Related
I have the data with (X,Y,Z) values. I tried to make a density plot with Z values for intensity. However the plot I get is not smooth and and has polytope i.e not completely filled.
The following is the code with the Data
but I want to obtain smooth and completely filled plot
import numpy as np
from scipy.interpolate import griddata
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import xlrd
location = "~/Desktop/Data.xlsx"
data = xlrd.open_workbook(location)
sheet = data.sheet_by_index(0)
sample=2000
x=np.array(sheet.col_values(0))[0:sample]
y=np.array(sheet.col_values(1))[0:sample]
z=np.hamming(9000)[0:sample]
print z
def plot_contour(x,y,z,resolution = 500,contour_method='cubic'):
resolution = str(resolution)+'j'
X,Y = np.mgrid[min(x):max(x):complex(resolution), min(y):max(y):complex(resolution)]
points = [[a,b] for a,b in zip(x,y)]
Z = griddata(points, z, (X, Y), method=contour_method)
return X,Y,Z
X,Y,Z = plot_contour(x,y,z,resolution = 500,contour_method='linear')
plt.style.context("seaborn-deep")
plt.contourf(X,Y,Z)
plt.colorbar()
plt.show()
This is the output:
This is what I want to achieve using contourplotf:
plt.contourf() is not the main problem here, it's just working with the data it has. The problem is the linear interpolation in scipy.interpolate.griddata().
I recommend not using griddata, but instead using one of the following methods:
scipy.interpolate.Rbf() — this is what you were using before (see my previous answer).
verde — an awesome gridding package.
sklearn.gaussian_process — or some other prediction model.
All of these methods will fill in the grid. If you plot the result with plt.imshow() you'll get the type of plot you show in your question — that is not a plt.contourf() plot.
Here's a demo notebook showing all of these approaches (including griddata).
I am trying to produce RGB polar plots in Python and I was expecting matplotlib.pyplot.imshow to be able to do it. However, whenever I try plotting data using this method I obtain a blank output.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
data = np.array([[[0,0,1],[0,1,0],[1,0,0]],[[0,0,0.5],[0,0.5,0],[0.5,0,0]]])
# Sample, any N,M,3 data should work
ax = plt.subplot(111,polar=True)
ax.imshow(data,extent=[0,2*np.pi,0,1]) # Produces a white circle
Is there a good way to accomplish this using the aforementioned method or another ?
Thanks.
EDIT: I managed to make a single quadrant by using extent=[0,np.pi/2,0,1] but its use is clearly bugged for polar plots. since anything but a full quadrant doesn't produce the expected outcome.
Using imshow on a polar plot is unfortunately not possible, because the imshow grid is necessarily quadratic in its pixels. You may however use pcolormesh and apply a trick (similar to this one), namely to provide the colors as color argument to pcolormesh, as it would usually just take 2D input.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
data = np.array([[[0,0,1],[0,1,0],[1,0,0]],
[[0,0,0.5],[0,0.5,0],[0.5,0,0]]])
ax = plt.subplot(111, polar=True)
#get coordinates:
phi = np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,data.shape[1]+1)
r = np.linspace(0,1,data.shape[0]+1)
Phi,R = np.meshgrid(phi, r)
# get color
color = data.reshape((data.shape[0]*data.shape[1],data.shape[2]))
# plot colormesh with Phi, R as coordinates,
# and some 2D array of the same shape as the image, except the last dimension
# provide colors as `color` argument
m = plt.pcolormesh(Phi,R,data[:,:,0], color=color, linewidth=0)
# This is necessary to let the `color` argument determine the color
m.set_array(None)
plt.show()
The result is not a circle because you do not have enough points. Repeating the data, data = np.repeat(data, 25, axis=1) would then allow to get a circle.
I'm trying to create a 3D wireframe in Python using matplotlib.
When I get to the actual graph plotting, however, the wireframe joins the wrong way, as shown in the images below.
How can I force matplotlib to join the wireframe along a certain axis?
My code is below:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import axes3d
def rossler(x_n, y_n, z_n, h, a, b, c):
#defining the rossler function
x_n1=x_n+h*(-y_n-z_n)
y_n1=y_n+h*(x_n+a*y_n)
z_n1=z_n+h*(b+z_n*(x_n-c))
return x_n1,y_n1,z_n1
#defining a, b, and c
a = 1.0/5.0
b = 1.0/5.0
c = 5
#defining time limits and steps
t_0 = 0
t_f = 32*np.pi
h = 0.01
steps = int((t_f-t_0)/h)
#3dify
c_list = np.linspace(5,10,6)
c_size = len(c_list)
c_array = np.zeros((c_size,steps))
for i in range (0, c_size):
for j in range (0, steps):
c_array[i][j] = c_list[i]
#create plotting values
t = np.zeros((c_size,steps))
for i in range (0, c_size):
t[i] = np.linspace(t_0,t_f,steps)
x = np.zeros((c_size,steps))
y = np.zeros((c_size,steps))
z = np.zeros((c_size,steps))
binvar, array_size = x.shape
#initial conditions
x[0] = 0
y[0] = 0
z[0] = 0
for j in range(0, c_size-1):
for i in range(array_size-1):
c = c_list[j]
#re-evaluate the values of the x-arrays depending on the initial conditions
[x[j][i+1],y[j][i+1],z[j][i+1]]=rossler(x[j][i],y[j][i],z[j][i],t[j][i+1]-t[j][i],a,b,c)
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
ax.plot_wireframe(t,x,c_array, rstride=10, cstride=10)
plt.show()
I am getting this as an output:
The same output from another angle:
Whereas I'd like the wireframe to join along the wave-peaks. Sorry, I can't give you an image I'd like to see, that's my problem, but I guess it'd be more like the tutorial image.
If I understood, you want to link the 6 traces with polygons. You can do that by triangulating the traces 2 by 2, then plotting the surface with no edges or antialising. Maybe choosing a good colormap will also help.
Just keep in mind that this will be a very heavy plot. The exported SVG weight 10mb :)
import matplotlib.tri as mtri
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
for LineIndex in range(c_size-1):
# If plotting all at once, you get a MemoryError. I'll plot each 6 points
for Sample in range(0, array_size-1, 3):
# I switched x and c_array, because the surface and the triangles
# will look better by default
X = np.concatenate([t[LineIndex,Sample:Sample+3], t[LineIndex+1,Sample:Sample+3]])
Y = np.concatenate([c_array[LineIndex,Sample:Sample+3], c_array[LineIndex+1,Sample:Sample+3]])
Z = np.concatenate([x[LineIndex,Sample:Sample+3], x[LineIndex+1,Sample:Sample+3]])
T = mtri.Triangulation(X, Y)
ax.plot_trisurf(X, Y, Z, triangles=T.triangles, edgecolor='none', antialiased=False)
ax.set_xlabel('t')
ax.set_zlabel('x')
plt.savefig('Test.png', format='png', dpi=600)
plt.show()
Here is the resulting image:
I'm quite unsure about what you're exactly trying to achieve, but I don't think it will work.
Here's what your data looks like when plotted layer by layer (without and with filling):
You're trying to plot this as a wireframe plot. Here's how a wireframe plot looks like as per the manual:
Note the huge differene: a wireframe plot is essentially a proper surface plot, the only difference is that the faces of the surface are fully transparent. This also implies that you can only plot
single-valued functions of the form z(x,y), which are furthermore
specified on a rectangular mesh (at least topologically)
Your data is neither: your points are given along lines, and they are stacked on top of each other, so there's no chance that this is a single surface that can be plotted.
If you just want to visualize your functions above each other, here's how I plotted the above figures:
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d.art3d import Poly3DCollection
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
for zind in range(t.shape[0]):
tnow,xnow,cnow = t[zind,:],x[zind,:],c_array[zind,:]
hplot = ax.plot(tnow,xnow,cnow)
# alternatively fill:
stride = 10
tnow,xnow,cnow = tnow[::stride],xnow[::stride],cnow[::stride]
slice_from = slice(None,-1)
slice_to = slice(1,None)
xpoly = np.array([tnow[slice_from],
tnow[slice_to],
tnow[slice_to],
tnow[slice_from]]
).T
ypoly = np.array([xnow[slice_from],
xnow[slice_to],
np.zeros_like(xnow[slice_to]),
np.zeros_like(xnow[slice_from])]
).T
zpoly = np.array([cnow[slice_from],
cnow[slice_to],
cnow[slice_to],
cnow[slice_from]]
).T
tmppoly = [tuple(zip(xrow,yrow,zrow)) for xrow,yrow,zrow in zip(xpoly,ypoly,zpoly)]
poly3dcoll = Poly3DCollection(tmppoly,linewidth=0.0)
poly3dcoll.set_edgecolor(hplot[0].get_color())
poly3dcoll.set_facecolor(hplot[0].get_color())
ax.add_collection3d(poly3dcoll)
plt.xlabel('t')
plt.ylabel('x')
plt.show()
There is one other option: switching your coordinate axes, such that the (x,t) pair corresponds to a vertical plane rather than a horizontal one. In this case your functions for various c values are drawn on parallel planes. This allows a wireframe plot to be used properly, but since your functions have extrema in different time steps, the result is as confusing as your original plot. You can try using very few plots along the t axis, and hoping that the extrema are close. This approach needs so much guesswork that I didn't try to do this myself. You can plot each function as a filled surface instead, though:
from matplotlib.collections import PolyCollection
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
for zind in range(t.shape[0]):
tnow,xnow,cnow = t[zind,:],x[zind,:],c_array[zind,:]
hplot = ax.plot(tnow,cnow,xnow)
# alternative to fill:
stride = 10
tnow,xnow,cnow = tnow[::stride],xnow[::stride],cnow[::stride]
slice_from = slice(None,-1)
slice_to = slice(1,None)
xpoly = np.array([tnow[slice_from],
tnow[slice_to],
tnow[slice_to],
tnow[slice_from]]
).T
ypoly = np.array([xnow[slice_from],
xnow[slice_to],
np.zeros_like(xnow[slice_to]),
np.zeros_like(xnow[slice_from])]
).T
tmppoly = [tuple(zip(xrow,yrow)) for xrow,yrow in zip(xpoly,ypoly)]
polycoll = PolyCollection(tmppoly,linewidth=0.5)
polycoll.set_edgecolor(hplot[0].get_color())
polycoll.set_facecolor(hplot[0].get_color())
ax.add_collection3d(polycoll,zdir='y',zs=cnow[0])
hplot[0].set_color('none')
ax.set_xlabel('t')
ax.set_zlabel('x')
plt.show()
This results in something like this:
There are a few things to note, however.
3d scatter and wire plots are very hard to comprehend, due to the lacking depth information. You might be approaching your visualization problem in a fundamentally wrong way: maybe there are other options with which you can visualize your data.
Even if you do something like the plots I showed, you should be aware that matplotlib has historically been failing to plot complicated 3d objects properly. Now by "properly" I mean "with physically reasonable apparent depth", see also the mplot3d FAQ note describing exactly this. The core of the problem is that matplotlib projects every 3d object to 2d, and draws these pancakes on the sreen one after the other. Sometimes the asserted drawing order of the pancakes doesn't correspond to their actual relative depth, which leads to artifacts that are both very obvious to humans and uncanny to look at. If you take a closer look at the first filled plot in this post, you'll see that the gold flat plot is behind the magenta one, even though it should be on top of it. Similar things often happen with 3d bar plots and convoluted surfaces.
When you're saying "Sorry, I can't give you an image I'd like to see, that's my problem", you're very wrong. It's not just your problem. It might be crystal clear in your head what you're trying to achieve, but unless you very clearly describe what you see in your head, the outside world will have to resort to guesswork. You can make the work of others and yourself alike easier by trying to be as informative as possible.
I have a problem changing my axis labels in Matplotlib. I want to change the radial axis options in my Polar Plot.
Basically, I'm computing the distortion of a cylinder, which is nothing but how much the radius deviates from the original (perfectly circular) cylinder. Some of the distortion values are negative, while some are positive due to tensile and compressive forces. I'm looking for a way to represent this in cylindrical coordinates graphically, so I thought that a polar plot was my best bet. Excel gives me a 'radar chart' option which is flexible enough to let me specify minimum and maximum radial axis values. I want to replicate this on Python using Matplotlib.
My Python script for plotting on polar coordinates is as follows.
#!usr/bin/env python
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
x = np.arange(-180.0,190.0,10)
theta = (np.pi/180.0 )*x # in radians
offset = 2.0
R1 = [-0.358,-0.483,-0.479,-0.346,-0.121,0.137,0.358,0.483,0.479,0.346,0.121,\
-0.137,-0.358,-0.483,-0.479,-0.346,-0.121,0.137,0.358,0.483,0.479,0.346,0.121,\
-0.137,-0.358,-0.483,-0.479,-0.346,-0.121,0.137,0.358,0.483,0.479,0.346,0.121,\
-0.137,-0.358]
fig1 = plt.figure()
ax1 = fig1.add_axes([0.1,0.1,0.8,0.8],polar=True)
ax1.set_rmax(1)
ax1.plot(theta,R1,lw=2.5)
My plot looks as follows:
But this is not how I want to present it. I want to vary my radial axis, so that I can show the data as a deviation from some reference value, say -2. How do I ask Matplotlib in polar coordinates to change the minimum axis label? I can do this VERY easily in Excel. I choose a minimum radial value of -2, to get the following Excel radar chart:
On Python, I can easily offset my input data by a magnitude of 2. My new dataset is called R2, as shown:
#!usr/bin/env python
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
x = np.arange(-180.0,190.0,10)
theta = (np.pi/180.0 )*x # in radians
offset = 2.0
R2 = [1.642,1.517,1.521,1.654,1.879,2.137,2.358,2.483,2.479,2.346,2.121,1.863,\
1.642,1.517,1.521,1.654,1.879,2.137,2.358,2.483,2.479,2.346,2.121,1.863,1.642,\
1.517,1.521,1.654,1.879,2.137,2.358,2.483,2.479,2.346,2.121,1.863,1.642]
fig2 = plt.figure()
ax2 = fig2.add_axes([0.1,0.1,0.8,0.8],polar=True)
ax2.plot(theta,R2,lw=2.5)
ax2.set_rmax(1.5*offset)
plt.show()
The plot is shown below:
Once I get this, I can MANUALLY add axis labels and hard-code it into my script. But this is a really ugly way. Is there any way I can directly get a Matplotlib equivalent of the Excel radar chart and change my axis labels without having to manipulate my input data?
You can just use the normal way of setting axis limits:
#!usr/bin/env python
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
x = np.arange(-180.0,190.0,10)
theta = (np.pi/180.0 )*x # in radians
offset = 2.0
R1 = [-0.358,-0.483,-0.479,-0.346,-0.121,0.137,0.358,0.483,0.479,0.346,0.121,\
-0.137,-0.358,-0.483,-0.479,-0.346,-0.121,0.137,0.358,0.483,0.479,0.346,0.121,\
-0.137,-0.358,-0.483,-0.479,-0.346,-0.121,0.137,0.358,0.483,0.479,0.346,0.121,\
-0.137,-0.358]
fig1 = plt.figure()
ax1 = fig1.add_axes([0.1,0.1,0.8,0.8],polar=True)
ax1.set_ylim(-2,2)
ax1.set_yticks(np.arange(-2,2,0.5))
ax1.plot(theta,R1,lw=2.5)
I was wondering if there's a way to plot a data cube in Python. I mean I have three coordinate for every point
x=part.points[:,0]
y=part.points[:,1]
z=part.points[:,2]
And for every point I have a scalar field t(x,y,z)
I would like to plot a 3D data cube showing the position of the point and for every point a color which is proportional to the scalar field t in that point.
I tried with histogramdd but it didn't work.
You can use matplotlib.
Here you have a working example (that moves!):
import random
from matplotlib import pyplot
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
mypoints = []
for _ in range(100):
mypoints.append([random.random(), #x
random.random(), #y
random.random(), #z
random.randint(10,100)]) #scalar
data = zip(*mypoints) # use list(zip(*mypoints)) with py3k
fig = pyplot.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d')
ax.scatter(data[0], data[1], data[2], c=data[3])
pyplot.show()
You probably have to customize the relation of your scalar values with the corresponding colors.
Matplotlib has a very nice look but it can be slow drawing and moving these 3D drawings when you have many points. In these cases I used to use Gnuplot controlled by gnuplot.py. Gnuplot can also be used directly as a subprocess as shown here and here.
Another option is Dots plot, produced by MathGL. It is GPL plotting library. Add it don't need many memory if you save in bitmap format (PNG, JPEG, GIF and so on).