying to enforce a constraint for mysql where user is prohibited from inserting twice the same name and model. E.g This should not be allowed to be inserted twice: name:Name1 model:Model1
#Model
class Car(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
model = models.CharField(max_length=100)
#View
class CarListCreateAPIView(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
serializer_class = CarSerializer
def get_queryset(self):
trip_code = self.kwargs.get("pk")
return Car.objects.filter(trip = trip_code) #Return cars for given trip
#Seializer
class CarSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Car
fields = ('__all__')
constraints = [
models.UniqueConstraint(fields=['name', 'model'], name='car_name_model_constraint')
]
The problem is that the constraint is never created and thus not enforced. What might be the issue with the code?
Use unique_together in class Meta in Model like that:
class Car(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
model = models.CharField(max_length=100)
class Meta:
unique_together = ['name','model']
More on that here: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/ref/models/options/#unique-together
now i want output such a way that there for each list i must get entire timing record how to achieve it
below is my model
model.py
class Refreshment(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=200, unique=True)
charges = models.DecimalField(max_digits=12, decimal_places=2, help_text="Charges per hour")
class Timeing(models.Model):
refreshment = models.OneToOneField(Refreshment,on_delete=models.CASCADE)
sunday_open = models.TimeField(blank=True, editable=True)
Below is my views.py
#api_view()
def all_games_sports(request):
entertainment = Refreshment.objects.filter(type=1)
serialize = EntertainmentSerializer(instance=entertainment, many=True)
main = {'status': True, 'code': "CODE_SUCCESSFUL", 'msg': "SUCCESS", 'all_games_sports': serialize.data}
return Response(main)
Serializer.py
class TimeingSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Timeing
fields = '__all__'
class EntertainmentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
refreshment = TimeingSerializer(many=True,read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Refreshment
fields = '__all__'
AttributeError: Got AttributeError when attempting to get a value for field `refreshment` on serializer `AvailableHourSerializer`.
The serializer field might be named incorrectly and not match any attribute or key on the `Refreshment` instance.
Original exception text was: 'Refreshment' object has no attribute 'refreshment'.
Your code throws an error. It should. You defined refreshment, but not added it to fields.
class EntertainmentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
refreshment = TimeingSerializer(many=True,read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Refreshment
fields = '__all__' #You have not added refreshment to fields.
You should be doing this instead:
class EntertainmentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
timeing = TimeingSerializer(many=True,read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Refreshment
fields = '__all__'
Is this possible with DRF using ModelSerializers? I'm mostly interested in seeing an example to reproduce if possible.
Here are my models:
class Grandparent(Model):
g_name = CharField(max_length=10)
parent = ForeignKey('Parent')
class Parent(Model):
p_name = CharField(max_length=10)
child = ForeignKey('Child')
class Child(Model):
c_name = CharField(max_length=10)
Here are my serializers:
class ChildSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = models.Child
fields = ('id', 'c_name')
class ParentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
child = ChildSerializer()
def create(self, validated_data):
child_data = validated_data.pop('child')
child, _ = models.Child.objects.get_or_create(**child_data)
return models.Parent.objects.create(child=child, **validated_data)
class Meta:
model = models.Parent
fields = ('id', 'p_name', 'child')
class GrandparentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
parent = ParentSerializer()
class Meta:
model = models.Grandparent
fields = ('id', 'g_name', 'parent')
Here is my grandparent view:
class GrandparentList(generics.ListCreateAPIView):
queryset = models.Grandparent.objects.all()
serializer_class = serializers.GrandparentSerializer
Here is the error I get when I try to post to the Grandparent view:
AttributeError at /grandparents/ 'list' object has no attribute 'get'
Issue we found was that is a bug in the form front-end provided by DRF. Nested serializer behaved correctly when called directly over HTTP.
How do I serialize a many-to-many field into list of something, and return them through rest framework? In my example below, I try to return the post together with a list of tags associated with it.
models.py
class post(models.Model):
tag = models.ManyToManyField(Tag)
text = models.CharField(max_length=100)
serializers.py
class PostSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Post
fields = ("text", "tag"??)
views.py
class PostViewSet(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
queryset = Post.objects.all()
serializer_class = PostSerializer
You will need a TagSerializer, whose class Meta has model = Tag. After TagSerializer is created, modify the PostSerializer with many=True for a ManyToManyField relation:
class PostSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
tag = TagSerializer(read_only=True, many=True)
class Meta:
model = Post
fields = ('tag', 'text',)
Answer is for DRF 3
This is what I did, let´s suppose a Book can have more than one author and an Author can have more than one book:
On Model:
class Author(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100, default="")
last_name = models.IntegerField(default=0)
class Book(models.Model):
authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author, related_name="book_list", blank=True)
name = models.CharField(max_length=100, default="")
published = models.BooleanField(default=True)
On Serializers:
class BookSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
authors = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(queryset=Author.objects.all(), many=True)
class Meta:
model = Book
fields = ('id', 'name', 'published', 'authors')
class AuthorSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
book_list = BookSerializer(many=True, read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Author
fields = ('id', 'name', 'last_name', 'book_list')
Adding to #Brian's answer
"tags": [{"name": "tag1"}] can be simplified to "tags": ["tag1", "tag2",...] in this way:
class TagListingField(serializers.RelatedField):
def to_representation(self, value):
return value.name
class PostSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
tag = TagListingField(many=True, read_only=True)
class Meta:
...
More info here: https://www.django-rest-framework.org/api-guide/relations/#custom-relational-fields
The default ModelSerializer uses primary keys for relationships. However, you can easily generate nested representations using the Meta depth attribute:
class PostSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Post
fields = ("text", "tag")
depth = 1
As mentioned in the documentation :
The depth option should be set to an integer value that indicates the depth of relationships that should be traversed before reverting to a flat representation.
This works for me.
tag = TagSerializer(source="tag", read_only=True, many=True)
Django 2.0
For many to many field, if you want specific one:
class QuestionSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
topics_list = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
def get_topics_list(self, instance):
names = []
a = instance.topics.get_queryset()
for i in a:
names.append(i.desc)
return names
class Meta:
model = Question
fields = ('topics_list',)
In the serializer on init method you can pass the queryset to the field and rest_framework valide the ids on that queryset
1) first extend your serializer from serializers.ModelSerializer
class YourSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
2) include the field on the meta class
class YourSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
fields = (..., 'your_field',)
3) in the init method:
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(YourSerializer, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.fields['your_field].queryset = <the queryset of your field>
You can limit the queryset for that field under any argument using filter or exclude like normally you do. In case that you want include all just use .objects.all()
models.py
class Tag(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
# ===============
# ... rest of the fields ...
class Post(models.Model):
tag = models.ManyToManyField(Tag)
text = models.CharField(max_length=100)
serialiazers.py
class TagSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Tag
fields = '__all__'
class PostSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
tags = TagSerializer(many=True, read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Post
fields = ("text", "tag")
views.py
## FUNCTION BASED VIEW
def fbvPost_ListView(request):
# list
if request.method == "GET":
posts = Post.objects.all()
serializer = PostSerializer(instance=posts, many=True)
return JsonResponse(serializer.data, safe=False)
return JsonResponse({"success": False})
# ===========================================================
## CLASS BASED VIEW
class cbvPost_ListView(viewsets.ReadOnlyModelViewSet):
queryset = Post.objects.all()
serializer_class = PostSerializer
NB: Tag, Post are two models & we need to serialize them. Here, Post model have a dependency of Tag models, so here we explicitly mention it, [tags = TagSerializer(many=True, read_only=True)] or its return it's primary field value.
DETAILS HERE
Hi I will be showing many to many for update and create. The context is the event can have many dances and dances can have many event.
The request will be as followed.
{
"competition": 2,
"title": "the title",
"dances":[ {"id":1},{"id":2}],
"description": "the desc"
}
The Create Function will be as followed.
def create(self, validated_data):
try:
dance_ids = []
for dance in self.initial_data['dances']:
if 'id' not in dance:
raise serializers.ValidationError({'detail': 'key error'})
dance_ids.append(dance['id'])
new_event = models.Event.objects.create(**validated_data)
if dance_ids:
for dance_id in dance_ids:
new_event.dances.add(dance_id)
new_event.save()
return new_event
except Exception as e:
raise serializers.ValidationError({'detail': e})
The Update Function will be as followed.
def update(self, instance, validated_data):
# Delete all records of genres.
try:
for current_genre in instance.dances.all():
instance.dances.remove(current_genre)
# Repopulate genres into instance.
for dance in self.initial_data['dances']:
if 'id' not in dance:
raise serializers.ValidationError({'detail': 'key error'})
dance_obj = models.Dance.objects.get(pk=dance['id'])
instance.dances.add(dance_obj)
event_updated = super().update(instance, validated_data)
return event_updated
except Exception as e:
raise serializers.ValidationError({'detail': e})
If you want to just do "dances":[1,2] instead, just make some amendments to the
for dance in self.initial_data['dances']:
if 'id' not in dance:
raise serializers.ValidationError({'detail': 'key error'})
dance_ids.append(dance['id'])
part. I hope this will be able to help yall out! :)
First, Tag needs its own serializer too
class TagSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Tag
fields = '__all__'
Then in your PostSerializer, add one line
class PostSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
tag = TagSerializer(read_only=True, many=True).data
class Meta:
model = Post
fields = ("text", "tag")
This will make it so your Tag field in Post is an array of tag ids. if you don't put the ".data" part, it will put all of the attributes of tag, which is probably too much in most cases
You can use serializers.SlugRelatedField() or serializers.StringRelatedField(many=True) Serializer relations
In your case :
class PostSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
tag = serializers.StringRelatedField(many=True) # this will return a list
class Meta:
model = Post
fields = ('tag', 'text',)