Working on 50 million rows in pandas (python) - python

I am working on a dataframe of 50 million rows in pandas. I need to run through a column and extract specific parts of the text. The column has string values defined in 4 or 5 patterns. I need to extract the text and replace the original string. I am using the apply function and regex for this. This takes me close to a day to execute. I feel this is inefficient. Or is this normal? Is there an approach i am missing to make it faster?

here are the docs:
http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/indexing.html
http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/text.html#extracting-substrings
Replacing text is easy. No a day isn't normal. Get rid of all the lists you had in an earlier version of this post. You don't need them. Add on columns to the dataframe if you need more space for data. Learn the data types to make the data smaller.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame() #import your data at this step
df['column'].str.extract(regex_thingy_here)
I'd write more but you took the code down.

Related

Python Iteratively Read and Write Rows

I am trying to read an excel file and write every fourth row into a new Excel file. I'm using Pandas to read and write, and if int(num%4) == 0 to determine which rows to select, but the iteration and subsequent writing continue to escape me. I've tried my best to look up answers, but I'm a new programmer and struggling :/
If you're using Pandas I'm assuming you've loaded the data into a dataframe?
If so then consider this:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv('YourFile.csv')
df.iloc[::4]
#once you're done with the data you can save it to another csv file
df.to_csv('OutputFile.csv')
This will leave your dataframe df with the 4th, 8th, 12th, etc. rows from your original dataframe/file. You can then read/write to each row left in the dataframe df. To visualize the before and after just insert df.head() before and after the df.iloc[::4] expression.
I did not understand what the problem is to be more specific, but you should try pandas' iloc property (or even loc depending on your df), check more info in here: https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.iloc.html

Pandas Read csv just read a line of a row

I have a classic panda data frame made of ID and Text. I would like to get just one column and therefore i use the typical df["columnname"]. But at this point it becomes a Pandas Series. Is there a way to make a new dataframe with just that single column?
I'm asking this is because if I cast the Pandas series in a string (columnname = columnname.astype ("string")) and I save it in a text file, I see that it only saves the first sentence of each line and not the entire textual content, as I would like.
If there are any other solution, I'm open to learn :)
Try this: pd.DataFrame(dfname["columnname"])

Converting for loop to numpy calculation for pandas dataframes

So I have a python script that compares two dataframes and works to find any rows that are not in both dataframes. It currently iterates through a for loop which is slow.
I want to improve the speed of the process, and know that iteration is the problem. However, I haven't been having much luck using various numpy methods such as merge and where.
Couple of caveats:
The column names from my file sources aren't the same, so I set their names into variables and use the variable names to compare.
I want to only use the column names from one of the dataframes.
df_new represents new information to be checked against what is currently on file (df_current)
My current code:
set_current = set(df_current[current_col_name])
df_out = pd.DataFrame(columns=df_new.columns)
for i in range(len(df_new.index)):
# if the row entry is new, we add it to our dataset
if not df_new[new_col_name][i] in set_current:
df_out.loc[len(df_out)] = df_new.iloc[i]
# if the row entry is a match, then we aren't going to do anything with it
else:
continue
# create a xlsx file with the new items
df_out.to_excel("data/new_products_to_examine.xlsx", index=False)
Here are some simple examples of dataframes I would be working with:
df_current
|partno|description|category|cost|price|upc|brand|color|size|year|
|:-----|:----------|:-------|:---|:----|:--|:----|:----|:---|:---|
|123|Logo T-Shirt||25|49.99||apple|red|large|2021||
|456|Knitted Shirt||35|69.99||apple|green|medium|2021||
df_new
|mfgr_num|desc|category|cost|msrp|upc|style|brand|color|size|year|
|:-------|:---|:-------|:---|:---|:--|:----|:----|:----|:---|:---|
|456|Knitted Shirt||35|69.99|||apple|green|medium|2021|
|789|Logo Vest||20|39.99|||apple|yellow|small|2022|
There are usually many more columns in the current sheet, but I wanted the table displayed to be somewhat readable. The key is that I would only want the columns in the "new" dataframe to be output.
I would want to match partno with mfgr_num since the spreadsheets will always have them, whereas some items don't have upc/gtin/ean.
It's still a unclear what you want without providing examples of each dataframe. But if you want to test unique IDs in differently named columns in two different dataframes, try an approach like this.
Find the IDs that exist in the second dataframe
test_ids = df2['cola_id'].unique().tolist()
the filter the first dataframe for those IDs.
df1[df1['keep_id'].isin(test_ids)]
Here is the answer that works - was supplied to me by someone much smarter.
df_out = df_new[~df_new[new_col_name].isin(df_current[current_col_name])]

Why is the `df.columns` an empty list while I can see the column names if I print out the dataframe? Python Pandas

import pandas as pd
DATA = pd.read_csv(url)
DATA.head()
I have a large dataset that have dozens of columns. After loading it like above into Colab, I can see the name of each column. But running DATA.columns just return Index([], dtype='object'). What's happening in this?
Now I find it impossible to pick out a few columns without column names. One way is to specify names = [...] when I load it, but I'm reluctant to do that since there're too many columns. So I'm looking for a way to index a column by integers, like in R df[:,[1,2,3]] would simply give me the first three columns of a dataframe. Somehow Pandas seems to focus on column names and makes integer indexing very inconvenient, though.
So what I'm asking is (1) What did I do wrong? Can I obtain those column names as well when I load the dataframe? (2) If not, how can I pick out the [0, 1, 10]th column by a list of integers?
It seems that the problem is in the loading as DATA.shape returns (10000,0). I rerun the loading code a few times, and all of a sudden, things go back normal. Maybe Colab was taking a nap or something?
You can perfectly do that using df.loc[:,[1,2,3]] but i would suggest you to use the names because if the columns ever change the order or you insert new columns, the code can break it.

Excel SUMIFS Array in Python Pandas

I have an Excel sheet of time series data of prices where each day consists of 6 hourly periods. I am trying to use Python and Pandas which I have setup and working, importing a CSV and then creating a df from this. That is fine it is just the sorting code I am struggling with. In excel I can do this using a Sum(sumifs) array function but I would like it to work in Python/Pandas.
I am looking to produce a new time series from the data where for each day I get the average price for periods 3 to 5 inclusive only, excluding the others. I am struggling with this.
An example raw data exert and result I am looking for is below:
You need filter by between and boolean indexing and then aggregate mean:
df = df[df['Period'].between(3,5)].groupby('Date', as_index=False)['Price'].mean()

Categories