We Keep Coding

Omit in for loop in Python

I have a function to move between the given range of values, but I would like to add in my function a parameter that will be an array which would contain the numbers which must be skipped while my function run iteration
my function:
nums = []
def loopIteration(minValue, maxValue):
minValue += 1
for i in range(maxValue-minValue+1):
num = i+minValue
nums.append(Num('numbers_{}'.format(i)))
#function call
loopIteration(4,25)
i want to add in my function call an parameter like this:
loopIteration(4,25,[8,9,16])
thanks for any answers :)

You can use continue to skip certain is:
def loopIteration(minValue, maxValue, skip=set()):
for i in range(minValue + 1, maxValue + 1):
if i in skip:
continue
cells.append(Cell("numbers_{}".format(i)))

Continue is a Python syntax which would allow you to pass iteration in a for loop. Usually, continue can make it quite hard to follow flow later on, if you ever wish to look back on your script. Here is what you could do:
def loopInteration(minValue, maxValue, skipNums):
for number in range(maxValue-minValue+1):
if number in skipNums:
continue
num = i+minValue
nums.append(Num("numbers_{}".format(i)))
loopIteration(4,25,[NUMBERS HERE])

Creating a function with a condition in Python

I need to create a function named 'Bernoulli' that should take 2 input variables 'rr' and 'p' and should return a value of 1 if rr is less than or equal to p and a value of 0 if rr is greater than p.
The code I have produced so far is this:
rr=float(input())
p=float(input())
def bernoulli(rr,p):
if rr<=p:
return 'X=1'
else:
return 'X=0'
I am not sure how correct this is.
Upon running tests I get this feedback:
Your program took too long to execute.
Make sure that it isn't waiting for input and that there is no infinite loop.

rr=float(input())
p=float(input())
def bernoulli(rr,p):
if rr<=p:
return 1
else:
return 0
x = bernoulli(rr,p)
print(x)
However, if you are simply checking if one number is bigger than the other, it might make more sense down the line to use True and False because comparing them will be a shorter line of code later on. if x == False That being in the logical sense that we understand true to be positive and false to be negative. You might forget which way round the 1 and the 0 are ordered :)

Swift answered this in the same way I would approach this. The reason your code is not executing, is because it is never used. You must call a function to use it.
Here is how I did it:
rr=float(input())
p=float(input())
def bernoulli(rr,p):
if rr<=p:
return 'X=1'
else:
return 'X=0'
function_response = bernoulli(rr,p)
print(function_response)

Number of Odds and Evens in a List Function - Python

I am trying to create a function called "odd_even" which takes my already created list (named "nums") and determines the number of odd and even numbers, and then returns the variables to me. However when I run this code I get:
NameError: name 'odd' is not defined
How do I fix this? If you can give me any useful pointers on the "return" function that would also be greatly appreciated.
import random
def main():
nums = []
for x in range(10):
nums.append(random.randrange(1,26))
def odd_even(given_list):
odd = 0
even = 0
for x in given_list:
if x % 2 == 0:
even += 1
else:
odd += 1
return odd
return even
odd_even(nums)
print("List had ", odd, "odds and ", even, "evens.")
main()

You are doing 2 things wrong.
First, you are trying to return two values but on different lines. You cant do this, to do this, do so as a tuple:
def odd_even(given_list):
odd = 0
even = 0
for x in given_list:
if x % 2 == 0:
even += 1
else:
odd += 1
return odd, even
Second, you call the function but dont store the value(s) of return. So you need change:
odd_even(nums) to odd, even = odd_even(nums)
By trying to execute:
print("List had ", odd, "odds and ", even, "evens.")
The main() is looking for variables odd and even, but they dont exist in main(), they exist locally in odd_even() (hence why you are calling return as to return them to the calling function. The reason you only see an error with respect to odd is because it is the first variable in that print() that the interpreter encounters an error on.
The only way around this without correct use of return is to declare them as global. But that is a bad idea so don't do that, keep things local on the stack!

You have some syntactic errors. Python...unlike many programming languages is whitespace conscious. This means you need to be careful with your indentation and spacing. More traditional languages like Java and C use brackets {} to define a scope, and semicolons ; to figure out line termination.
Perhaps you copied it poorly, but from what I see, it appears as though you are defining the function odd_even() within the function main(). That is, the definition of odd_even() is tabbed to the right, which means that its definition is within the function main. I assume that you want main to call the function odd_even(). Thus, you must tab it back over to the left so that it is at the same indentation level as main().
For this reason I use horizontal lines (see below) to clearly outline the scope of functions. This is good for me when I write in Python because otherwise it can be very unclear where one function ends, and where another begins.
Also, it appears as though you have 2 return statements. If you want to return 2 values, you should encompass it within an object. To get around this, there are two simple solutions that come to mind. You can make the odd_even() function access global variables (not recommended)...or you can return an array (any number of values back) or a tuple (exactly 2, but this is python specific).
Below is an implementation of both:
import random
# Declare global variables outside the scope of any function
odd = 0
even = 0
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
def main():
nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
return_value = odd_even(nums)
# Get the individual values back
o = return_value[0]
e = return_value[1]
# You can use the global variables
print("List had ", odd, "odds and ", even, "evens.")
# Or you can get the array back
print("List had ", o, "odds and ", e, "evens.")
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
def odd_even(given_list):
# This means we are referencing the variables odd and even that are global
global odd
global even
# Loop through the array
for x in given_list:
if x % 2 == 0:
even += 1
else:
odd += 1
return [odd, even]
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
main()

Issue with calling a function inside a while loop

I don't know if this is a simple question or not, but I couldn't find anything on it so I figured I would ask it.
I try to call a function in a while loop but it keeps on returning the same result until the condition is completed. The function main() is imported from another file and return a list with two elements [a,b].
Those two elements are generated randomly, therefor they should change after every step. The function works perfectly fine if I call it on its own.
Here is my code so far, I hope someone can help me:
I thought there was something wrong with my list x so I tried to delete it after every step, but it doesn't change anything.
from some_module import main
def loop(variable):
i = 0
while i <= 5 :
x = main(variable)
a ,b = x[0], x[1]
print a, b
del x[:]
i += 1
The code for main() is :
def main(file):
iniciate(file)
obtain_neighbours(initial_solution())
get_all_costs(get_all_solutions())
return get_best_solution()
And the random choice appears in the function initial_solution() :
#those list are being updated at every step
So = []
I_assign = []
I_available = ['1','2','3','4',...,'n']
def initial_solution():
while len(I_available) != 0:
update_I_assign()
random_task = random.choice(I_assign)
So.append(random_task)
I_available.remove(random_task)
return So
def get_best_solution():
if min(i for i in all_cost) < calculate_cost(fill_station(So)):
best_solution = solutions[all_cost.index(min(i for i in all_cost))]
return [min(i for i in all_cost),best_solution]
else:
best_solution = fill_station(So)
return [calculate_cost(fill_station(So)),best_solution]
It's pretty hard for me to show the rest of the code here because it's quite long. Hope the update helps you understand.

when to use if vs elif in python

If I have a function with multiple conditional statements where every branch gets executed returns from the function. Should I use multiple if statements, or if/elif/else? For example, say I have a function:
def example(x):
if x > 0:
return 'positive'
if x < 0:
return 'negative'
return 'zero'
Is it better to write:
def example(x):
if x > 0:
return 'positive'
elif x < 0:
return 'negative'
else:
return 'zero'
Both have the same outcome, but is one more efficient or considered more idiomatic than the other?
Edit:
A couple of people have said that in the first example both if statements are always evaluated, which doesn't seem to be the case to me
for example if I run the code:
l = [1,2,3]
def test(a):
if a > 0:
return a
if a > 2:
l.append(4)
test(5)
l will still equal [1,2,3]

I'll expand out my comment to an answer.
In the case that all cases return, these are indeed equivalent. What becomes important in choosing between them is then what is more readable.
Your latter example uses the elif structure to explicitly state that the cases are mutually exclusive, rather than relying on the fact they are implicitly from the returns. This makes that information more obvious, and therefore the code easier to read, and less prone to errors.
Say, for example, someone decides there is another case:
def example(x):
if x > 0:
return 'positive'
if x == -15:
print("special case!")
if x < 0:
return 'negative'
return 'zero'
Suddenly, there is a potential bug if the user intended that case to be mutually exclusive (obviously, this doesn't make much sense given the example, but potentially could in a more realistic case). This ambiguity is removed if elifs are used and the behaviour is made visible to the person adding code at the level they are likely to be looking at when they add it.
If I were to come across your first code example, I would probably assume that the choice to use ifs rather than elifs implied the cases were not mutually exclusive, and so things like changing the value of x might be used to change which ifs execute (obviously in this case the intention is obvious and mutually exclusive, but again, we are talking about less obvious cases - and consistency is good, so even in a simple example when it is obvious, it's best to stick to one way).

Check this out to understand the difference:
>>> a = 2
>>> if a > 1: a = a+1
...
>>> if a > 2: a = a+1
...
>>> a
4
versus
>>> a = 2
>>> if a > 1: a = a+1
... elif a > 2: a = a+1
...
>>> a
3
The first case is equivalent to two distinct if's with empty else statements (or imagine else: pass); in the second case elif is part of the first if statement.

In some cases, elif is required for correct semantics. This is the case when the conditions are not mutually exclusive:
if x == 0: result = 0
elif y == 0: result = None
else: result = x / y
In some cases it is efficient because the interpreter doesn't need to check all conditions, which is the case in your example. If x is negative then why do you check the positive case? An elif in this case also makes code more readable as it clearly shows only a single branch will be executed.

In general (e.g. your example), you would always use an if..elif ladder to explicitly show the conditions are mutually-exclusive. It prevents ambiguity, bugs etc.
The only reason I can think of that you might ever not use elif and use if instead would be if the actions from the body of the preceding if statement (or previous elif statements) might have changed the condition so as to potentially make it no longer mutually exclusive. So it's no longer really a ladder, just separate concatenated if(..elif..else) blocks. (Leave an empty line between the separate blocks, for good style, and to prevent someone accidentally thinking it should have been elif and 'fixing' it)
Here's a contrived example, just to prove the point:
if total_cost>=10:
if give_shopper_a_random_discount():
print 'You have won a discount'
total_cost -= discount
candidate_prime = True
if total_cost<10:
print 'Spend more than $10 to enter our draw for a random discount'
You can see it's possible to hit both conditions, if the first if-block applies the discount, so then we also execute the second, which prints a message which would be confusing since our original total had been >=10.
An elif here would prevent that scenario.
But there could be other scenarios where we want the second block to run, even for that scenario.
if total_cost<10:
<some other action we should always take regardless of original undiscounted total_cost>

In regards to the edit portion of your question when you said:
"A couple of people have said that in the first example both if statements are always evaluated, which doesn't seem to be the case to me"
And then you provided this example:
l = [1,2,3]
def test(a):
if a > 0:
return a
if a > 2:
l.append(4)
test(5)
Yes indeed the list l will still equal [1,2,3] in this case, ONLY because you're RETURNING the result of running the block, because the return statement leads to exiting the function, which would result in the same thing if you used elif with the return statement.
Now try to use the print statement instead of the return one, you'll see that the 2nd if statement will execute just fine, and that 4 will indeed be appended to the list l using append.
Well.. now what if the first ifstatement changes the value of whatever is being evaluated in the 2nd if statement?
And yes that's another situation. For instance, say you have a variable x and you used if statement to evaluate a block of code that actually changed the x value.
Now, if you use another if statement that evaluates the same variable x will be wrong since you're considering x value to be the same as its initial one, while in fact it was changed after the first if was executed. Therefore your code will be wrong.
It happens pretty often, and sometimes you even want it explicitly to be changed. If that's how you want your code to behave, then yes you should use multiple if's which does the job well. Otherwise stick to elif.
In my example, the 1st if block is executed and changed the value of x, which lead to have the 2nd if evaluates a different x (since its value was changed).
That's where elif comes in handy to prevent such thing from happening, which is the primary benefit of using it.
The other secondary good benefit of using elif instead of multiple if's is to avoid confusion and better code readability.

Consider this For someone looking for a easy way:
>>> a = ['fb.com', 'tw.com', 'cat.com']
>>> for i in a:
... if 'fb' in i:
... pass
... if 'tw' in i:
... pass
... else:
... print(i)
output:
fb.com
cat.com
And
>>> a = ['fb.com', 'tw.com', 'cat.com']
>>> for i in a:
... if 'fb' in i:
... pass
... elif 'tw' in i:
... pass
... else:
... print(i)
Output:
cat.com
'If' checks for the first condition then searches for the elif or else, whereas using elif, after if, it goes on checking for all the elif condition and lastly going to else.

elif is a bit more efficient, and it's quite logical: with ifs the program has to evaluate each logical expression every time. In elifs though, it's not always so. However, in your example, this improvement would be very, very small, probably unnoticeable, as evaluating x > 0 is one of the cheapest operations.
When working with elifs it's also a good idea to think about the best order. Consider this example:
if (x-3)**3+(x+1)**2-6*x+4 > 0:
#do something 1
elif x < 0:
#do something 2
Here the program will have to evaluate the ugly expression every time! However, if we change the order:
if x < 0:
#do something 2
elif (x-3)**3+(x+1)**2-6*x+4 > 0:
#do something 1
Now the program will first check if x < 0 (cheap and simple) and only if it isn't, will it evaluate the more complicated expression (btw, this code doesn't make much sense, it's just a random example)
Also, what perreal said.