We Keep Coding

Django rest framework create password for custom user model

Actually I'm creating an employee management system project using django rest api.
Now i have created my own custom models like shown below, i want to create the register employee with the below models. But how can i set the password field for login, since I haven't included in my fields. I've attached my models and serializer. Please do help for me. I'm beginner
Class Employee (models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50, unique=True, verbose_name='None')
email = models.EmailField(verbose_name='Email')
department = models.CharField(max_length=30, unique=False, verbose_name='Departamento')
(And many more details like personal email,contact, and many)
# Function used to display the employee's name in the admin page
def __str__(self):
return self.name
My serializer class is
class Employee DetailsSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Employee
Fields = [__all__]
My views be like, i want to create register view, since i dont have password in my model, how to create password field to my above shown register field,
Whatever maybe my register field should contain all those above details. I'm scratching my head here.please someone help

Yes, you can add a password field in your Employee model but you are requested not to do it because Django already provided this type of facility. Just you have to know How to use it. Try to extend the existing User model from django.contrib.auth.models.User.Let's organize your Employee model.
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
class Employee(models.Model):
user = models.OneToOneField(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
#name = models.CharField(max_length=50, unique=True,
verbose_name='None')
#email = models.EmailField(verbose_name='Email')
department = models.CharField(max_length=30, unique=False,
verbose_name='Departamento')
#property
def name(self):
return "{0} {1}".format(self.user.first_name,
self.user.last_name)
No need to add an email field because this field already exists in the User model and the name field can be a property that retrieves data from the user model and the rest of the code will be unchanged. So you are concerned about the password field and it also exists in the User model.
Please check out this repo and it might help you.

It is impossible to add a non-nullable field Error when extending Abstract User

I want to extend the Base Abstract User Model and this is the extended model:
class Student(AbstractUser):
birth = models.DateField(default=datetime.date.today)
street = models.CharField(max_length=25)
street_number = models.IntegerField(validators=[MinValueValidator(0), MaxValueValidator(99)])
city = models.CharField(max_length=20)
province = models.CharField(max_length=20)
code = models.IntegerField(validators=[MinValueValidator(0, MaxValueValidator(9999))])
address = str(street) + str(street_number) + str(city) + str(code) + str(province)
But I get this message popup:
It is impossible to add a non-nullable field 'password' to student without specifying a default. This is because the database needs something to populate existing rows.
However I haven't added a new password field and all the existing password fields (for the superuser) already have a value. What should I do?
When I add a default value and try to migrate it, it complains that there is no such table as 'mainApp_student'.

You don't want to do that. You want a User model (you already have one that Django provides, no need to extend it for now), and a Student model that has a OneToOne relationship with the User model.
Conceptually:
User: models a user of your application and its authentication and permissions
Student: the representation of a person attending classes, with a name, a birthday etc..., also has a user to access your application which is unique to them.
In code:
from django.db import models
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
class Student(models.Model):
user = models.OneToOneField(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE))
# ... other fields: birth address etc...
This page of the docs explains it well, especially the Employee example given:
If you wish to store information related to User, you can use a OneToOneField to a model containing the fields for additional information. This one-to-one model is often called a profile model, as it might store non-auth related information about a site user.

Why is Django's `add()` method in my `many-to-many` Django models not taking?

Question / Problem:
I am building a Django app, with 2 models: User and Secret. Secrets can be made by Users, and other Users can "like" them. I've setup my likes field as a ManyToManyField, so that Users whom like a Secret can be stored there and later retrieved, etc. However, when I try to query for a User and a Secret and use my_secret.likes.add(my_User) nothing happens. I don't receive an error and when I print my Secret's many-to-many likes field, after the add, I see: secrets.User.None.
Why is my add() method running but I am not receiving any errors, and why is my User not properly being added to my Secret's likes?
Note: I've saved both the User and Secret objects upon initial creation. Outside this application I've been able to use the add() method just fine, but in those scenarios I was creating objects in the moment, and not retreiving already existing objects.
Is there a different way to handle add() when using data retreived from a Query? That's my only other line of reasoning right now, and I've followed the documentation here exactly: Django Many-to-Many Docs
I also apologize if this was answered elsewhere on the site. I did find one other post here, but there was no solution provided, granted they were experiencing the exact same issue.
My Models:
class User(models.Model):
"""
Creates instances of a `User`.
Parameters:
-`models.Model` - Django's `models.Model` method allows us to create new models.
"""
first_name = models.CharField(max_length=50) # CharField is field type for characters
last_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
email = models.CharField(max_length=50)
password = models.CharField(max_length=22)
created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) # DateTimeField is field type for date and time
updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True) # note the `auto_now=True` parameter
objects = UserManager() # Attaches `UserManager` methods to our `User.objects` object.
class Secret(models.Model):
"""
Creates instances of a `Secret`.
Parameters:
-`models.Model` - Django's `models.Model` method allows us to create new models.
"""
description = models.CharField(max_length=100) # CharField is field type for characters
user = models.ForeignKey(User, related_name="secrets") # One-to-Many Relationship
likes = models.ManyToManyField(User) # Many to Many Relationship
created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) # DateTimeField is field type for date and time
updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True) # note the `auto_now=True` parameter
objects = SecretManager() # Attaches `SecretManager` methods to our `Secret.objects` object.
Problem Example:
The model migrates fine, everything seems to be in proper syntax. However, when I try and retrieve a User and a Secret, and add the User to the Secret.likes, the add() method gives no errors, runs, but no objects are saved.
Here's an example:
tim = User.objects.get(email="tim#tim.com") # Gets a user object
my_secret = Secret.objects.get(id=2) # Gets a secret object
# This is where nothing seems to happen / take:
my_secret.likes.add(tim) # add() method per Django many-to-many docs
print my_secret.likes # returns: `secrets.User.None` -- why?
Why when printing my_secret.likes above, is nothing printed?
Especially when:
tim.secret_set.all() shows the secret containing an id=2 as in the above example....so the User is recording the relationship with the Secret, but the Secret is not recording any relationship with the User. What am I doing wrong?

You need to call the all method of the many-to-many field to view all related objects:
print my_secret.likes.all()
# ^^^^^

ValueError: Lookup failed for model referenced by field

I have made Custom User model in my Django project. Here it is:
class CustomUser(User):
avatar = models.ImageField(upload_to='avatars')
about_myself = models.TextField(max_length=300)
USERNAME_FIELD = 'username'
def __str__(self):
return self.username
def is_author(self):
return 'blog.change_post' and 'blog.add_post' in self.get_all_permissions()
And after it, I changed all Foreign Keys of user to new CustomUser model. It works OK. But I make one new migration and django cause error, when I want to migrate it:
ValueError: Lookup failed for model referenced by field blog.Comment.author: main.CustomUser
My blog.Comment model:
class Comment(models.Model):
content = models.TextField()
author = models.ForeignKey(CustomUser)
date_create = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
post = models.ForeignKey(Post)
What should I do?
Thanks!

Judging from the code you posted, you might be might be better served by extending the user model rather than replacing it. This pattern is usually called a profile model and works via a one-to-one relationship with User.
Profiles provides application specific fields and behaviors, while allowing User to go about it's usual business unchanged. It doesn't require you to muck around with rewriting auth or even necessarily change your foreign keys.
Here's an example of your code written as a profile:
class Profile(models.Model):
# Link to user :
user = models.OneToOneField(settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
avatar = models.ImageField(upload_to='avatars')
about_myself = models.TextField(max_length=300)
def __str__(self):
return self.user.username
def is_author(self):
return 'blog.change_post' and 'blog.add_post' in self.user.get_all_permissions()
Comment model:
class Comment(models.Model):
content = models.TextField()
author = models.ForeignKey(settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)
date_create = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
post = models.ForeignKey(Post)
# How to access the profile:
def check_author(self):
self.author.profile.is_author()
You'll also want to add a signal to create a new profile when a user is registered:
#receiver(post_save, sender=settings.AUTH_USER_MODEL)
def create_profile_for_new_user(sender, created, instance, **kwargs):
if created:
profile = Profile(user=instance)
profile.save()
Django docs on extending users.
If a profile approach doesn't work for you, try inheriting from AbstractUser or AbstractBaseUser instead of User. The abstract models provide the same basic functionality as User and are the preferred technique for recent Django versions.
There are a handful of additional steps however, check out the docs on creating custom users for a run down.

Django Rest Framework not saving foreign key for a small number of requests

I am using Django Rest Framework to provide API to a mobile app. I have two models, Order and User. Order has a foreign key relation to User.
For about 1% or so of all my order objects, the User field is null. I've been testing this behavior using cURL.
If I do a cURL without a user object, it tells me "This field is required".
If done with a wrong user object, it tells me that the object does not exist. Both of these are the intended and expected behaviors.
I'm trying to figure out how it is possible for some of the Order objects to be saved without a user field. Is there something I'm not taking into account?
My views:
class OrderList (generics.ListCreateAPIView):
model = Order
serializer_class = OrderSerializer
And serializer:
class OrderSerializer (serializers.ModelSerializer):
user = serializers.SlugRelatedField(slug_field = 'user')
partial = True
class Meta:
model = Order
Models:
class User (models.Model):
uid = models.CharField(max_length =200, unique=True)
class Order (models.Model):
uid = models.ForeignKey (User, related_name = "orders", verbose_name = "User",blank=True, null=True)

You could use two different ModelSerializer classes, one for creation, that makes sure, that an Order object can't be created without a related User and one for updating orders, that passes required=False to the related field's constructor, so that you still can save existing orders that haven't a related User.

Try adding default=None to your models.ForeignKey declaration. You could also just create an anonymous user in the users table and when the user isn't specified it could set the anonymous user instead.