We Keep Coding

Python- Insert new values into 'nested' list?

What I'm trying to do isn't a huge problem in php, but I can't find much assistance for Python.
In simple terms, from a list which produces output as follows:
{"marketId":"1.130856098","totalAvailable":null,"isMarketDataDelayed":null,"lastMatchTime":null,"betDelay":0,"version":2576584033,"complete":true,"runnersVoidable":false,"totalMatched":null,"status":"OPEN","bspReconciled":false,"crossMatching":false,"inplay":false,"numberOfWinners":1,"numberOfRunners":10,"numberOfActiveRunners":8,"runners":[{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":2.8,"size":34.16},{"price":2.76,"size":200},{"price":2.5,"size":237.85}],"availableToLay":[{"price":2.94,"size":6.03},{"price":2.96,"size":10.82},{"price":3,"size":33.45}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832765}...
All I want to do is add in an extra field, containing the 'runner name' in the data set below, into each of the 'runners' sub lists from the initial data set, based on selection_id=selectionId.
So initially I iterate through the full dataset, and then create a separate list to get the runner name from the runner id (I should point out that runnerId===selectionId===selection_id, no idea why there are multiple names are used), this works fine and the code is shown below:
for market_book in market_books:
market_catalogues = trading.betting.list_market_catalogue(
market_projection=["RUNNER_DESCRIPTION", "RUNNER_METADATA", "COMPETITION", "EVENT", "EVENT_TYPE", "MARKET_DESCRIPTION", "MARKET_START_TIME"],
filter=betfairlightweight.filters.market_filter(
market_ids=[market_book.market_id],
),
max_results=100)
data = []
for market_catalogue in market_catalogues:
for runner in market_catalogue.runners:
data.append(
(runner.selection_id, runner.runner_name)
)
So as you can see I have the data in data[], but what I need to do is add it to the initial data set, based on the selection_id.
I'm more comfortable with Php or Javascript, so apologies if this seems a bit simplistic, but the code snippets I've found on-line only seem to assist with very simple Python lists and nothing 'nested' (to me the structure seems similar to a nested array).
As per the request below, here is the full list:
{"marketId":"1.130856098","totalAvailable":null,"isMarketDataDelayed":null,"lastMatchTime":null,"betDelay":0,"version":2576584033,"complete":true,"runnersVoidable":false,"totalMatched":null,"status":"OPEN","bspReconciled":false,"crossMatching":false,"inplay":false,"numberOfWinners":1,"numberOfRunners":10,"numberOfActiveRunners":8,"runners":[{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":2.8,"size":34.16},{"price":2.76,"size":200},{"price":2.5,"size":237.85}],"availableToLay":[{"price":2.94,"size":6.03},{"price":2.96,"size":10.82},{"price":3,"size":33.45}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832765},{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":20,"size":3},{"price":19.5,"size":26.36},{"price":19,"size":2}],"availableToLay":[{"price":21,"size":13},{"price":22,"size":2},{"price":23,"size":2}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832767},{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":11,"size":9.75},{"price":10.5,"size":3},{"price":10,"size":28.18}],"availableToLay":[{"price":11.5,"size":12},{"price":13.5,"size":2},{"price":14,"size":7.75}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832766},{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":48,"size":2},{"price":46,"size":5},{"price":42,"size":5}],"availableToLay":[{"price":60,"size":7},{"price":70,"size":5},{"price":75,"size":10}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832769},{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":18.5,"size":28.94},{"price":18,"size":5},{"price":17.5,"size":3}],"availableToLay":[{"price":21,"size":20},{"price":23,"size":2},{"price":24,"size":2}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832768},{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":4.3,"size":9},{"price":4.2,"size":257.98},{"price":4.1,"size":51.1}],"availableToLay":[{"price":4.4,"size":20.97},{"price":4.5,"size":30},{"price":4.6,"size":16}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832771},{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":24,"size":6.75},{"price":23,"size":2},{"price":22,"size":2}],"availableToLay":[{"price":26,"size":2},{"price":27,"size":2},{"price":28,"size":2}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":12832770},{"status":"ACTIVE","ex":{"tradedVolume":[],"availableToBack":[{"price":5.7,"size":149.33},{"price":5.5,"size":29.41},{"price":5.4,"size":5}],"availableToLay":[{"price":6,"size":85},{"price":6.6,"size":5},{"price":6.8,"size":5}]},"sp":{"nearPrice":null,"farPrice":null,"backStakeTaken":[],"layLiabilityTaken":[],"actualSP":null},"adjustmentFactor":null,"removalDate":null,"lastPriceTraded":null,"handicap":0,"totalMatched":null,"selectionId":10064909}],"publishTime":1551612312125,"priceLadderDefinition":{"type":"CLASSIC"},"keyLineDescription":null,"marketDefinition":{"bspMarket":false,"turnInPlayEnabled":false,"persistenceEnabled":false,"marketBaseRate":5,"eventId":"28180290","eventTypeId":"2378961","numberOfWinners":1,"bettingType":"ODDS","marketType":"NONSPORT","marketTime":"2019-03-29T00:00:00.000Z","suspendTime":"2019-03-29T00:00:00.000Z","bspReconciled":false,"complete":true,"inPlay":false,"crossMatching":false,"runnersVoidable":false,"numberOfActiveRunners":8,"betDelay":0,"status":"OPEN","runners":[{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":1,"id":10064909},{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":2,"id":12832765},{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":3,"id":12832766},{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":4,"id":12832767},{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":5,"id":12832768},{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":6,"id":12832770},{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":7,"id":12832769},{"status":"ACTIVE","sortPriority":8,"id":12832771},{"status":"LOSER","sortPriority":9,"id":10317013},{"status":"LOSER","sortPriority":10,"id":10317010}],"regulators":["MR_INT"],"countryCode":"GB","discountAllowed":true,"timezone":"Europe\/London","openDate":"2019-03-29T00:00:00.000Z","version":2576584033,"priceLadderDefinition":{"type":"CLASSIC"}}}

i think i understand what you are trying to do now
first hold your data as a python object (you gave us a json object)
import json
my_data = json.loads(my_json_string)
for item in my_data['runners']:
item['selectionId'] = [item['selectionId'], my_name_here]
the thing is that my_data['runners'][i]['selectionId'] is a string, unless you want to concat the name and the id together, you should turn it into a list or even a dictionary
each item is a dicitonary so you can always also a new keys to it
item['new_key'] = my_value

So, essentially this works...with one exception...I can see from the print(...) in the loop that the attribute is updated, however what I can't seem to do is then see this update outside the loop.
mkt_runners = []
for market_catalogue in market_catalogues:
for r in market_catalogue.runners:
mkt_runners.append((r.selection_id, r.runner_name))
for market_book in market_books:
for runner in market_book.runners:
for x in mkt_runners:
if runner.selection_id in x:
setattr(runner, 'x', x[1])
print(market_book.market_id, runner.x, runner.selection_id)
print(market_book.json())
So the print(market_book.market_id.... displays as expected, but when I print the whole list it shows the un-updated version. I can't seem to find an obvious solution, which is odd, as it seems like a really simple thing (I tried messing around with indents, in case that was the problem, but it doesn't seem to be, its like its not refreshing the market_book list post update of the runners sub list)!

Parsing JSON in Python (Reverse dictionary search)

I'm using Python and "requests" to practice the use of API. I've had success with basic requests and parsing, but having difficulty with list comprehension for a more complex project.
I requested from a server and got a dictionary. From there, I used:
participant_search = (match1_request['participantIdentities'])
To convert the values of the participantIdentities key to get the following data:
[{'player':
{'summonerName': 'Crescent Bladex',
'matchHistoryUri': '/v1/stats/player_history/NA1/226413119',
'summonerId': 63523774,
'profileIcon': 870},
'participantId': 1},
My goal here is to combine the summonerId and participantId to one list. Which is easy normally, but the order of ParticipantIdentities is randomized. So the player I want information on will sometimes be 1st on the list, and other times third.
So I can't use the var = list[0] like how I would normally do.
I have access to summonerId, so I'm thinking I can search the list the summonerId, then somehow collect all the information around it. For instance, if I knew 63523774 then I could find the key for it. From here, is it possible to find the parent list of the key?
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Edit (Clarification):
Here's the data I'm working with: http://pastebin.com/spHk8VP0
At line 1691 is where participant the nested dictionary 'participantIdentities' is. From here, there are 10 dictionaries. These 10 dictionaries include two nested dictionaries, "player" and "participantId".
My goal is to search these 10 dictionaries for the one dictionary that has the summonerId. The summonerId is something I already know before I make this request to the server.
So I'm looking for some sort of "search" method, that goes beyond "true/false". A search method that, if a value is found within an object, the entire dictionary (key:value) is given.

Not sure if I properly understood you, but would this work?
for i in range(len(match1_request['participantIdentities'])):
if(match1_request['participantIdentities'][i]['summonerid'] == '63523774':
# do whatever you want with it.
i becomes the index you're searching for.

ds = match1_request['participantIdentities']
result_ = [d for d in ds if d["player"]["summonerId"] == 12345]
result = result_[0] if result_ else {}
See if it works for you.

You can use a dict comprehension to build a dict wich uses summonerIds as keys:
players_list = response['participantIdentities']
{p['player']['summonerId']: p['participantId'] for p in players_list}

I think what you are asking for is: "How do I get the stats for a given a summoner?"
You'll need a mapping of participantId to summonerId.
For example, would it be helpful to know this?
summoner[1] = 63523774
summoner[2] = 44610089
...
If so, then:
# This is probably what you are asking for:
summoner = {ident['participantId']: ident['player']['summonerId']
for ident in match1_request['participantIdentities']}
# Then you can do this:
summoner_stats = {summoner[p['participantId']]: p['stats']
for p in match1_request['participants']}
# And to lookup a particular summoner's stats:
print summoner_stats[44610089]
(ref: raw data you pasted)

Parsing data with pattern

I'm parsing some data with the pattern as follows:
tagA:
titleA
dataA1
dataA2
dataA3
...
tagB:
titleB
dataB1
dataB2
dataB3
...
tagC:
titleC
dataC1
dataC2
...
...
These tags are stored in a list list_of_tags, if I iterate through the list, I can get all the tags; also, if iterating through the tags, I can get the title and the data associated with the title.
The tags in my data are pretty much something like <div>, so they are not useful to me; what I'm trying to do is to construct a dictionary which uses titles as keys and datas as a list of values.
The constructed dictionary would look like:
{
titleA: [dataA1, dataA2, dataA3...],
titleB: [dataB1, dataB2, dataB3...],
...
}
Notice every tag only contains one title and some datas, and title always comes before data.
So here are my working codes:
Method 1:
result = {}
for tag in list_of_tags:
list_of_values = []
for idx, elem in enumerate(tag):
if not idx:
key = elem
else:
construct_list_of_values()
update_the_dictionary()
Actually, method 1 works fine and gives me my desired result; however, if I put that piece of codes in PyCharm, it warns me that "Local variable 'key' might be referenced before assignment" at the last line. Hence, I try another approach:
Method 2:
result = {tag[0]: tag[1:] for tag in list_of_tags}
Method 2 works fine if tags are lists, but I also want the code to work normally if tags are generators ('generator' object is not subscriptable will occur with method 2)
In order to work with generators, I come up with:
Method 3:
key_val_list = [(next(tag), list(tag)) for tag in list_of_tags]
result = dict(key_val_list)
Method 3 also works; but I cannot write this in dictionary comprehension ({next(tag): list(tag) for tag in list_of_tags} would give StopIteration exception because list(tag) will be evaluated first)
So, my question is, is there an elegant way for dealing with this pattern which could work no matter tags are lists or generators? (method 1 seems to work for both, but I don't know if I should ignore the warning PyCharms gives; the other two methods looks more concise, but one can only work on lists while the other can only work on generators)
Sorry for the long question, thanks for the patience!

I guess the reason why PyCharm is giving you a warning is that you are using key in update_the_dictionary, but key could be left unassigned if tag does not contain at least one element. You might have the knowledge that the title will always be in the list, but the static analyzer is not able to infer that from the context.
If you are using Python 3, you might want to try using PEP 3132 - Extended Iterable Unpacking. It should work for both lists and generators.
e.g.
title, *data = tag

Parse JSON in python to a dictionary

A bit lost after much research. My code below parses the JSON to a dictionary I have thought using json load
response = json.load(MSW) # -->Will take a JSON String & Turn it into a python dict
Using the iteration below I return a series like this which is fine
{u'swell': {u'components': {u'primary': {u'direction': 222.5}}}}
{u'swell': {u'components': {u'primary': {u'direction': 221.94}}}}
ourResult = response
for rs in ourResult:
print rs
But how oh how do I access the 222.5 value. The above appears to just be one long string eg response[1] and not a dictionary structure at all.
In short all I need is the numerical value (which I assume is a part of that sting) so I can test conditions in the rest of my code. Is is a dictionary? With thanks as new and lost

You have to use python syntax as follows:
>>> print response['swell']['components']['primary']['direction']
222.5

Just access the nested dictionaries, unwrapping each layer with an additional key:
for rs in ourResult:
print rs['components']['primary']['direction']

python nested list and dicts, trouble accesing and setting

I am originally a c guy but recently I started doing some stuff in python.
The things that gives me trouble is the more advanced data structures in python.
I could do it all with multiple list like in c but that would just be boring right?
anyway here I have a data structure which is basically a list of dicts where the value field of the dict is another list of 2 key-value pairs:
clients = [
{'client1':[{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'}]},
{'client2':[{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'}]},
{'client3':[{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'}]}
]
now I want to be able to acces the testvalue and statusvalue fields and modify or read them. based on the position in the list.
in pseudocode it would be something like:
for i in range(0,clients):
getvalue(clients[i].'test')
setvalue(clients[i].'test')
getvalue(clients[i].'status')
setvalue(clients[i].'status')
in the end I want to use this data structure to render a html page with jinja2

For a start, in Python you should (almost) never iterate over range(len(something)). You iterate over something.
Secondly, your data structure is wrong. There's no point having a list of dicts, each dict containing a single key/value pair and each value consisting of a list with a single item. You should just have a dict of dicts: you can still iterate over it.
clients = {
'client1':{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'},
'client2':{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'},
'client3':{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'},
}
for key, value in clients.iteritems():
print value['test']
value['test'] = 'newvalue'

I have noticed that you put a dictionary inside a list as the value for each client.
I think you may wish to re-configure your data structure as such:
clients = [
{'client1':{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'}}
{'client2':{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'}}
{'client3':{'test':'testvalue','status':'statusvalue'}}
]
Therefore, you can begin iterating as such:
for client in clients:
for k, v in client.iteritems(): #this unpacks client into 'client' (k) and {'val'...} (v)
print v['test'] #this gets the value of test.
v['test'] = 'some_new_value' #this sets the value of test.