Hi everyone / Python Gurus
I would like to know how to accomplish the following task, which so far I've been unable to do so.
Here's what I have:
Q1 = 20e-6
Now this is an exponential number that if you print(Q1) as is it will show: 2e-5 which is fine. Mathematically speaking.
However, here's what I want to do with it:
I want Q1 to print only the number 20. And based on the whether this is e-6 then print uC or if this e-9 the print nC.
Here's an example for better understanding:
Q1=20e-6
When I run print(Q1) show: 20uC.
Q2=20e-9
When I run print(Q2) show: 20nC.
Can you please help me figure this out?
just replace the exponent using str.replace:
q1 = 'XXXXXX'
q1 = q1.replace('e-9', 'nC').replace('e-6', 'uC')
print(q1)
I recommend you using si-prefix.
You can install it using pip:
sudo pip install si-prefix
Then you can use something like this:
from si_prefix import si_format
# precision after the point
# char is the unity's char to be used
def get_format(a, char='C', precision=2):
temp = si_format(a, precision)
try:
num, prefix = temp.split()
except ValueError:
num, prefix = temp , ''
if '.' in num:
aa, bb = num.split('.')
if int(bb) == 0:
num = aa
if prefix:
return num + ' ' + prefix + char
else:
return num
tests = [20e-6, 21.46e05, 33.32e-10, 0.5e03, 0.33e-2, 112.044e-6]
for k in tests:
print get_format(k)
Output:
20 uC
2.15 MC
3.33 nC
500
3.30 mC
112.04 uC
You can try by splitting the string:
'20e-9'.split('e')
gives
['20', '-9']
From there on, you can insert whatever you want in between those values:
('u' if int(a[1]) > 0 else 'n').join(a)
(with a = '20e-9'.split('e'))
You can not. The behaviour you are looking for is called "monkey patching". And this is not allowed for int and float.
You can refer to this stackoverflow question
The only way I can think of is to create a class that extends float and then implement a __str__ method that shows as per your requirement.
------- More explanation -----
if you type
Q1 = 20e-6
in python shell and then
type(Q1)
your will get a
float
So basically your Q1 is considered as float by python type system
when you type print(Q1)
the _str__ method of float is called
The process of extending core class is one example of "monkey patch" and that is what I was refereing to.
Now the problem is that you can not "monkey patch" (or extend if you prefer that) core classes in python (which you can in some languages like in Ruby).
[int, float etc are core classes and written in C for your most common python distribution.]
So how do you solve it?
you need to create a new class like this
class Exponent(float):
def init(self, value):
self.value = value
def __str__(self):
return "ok"
x = Exponent(10.0)
print(x) ==> "ok"
hope this helps
Related
I am trying to create a python code which can help to increment the version values below by 1,expected output shows the result?I am thinking of splitting the version saving each digit ,increment the last digit by 1 and reconstruct the version,is there a way to this simply in python?
version1 = 1151.1
version2 = 4.1.1
version3 = 275.1.2.99
version4 = 379
next_version1 = version1 + 1
print next_version1
next_version2 = version2 + 1
print next_version2
next_version3 = version3 + 1
print next_version3
next_version4 = version4 + 1
print next_version4
EXPECTED OUTPUT:-
1151.2
4.1.2
275.1.2.100
380
Actually not all the numbers are floats in this case.
You should treat it as strings and update the last element.
version1 = '275.1.2.3'
version2 = '279'
version3 = '275.2.3.10'
def updateVersion(version):
if '.' in version:
version = version.split('.')
version[-1] = str(int(version[-1]) + 1)
version = '.'.join(version)
else:
version = str(int(version)+1)
return version
updateVersion(version1)
updateVersion(version2)
Output:
275.1.2.4
280
275.2.3.11
First and foremost please read about Floating Point Arithmetic: Issues and Limitations
Maybe that was the reason why you ask, not clear.
However, I suggest to save each part as an integer, e.g.
main_version_number = 1151
minor_version_number = 1
sub_version_number = 0
You could maybe have a data structure with those fields (a Version class maybe?) with appropriate methods.
Do not rely on floating point arithmetic.
First off, the code you outline would most certainly give a syntax error.
A number of the form 2 is an integer; 2.2, a floating point; but a 2.2.2, meaningless.
You are looking for tuples here. For instance,
>>> version3 = (275,1,2,3)
Then you would get
>>> version3
(275, 1, 2, 3)
To dirty-update only the last bit of such a tuple, you could do
>>> version3 = version3[:-1] + (version3[-1] + 1,)
>>> version3
(275, 1, 2, 4)
The reason I call this dirty updating is that it will not take care of carrying over into the next significant bit.
Here's a relatively simple script to do just that that I could put together in a couple of minutes. Assuming you have stored your version number as a tuple object called version, attempt the following:
new_version = version
for bit in range(len(version)):
new_version = new_version[:-1-bit] + ((new_version[-1-bit] + 1) % 10,) + new_version[-bit:]
if -2-bit >=0:
new_version = new_version[-2-bit:] + (new_version[-2-bit] + (version[-2-bit] + 1) // 10,) + new_version[-1-bit:]
elif (version[-2-bit] + 1) // 10:
new_version = (1,) + new_version
Alternatively, take a look at bumpversion, a tool that lets you take care of version-numbering within your project, with git integration.
The variables 'version2' and 'version3' will result in a syntax error. This syntax error is caused by the fact that Python does not know of any (number) type that has several points in its value. In essence you are trying to use certain types in a way that they are not meant to be used. More specifically the floating point number is not suitable for your goals. As the name suggests a floating point number, only contains one point and that point can be placed anywhere between its digits (floating).
My advice would be to create your own type/class. This would enable you to store the version number in a way that allows for easy modification of its values and better separation of concerns in your code (i.e. that each part of your code is only concerned with one thing).
Example
class VersionNumber:
"""Represents a version number that can contain parts (major, minor, etc)."""
def __init__(self, *argv):
"""This is the constructor, i.e. a function that is called when you create a new VersionNumber.
The '*argv' allows the user of this class to give a variable amount of arguments. This is why
you can have a version number with only 1 number, and one with 4. The '*argv' is iterable."""
#Create a class specific field, that stores all the version number parts in a list.
self.Parts = []
#Fill it with the supplied arguments.
for part in argv:
self.Parts.append(part)
def __repr__(self):
"""This function is called when the VersionNumber needs to be displayed in the console"""
return str(self)
def __str__(self):
"""This function is called when the VersionNumber is parsed to a string"""
return '.'.join(map(str,self.Parts))
def incrementVersion(self, position, incrementAmount):
"""This function allows you to increment the version number. It does this by adjusting the list
we have set in the constructor."""
self.Parts[position] += incrementAmount
version1 = VersionNumber(1, 23, 45, 0)
print(version1)
#Position -1, takes the last (most right) version number part from the version number.
version1.incrementVersion(-1, 1)
print(version1)
version2 = VersionNumber(346)
print(version2)
version2.incrementVersion(-1, 2)
print(version2)
I would like Z3 to check whether it exists an integer t that satisfies my formula. I'm getting the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "D:/z3-4.6.0-x64-win/bin/python/Expl20180725.py", line 18, in <module>
g = ForAll(t, f1(t) == And(t>=0, t<10, user[t].rights == ["read"] ))
TypeError: list indices must be integers or slices, not ArithRef
Code:
from z3 import *
import random
from random import randrange
class Struct:
def __init__(self, **entries): self.__dict__.update(entries)
user = [Struct() for i in range(10)]
for i in range(10):
user[i].uid = i
user[i].rights = random.choice(["create","execute","read"])
s=Solver()
f1 = Function('f1', IntSort(), BoolSort())
t = Int('t')
f2 = Exists(t, f1(t))
g = ForAll(t, f1(t) == And(t>=0, t<10, user[t].rights == ["read"] ))
s.add(g)
s.add(f2)
print(s.check())
print(s.model())
You are mixing and matching Python and Z3 expressions, and while that is the whole point of Z3py, it definitely does not mean that you can mix/match them arbitrarily. In general, you should keep all the "concrete" parts in Python, and relegate the symbolic parts to "z3"; carefully coordinating the interaction in between. In your particular case, you are accessing a Python list (your user) with a symbolic z3 integer (t), and that is certainly not something that is allowed. You have to use a Z3 symbolic Array to access with a symbolic index.
The other issue is the use of strings ("create"/"read" etc.) and expecting them to have meanings in the symbolic world. That is also not how z3py is intended to be used. If you want them to mean something in the symbolic world, you'll have to model them explicitly.
I'd strongly recommend reading through http://ericpony.github.io/z3py-tutorial/guide-examples.htm which is a great introduction to z3py including many of the advanced features.
Having said all that, I'd be inclined to code your example as follows:
from z3 import *
import random
Right, (create, execute, read) = EnumSort('Right', ('create', 'execute', 'read'))
users = Array('Users', IntSort(), Right)
for i in range(10):
users = Store(users, i, random.choice([create, execute, read]))
s = Solver()
t = Int('t')
s.add(t >= 0)
s.add(t < 10)
s.add(users[t] == read)
r = s.check()
if r == sat:
print s.model()[t]
else:
print r
Note how the enumerated type Right in the symbolic land is used to model your "permissions."
When I run this program multiple times, I get:
$ python a.py
5
$ python a.py
9
$ python a.py
unsat
$ python a.py
6
Note how unsat is produced, if it happens that the "random" initialization didn't put any users with a read permission.
I have a program that is a converter for times in minutes and seconds and returns a float value with a decimal, for example:
6.57312
I would like to extract the .57312 part in order to convert it to seconds.
How can I get python to take only the value after the decimal point and put it into a variable that I can then use for the conversion?
You can do just a simple operation
dec = 6.57312 % 1
math.modf does that. It also has the advantage that you get the whole part in the same operation.
import math
f,i = math.modf(6.57312)
# f == .57312, i==6.0
Example program:
import math
def dec_to_ms(value):
frac,whole = math.modf(value)
return "%d:%02d"%(whole, frac*60)
print dec_to_ms(6.57312)
You can do this also
num = 6.57312
dec = num - int(num)
I've defined a function that receives an optional parameter, using a fractional default value:
def foo(x=0.1):
pass
Now when typing foo( in the IDLE shell, the tool-tip that pops out to help me complete the call reads (x=0<tuple>), instead of the expected (x=0.1). I've never encountered this before, though I find it hard to believe I haven't used any function/method with a fractional default values.
Assuming it's a feature, rather than a bug, I'd be glad if someone can explain why it's happening. I'm using python 2.7.5 64-bit on Windows 7.
EDIT:
From the comments, it does not seem to be a feature.
I've checked different function definitions, by 2rs2ts's suggestion, and found every appearance of a decimal point I've tried to be replaced in the tool-tip. So this definition -
def foo(x=[(1,0.1), 2, .3]):
pass
produces the tool-tip (x=[(1, 0<tuple>), 2, 0<tuple>]).
Should I close this question and submit a bug report instead?
This is a strange answer and finding it felt a bit like a wild goose chase...
I did not see the issue posted at bugs.python.org, but after some poking around, I found the CallTips.py file in Python 2.6.6 and I saw the potentially offending line of code. By scrolling down to line 161 in the get_arg_text() method, I saw
arg_text = "(%s)" % re.sub("\.\d+", "<tuple>", arg_text)
This looked just like what you posted in your question and indeed if arg_text is a float converted to a string, that line returns the <tuple> string:
arg_text = "(%s)" % re.sub("\.\d+", "<tuple>", "9.0") # returns (9<tuple>)
However, the issue must have been fixed at svn.python.org/.../Calltips.py (during PEP 384?) since that version does not have the line above. In fact, get_arg_text() was replaced by get_argspec().
So the answer would seem to be it was fixed during PEP 384. Based on the comments to your question, Python 3.3's IDLE has this fix but as you point out, Python 2.7.5 does not. For comparison, I pasted the two methods below so that someone might be able to explain exactly how PEP 384 fixed the issue you saw.
Hope it helps.
Just for reference:
Older versions of Calltips.py has get_arg_text(ob) (at least as recently as the 2.7.5 build you are using). For example, it is located at /Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/idlelib/CallTips.py on a Mac. The function was defined as follows:
def get_arg_text(ob):
"""Get a string describing the arguments for the given object"""
arg_text = ""
if ob is not None:
arg_offset = 0
if type(ob) in (types.ClassType, types.TypeType):
# Look for the highest __init__ in the class chain.
fob = _find_constructor(ob)
if fob is None:
fob = lambda: None
else:
arg_offset = 1
elif type(ob)==types.MethodType:
# bit of a hack for methods - turn it into a function
# but we drop the "self" param.
fob = ob.im_func
arg_offset = 1
else:
fob = ob
# Try to build one for Python defined functions
if type(fob) in [types.FunctionType, types.LambdaType]: # <- differs here!
argcount = fob.func_code.co_argcount
real_args = fob.func_code.co_varnames[arg_offset:argcount]
defaults = fob.func_defaults or []
defaults = list(map(lambda name: "=%s" % repr(name), defaults))
defaults = [""] * (len(real_args) - len(defaults)) + defaults
items = map(lambda arg, dflt: arg + dflt, real_args, defaults)
if fob.func_code.co_flags & 0x4:
items.append("...")
if fob.func_code.co_flags & 0x8:
items.append("***")
arg_text = ", ".join(items)
arg_text = "(%s)" % re.sub("\.\d+", "<tuple>", arg_text)
# See if we can use the docstring
doc = getattr(ob, "__doc__", "")
if doc:
doc = doc.lstrip()
pos = doc.find("\n")
if pos < 0 or pos > 70:
pos = 70
if arg_text:
arg_text += "\n"
arg_text += doc[:pos]
return arg_text
The corresponding function located at svn.python.org/.../Calltips.py seems to have fixed a bug. The method was renamed to get_argspec:
def get_argspec(ob):
"""Get a string describing the arguments for the given object."""
argspec = ""
if ob is not None:
if isinstance(ob, type):
fob = _find_constructor(ob)
if fob is None:
fob = lambda: None
elif isinstance(ob, types.MethodType):
fob = ob.__func__
else:
fob = ob
if isinstance(fob, (types.FunctionType, types.LambdaType)):
argspec = inspect.formatargspec(*inspect.getfullargspec(fob))
pat = re.compile('self\,?\s*')
argspec = pat.sub("", argspec)
doc = getattr(ob, "__doc__", "")
if doc:
doc = doc.lstrip()
pos = doc.find("\n")
if pos < 0 or pos > 70:
pos = 70
if argspec:
argspec += "\n"
argspec += doc[:pos]
return argspec
Thanks to Gary's and Ariel's detective work, I was able to fix this by adding the negative lookbehind assertion "(?<!\d)" to the beginning of the replacement re. The re now matches, for instance, '.0', the funny 'name' for the first parameter tuple, which never follows a digit, but not match '0.0', the string representation of a float, which always begins with a digit. CPython tracker issue 18539
I'm using an old version of python on an embedded platform ( Python 1.5.2+ on Telit platform ). The problem that I have is my function for converting a string to hex. It is very slow. Here is the function:
def StringToHexString(s):
strHex=''
for c in s:
strHex = strHex + hexLoookup[ord(c)]
return strHex
hexLookup is a lookup table (a python list) containing all the hex representation of each character.
I am willing to try everything (a more compact function, some language tricks I don't know about). To be more clear here are the benchmarks (resolution is 1 second on that platform):
N is the number of input characters to be converted to hex and the time is in seconds.
N | Time (seconds)
50 | 1
150 | 3
300 | 4
500 | 8
1000 | 15
1500 | 23
2000 | 31
Yes, I know, it is very slow... but if I could gain something like 1 or 2 seconds it would be a progress.
So any solution is welcomed, especially from people who know about python performance.
Thanks,
Iulian
PS1: (after testing the suggestions offered - keeping the ord call):
def StringToHexString(s):
hexList=[]
hexListAppend=hexList.append
for c in s:
hexListAppend(hexLoookup[ord(c)])
return ''.join(hexList)
With this function I obtained the following times: 1/2/3/5/12/19/27 (which is clearly better)
PS2 (can't explain but it's blazingly fast) A BIG thank you Sven Marnach for the idea !!!:
def StringToHexString(s):
return ''.join( map(lambda param:hexLoookup[param], map(ord,s) ) )
Times:1/1/2/3/6/10/12
Any other ideas/explanations are welcome!
Make your hexLoookup a dictionary indexed by the characters themselves, so you don't have to call ord each time.
Also, don't concatenate to build strings – that used to be slow. Use join on a list instead.
from string import join
def StringToHexString(s):
strHex = []
for c in s:
strHex.append(hexLoookup[c])
return join(strHex, '')
Building on Petr Viktorin's answer, you could further improve the performance by avoiding global vairable and attribute look-ups in favour of local variable look-ups. Local variables are optimized to avoid a dictionary look-up on each access. (They haven't always been, by I just double-checked this optimization was already in place in 1.5.2, released in 1999.)
from string import join
def StringToHexString(s):
strHex = []
strHexappend = strHex.append
_hexLookup = hexLoookup
for c in s:
strHexappend(_hexLoookup[c])
return join(strHex, '')
Constantly reassigning and adding strings together using the + operator is very slow. I guess that Python 1.5.2 isn't yet optimizing for this. So using string.join() would be preferable.
Try
import string
def StringToHexString(s):
listhex = []
for c in s:
listhex.append(hexLookup[ord(c)])
return string.join(listhex, '')
and see if that is any faster.
Try:
from string import join
def StringToHexString(s):
charlist = []
for c in s:
charlist.append(hexLoookup[ord(c)])
return join(charlist, '')
Each string addition takes time proportional to the length of the string so, while join will also take time proportional to the length of the entire string, but you only have to do it once.
You could also make hexLookup a dict mapping characters to hex values, so you don't have to call ord for every character. It's a micro-optimization, so probably won't be significant.
def StringToHexString(s):
return ''.join( map(lambda param:hexLoookup[param], map(ord,s) ) )
Seems like this is the fastest! Thank you Sven Marnach!