Recently I've been making a few test projects in Django and while I've found the structure to be better than that of other Web Frameworks, I am a little confused on the concept of different 'apps'.
Here is a test case example:
Suppose I have a simple CRUD application where users post a picture and a title, with a small description, but I want other users to have the ability to create a review of this picture.
Seeing as both the "Post" and "Review" models in this case require CRUD functionality, would I just have two models in the same app, and associate them with one another? Or have two separate apps with different urls.py and views.py files?
I have a hunch I've been doing it wrong and it should be just two models, if this is the case how would I go about writing the urls and views for two models in the same app?
Thanks and any input is appreciated!
The term application describes a Python package that provides some
set of features. Applications may be reused in various projects.
So in this case, better to have both Post and Review as two models in one app, since both of them apply to pictures.
how would I go about writing the urls and views for two models in the same app
The Django project provides a near perfect documentation on how to structure urls and views.
In your case, I think the better is to put your two models in one app.
Related
After some years developing web apps using ruby on rails, I decided to give Django a try, however it seems that I'm missing something, which is how to structure large project, or any project in general.
For example, in rails we have a models folder which contains model classes, each in a separate ruby file, a controllers folder which contains controller classes, again each in a separate ruby file.
However, in Django it split the project into independent apps, which can be installed independently in other Django project, each app has a models.py file which contains all the models classes, a views.py file which contain all the views functions.
But then how to group functions in views like rails? That is one controller per each model.
In general how to structure my project when it contains one large app that can't be separated into multiple independent apps? I want for example to have a view index function for each model, but how to do this if all functions are in one file?
If my project is about selling cars for example. I should have index function that maps to /cars, another index function to map to /users, etc...
I searched the web but couldn't find a suitable answer.
It is unclear to me how to structure Django app, so any help will be appreciated.
As mentioned in #shanksfk's answer, Django is very flexible in folder arrangements. You don't have to follow the default app structure. When I create a purely backend Django project (with DRF), I usually have 3 base apps:
api - where modules, serializers, and urls are stored
core - the default app (the one that has the name of your Django project)
db - where models are stored
Then as I expand, I can add a folder dedicated for the helpers, utils, and possibly abstraction layers for external services. I recommend reading more about Domain-driven Design to get an idea on how to structure your project. You can also check other Django projects for inspiration:
django CMS
Baserow
Django API Domains
In short, Django is a Model-View-Template framework and Rails is a Model-View-Controller framework.
In Django we store controllers(sort of) in views.py for each specified app, while in MVC framework such as Rails store it in controllers. In Django, you also have to create your own HTML template separately which some people may find it tedious but its easier to work with other frameworks such as Vue or React due to that separation.
This is general comparison I found on the net.
However, to answer your questions on folder structure. Basically Django is very flexible on folder arrangements, it really depends how you want to design the project structure. Normally what I'd do is keep every app in the main folder (project folder). This way you wont mess with the venv setup
I hope this is not a opinion based question but more like a solutions to a complicated django website. fyi, i am quite a beginner in django.
first of all, i am doing a complicated accounting django website where there are features like:
purchases (purchase order, quotation request, quotation, invoice, do)
Custom user roles and permissions, because we want user to setup their own roles and permissions system
sales (POS, stocks, too many to mentions)
user and registrations
incomes & expenses tracking and reporting.
There are articles and SO's answers about 'many apps vs 1 large app'. My confusion started. I figured out django allows seperating views.py and models.py into multiple file in app/views and app/models with init.py imports.
I personally do not like large app file as it is hard to locate things. I prefer neat structures. But the confusion keeps attacking. I want to do one thing and do it well but it seem like having one large app makes more sense because all the mentioned features are ForeignKey dependent.
So, according to your experience. what's your ideal folder structures and solutions to deal with this?
If you could provide performance difference that would be helpful.
UPDATE:
Since most people said multi apps, I have last question regarding this.
Since Django app can have models/ & views/ folder with multiple models.py & views.py inside, that means one large app can be seperated into multiple views files inside a views/ folder. What yall think about this?
since this will put all migrations in one place, does it provide long term safety in term of messy things like foreign keys across apps.
This kind of question I have asked long time back, on different platform. Common answer is
If you want to reuse that, then create an app or if you don't want
then you no need to make a separate app
Let me give you an example. If your project has features like
Sharing an Image
Sharing text
Comment on Media and Text
Upvote and Downvote options
Here an user can share either a image or text and other can comment on it or Upvote/Downvote it. In this case If you make Comment a separate app and Upvote/Downvote a separate app, then in future if you have to add Video along with Image and Text, then all you have to link Video to Comment app and Upvote/DOwnvote app, that will be less task comparing to a big app with all things inside. Also You can manage your database accordingly.
In your case, you can make (for example),
Custom User (help you add extra permission in future)
Product Category (help you to add more category or subcategory)
Products or Sales etc.
For many admins, when you add those apps to your settings.py, and if you edit admin.py separately in each app, everything will appear your admin panel without any hassle.
For many views, you can import all the models to views.py of any app or use it separately in their apps. It will not cause any problem. Same for urls.py and forms.py etc.
For your solution, i will recommend that you create multiple apps, with each app containing it's own view.py, models.py and urls.py. What you can do is, create a separate app for user that will contain User model (if you decide to override the existing user model provided by django) and all user related views (such as login, registration etc.). I will recommend that you create a separate model for Role as well that will contain all roles in your system. Make a management command that will add roles in that table, whenever you decide to add a new role. Create an enum type class like:
class Role(enum.Enum):
ADMIN = 1
USER= 2
labels = {
ADMIN: "Admin",
USER: "User"
}
So the first entry in Role table will be Admin with pk=1 and so on.
This was an idea as to how you can create models and keep things separate. You can associate user from a separate app to a table in your sales app as that won't cause you any problem and keep the code readable and things neat.
For your own sanity go for multiple apps.
just lay them out first and figure out what should logically go together in one app and what should go to the next.
You want to avoid running into circular imports!
Foreign keys across apps is no problem at all. Basically as soon as u use the USER anywhere in your models, you'll reference across app boundaries already.
I have been using django for a while, but there is something im not quite clear on.
How big should a django app be. If for example a django app should only be user authentication or if it should be an entire website in one app.
If I have a project with several apps and each app is a whole website with a lot of code, is that the way it suppose to be or should all apps related to a single site within a project ?
Im thinking of creating one django project for each site, but im now wondering if I should be creating one project where each app is one site. Can anyone please comment on this, what it the preferred way to do it ?
In the django documentation one app is only used for a poll, so it seems to be that, according to the documentation, that each app should be some part of functionality on the site.
An app is a submodule of a project which contains functionality (views, models, urls etc) for a specific part of the larger site and is as decoupled from the other apps as possible. The project as a whole is the website and your apps make up the separate parts of functionality for your site.
If your sites are going to basically contain the same functionality, it might be worth looking into the Sites framework which django provides.
So taking the polls example further.
Lets say the website is a survey site. There would be the polls app, which would contain the relevant models and views for creating and recording poll results. Then you might need to view the data, so you could create an analysis app, which would store the views for displaying dashboards and contain functions for data processing. Then we could take things a bit further, and have users be able to log in and see their own results (and give us the chance to link users to poll results), so you would make an accounts app, which would hold views for logging in/out, maybe a profile page etc.
So each of these different parts of functionality would be separated out into distinct apps, which would make up the project (site) as a whole.
If the apps have been decoupled properly, you could reuse the different apps in other projects (e.g. the accounts app could be dropped into a new project do provide logging in/out functionality)
In my experience so far, an app should be a reusable entity. There many guiding principles for choosing what to go and what not in an app. Separating authentication is one example. A projcet is one big collection of may apps and a reusable app can be in many projects.
Nowadays, there is a trend to move to micro service architecture, which is next level of separation of functionality with each service doing best one thing.
Each project is a unit in itself, not an individual app. So you host the project, not the app. I recommend using different project for each site and using micro-service architecture. A lot depends on your existing codebase too.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Note: I am not a proper python programmer... but I use python extensively. I do things like write classes with inheritance, use iterators and comprehension, etc. My point is that I do not have a full grasp of the language, e.g. what exactly constitutes an python object, why __init__.py is needed other than to specify a module, etc. In relation to Django, I have written multi-app sites (with the help of S.O.) and have really enjoyed Django's templating system, blocks, and how they can be nested. Now are my apps fully decoupled and reusable? That this is subject of this post.
I state this disclaimer because a lot of the Django resources seem to assume that one knows these things. This makes understanding some of the documentation and S.O. questions difficult for a person who is just an (subpower)-user. So please answer this question with that in mind.
Question
These questions are inspired by both the question When to create a new app with startapp in django? by #håkan and the answer given by #antti rasinen which links to James Bennett's 2008 PyCon presentation
A few key points from Bennett's presentation are:
sites are a collection of apps
an app does one thing and one thing well
Which directs me to his section "Project coupling kills re-use" that mentions:
Single module directly on Python path (registration, tagging, etc.)
Related modules under a package (ellington.events, ellington.podcasts, etc.)
Question 0
A "module" in this case is just an app made of other apps?
Question 1
(Apps with related functionality and shared models )
What should I do when apps share models?
In Barrett's slides he implies that user registration and user profiles are distinct and should be distinct apps. (He certainly states that profiles have nothing to do with user registration).
So if I wanted both, would my project have two apps like:
user-registration
user-profile
even though the app user-profile will need the user model from user-registration? Or do I make a single app (module):
user-app
registration
profile
which contains both?
Question 2
(Apps with distinct functions but shared models)
Extending the example from question 1, lets say that my main app (or some other app that is used by the main app) utilizes some aspect of the user model (e.g. recently active members if it was a chat site).
Clearly my main app gets this information from the user model. Does my main app now get bundled under the user-app module?
This may not be the best example, but the point is as follows:
I have two apps app-dependency and app-needs-dependency, where each app does its one thing and one thing well... It is just that app-needs-dependency needs information from app-dependency. What do I do in this case, if everything else about app-needs-dependency is completely decoupled from app-dependency (so it could be used in other projects)?
Question 3
(writing apps for flexibility)
Now I have my site with its couple of apps. Each app does its one thing and does it well. The main app serves as the landing page/ overview in this case.
I want all my other apps to use / inherit the static and template files of the main app.
Where do I store all the static files and templates? In the main app and set that as the default for the other apps? Or where should these static files / templates (e.g. base.css, base.html) go?
Do I make a copy of these files for each other app, so they can be run even though this is redundant?
Which makes my app more flexible?
Question 0
A "module" in the Python context is simply a file that contains definitions and statements. So "related modules under a package" really just means "split your code into separate files based on what the code is doing".
Describing it as "an app made of other apps" is to start confusing Django's concept of an app with Python's concept of a module (which, as stated above is just a file that houses some code).
Question 1
What should I do when apps share models?
You should still try and stick to the "apps do one thing and do it well" maxim. In this case separate profile and registration apps seems like a good idea - because they have quite different functions. A registration app is going to contain the logic for allowing users to register on your site. A profile app is all about what information you will store about a user.
There is nothing wrong with these two apps having a relationship to each other - see below.
Question 2
Let's say that my main app (or some other app that is used by the main app) utilizes some aspect of the user model (e.g. recently active members if it was a chat site). Clearly my main app gets this information from the user model. Does my main app now get bundled under the user-app?
No. It should still be a separate app, with links to the other app.
The user model is actually a good example. Django allows you to specify a custom user model that lets you store whatever additional data you want about a user.
Now, there are loads of third party apps out there that do things like registration, authentication, etc for users. They are designed to work with any user model, not just Django's default one. The way they do that is to use get_user_model() wherever they need to reference the User model, instead of directly importing django.contrib.auth.models.User.
This means that you can use those third party apps with whatever user model you have defined for your own project.
Django's get_user_model() utility is there to serve a very common use case. However the same principle can be extended to your own apps. If there is a dependency between your apps that you think should be swappable, then you can provide a way to swap it out - e.g., a setting/configuration that allows any other project using your app to specify an alternative.
There are hundreds of examples of this kind of configurability in the Django ecosystem. For example, Django itself ships with its own django.contrib.auth authentication app. However if you want to implement your own authentication logic, you don't have to reimplement the entire auth app again yourself (that would be a huge pain). Instead you specify an an authentication backend that it's auth app will use to authenticate. The auth app is designed to allow any project to swap out a core piece of its functionality with minimal effort.
So in your main app, you might define a setting that controls which profile model to use. This means that if someone else wants to use a different profile model, they simply change this setting and they're all set. They are no longer tied to your profile app.
For example - let's say you have a main app that has a view that displays some user data, but also provides a link to a registration view that is provided by a different app. You want anyone else to be able to use that app regardless of what registration app they are using. So you can make this view resuable like so:
In main/views.py:
from django.contrib.auth import get_user_model
from django.conf import settings
from django.urls import reverse
class UserDetailView(DetailView):
# First of all, we're using get_user_model so that a project
# can specify whatever user model it wants, and still use this
# view.
model = get_user_model()
def get_context_data(self, *args, *kwargs):
ctx = super().get_context_data(*args, **kwargs)
# We want to add a link to a registration view into this template context.
# But we want this to be configurable.
# Your REGISTRATION_URL would be something like 'profile:registration'
ctx['registration_link'] = reverse(settings.REGISTRATION_URL)
return ctx
Question 3
The main app serves as the landing page/ overview in this case. I want all my other apps to use / inherit the static and template files of the main app. Where do I store all the static files and templates?
You should store the templates in each respective app. If your main app is providing the base templates, then those should reside in the main app.
If your profile app is then providing a registration view, then the template for that should live in the profile app. There is nothing wrong with it extending the base template from the main app - this can easily be overridden by a project that wants to.
It's fine to make assumptions about how two apps are related to each other - as long as you're careful to allow overriding of those assumptions.
I have to admit your question is not a technical one but rather a conceptual and dogmatic one.
No answer is absolute and universally valid and every detail about how you project is structured and should behave can change the perspective.
As you wrote, each Django app does one thing and it does it well.
I would extend that to the point that each app should contain no more than one Model and at most, it's closets dependents.
Ex: the Product with it's Category, Color, Image
"What Changes together, stay together"
You will have plenty of logic to cover inside that app with only these ones.
Try to look at Django framework as a tool to create your project..this is the final goal...but if you want also to create reusable apps try to create them as independent as possible, or at least dependent to some Django features:
ex: a reusable app and totally independent would be an app that only requires User Model, Sessions, Groups included in Django. You get the idea of dependent but still autonomous app.
An app is part of a project after all...either here or in other part after you build it. Look at it as if it would be a simple function...can run alone or can depend on other functions result...at what point you keep everything inside one function and when you decide to split them in 2 separate ones.
So:
Question 0:
An app is the smallest piece that can run by it's own...having models, views, templates, urls, static files.
It can depend also on other apps...so answer is YES
Question 1:
Always keep things separate by functionality...
User Auth is dealing with user creation and their authentication
User Profile is dealing with personal data of the User
Question 2:
Nothing gets bundled. Everything stays at the same level as 2 different but dependents apps
Question 3:
You can do as you wish.
You can do static as a central place and templates specific for each app or everything central.
No right answer here but only what scales well for your project.
This is a great question and it covers all the questions associated to structuring the project I asked myself when i started working with Django.
Question 0:
Yes, in that case, a module is an app which consists of serveral apps (ellington.events, ellington.podcasts).
Question 1, Question 2, Question 3:
Django is a general purpose, full stack web framework. Since it is general purpose, a lot of it depends on your particular use case. You need not have an entire Django project follow a particular structure (if you want to achieve code reuse AND functional decoupling AND relational decoupling).
With that said, if you can prioritize what you want to achieve, you can go with one pattern over the other.
Let's take the example of Blog.
Code Reuse:
For achieving maximum code reuse, you have to identify what parts of your project is worthy of reuse. Once you have done that, you can set your project structure accordingly.
Project Structure:
BlogProject
-CommonApps
--AbstractUser(abstract class (just like it's java counterpart) )
--AbstractActivity
--AbstractComment
--AbstractArticle
-ProjectApps
--BlogUser (extends AbstractUser)
--BlogActivity (extends AbstractActivity)
--BlogComment (extends AbstractComment)
--BlogArticle (extends AbstractArticle)
The functionalities that can be shared across multiple projects should be implemented in abstract apps, and the ones specific to project can be implemented in Project apps.
Relational Decoupling:
You can create apps to represent the relations between two other apps, and implement all the functionality involving two different apps in that relation.
Project Structure:
BlogProject
-User
-UserActivityRelation
-Activity
-Article
-ArticleCommentRelation
-Comment
-UserCommentRelation
-and so on
Functional Decoupling:
This is the most common practice - create apps for particular functionality.
Project Structure:
BlogProject
-Article
-Activity
-User
-Comment
The point I am trying to make here is that the choice is yours. In more complex projects, it won't be so white and black.
You, depending on what an "app" means to you, and what you want it to do in a particular project and other projects, can decide on a particular structure.
Django keeps it abstract to give you the ability to do that.
I always go for an app setup that makes sense to that particular project. In a project not all apps are reusable. And having flexible/reusable apps does not make sense in all the cases.
As a general rule of thumb, Django devs say an App should be something whose functionality can be described with one sentence. But Django is designed so that you can bend the rules for your projects if you have to.
DISCLAIMER: Functional decoupling and relational decoupling aren't textbook terms. I just used them to describe what I meant here.
I just wanted to try to build a project with django. Therefore I have a (basic) question on how to manage such a project. Since I cannot find any guidelines or so on how to split a project into applications.
Let's take a kind of SO as an example. Which applications would you use?
I'd say there should be the applications "users" and "questions". But what if there was a topic system with static articles, too. Maybe they also could receive votes.
How to build the apps structure then? One app for "questions", "votes" and "topics" or just one app "content"?
I have no idea what to do. Maybe it's because I know not very much about Django yet, but I'm interested either...
There aren't hard-and-fast rules, but I would say it's better to err on the side of more specialized applications. Ideally an application should handle just one functional concern: i.e. "tagging" or "commenting" or "auth/auth" or "posts." This type of design will also help you reuse available open source applications instead of reinventing the wheel (i.e. Django comes with auth and comments apps, django-tagging or django-taggable can almost certainly do what you need, etc).
Generic foreign keys can help you decouple applications such as tagging or commenting that might be applied to models from several other applications.
You should try and separate the project in as much applications as possible. For most projects an application will not contain more than 5 models. For example a project like SO would have separate applications for UsersProfiles, Questions, Tags (there's a ready one in django for this), etc. If there was a system with static pages that'd be a separate application too (there are ready ones for this purpose). You should also try and make your applications as generic as possible, so you may reuse them in other projects. There's a good presentation on reusable apps.
Just like any set of dependencies... try to find the most useful stand-alone aspects of the project and make those stand-alone apps. Other Django Apps will have higher level functionality, and reuse the parts of the lowest level apps that you have set up.
In my project, I have a calendar app with its own Event object in its models. I also have a carpool database set up, and for the departure time and the duration I use the calendar's Event object right in my RideShare tables. The carpooling database is calendar-aware, and gets all the nice .ics export and calendar views from the calendar app for 'free.'
There are some tricks to getting the Apps reusable, like naming the templates directory: project/app2/templates/app2/index.html. This lets you refer to app2/index.html from any other app, and get the right template. I picked that one up looking at the built-in reusable apps in Django itself. Pinax is a bit of a monster size-wise but it also demonstrates a nice reusable App structure.
If in doubt, forget about reusable apps for now. Put all your messages and polls in one app and get through one rev. You'll discover during the process what steps feel unnecessary, and could be broken out as something stand-alone in the future.
A good question to ask yourself when deciding whether or not to write an app is "could I use this in another project?". If you think you could, then consider what it would take to make the application as independent as possible; How can you reduce the dependancies so that the app doesn't rely on anything specific to a particular project.
Some of the ways you can do this are:
Giving each app its own urls.py
Allowing model types to be passed in as parameters rather than explicitly declaring what models are used in your views. Generic views use this principle.
Make your templates easily overridden by having some sort of template_name parameter passed in your urls.py
Make sure you can do reverse url lookups with your objects and views. This means naming your views in the urls.py and creating get_absolute_url methods on your models.
In some cases like Tagging, GenericForeignKeys can be used to associate a model in your app to any other model, regardless of whether it has ForeignKeys "looking back" at it.
I'll tell you how I am approaching such question: I usually sit with a sheet of paper and draw the boxes (functionalities) and arrows (interdependencies between functionalities). I am sure there are methodologies or other things that could help you, but my approach usually works for me (YMMV, of course).
Knowing what a site is supposed to be is basic, though. ;)