Python ssh with fabric, code 127 - python

I'm trying to use fabric in python to send commands to a program on another machine.
This code works fine:
from fabric.api import env, run
env.host_string = 'xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx'
env.user = 'username'
env.password = 'password'
run('ls')
But when running
run('rostopic list')
I get
Warning: run() received nonzero return code 127 while executing 'rostopic list'!
'/bin/bash: rostopic: command not found'
However on the machine itself if I run
rostopic list
it runs as it's supposed to
I'm not sure how to proceed and I don't understand why it's not working with fabric. FYI I tried implementing this with paramiko but I also run into problems, however it works fine with pxssh. The issue is that I need this to work on Windows and pxssh isn't compatible. How can I make this command work with fabric?

From the comments you've made about the pathing issues, it sounds like you will need to use some combination of the path, cd, and/or prefix context managers in order to run ROS (Robot Operating System) commands over an SSH connection. You might also wish to troubleshoot by getting Fabric completely out of the picture, and instead work on getting the command to work via ssh -t, like so:
$ ssh user#machine -t "cd /my/home/directory && /opt/ros/indigo/bin/rostopic list"
An example using context managers with Fabric would look like this:
with path('/opt/ros/indigo/bin/'):
with prefix('always run this command'):
with cd('/my/special/directory'):
run('rostopic list')
That's pretty contrived, but hopefully illustrates the point. Regardless, I would first make sure that you can run the command via ssh -t. Solving that problem will likely lead you to the correct way to make this happen with Fabric.
As a side/related consideration: is this a virtual environment on your remote machine? You could use the prefix context manager to activate it, like so:
with prefix('/opt/ros/indigo/bin/activate'):
run('rostopic list')
Or using ssh -t, you could execute:
$ ssh user#machine -t "/opt/ros/indigo/bin/activate && rostopic list"

Related

Starting batch file via Paramiko on hpc-system leads to an error message [duplicate]

I am trying to run sesu command in Unix server from Python with the help of Paramiko exec_command. However when I am running this command exec_command('sesu test'), I am getting
sh: sesu: not found
When I am running simple ls command it giving me desired output. Only with sesu command it is not working fine.
This is how my code looks like:
import paramiko
host = host
username = username
password = password
port = port
ssh=paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
ssh.connect(ip,port,username,password)
stdin,stdout,stderr=ssh.exec_command('sesu test')
stdin.write('Password')
stdin.flush()
outlines=stdout.readlines()
resp=''.join(outlines)
print(resp)
The SSHClient.exec_command by default does not run shell in "login" mode and does not allocate a pseudo terminal for the session. As a consequence a different set of startup scripts is (might be) sourced, than in your regular interactive SSH session (particularly for non-interactive sessions, .bash_profile is not sourced). And/or different branches in the scripts are taken, based on an absence/presence of TERM environment variable.
Possible solutions (in preference order):
Fix the command not to rely on a specific environment. Use a full path to sesu in the command. E.g.:
/bin/sesu test
If you do not know the full path, on common *nix systems, you can use which sesu command in your interactive SSH session.
Fix your startup scripts to set the PATH the same for both interactive and non-interactive sessions.
Try running the script explicitly via login shell (use --login switch with common *nix shells):
bash --login -c "sesu test"
If the command itself relies on a specific environment setup and you cannot fix the startup scripts, you can change the environment in the command itself. Syntax for that depends on the remote system and/or the shell. In common *nix systems, this works:
PATH="$PATH;/path/to/sesu" && sesu test
Another (not recommended) approach is to force the pseudo terminal allocation for the "exec" channel using the get_pty parameter:
stdin,stdout,stderr = ssh.exec_command('sesu test', get_pty=True)
Using the pseudo terminal to automate a command execution can bring you nasty side effects. See for example Is there a simple way to get rid of junk values that come when you SSH using Python's Paramiko library and fetch output from CLI of a remote machine?
You may have a similar problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH and locating shared objects.
See also:
Environment variable differences when using Paramiko
Certain Unix commands fail with "... not found", when executed through Java using JSch

'arp' command not found when run remotely through Python Paramiko [duplicate]

I am trying to run sesu command in Unix server from Python with the help of Paramiko exec_command. However when I am running this command exec_command('sesu test'), I am getting
sh: sesu: not found
When I am running simple ls command it giving me desired output. Only with sesu command it is not working fine.
This is how my code looks like:
import paramiko
host = host
username = username
password = password
port = port
ssh=paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
ssh.connect(ip,port,username,password)
stdin,stdout,stderr=ssh.exec_command('sesu test')
stdin.write('Password')
stdin.flush()
outlines=stdout.readlines()
resp=''.join(outlines)
print(resp)
The SSHClient.exec_command by default does not run shell in "login" mode and does not allocate a pseudo terminal for the session. As a consequence a different set of startup scripts is (might be) sourced, than in your regular interactive SSH session (particularly for non-interactive sessions, .bash_profile is not sourced). And/or different branches in the scripts are taken, based on an absence/presence of TERM environment variable.
Possible solutions (in preference order):
Fix the command not to rely on a specific environment. Use a full path to sesu in the command. E.g.:
/bin/sesu test
If you do not know the full path, on common *nix systems, you can use which sesu command in your interactive SSH session.
Fix your startup scripts to set the PATH the same for both interactive and non-interactive sessions.
Try running the script explicitly via login shell (use --login switch with common *nix shells):
bash --login -c "sesu test"
If the command itself relies on a specific environment setup and you cannot fix the startup scripts, you can change the environment in the command itself. Syntax for that depends on the remote system and/or the shell. In common *nix systems, this works:
PATH="$PATH;/path/to/sesu" && sesu test
Another (not recommended) approach is to force the pseudo terminal allocation for the "exec" channel using the get_pty parameter:
stdin,stdout,stderr = ssh.exec_command('sesu test', get_pty=True)
Using the pseudo terminal to automate a command execution can bring you nasty side effects. See for example Is there a simple way to get rid of junk values that come when you SSH using Python's Paramiko library and fetch output from CLI of a remote machine?
You may have a similar problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH and locating shared objects.
See also:
Environment variable differences when using Paramiko
Certain Unix commands fail with "... not found", when executed through Java using JSch

Running a python script through SSH works, but not through paramiko. Doesn't find system libraries [duplicate]

I am trying to run sesu command in Unix server from Python with the help of Paramiko exec_command. However when I am running this command exec_command('sesu test'), I am getting
sh: sesu: not found
When I am running simple ls command it giving me desired output. Only with sesu command it is not working fine.
This is how my code looks like:
import paramiko
host = host
username = username
password = password
port = port
ssh=paramiko.SSHClient()
ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy())
ssh.connect(ip,port,username,password)
stdin,stdout,stderr=ssh.exec_command('sesu test')
stdin.write('Password')
stdin.flush()
outlines=stdout.readlines()
resp=''.join(outlines)
print(resp)
The SSHClient.exec_command by default does not run shell in "login" mode and does not allocate a pseudo terminal for the session. As a consequence a different set of startup scripts is (might be) sourced, than in your regular interactive SSH session (particularly for non-interactive sessions, .bash_profile is not sourced). And/or different branches in the scripts are taken, based on an absence/presence of TERM environment variable.
Possible solutions (in preference order):
Fix the command not to rely on a specific environment. Use a full path to sesu in the command. E.g.:
/bin/sesu test
If you do not know the full path, on common *nix systems, you can use which sesu command in your interactive SSH session.
Fix your startup scripts to set the PATH the same for both interactive and non-interactive sessions.
Try running the script explicitly via login shell (use --login switch with common *nix shells):
bash --login -c "sesu test"
If the command itself relies on a specific environment setup and you cannot fix the startup scripts, you can change the environment in the command itself. Syntax for that depends on the remote system and/or the shell. In common *nix systems, this works:
PATH="$PATH;/path/to/sesu" && sesu test
Another (not recommended) approach is to force the pseudo terminal allocation for the "exec" channel using the get_pty parameter:
stdin,stdout,stderr = ssh.exec_command('sesu test', get_pty=True)
Using the pseudo terminal to automate a command execution can bring you nasty side effects. See for example Is there a simple way to get rid of junk values that come when you SSH using Python's Paramiko library and fetch output from CLI of a remote machine?
You may have a similar problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH and locating shared objects.
See also:
Environment variable differences when using Paramiko
Certain Unix commands fail with "... not found", when executed through Java using JSch

Executing a python script on multpile nodes by using ssh command in BASH

keygen etc. so I can just ssh remotehost w/o using password, shell =BASH
I am using a for loop to ssh over multiple nodes (remote host) and wish to execute a script but it dosent seem to work
for i in {1..10};
do
ssh -f node$i "python script.py $i"
done
the terminal script hangs up and nothing happens
Also I can manually ssh and use python. The PYTHONPATH etc are configured for enodes.
There was cshell on nodes, so i used .cshrc wit exec /bin/bash which atleast when i log manually gives me bash shell, so problem doesent seem to be there.
I
Instead of wrapping python script in a shell script, you should probably have a python script that connects to all the remote hosts via ssh and executes stuff.
Paramiko is a very good framework for this kind of use-case. It will be much easier to maintain your script this was in the long run.
Use -o BatchMode=yes
and maybe you need to force allocate pseudo-tty and -n to prevent reading from stdin

run ssh command remotely without redirecting output

I want to run a python script on my server (that python script has GUI). But I want to start it from ssh. Something like this:
ssh me#server -i my_key "nohup python script.py"
... > let the script run forever
BUT it complains "unable to access video driver" since it is trying to use my ssh terminal as output.
Can I somehow make my commands output run on server machine and not to my terminal... Basically something like "wake-on-lan functionality" -> tell the server you want something and he will do everything using its own system (not sending any output back)
What about
ssh me#server -i my_key "nohup python script.py >/dev/null 2>&1"
You can use redirection to some remote logfile instead of /dev/null of course.
? :)
EDIT: GUI applications on X usually use $DISPLAY variable to know where they should be displayed. Moreover, X11 display servers use authorization to permit or disallow applications connecting to its display. Commands
export DISPLAY=:0 && xhost +
may be helpful for you.
Isn't it possible for you to rather use python ssh extension instead of calling external application?
It would:
run as one process
guarantee that invocation will be the same among all possible system
lose the overhead from "execution"
send everything trough ssh (you won't have to worry about input like "; possibly local executed command)
If not, go with what Piotr Wades suggested.

Categories