I've just split my data into a training and testing set and my plan is to train a Linear Regression model and be able to check what the performance is like using my testing split.
My current code is:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn import datasets, linear_model
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
df = pd.read_csv('C:/Dataset.csv')
df['split'] = np.random.randn(df.shape[0], 1)
split = np.random.rand(len(df)) <= 0.75
training_set = df[split]
testing_set = df[~split]
Is there a proper method I should be using to plot a Linear Regression model from an external file such as a .csv?
Since you want to use scikit-learn, here's an approach using sklearn.linear_model.LinearRegression:
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
model = LinearRegression()
X_train, y_train = training_set[x_vars], training_set[y_var]
X_test, y_test = testing_test[x_vars], testing_test[y_var]
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
predictions = model.predict(X_test)
Depending on whether you need more descriptive output, you might also look into use statsmodels for linear regression.
Related
I have test and train subset separately. I need to apply regression models on those datasets. Just tried to make an example but something is wrong. My prediction column for regression is 'survival-time'. Also i have 93 column on each datasets. Here is code.
NOTE: Specially, troubling on 'score = svr.score(X_train,y_train)', should i use test for train argument?
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.svm import SVR
train = pd.read_csv('training.csv',sep=";")
test = pd.read_csv('test.csv',sep=";")
X_train = train.drop('survival-time',axis=1)
y_train = train['survival-time']
X_test = test.drop('survival-time',axis=1)
y_test = test['survival-time']
svr = SVR().fit(X_train, y_train)
print(svr)
yfit = svr.predict(X_train)
score = svr.score(X_train,y_train)
print("R-squared:", score)
print("MSE:", mean_squared_error(y_train, yfit))
print("RMSLE:", mean_squared_log_error(y_train, yfit))
So I have this small dataset and ı want to perform multiple linear regression on it.
first I drop the deliveries column for it's high correlation with miles. Although gasprice is supposed to be removed, I don't remove it so that I can perform multiple linear regression and not simple linear regression.
finally I removed the outliers and did the following:
Dataset
import math
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
from scipy import stats
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import statsmodels.api as sm
from statsmodels.stats import diagnostic as diag
from statsmodels.stats.outliers_influence import variance_inflation_factor
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error, r2_score, mean_absolute_error
from sklearn import linear_model
%matplotlib inline
X = dfafter
Y = dfafter[['hours']]
# Split X and y into X_
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, Y, test_size=0.2, random_state=1)
# create a Linear Regression model object
regression_model = LinearRegression()
# pass through the X_train & y_train data set
regression_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
y_predict = regression_model.predict(X_train)
#lets find out what are our coeffs of the multiple linear regression and olso find intercept
intercept = regression_model.intercept_[0]
coefficent = regression_model.coef_[0][0]
print("The intercept for our model is {}".format(intercept))
print('-'*100)
# loop through the dictionary and print the data
for coef in zip(X.columns, regression_model.coef_[0]):
print("The Coefficient for {} is {}".format(coef[0],coef[1]))
#Coeffs here don't match the ones that will appear later
#Rebuild the model using Statsmodel for easier analysis
X2 = sm.add_constant(X)
# create a OLS model
model = sm.OLS(Y, X2)
# fit the data
est = model.fit()
# calculate the mean squared error
odel_mse = mean_squared_error(y_train, y_predict)
# calculate the mean absolute error
model_mae = mean_absolute_error(y_train, y_predict)
# calulcate the root mean squared error
model_rmse = math.sqrt(model_mse)
# display the output
print("MSE {:.3}".format(model_mse))
print("MAE {:.3}".format(model_mae))
print("RMSE {:.3}".format(model_rmse))
print(est.summary())
#????????? something is wrong
X = df[['miles', 'gasprice']]
y = df['hours']
regr = linear_model.LinearRegression()
regr.fit(X, y)
print(regr.coef_)
So the code ends here. I found different coeffs every time I printed them out. what did I do wrong and is any of them correct?
I see you are trying 3 different things here, so let me summarize:
sklearn.linear_model.LinearRegression() with train_test_split(X, Y, test_size=0.2, random_state=1), so only using 80% of the data (but the split should be the same every time you run it since you fixed the random state)
statsmodels.api.OLS with the full dataset (you're passing X2 and Y, which are not cut up into train-test)
sklearn.linear_model.LinearRegression() with the full dataset, as in n2.
I tried to reproduce with the iris dataset, and I am getting identical results for cases #2 and #3 (which are trained on the same exact data), and only slightly different coefficients for case 1.
In order to evaluate if any of them are "correct", you will need to evaluate the model on unseen data and look at adjusted R^2 score, etc (hence you need the holdout (test) set). If you want to further improve the model you can try to understand better the interactions of the features in the linear model. Statsmodels has a neat "R-like" formula way to specify your model: https://www.statsmodels.org/dev/example_formulas.html
I have a multi-class classification problem with 9 different classes. I am using the AdaBoostClassifier class from scikit-learn to train my model without using the one vs all technique, as the number of classes is very high and it might be inefficient.
I have tried using the tips from the documentation in scikit learn [1], but there the one vs all technique is used, which is substantially different. In my approach I only get one prediction per event, i.e. if I have n classes, the outcome of the prediction is a single value within the n classes. For the one vs all approach, on the other hand, the outcome of the prediction is an array of size n with a sort of likelihood value per class.
[1]
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/model_selection/plot_roc.html#sphx-glr-auto-examples-model-selection-plot-roc-py
The code is:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # Matplotlib plotting library for basic visualisation
%matplotlib inline
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.ensemble import AdaBoostClassifier
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
from sklearn.metrics import roc_curve, auc
from sklearn import preprocessing
# Read data
df = pd.read_pickle('data.pkl')
# Create the dependent variable class
# This will substitute each of the n classes from
# text to number
factor = pd.factorize(df['target_var'])
df.target_var= factor[0]
definitions = factor[1]
X = df.drop('target_var', axis=1)
y = df['target_var]
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, random_state = 0)
bdt_clf = AdaBoostClassifier(
DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=2),
n_estimators=250,
learning_rate=0.3)
bdt_clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
y_pred = bdt_clf.predict(X_test)
#Reverse factorize (converting y_pred from 0s,1s, 2s, etc. to their original values
reversefactor = dict(zip(range(9),definitions))
y_test_rev = np.vectorize(reversefactor.get)(y_test)
y_pred_rev = np.vectorize(reversefactor.get)(y_pred)
I tried directly with the roc curve function, and also binarising the labels, but I always get the same error message.
def multiclass_roc_auc(y_test, y_pred):
lb = preprocessing.LabelBinarizer()
lb.fit(y_test)
y_test = lb.transform(y_test)
y_pred = lb.transform(y_pred)
return roc_curve(y_test, y_pred)
multiclass_roc_auc(y_test, y_pred_test)
The error message is:
ValueError: multilabel-indicator format is not supported
How could this be sorted out? Am I missing some important concept?
I'm trying out different classification models using a binary dependent variable (occupied/unoccupied). The models I am interested in are Logistic regression, Decision tree and Gaussian Naïve Bayes.
My input data is a csv-file with a datetime index (e.g. 2019-01-07 14:00), three variable columns ("R", "P", "C", containing numerical values), and the dependent variable column ("value", containing the binary values).
Training the model is not the problem, that all works fine. All the models give me their prediction in binary values (this of course should be the ultimate outcome), but I would also like to see the predicted probabilities which made them decide on either of the binary values. Is there any way to get also these values?
I have tried all of the classification visualizers that function with the yellowbrick package (ClassBalance, ROCAUC, ClassificationReport, ClassPredictionError). But all of these don't give me a graph that shows the calculated probabilities by the model for the data set.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
data = pd.read_csv('testrooms_data.csv', parse_dates=['timestamp'])
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, confusion_matrix, classification_report
##split dataset into test and trainig set
X = data.drop("value", axis=1) # X contains all the features
y = data["value"] # y contains only the label
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size = 0.5, random_state = 1)
###model training
###Logistic Regression###
clf_lr = LogisticRegression()
# fit the dataset into LogisticRegression Classifier
clf_lr.fit(X_train, y_train)
#predict on the unseen data
pred_lr = clf_lr.predict(X_test)
###Decision Tree###
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
clf_dt = DecisionTreeClassifier()
pred_dt = clf_dt.fit(X_train, y_train).predict(X_test)
###Bayes###
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB
bayes = GaussianNB()
pred_bayes = bayes.fit(X_train, y_train).predict(X_test)
###visualization for e.g. LogReg
from yellowbrick.classifier import ClassificationReport
from yellowbrick.classifier import ClassPredictionError
from yellowbrick.classifier import ROCAUC
#classificationreport
visualizer = ClassificationReport(clf_lr, support=True)
visualizer.fit(X_train, y_train) # Fit the visualizer and the model
visualizer.score(X_test, y_test) # Evaluate the model on the test data
g = visualizer.poof() # Draw/show/poof the data
#classprediction report
visualizer2 = ClassPredictionError(LogisticRegression())
visualizer2.fit(X_train, y_train) # Fit the training data to the visualizer
visualizer2.score(X_test, y_test) # Evaluate the model on the test data
g2 = visualizer2.poof() # Draw visualization
#(ROC)
visualizer3 = ROCAUC(LogisticRegression())
visualizer3.fit(X_train, y_train) # Fit the training data to the visualizer
visualizer3.score(X_test, y_test) # Evaluate the model on the test data
g3 = visualizer3.poof() # Draw/show/poof the data
it would be great to have e.g. an array similar to pred_lr that contains the probabilities calculated for each row of the csv file. Is that possible? If yes, how can I get it?
In most sklearn estimators (if not all) you have a method for obtaining the probability that precluded the classification, either in log probability or probability.
For example, if you have your Naive Bayes classifier and you want to obtain probabilities but not classification itself, you could do (I used same nomenclatures as in your code):
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB
bayes = GaussianNB()
pred_bayes = bayes.fit(X_train, y_train).predict(X_test)
#for probabilities
bayes.predict_proba(X_test)
bayes.predict_log_proba(X_test)
Hope this helps.
I'm new to machine learning and trying Sklearn for the first time. I have two dataframes, one with data to train a logistic regression model (with 10-fold cross-validation) and another one to predict classes ('0,1') using that model.
Here's my code so far using bits of tutorials I found on Sklearn docs and on the Web:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import sklearn
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
from sklearn.preprocessing import normalize
from sklearn.preprocessing import scale
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_predict
from sklearn import metrics
# Import dataframe with training data
df = pd.read_csv('summary_44.csv')
cols = df.columns.drop('num_class') # Data to use (num_class is the column with the classes)
# Import dataframe with data to predict
df_pred = pd.read_csv('new_predictions.csv')
# Scores
df_data = df.ix[:,:-1].values
# Target
df_target = df.ix[:,-1].values
# Values to predict
df_test = df_pred.ix[:,:-1].values
# Scores' names
df_data_names = cols.values
# Scaling
X, X_pred, y = scale(df_data), scale(df_test), df_target
# Define number of folds
kf = KFold(n_splits=10)
kf.get_n_splits(X) # returns the number of splitting iterations in the cross-validator
# Logistic regression normalizing variables
LogReg = LogisticRegression()
# 10-fold cross-validation
scores = [LogReg.fit(X[train], y[train]).score(X[test], y[test]) for train, test in kf.split(X)]
print scores
# Predict new
novel = LogReg.predict(X_pred)
Is this the correct way to implement a Logistic Regression?
I know that the fit() method should be used after cross-validation in order to train the model and use it for predictions. However, since I called fit() inside a list comprehension I really don't know if my model was "fitted" and can be used to make predictions.
I general things are okay, but there are some problems.
Scaling
X, X_pred, y = scale(df_data), scale(df_test), df_target
You scale training and test data independently, which isn't correct. Both datasets must be scaled with the same scaler. "Scale" is a simple function, but it is better to use something else, for example StandardScaler.
scaler = StandardScaler()
scaler.fit(df_data)
X = scaler.transform(df_data)
X_pred = scaler.transform(df_test)
Cross-validation and predicting.
How your code works? You split data 10 times into train and hold-out set; 10 times fit model on train set and calculate score on hold-out set. This way you get cross-validation scores, but the model is fitted only on a part of data. So it would be better to fit model on the whole dataset and then make a prediction:
LogReg.fit(X, y)
novel = LogReg.predict(X_pred)
I want to notice that there are advanced technics like stacking and boosting, but if you learn using sklearn, then it is better to stick to the basics.