I recently was asked to deliver a python project as part of an interview process.
I tested my project on Windows and MacOSX, with Pycharm, Spyder, jupyter notebook and command line and everything works fine.
However, the reviewer was unable to make the project work on his side, because of module import issues according to him.
My modules are organized like this:
my_project/
my_module.py
main_module.py
my_package/
__init__.py
my_submodule_1.py
my_submodule_2.py
my_submodule_1.py:
import my_module
import my_submodule_2
I haven't added any path related to this project in PYTHONPATH.
The project main function is located in main_module.py.
The reviewer seem to have problems with the modules imported in my_submodule_1.py.
Could anyone shed some light on possible mistakes here and why it would work on my side and not on his?
Your my_submodule_1 module is doing an implicit relative import when it imports my_submodule_2 directly.
That's not legal in Python 3. It is allowed in Python 2, though its usually a bad idea to use it. You can get the Python 3 semantics by putting from __future__ import absolute_import above the other import statements in your file. To fix the import, you'd want to change import my_submodule_2 to either import my_package.my_submodule_2 (an absolute import) or from . import my_submodule2 (an explicit relative import).
If your interviewer is using Python 3 and you're using Python 2, there are likely to be other issues with your code (especially if you're doing any sort of text processing), so I'd make sure you're testing your code in the version they expect!
I think since my_module.py is not in same directory as my_submodule1.py ,and on the reviewer pc the sys.path doesn't have that location of my_module.py, that's why it getting problem in importing the module from its parent directory.
if u give the details of error that the reviewer is getting it might help finding the right solution.
Related
I used below solution for importing dependencies.
I found this solution works if I run the code in Pycharm but not in Terminal.
The error message in Terminal is "cannot find graphics.primitive".
I'm using Mac and Python 3.5.
Why I see different behaviors from the Terminal and Pycharm?
How may I make the solution work for both?
http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000393/ch10.html#_solution_169
Making a Hierarchical Package of Modules
Problem
You want to organize your code into a package consisting of a hierarchical collection of modules.
Solution
Making a package structure is simple. Just organize your code as you wish on the file-system and make sure that every directory defines an init.py file. For example:
graphics/
__init__.py
primitive/
__init__.py
line.py
fill.py
text.py
formats/
__init__.py
png.py
jpg.py
Once you have done this, you should be able to perform various import statements, such as the following:
import graphics.primitive.line
from graphics.primitive import line
import graphics.formats.jpg as jpg
You need to make sure that the graphics package is in the Python search path. PyCharm does this by extending sys.path as follows:
import sys
sys.path.extend(['/Users/hackworth/Development/graphics_parent_dir', '/Applications/PyCharm.app/Contents/helpers/pycharm', '/Applications/PyCharm.app/Contents/helpers/pydev'])
You can do the same in your code replacing /Users/hackworth/graphics_parent_dir with the appropriate path, or you can include the full path to graphics_parent_dir in the PYTHONPATH environment variable. See the Python documentation for details.
Another option would be to place the graphics package into a location the is searched by default on your system.
I developed a python3 package in Pycharm but am running into some confusing behavior when I try to import modules in my test cases. The problem seems to be with the directory path to the internal package modules. It is a bit difficult to explain the issue, but here is the gist.
So the python package name is pyugend. Now when I try and import a module--inside the package--named Models into a test case, pycharm forces me to reference the path as pyugend.pyugend.Models. So I need to reference pyugend twice.
However, when I build, install, and import this package into a jupyter notebook or some script, then I run into errors about the pyugend package not finding the internal modules. The only way to fix these errors is to change the paths inside of the module to references like pyugend.Models.
So basically, to run tests inside of pycharm I have make sure all of the internal package imports use a directory path like from pyugend.pyugend.Models import ... But when I want to use the package outside of pycharm then I actually have to go into the package, convert all of the import pyugend.pyugend... references to just single import pyugend.Models ... references.
I have included a picture of the directory structure as well as a picture of the __init__.py.
You can add the linesys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))) before the imports in __init.py__ and then change the imports to from pyugend.Models import Base_model and so on, to enable consistent behavior wherever you use the package.
I'm self-taught in the Python world, so some of the structural conventions are still a little hazy to me. However, I've been getting very close to what I want to accomplish, but just ran into a larger problem.
Basically, I have a directory structure like this, which will sit outside of the normal python installation (this is to be distributed to people who should not have to know what a python installation is, but will have the one that comes standard with ArcGIS):
top_directory/
ArcToolbox.tbx
scripts/
ArcGIStool.py (script for the tool in the .tbx)
pythonmod/
__init__.py
general.py
xlrd/ (copied from my own python installation)
xlwt/ (copied from my own python installation)
xlutils/ (copied from my own python installation)
So, I like this directory structure, because all of the ArcGIStool.py scripts call functions within the pythonmod package (like those within general.py), and all of the general.py functions can call xlrd and xlwt functions with simple "import xlrd" statements. This means that if the user desired, he/she could just move the pythonmod folder to the python site-packages folder, and everything would run fine, even if xlrd/xlwt/xlutils are already installed.
THE PROBLEM:
Everything is great, until I try to use xlutils in general.py. Specifically, I need to "from xlutils.copy import copy". However, this sets off a cascade of import errors. One is that xlutils/copy.py uses "from xlutils.filter import process,XLRDReader,XLWTWriter". I solved this by modifying xlutils/copy.py like this:
try:
from xlutils.filter import process,XLRDReader,XLWTWriter
except ImportError:
from filter import process,XLRDReader,XLWTWriter
I thought this would work fine for other situations, but there are modules in the xlutils package that need to import xlrd. I tried following this advice, but when I use
try:
import xlrd
except ImportError:
import os, sys, imp
path = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(sys.argv[0]))
xlrd = imp.load_source("pythonmod.xlrd",os.path.join(path,"xlrd","__init__.py"))
I get a new import error: In xlrd/init.py, the info module is called (from xlrd/info.py), BUT when I use the above code, I get an error saying that the name "info" is not defined.
This leads me to believe that I don't really know what is going on, because I thought that when the init.py file was imported it would run just like normal and look within its containing folder for info.py. This does not seem to be the case, unfortunately.
Thanks for your interest, and any help would be greatly appreciated.
p.s. I don't want to have to modify the path variables, as I have no idea who will be using this toolset, and permissions are likely to be an issue, etc.
I realized I was using imp.load_source incorrectly. The correct syntax for what I wanted to do should have been:
imp.load_source("xlrd",os.path.join(path,"xlrd","__init__.py"))
In the end though, I ended up rewriting my code to not need xlutils at all, because I continued to have import errors that were causing many more problems than were worth dealing with.
Okay, so in the past, I've made my own Python packages with Python 2.x (most recently, 2.7.5). It has worked fine. Let me explain how I did that, for reference:
Make a directory within the working directory. We'll call it myPackage.
Make a file called __init__.py in the directory myPackage.
Make sure all the modules that you want to be part of the package are imported within __init__.py. These modules are typically in the myPackage folder.
From a Python program in the working directory, type import myPackage (and it imports fine, and is usable).
However, in Python 3, I get errors with that. (ImportError: No module named 'Whatever the first imported module is')
I researched the problem and found the following:
Starred imports don't work in Python 3.3.
The __init__.py file is not required in Python 3.3.
So, I removed the stars from my imports, and leaving the __init__.py file in, I still got errors (ImportError: No module named 'Whatever the first imported module is'). So, I removed the __init__.py file, and I don't get any errors, but my package doesn't include any of my modules.
Okay, so I discovered by doing a web search for python3 __init__.py or some such that I can do the following, although I don't have any clue if this is the standard way of doing things:
In the modules in the package, make sure there are no plain imports (not just no starred ones). Only do from myModule import stuff. However, you need to put a . in front of myModule: e.g. from .myModule import stuff. Then, I can import myPackage.oneOfMyModules
I found that by following this rule in the __init__.py file, it also works.
Once again, I don't know if this is how it's supposed to work, but it seems to work.
I found this page that is supposed to have something to do with the changes in packages in Python 3.something, but I'm not sure how it relates to what I'm doing:
http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0420/
So, what is the standard way to do this? Where is it documented (actually saying the syntax)? Is the way I'm doing it right? Can I do regular imports instead of from package import module?
After analyzing some Python 3 packages installed on my system (I should have tried that to start with!) I discovered that they often seem to do things a little differently. Instead of just doing from .myModule import stuff they would do from myPackage.myModule import stuff (inside the modules in the package). So, that works, too, I suppose, and seems to be more frequently used.
First of all let me tell you that I'm a new user and I'm just starting to learn Python in College so my apologies if this question is answered in other topic, but I searched and I can't seem to find it.
I received a file work.pyc from my teacher and he says I have to import it in my Wing IDE using the command from work import *, the question is I don't know where to put the file to import it.
It just says ImportError: No module named work.
Thank you
There are several options for this.
The most straightforward is to just place it in the same folder as the py file that wants to import it.
You may also want to have a look at this
if you're using the python interpreter (the one that lets you directly input python code into it and executes) you'll have to do this:
sys.path.append('newpath')
from work import *
where newpath is the path on your filesystem containing your work.pyc file
If you're working on a script called main.py in the folder project, one option is to place it at project/work.pyc
This will make the module importable because it's in the same working directory as your code.
The way Python resolves import statements works like this (simplified):
The Python interpreter you're using (/usr/bin/python2.6 for example, there can be several on your system) has a list of search paths where it looks for importable code. This list is in sys.path and you can look at it by firing up your interpreter and printing it out like this:
>>> import sys
>>> from pprint import pprint
>>> pprint(sys.path)
sys.path usually contains the path to modules from the standard library, additional installed packages (usually in site-packages) and possibly other 3rd party modules.
When you do something like import foo, Python will first look if there is a module called foo.py in the directory your script lives. If not, it will search sys.path and try to import it from there.
As I said, this explanation is a bit simplified. The details are explained in the section about the module search path.
Note 1:
The *.pyc you got handed is compiled Python bytecode. That means it's contents are binary, it contains instructions to be executed by a Python virtual machine as opposed to source code in *.py that you will normally deal with.
Note 2:
The advice your teacher gave you to do from work import * is rather bad advice. It might be ok to do this for testing purposes in the interactive interpreter, but your should never do that in actual code. Instead you should do something like from work import chop, hack
Main reasons:
Namespace pollution. You're likely to import things you don't need but still pollute your global namespace.
Readability. If you ever read someone elses code and wonder where foo came from, just scroll up and look at the imports, and you'll see exactly where it's being imported from. If that person used import *, you can't do that.