Django create a custom form permission - python

I'm developing a management software. And I need create a module for manage the permissions and groups using the auth of django. I dont want use the admin django because this just allow log in for super users.
I want override the admin route and create a form with the same features from the admin site. If is possible, I want use the widget for the assignment of permission and group.
I need all this built into an app because I need this to work for this and other projects.
I have already written a custom form to add, edit and view users extending the class UserCreationForm, I need something similar to that.
I hope you can help me...

First things first: don't do this!
Creating your own Django admin site is a load of work, and likely to be insecure etc. Your'e opening a giant can of worms here.
If you need members of your app to edit permissions, they do not have to be superusers! Users with is_staff = True can all access the admin site. Once you've set this for the users you want, go ahead and configure the exact permissions for this type of user.
Start with the official docs on user permissions.

Related

Django: add only permissions of specific application

I´m using django for my backend and this backend is managing multiple applications.
For example i have app_a and app_b.
for app_a i created a lot of custom permissions and groups.
Now i want to give another user the permission to access the admin panel, but i wan`t that he can only add permissions and groups to users that belongs to app_a.
I tried to use add_group or add_permission, but this is assigned to all apps.
Thank you for support!

Django group permission activate

If you have django.contrib.auth in your INSTALLED_APPS django will automatically create add, change, delete and view permissions to every model in your system (or any one you add later). These are stored in auth_permission.
In django doc, here is what we can read under Groups section:
django.contrib.auth.models.Group models are a generic way of categorizing users so you can apply permissions, or some other label, to those users. A user can belong to any number of groups.
A user in a group automatically has the permissions granted to that group. For example, if the group 'Site editors' has the permission can_edit_home_page, any user in that group will have that permission.
I've a group with no permission at all (call it NADA) and I've assign that group to a specific user (let's call him Pierre). Pierre can still connect and create, update, delete or view anything on my web interface.
How can I make it working? There's few or no doc on the web for native Django Permission.
I've read this nice publication
django-permission-apps-comparison.
I know I could install django-guardian, django-role-permissions or
django-rules...
I know we can manage access via middleware or decorator But since django IS creating these tables for us (user, groups, permissions and group_permissions)
I thought it was extremely simple to implement CRUD access to any model class!
Wrong?
Do I miss something?
Note: Working with Python3.6 and Django 2.1.3
Django permissions are simple. As far as I understand your question, you are trying to create a user with no permission and he should not see any entries on the Django admin.
First thing is to make sure the user is not marked as "superuser", the superuser sees everything no matter which group they are added in.
If he is not a superuser and is still able to see the model then you should make sure he is not part of multiple groups. If a user is in multiple groups then a union of all permissions is what is applied to them. This link will give you more details on different flags for a user https://djangobook.com/users-groups-permissions/. Let me know if this helps.

Adding custom attributes to django scheema

I am trying to authenticate my django application written in python with okta IDP. I have almost configured everything at SP side and IDP side too. Now I need to pass a custom variable from IDP which assert SP that user is a publisher,editor or admin and further save this to the django format database (in auth_user_groups table). Anyone have tried doing this, or anyone has idea about this?
I am able to get the custom variable values by attributes mappings from IDP. But this allows me to save the custom attributes only on the user table. please let me know if i have not made myself clear here about my question.
Once again I have a privilege to answer my own question. So hear is the solution.
Django has a user profile module which is to be turned on by giving the module location in the settings.py
i.e -
"AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE = appTitle.UserProfile"
The UserProfile needs to be specified in modules.py specifying the required structure of user profile u need for your app.
Now doing sync -db django creates the Database table for your user profile and further on the same user profile pysaml adds the value (CustomAttribute) which come on the saml Assertion.
more explanations on this can be found on django documentations too.
If any one still faces any issue please let me know.

Setting model level permissions in code for Django admin panel

Is there a way to implement the permissions for models through the code? I have a large set of models and I want some of the models to be just viewable by the admin and not the ability to add them.
Please suggest.
You can set permissions through the admin site itself. For instructions, see the "Users, Groups and Permissions" section in the django book chapter:
The Django Administration Site
Found the solution here: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RowLevelPermissions
works the way I needed.

Django Project structure, recommended structure to share an extended auth "User" model across apps?

I'm wondering what the common project/application structure is when the user model extended/sub-classed and this Resulting User model is shared and used across multiple apps.
I'd like to reference the same user model in multiple apps.
I haven't built the login interface yet, so I'm not sure how it should fit together.
The following comes to mind:
project.loginapp.app1
project.loginapp.app2
Is there a common pattern for this situation?
Would login best be handled by a 'login app'?
Similar to this question but more specific.
django application configuration
UPDATE
Clarified my use-case above.
I'd like to add fields (extend or subclass?) to the existing auth user model. And then reference that model in multiple apps.
Why are you extending User? Please clarify.
If you're adding more information about the users, you don't need to roll your own user and auth system. Django's version of that is quite solid. The user management is located in django.contrib.auth.
If you need to customize the information stored with users, first define a model such as
class Profile(models.Model):
...
user = models.ForeignKey("django.contrib.auth.models.User", unique=True)
and then set
AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE = "appname.profile"
in your settings.py
The advantage of setting this allows you to use code like this in your views:
def my_view(request):
profile = request.user.get_profile()
etc...
If you're trying to provide more ways for users to authenticate, you can add an auth backend. Extend or re-implement django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend and set it as
your AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS in settings.py.
If you want to make use of a different permissions or groups concept than is provided by django, there's nothing that will stop you. Django makes use of those two concepts only in django.contrib.admin (That I know of), and you are free to use some other concept for those topics as you see fit.
You should check first if the contrib.auth module satisfies your needs, so you don't have to reinvent the wheel:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/auth/#topics-auth
edit:
Check this snippet that creates a UserProfile after the creation of a new User.
def create_user_profile_handler(sender, instance, created, **kwargs):
if not created: return
user_profile = UserProfile.objects.create(user=instance)
user_profile.save()
post_save.connect(create_user_profile_handler, sender=User)
i think the 'project/app' names are badly chosen. it's more like 'site/module'. an app can be very useful without having views, for example.
check the 2008 DjangoCon talks on YouTube, especially the one about reusable apps, it will make you think totally different about how to structure your project.

Categories