In the example below, Column C should be deleted because it already exists (Column A should remain)
type(df): pandas.core.frame.DataFrame
A B C
1 2 1
0 2 0
3 2 3
I tried creating a dictionary to later delete repeated values but got stuck
dict_test = {}
for each_column in df:
dict_test[each_column] = df[[each_column]].mean()
dict_test
The result came out to be dtype: float64, 'A' : A 1.33333
The problem above is that the dictionary is storing the 'Key and Value' in the Value section so I can't compare Values to one another
You can use df.mean().drop_duplicates() and pandas indexing:
In [30]: df[df.mean().drop_duplicates().index]
Out[30]:
A B
0 1 2
1 0 2
2 3 2
I am concatenating multiple months of csv's where newer, more recent versions have additional columns. As a result, putting them all together fills certain rows of certain columns with NaN.
The issue with this behavior is that it mixes these NaNs with true null entries from the data set which need to be easily distinguishable.
My only solution as of now is to replace the original NaNs with a unique string, concatenate the csv's, replace the new NaNs with a second unique string, replace the first unique string with NaN.
Given the amount of data I am processing, this is a very inefficient solution. I thought there was some way to determine how Panda's DataFrame fill these entries but couldn't find anything on it.
Updated example:
A B
1 NaN
2 3
And append
A B C
1 2 3
Gives
A B C
1 NaN NaN
2 3 NaN
1 2 3
But I want
A B C
1 NaN 'predated'
2 3 'predated'
1 2 3
In case you have a core set of columns, as here represented by df1, you could apply .fillna() to the .difference() between the core set and any new columns in more recent DataFrames.
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data={'A': [1, 2], 'B': [np.nan, 3]})
A B
0 1 NaN
1 2 3
df2 = pd.DataFrame(data={'A': 1, 'B': 2, 'C': 3}, index=[0])
A B C
0 1 2 3
df = pd.concat([df1, df2], ignore_index=True)
new_cols = df2.columns.difference(df1.columns).tolist()
df[new_cols] = df[new_cols].fillna(value='predated')
A B C
0 1 NaN predated
1 2 3 predated
2 1 2 3
I have 2 data frames with one column each. Index of the first is [C,B,F,A,Z] not sorted in any way. Index of the second is [C,B,Z], also unsorted.
I use pd.concat([df1,df2],axis=1) and get a data frame with 2 columns and NaN in the second column where there is no appropriate value for the index.
The problem I have is that index automatically becomes sorted in alphabetical order.
I have tried = pd.concat([df1,df2],axis=1, names = my_list) where my_list = [C,B,F,A,Z], but that didn't make any changes.
How can I specify index to be not sorted?
This seems to be by design, the only thing I'd suggest is to call reindex on the concatenated df and pass the index of df:
In [56]:
df = pd.DataFrame(index=['C','B','F','A','Z'], data={'a':np.arange(5)})
df
Out[56]:
a
C 0
B 1
F 2
A 3
Z 4
In [58]:
df1 = pd.DataFrame(index=['C','B','Z'], data={'b':np.random.randn(3)})
df1
Out[58]:
b
C -0.146799
B -0.227027
Z -0.429725
In [67]:
pd.concat([df,df1],axis=1).reindex(df.index)
Out[67]:
a b
C 0 -0.146799
B 1 -0.227027
F 2 NaN
A 3 NaN
Z 4 -0.429725
I'm trying to set multiple new columns to one column and, separately, multiple new columns to multiple scalar values. Can't do either. Any way to do it other than setting each one individually?
df=pd.DataFrame(columns=['A','B'],data=np.arange(6).reshape(3,2))
df.loc[:,['C','D']]=df['A']
df.loc[:,['C','D']]=[0,1]
for c in ['C', 'D']:
df[c] = d['A']
df['C'] = 0
df['D'] = 1
Maybe it is what you are looking for.
df=pd.DataFrame(columns=['A','B'],data=np.arange(6).reshape(3,2))
df['C'], df['D'] = df['A'], df['A']
df['E'], df['F'] = 0, 1
# Result
A B C D E F
0 0 1 0 0 0 1
1 2 3 2 2 0 1
2 4 5 4 4 0 1
The assign method will create multiple, new columns in one step. You can pass a dict() with the column and values to return a new DataFrame with the new columns appended to the end.
Using your examples:
df = df.assign(**{'C': df['A'], 'D': df['A']})
and
df = df.assign(**{'C': 0, 'D':1})
See this answer for additional detail: https://stackoverflow.com/a/46587717/4843561
If you came here looking for information on how to
merge a DataFrame and Series on the index, please look at this
answer.
The OP's original intention was to ask how to assign series elements
as columns to another DataFrame. If you are interested in knowing the
answer to this, look at the accepted answer by EdChum.
Best I can come up with is
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[1, 2], 'b':[3, 4]}) # see EDIT below
s = pd.Series({'s1':5, 's2':6})
for name in s.index:
df[name] = s[name]
a b s1 s2
0 1 3 5 6
1 2 4 5 6
Can anybody suggest better syntax / faster method?
My attempts:
df.merge(s)
AttributeError: 'Series' object has no attribute 'columns'
and
df.join(s)
ValueError: Other Series must have a name
EDIT The first two answers posted highlighted a problem with my question, so please use the following to construct df:
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[np.nan, 2, 3], 'b':[4, 5, 6]}, index=[3, 5, 6])
with the final result
a b s1 s2
3 NaN 4 5 6
5 2 5 5 6
6 3 6 5 6
Update
From v0.24.0 onwards, you can merge on DataFrame and Series as long as the Series is named.
df.merge(s.rename('new'), left_index=True, right_index=True)
# If series is already named,
# df.merge(s, left_index=True, right_index=True)
Nowadays, you can simply convert the Series to a DataFrame with to_frame(). So (if joining on index):
df.merge(s.to_frame(), left_index=True, right_index=True)
You could construct a dataframe from the series and then merge with the dataframe.
So you specify the data as the values but multiply them by the length, set the columns to the index and set params for left_index and right_index to True:
In [27]:
df.merge(pd.DataFrame(data = [s.values] * len(s), columns = s.index), left_index=True, right_index=True)
Out[27]:
a b s1 s2
0 1 3 5 6
1 2 4 5 6
EDIT for the situation where you want the index of your constructed df from the series to use the index of the df then you can do the following:
df.merge(pd.DataFrame(data = [s.values] * len(df), columns = s.index, index=df.index), left_index=True, right_index=True)
This assumes that the indices match the length.
Here's one way:
df.join(pd.DataFrame(s).T).fillna(method='ffill')
To break down what happens here...
pd.DataFrame(s).T creates a one-row DataFrame from s which looks like this:
s1 s2
0 5 6
Next, join concatenates this new frame with df:
a b s1 s2
0 1 3 5 6
1 2 4 NaN NaN
Lastly, the NaN values at index 1 are filled with the previous values in the column using fillna with the forward-fill (ffill) argument:
a b s1 s2
0 1 3 5 6
1 2 4 5 6
To avoid using fillna, it's possible to use pd.concat to repeat the rows of the DataFrame constructed from s. In this case, the general solution is:
df.join(pd.concat([pd.DataFrame(s).T] * len(df), ignore_index=True))
Here's another solution to address the indexing challenge posed in the edited question:
df.join(pd.DataFrame(s.repeat(len(df)).values.reshape((len(df), -1), order='F'),
columns=s.index,
index=df.index))
s is transformed into a DataFrame by repeating the values and reshaping (specifying 'Fortran' order), and also passing in the appropriate column names and index. This new DataFrame is then joined to df.
Nowadays, much simpler and concise solution can achieve the same task. Leveraging the capability of DataFrame.apply() to turn a Series into columns of its belonging DataFrame, we can use:
df.join(df.apply(lambda x: s, axis=1))
Result:
a b s1 s2
3 NaN 4 5 6
5 2.0 5 5 6
6 3.0 6 5 6
Here, we used DataFrame.apply() with a simple lambda function as the applied function on axis=1. The applied lambda function simply just returns the Series s:
df.apply(lambda x: s, axis=1)
Result:
s1 s2
3 5 6
5 5 6
6 5 6
The result has already inherited the row index of the original DataFrame df. Consequently, we can simply join df with this interim result by DataFrame.join() to get the desired final result (since they have the same row index).
This capability of DataFrame.apply() to turn a Series into columns of its belonging DataFrame is well documented in the official document as follows:
By default (result_type=None), the final return type is inferred from
the return type of the applied function.
The default behaviour (result_type=None) depends on the return value of the
applied function: list-like results will be returned as a Series of
those. However if the apply function returns a Series these are
expanded to columns.
The official document also includes example of such usage:
Returning a Series inside the function is similar to passing
result_type='expand'. The resulting column names will be the Series
index.
df.apply(lambda x: pd.Series([1, 2], index=['foo', 'bar']), axis=1)
foo bar
0 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 2
If I could suggest setting up your dataframes like this (auto-indexing):
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[np.nan, 1, 2], 'b':[4, 5, 6]})
then you can set up your s1 and s2 values thus (using shape() to return the number of rows from df):
s = pd.DataFrame({'s1':[5]*df.shape[0], 's2':[6]*df.shape[0]})
then the result you want is easy:
display (df.merge(s, left_index=True, right_index=True))
Alternatively, just add the new values to your dataframe df:
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[nan, 1, 2], 'b':[4, 5, 6]})
df['s1']=5
df['s2']=6
display(df)
Both return:
a b s1 s2
0 NaN 4 5 6
1 1.0 5 5 6
2 2.0 6 5 6
If you have another list of data (instead of just a single value to apply), and you know it is in the same sequence as df, eg:
s1=['a','b','c']
then you can attach this in the same way:
df['s1']=s1
returns:
a b s1
0 NaN 4 a
1 1.0 5 b
2 2.0 6 c
You can easily set a pandas.DataFrame column to a constant. This constant can be an int such as in your example. If the column you specify isn't in the df, then pandas will create a new column with the name you specify. So after your dataframe is constructed, (from your question):
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[np.nan, 2, 3], 'b':[4, 5, 6]}, index=[3, 5, 6])
You can just run:
df['s1'], df['s2'] = 5, 6
You could write a loop or comprehension to make it do this for all the elements in a list of tuples, or keys and values in a dictionary depending on how you have your real data stored.
If df is a pandas.DataFrame then df['new_col']= Series list_object of length len(df) will add the or Series list_object as a column named 'new_col'. df['new_col']= scalar (such as 5 or 6 in your case) also works and is equivalent to df['new_col']= [scalar]*len(df)
So a two-line code serves the purpose:
df = pd.DataFrame({'a':[1, 2], 'b':[3, 4]})
s = pd.Series({'s1':5, 's2':6})
for x in s.index:
df[x] = s[x]
Output:
a b s1 s2
0 1 3 5 6
1 2 4 5 6