Really newbie questions.
I made a Python bot which receives some data and has to analyze it,then prints everything. To use it, i need it to run for the whole day, the problem is that i can't leave my computer on 24/7, so i need a server or something similar for it and i need to be able to check what it prints whenever i want.
I made some research and found Heroku, but i'm having some problems understanding it: i tried to deploy it there and it's working but it prints all the stuff on a shell in the app's page and not on the webpage that heroku assigned to my app, so my problem is partially solved, since i can run it for the whole day but checking what it prints is way harder.
I was thinking of making it as a Telegram bot in order to have everything there but since it prints a lot of stuff, Telegram would not be the best platform for this kind of thing.
Is there another resource to deploy it and have it, for example, on a webpage?
You can look into renting a cheapish cloud server (from digitalocean for example).
There are multiple ways of transferring data from your python script to your bot, either directly, through a websocket, or a webpage that displays it in a JSON format or otherwise.
Since you're already using python you could look into running a flask app on your node alongside your script or even combine them together.
If ran separately you could modify your script to output it's content into a file and then read the file with your flask application to display it on a webpage. For example:
with open('/tmp/data.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write(yourdata)
then in your flask application:
from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)
#app.route('/')
def show_data():
with open('/tmp/data.txt', 'r') as f:
data = f.read()
return data
There are way more efficient ways of transferring data. Example above is a quick and dirty solution I wouldn't recommend running it due to security reasons especially if you are transmitting sensitive data.
Related
I finally made a project that I wanted to make since a long time :
I'm using an Arduino Uno to replace my PC power button (with a simple relay) and that Arduino Board is connected to a Raspi 3 for network connection purposes
My wish is to do a webpage (or a API-Like request) that at a touch of a button (preferably in a password-protected page) It'll power the PC on
I know how to code in Python, and my script to control the Arduino is already done but I can't find a way to run, only server-side, a Python Script from a button in a webpage
I found that CherryPy framework but I don't think it'll suit my needs
Can someone give me any ideas about that please?
As already mentioned by #ForceBru, you need a python webserver.
If this can be useful to you, this is a possible unsecure implementation using flask:
from flask import Flask
from flask import request
app = Flask(__name__)
#app.route('/turnOn')
def hello_world():
k = request.args.get('key')
if k == "superSecretKey":
# Do something ..
return 'Ok'
else:
return 'Nope'
If you put this in an app.py name file and, after having installed flask (pip install flask), you run flask run you should be able to see Ok if visiting the url http://localhost:5000/turnOn?key=superSecretKey .
You could write a brief html gui with a button and a key field in a form but I leaves that to you (you need to have fun too!).
To avoid potential security issues you could use a POST method and https.
Look at the flask documentation for more infos.
Im new to Javascript so I would like to keep it at the bare minimum. Is there a way that I can use the Electron to communicate with python script without having node.js? My app is just a basic app that takes some input from users from a html page and I need this text input to be processed in python and write an excel file. So there is not much happening in html so is there a simple way to transfer the input to python file? I want to use Electron because I need this html to be my UI and also I need to distribute this app.
I guess the answer is "no": the main process running node will always be there.
An Electron app consists of a JavaScript main process, and one or more JavaScript renderer processes. There is no built-in Python support. And the user will need Python already installed. So, it sounds like a poor fit for what you need.
The answers here may be useful, and will show how to call the python script. I took a quick look at the flexx toolkit mentioned there. It seems to work with the user's browser, rather than producing a single executable.
Recently i have done it with some sort of trick hope it will help you and there are the following step which i followed-
Created a stand alone python exe using pyinstaller and the exe has flask server internally then i put the flask server inside my node application.
Now we have to initiate our flask server and send a request to it for processing, i have done this with the help of "execFile" function as a child process, for which i have created a function and the code was something like that-
async function callFlask(){
var child = require('child_process').execFile;
child('path_to_python_exe ', function(err, data) {
if(err){
console.error(err);
return;
}
});
}
Now we have initiated our flask server then will send the request with the help of fetch request like
await callFlask().then(
await fetch('host_ip_defined_in_flask'+encodeURIComponent('data'))
Now further we can extend our then chain to get response from python if any and proceed further forexample -
await callFlask().then(
await fetch('host_ip_defined_in_flask'+encodeURIComponent('data'))
.then(res => res.text())
.then(body => console.log(body)))
Here, your output data which python return will be printed in console then you can make your node application behave differently depending on output returned by it.
Also you can package your app with available packagers for electron like electron-packager it will work like a charm.
Also there is are some disadvantage for using python as like it will increase your package size and the process will be difficult to kill from electron after processing so it will increase burden on host machine.
I am assuming that Explaining to create a flask server is not the scope of this question instead if you face any issues let me know, i hope it will help...
I am working on a little personal project with the aim of using Python to obtain and process data from a running game and use HTML/CSS to output this data using Flask.
I am very new to Python, but have some basic exposure to HTML/CSS and JavaScript.
Using example code from the web and various tutorials I have been able to get two distinct sections of this working to a proof of concept stage:
My python code runs in an interuptible loop and will output a variable every X seconds to the console.
I have setup a Flask application that I can pass a variable to in a Python script and display in a browser.
My problem is I am stumped with how I go about joining these two together. In the Python script that runs the Flask app nothing else happens while the Flask app is running, I assume because it is executing synchronously. This means that I can't start the Flask app and then have my loop run after that, how can I get both to work simultaneously?
EDIT:
After more thinking about this and some further research I think I have framed the problem incorrectly due to the way I have setup my local environment.
My original thinking was that the Python script which runs the Flask server could also be used to recieve/process and output my game logic*. I now believe this to be incorrect because in typical usage Flask would be running on a web server somewhere serving the website while the data from the game would have to be collected and processed by an application local to the running of the game.
So, given the above the question could be better posed as:
How to dynamically display (say with a maximum refresh interval of 1s) a Python variable that is constantly changing using a Flask server? How do I get these two separate parts of my project to communicate with one-another?
*If this were possible (and I don't know its not) it would actually accomplish what I want from this project but is not likely to be a particularly useful skill so I would like to figure out how to do this the correct way in case this becomes something I would like to make available to others.
I have been trying, in vain, to make a program that reads text out loud using the web application found here (http://www.ispeech.org/text.to.speech.demo.php). It is a demo text-to-speech program, that works very well, and is relatively fast. What I am trying to do is make a Python program that would input text to the application, then output the result. The result, in this case, would be sound. Is there any way in Python to do this, like, say, a library? And if not, is it possible to do this through any other means? I have looked into the iSpeech API (found here), but the only problem with it is that there is a limited number of free uses (I believe that it is 200). While this program is only meant to be used a couple of times, I would rather it be able to use the service more then 200 times. Also, if this solution is impractical, could anyone direct me towards another alternative?
# AKX I am currently using eSpeak, and it works well. It just, well, doesn't sound too good, and it is hard to tell at times what is being said.
If using iSpeech is not required, there's a decent (it's surely not as beautifully articulated as many commercial solutions) open-source text-to-speech solution available called eSpeak.
It's usable from the command line (subprocess with Python), or as a shared library. It seems there's also a Python wrapper (python-espeak) for it.
Hope this helps.
OK. I found a way to do it, seems to work fine. Thanks to everyone who helped! Here is the code I'm using:
from urllib import quote_plus
def speak(text):
import pydshow
words = text.split()
temp = []
stuff = []
while words:
temp.append(words.pop(0))
if len(temp) == 24:
stuff.append(' '.join(temp))
temp = []
stuff.append(' '.join(temp))
for i in stuff:
pydshow.PlayFileWait('http://api.ispeech.org/api/rest?apikey=8d1e2e5d3909929860aede288d6b974e&format=mp3&action=convert&voice=ukenglishmale&text='+quote_plus(i))
if __name__ == '__main__':
speak('Hello. This is a text-to speech test.')
I find this ideal because it DOES use the API, but it uses the API key that is used for the demo program. Therefore, it never runs out. The key is 8d1e2e5d3909929860aede288d6b974e.
You can actually test this at work without the program, by typing the following into your address bar:
http://api.ispeech.org/api/rest?apikey=8d1e2e5d3909929860aede288d6b974e&format=mp3&action=convert&voice=ukenglishmale&text=
Followed by the text you want to speak. You can also adjust the language, by changing, in this case, the ukenglishmale to something else that iSpeech offers. For example, ukenglishfemale. This will speak the same text, but in a feminine voice.
NOTE: Pydshow is my wrapper around DirectShow. You can use yours instead.
The flow of your application would be like this:
Client-side: User inputs text into form, and form submits a request to server
Server: may be python or whatever language/framework you want. Receives http request with text.
Server: Runs text-to-speech either with pure python library or by running a subprocess to a utility that can generate speech as a wav/mp3/aiff/etc
Server: Sends HTTP response back by streaming file with a mime type to Client
Client: Receives the http response and plays the content
Specifically about step 3...
I don't have any particular advise on the most articulate open source speech synthesizing software available, but I can say that it does not have to necessarily be pure python, or even python at all for that matter. Most of these packages have some form of a command line utility to take stdin or a file and produce an audio file as output. You would simply launch this utility as a subprocess to generate the file, and then stream the file back in your http response.
If you decide to make use of an existing web service that provides text-to-speech via an API (iSpeech), then step 3 would be replaced with making your own server-side http request out to iSpeech, receiving the response and pretty much forwarding that response back to the original client request, like a proxy. I would say the benefit is not having to maintain your own speech synthesis solution or getting better quality that you could from an open source... but the downside is that you probably will have a bit more latency in your response time since your server has to make its own external http request and download the data first.
Sorry if this makes no sense. Please comment if clarification is needed.
I'm writing a small file upload app in web.py which I am deploying using mod_wsgi + apache. I have been having a problem with my session management and would like clarification on how the threading works in web.py.
Essentially I embed a code in a hidden field of the html page I render when someone accesses my page. The file upload is then done via a standard POST request containing both the file and the code. Then I retrieve the progress of the file by updating it in the file upload POST method and grabbing it with a GET request to a different class. The 'session' (apologies for it being fairly naive) is stored in a session object like this:
class session:
def __init__(self):
self.progress = 0
self.title = ""
self.finished = False
def advance(self):
self.progress = self.progress + 1
The sessions are all kept in a global dictionary within my app script and then accessed with my code (from earlier) as the key.
For some reason my progress seems to stay at 0 and never increments. I've been debugging for a couple hours now and I've found that the two session objects referenced from the upload class and the progress class are not the same. The two codes, however, are (as far as I can tell) equal. This is driving me mad as it worked without any problems on the web.py test server on my local machine.
EDIT: After some research it seems that the dictionary may get copied for every request. I've tried putting the dictionary in another and importing but this doesn't work. Is there some other way short of using a database to 'seperate' the sessions dictionary?
Apache/mod_wsgi can run in multiprocess configurations and possible your requests aren't even being serviced by the same process and never will if for that multiprocess configuration each process is single thread because while the upload is occuring no other requests can be handled by that same process. Read:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ProcessesAndThreading
Possibly you should use mod_wsgi daemon mode with single multiple thread daemon process.
From PEP 333, defining WSGI:
Servers that can run multiple requests in parallel, should also provide the option of running an application in a single-threaded fashion, so that applications or frameworks that are not thread-safe may still be used with that server
Check the documentation of your WSGI server.